[GTER] Emails do CERT.br sobre copyright

Sat Aug 23 19:43:46 -03 2014

Não havendo jurisdição é melhor ignorar.
Repassar esse spam ao usuário é violação de privacidade, identificar o usuário ao reclamante sem mandato judicial também o é sendo ambos, ante onde sei, passível de processo por parte do usuário com o ISP.

Um AS não pode ser "solidariamente responsável" quando, em contrato, alerta para o não uso ilegal do serviço.
Havendo processo e mandato judicial o ISP identificará o usuário como em qualquer outra ordem judicial sem se tornar cúmplice. 

_______________
Bruno Araújo

Antes de imprimir, verifique se tem papel e tinta suficiente na impressora.

Em 23/08/2014, às 15:10, Evandro Nunes <evandronunes12 at gmail.com> escreveu:

> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:31 PM, <victor_volpe at bol.com.br> wrote:
> 
>> Chega a ser hilário a tentativa dessas "empresas" em acabar com a
>> pirataria quando na verdade deveriam focar na raiz dos problemas que são os
>> valores de comercialização praticados pelos estúdios e afins.
>> 
>> Deprimente!
>> 
> 
> nao acho hilario, acho triste
> e'  um problema de setores da industria que tem muita dificuldade em se
> reinventar e perdem receita por conta da pirataria, e mesmo em conjunto com
> novos negocios que condizem mais com o mundo atual, como netflix, itunes,
> etc, ainda tem praticas de negocio que nao conseguem fazer diferente hoje
> do que era na decada de 70, 80, quando foram criadas
> a columbia por exemplo e produtora e estudio, qual modelo de negocio ela
> pode usar pra ser competitiva hoje em dia? mesmo distribuindo o que produz
> pra netflix e afins na mesma proporcao que distribuem pra telecine, hbo,
> cinema e etc... o modelo e defasado e nao existem alternativas criadas, ou
> seja a pirataria afeta eles diretamente
> outro ponto e que
> o ato juridico dmca apesar de nao ser novo (1996) passou a ter
> jurisprudencia mais uniforme nos ultimos 10 anos, dai o subito
> desaparecimento de sites de torrent e outras fontes de pirataria em solo
> americano entao o que a columbia esta fazendo e sony e outras tantas fazem
> tem seu valor juridico que prepara o caminho para uma acao mais seria em
> caso de reincidencia ou ma vontade do sistema autonomo de internet em
> tentar coibir ou responder a isso
> claro que eles estao fazendo por rumo pois aqui em terra tupiniquim o dmca
> nao vale muita coisa (pra nao dizer q nao vale nada) e e inutil em linhas
> gerais, e se bobear, dependendo da interpretacao do texto do marco civil o
> isp/tele nao deveria sequer, saber o que seu usuario esta trafegando, se e
> piraria ou nao, que dira se preocupar em coibir. alias o proprio marco
> civil isenta o provedor dessa responsabilidade em oposicao ao dmca, o que
> faz o dmca nao ter sentido no brasil ainda que algum tratado internacional
> sugira que respeitaremos leis estrangeiras em ausencia de equivalentes
> nacionais
> 
> por ultimo, nao e legal sugerir numa lista com essa amplitude e portanto
> grande potencial de influencia, que esse tipo de ato possa ser simplesmente
> ignorado se se tornar recorrente, em especial se algo equivalente vier em
> bom portugues e o alvo de pirataria nao for algo da grande industria, e sim
> de um artista, banda, enfim pessoas, individuos detentores do direito
> autoral
> isso porque a lei de direito autoral no brasil e bastante severa, antiga, e
> portanto bastante discutida e julgada. some a isso o lindo direito de
> regresso, tao comum no direito processoal quando se fala de prejuizo
> causado a pessoa fisica (o detentor do direito autoral na hipotese
> 
> qualquer advogado mesmo que pouco experiente tem grandes chances de
> sucesso, focando linha de atuacao com base no direito de regresso, no
> direito autoral, e no art 37 p. 6 da constituicao, se de fato o fendido
> quiser, pode tentar identificar o causador do prejuizo -- aquele que em
> casa deixa seu torrent upando a obra de direito reservado -- e ao
> identificar o regresso vai garantir que voce, ISP ou Tele ou qualquer outro
