[GTER] New IETF draft: IPv4 with 64 bit Address Space

[Bruno Cabral]

Ele é muito inteligente, tem bons argumentos, mas a forma que se expressa é muitas vezes rude

Por ex o djbdns. Ele não concordou com o dnssec e não implementou. "E dai"?

Agora concordo que treze anos depois a falha da interoperabilidade persiste. 

Pior é ter que implantar nat64 (opa, isso não tinha sido a sugestão dada lá atrás?)

Obrigado por postar o artigo

!3runo

> To: gter at eng.registro.br
> From: modesto at isimples.com.br
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:26:34 -0200
> Subject: Re: [GTER] New IETF draft: IPv4 with 64 bit Address Space
> 
> Pelo jeito o Daniel J. Bernstein estava certo...
> 
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/ipv6mess.html
> 
> On 12/09/15 11:48, Humberto Galiza wrote:
> > Abstract
> >
> >     This document describes a solution to the Internet address depletion
> >     problem through use of a clever IPv4 options mechanism as a solution.
> >     This IPv4 protocol extension is called enhanced IP (EnIP).  Because
> >     it is IPv4, it maximizes backward compatibility while increasing
> >     address space by a factor of 17.9 million.  Unlike other similar
> >     proposals, care was taken to avoid costly changes and requirements to
> >     the core network and border routers, with the exception that options
> >     be passed in that equipment as described below.  Because it is
> >     backward compatible, current IPv4 software, network equipment,
> >     firewalls, intrusion detection/protection, and layer 5 firewalls can
> >     be maintained until IPv6 system information security reaches
> >     acceptable maturity and availability.
> >
> > Link direto para o draft:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chimiak-enhanced-ipv4/
> >
> > Comentários são apreciados.
> >
> > Abs,
> >
> > Humberto Galiza
> > --
> > gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> 
> -- 
> Atenciosamente,
> 
> 
> --
> gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter