[GTER] BGP Multi

Rafael Possamai rafael at gav.ufsc.br
Thu May 21 14:17:08 -03 2015


Achei dois links explicando bem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burstable_billing e
http://www.netrepid.com/burstable-billing-95th-percentile/

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Márcio Elias Hahn do Nascimento <
gter at eng.registro.br> wrote:

> --
> gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Márcio Elias Hahn do Nascimento" <marcio at sulonline.net>
> To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <
> gter at eng.registro.br>
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 13:15:42 -0300
> Subject: Re: [GTER] BGP Multi
>
>
> Eu sinceramente desconhecia esse modelo de negócios no Brasil.
>
> A
> quem comprou e/ou compra burstable, poderia dar uma informação de
> custos/mega quando comparado ao dedicado convencional?
>
> Com certeza o
> valor não será o mesmo... a pergunta é, compensa?
>
> ---
>
> Att
>
> Márcio
> Elias Hahn do Nascimento
> (48) 8469-1819 / 3524-0700 -
> marcio at sulinternet.net
> INOC-BR: 52977*100
> GERÊNCIA DE RECURSOS DE TIC -
> Sul Internet [2]
>
>  [2]
>
> Em 21/05/2015 12:33, Antonio Carlos Pina via
> gter escreveu:
>
> > Return-Path: <antoniocarlospina at gmail.com>
> >
> X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
> > Delivered-To:
> gter at eng.registro.br
> > Received: from localhost (localhost
> [127.0.0.1])
> > by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515D2162C46
> >
> for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:27:24 -0300 (BRT)
> >
> X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eng.registro.br
> > X-Spam-Flag:
> NO
> > X-Spam-Score: -0.798
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > X-Spam-Status: No,
> score=-0.798 tagged_above=-9999 required=4
> > tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
> DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
> > FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
> HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001,
> > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
> SPF_PASS=-0.001]
> > autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
> > Received: from
> eng.registro.br ([127.0.0.1])
> > by localhost (eng.registro.br
> [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
> > with ESMTP id KFTHQpScoSda for
> <gter at eng.registro.br>;
> > Thu, 21 May 2015 12:27:22 -0300 (BRT)
> >
> Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom;
> client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232; helo=mail-qg0-x232.google.com;
> envelope-from=antoniocarlospina at gmail.com; receiver=gter at eng.registro.br
>
> > DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.2.0 eng.registro.br 87484162C1A
> >
> Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com
> [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232])
> > (using TLSv1.2 with cipher
> ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
> > (No client certificate
> requested)
> > by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87484162C1A
> >
> for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:27:21 -0300 (BRT)
> >
> Received: by qgew3 with SMTP id w3so42070542qge.2
> > for
> <gter at eng.registro.br>; Thu, 21 May 2015 08:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> X-Received: by 10.229.174.202 with SMTP id
> u10mr4730191qcz.4.1432222040168;
> > Thu, 21 May 2015 08:27:20 -0700
> (PDT)
> > Received: from [179.241.143.254]
> (179-241-143-254.3g.claro.net.br. [179.241.143.254])
> > by mx.google.com
> with ESMTPSA id 64sm917611qkw.13.2015.05.21.08.27.15
> > for
> <gter at eng.registro.br>
> > (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA
> bits=128/128);
> > Thu, 21 May 2015 08:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Antonio
> Carlos Pina <antoniocarlospina at gmail.com>
> > Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
> >
> Subject: Re: [GTER] BGP Multi
> > Message-Id:
> <B7054E9E-C35D-4409-8FC4-165FCA50CF1F at gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 21 May
> 2015 12:27:11 -0300
> > References:
> <CAEK67VHWNKiS=NnBxGJgmOmhhP7gEygQcC5svtRsLiz0YGQnmQ at mail.gmail.com>
> <SNT152-W41F6BA2148DD4194734655F5C20 at phx.gbl>
> <89lxibgjvij25k4or2rspfkh.1432158367698 at email.android.com>
> <CAATqwBcU0Y5XCv0OBishAgYe2CNegqFpGVRxVwbW=pqnV=wh5Q at mail.gmail.com>
> <SNT152-W537161F9966033D30FECFBF5C20 at phx.gbl>
> <CAJB2g-H7OxDYLopt3w=q0kkw_T_AU7_CKGX6BXD8uA2vdBcQ=g at mail.gmail.com>
> <SNT152-W958BF87BBB837DDAFE407BF5C20 at phx.gbl>
> <CAJB2g-HGDw+qZ6hLe6ng24h2o-v_mdLafTV-FQNdwnm085REQw at mail.gmail.com>
> <CAGFn2k2cSif0bYse6RE-GEtmC0Ms4-9LRfvTKOO4LZ1r2odMEg at mail.gmail.com>
> <CAJB2g-GbP4sJfm3it9PA3aYJ0VN3ieHhUc-d+Y+Qc0Kyem6MEQ at mail.gmail.com>
> <CAKEr4RSzggEOnudS-AiPrMMRVGHewpgrHJAU2s8-tDU0Qs-kHQ at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> In-Reply-To:
> <CAKEr4RSzggEOnudS-AiPrMMRVGHewpgrHJAU2s8-tDU0Qs-kHQ at mail.gmail.com>
> >
> To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> <gter at eng.registro.br>
> > X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12F70)
> >
> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:33:48 -0300
> > Content-Type:
> text/plain;
> > charset=utf-8
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding:
> quoted-printable
> > X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20
> >
> >
> Compro da internexa e j=C3=A1 comprei da brasiltelecom e da
> globalcrossing (=
> > atual level3)
> >
> > Abs
> >
> >> Em 21/05/2015, =C3=A0s
> 10:50, Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas at gmail.com> e=
> >
> > screveu:
> >
> >>
> =20 Quem vende rajada no Brasil? A n=C3=A3o ser tr=C3=A2nsito comprado
> em bilateral no PTT, pelas bandas do=
> >
> > Paran=C3=A1 eu
> > n=C3=A3o
> conhe=C3=A7o. =20 Em 20 de maio de
> >
> >> ockquote>
> >>
> >> :
> >> =20
> > "
> style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px;
> width:100%">Nao tinha pensado nisso. Link burst
> >
> >>
> com">rubensk at gmail.com>: =20
> >>
> >>> 2015-05-20 23:31 GMT-03:00 Rafael
> Possamai <rafael at gav.ufsc.br>: =20
> >>>
> >>>> Doi na alma pagar por 2 e
> soh usar 1, mas o que eu tinha em mente eh se=
> > ding-left:5px;
> border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%">seu link
> cair em horario de pico, i
> >
> >> ote type="cite"
> style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px;
> width:100%"> que eu entendo, a ba
> > undo cairia pela metade
> supostamente. =20 A alternativa para isso =C3=A9 commited+burstable. Usa
> banda commited do=
> >
> > s dois
> > upstreams sempre; quando um deles cai,
> usa burstable da outro. Enquanto=
> >
> >> 5px; width:100%">
> >>
> >>> os
>
> >>>
> >>>> momentos de falha couberem no 95-percentil, sem custo
> adicional exceto o=
> > f 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%">de ter
> uma capacidade de enlace maior do que a commited. =20 =20 Rubens -- gter
> list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1] -- gter list
> https://e
> >
> >> e Controle e Automa=C3=A7=C3=A3o -- gter list
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1]
> >>
> >> --
> >> gter
> list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1]
> >
> >>
> >
> >>
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> [2]
> http://www.sulinternet.net
>
>



More information about the gter mailing list