> sistema autonomo que foi notificado e nao fez nada, seja tambem considerado
> "solidariamente responsavel" e respondera como tal, em ambos "caso de dolo
> ou culpa"
> os trechos citados vem direto da constituicao entao ainda que o marco civil
> isente o provedor da responsabilidade, a constituicao da esse direito de
> regresso contra terceiros, ou seja o marco civil como nao altera a
> constituicao nao salva o provedor nesse caso
> e ai o resto voces sabem, o cod civil garante que se o provedor nao tiver
> dinheiro rsss os bens dos administradores e socios serao agredidos em favor
> do reparo do dano causado... "por dolo ou culpa"
> e se o advogado da parte ofendida quiser brincar no cod civil, a
> notificacao seguida de nenhuma acao por parte do provedor ainda pode se
> enquadrar em omissao e negligencia; mais um ilicito civil na jogada que
> nesse caso nem precisa de regresso, e' omissao/negligencia de fato do
> provedor, que foi diretamente notificado
> enfim na duvida procure uma acao respaldada juridicamente por alguem ou
> algum escritorio de sua confianca, que nao seja alheio ao marco civil
> 
> como gestor o que eu faria, no minimo, se for possivel identificar quem
> esta naquele IP na data/hora do evento, encaminharia a notificacao ao
> cliente, acrescido de texto que deixa claro que a observacao do trafego e
> identificacao do IP de origem foi de exclusiva pratica de quem gerou a
> notificacao original, nao tendo sido validada ou comprovada por voce
> (provedor), garantindo que voce nao faz o que o marco civil diz que voce
> nao pode fazer, e acrescentaria algo na linha do "se voce nao praticou esse
> ato de pirataria, nao sabe quem pode ter praticado, ou acredita haver algum
> engano nessa identificacao, ignore essa notificacao encaminhada", mas claro
> isso 'e apenas uma sugestao, e em caso especifico do ofendido pela
> pirataria ser uma pessoa
> 
> nesse caso da brisanet mesmo sendo uma empresa brasileira, e em
> representacao dos interesses da columbia pictures, pode ser sim melhor
> ignorar e nao envolver seu cliente pra nao causar problema de
> relacionamento, porque nao sao comuns casos de uma empresa conseguir
> responsabilizar terceiros por direito de regresso em caso de prejuizo
> causado a essa empresa (pj) por uma pessoa (pf)
> o comum e ao contrario, a pf conseguir regresso contra todas as pj
> envolvidas
> 
> abracos
> 
> 
> 
> 
> artigo 37, parágrafo 6º
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> De: marcio at sulonline.net
>> Enviada: Sexta-feira, 22 de Agosto de 2014 22:50
>> Para: gter at eng.registro.br
>> Assunto: [GTER]  Emails do CERT.br sobre copyright
>> 
>> 
>> Também recebo dúzias, mais vem direto da IP-Echelon.
>> 
>>> /dev/null
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> 
>> Att
>> 
>> Márcio Elias Hahn do Nascimento
>> (48) 8469-1819 / 3524-0700
>> - marcio at sulinternet.net
>> GERÊNCIA DE RECURSOS DE TIC - Sul Internet [7]
>> 
>> 
>> [7]
>> 
>> Em 22/08/2014 21:24, Rubens Marins Schner escreveu:
>> 
>>> Aqui
>> esta o texto original de um dos emails, tenho dezenas deles aqui:
>>> 
>>> 
>> Delivered-To: rubens.marins at gmail.com
>>> Received: by 10.140.19.144 with
>> SMTP id 16csp471157qgh;
>>> Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
>>> 
>> X-Received: by 10.224.75.130 with SMTP id
>> y2mr11962695qaj.72.1408740925046;
>>> Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:55:25 -0700
>> (PDT)
>>> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
>>> spf=pass (google.com:
>> domain of cert at cert.br designates
>>> 200.160.7.2 as permitted sender)
>> smtp.mail=cert at cert.br
>>> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of
>> cert at cert.br designates
>>> 200.160.7.2 as permitted sender)
>> client-ip=200.160.7.2;
>>> Received: by 10.140.92.117 with POP3 id
>> a108mf2047212qge.33;
>>> Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
>>> 
>> X-Gmail-Fetch-Info: rubens at brisanet.com.br 1 pop3.brisanet.com.br 110
>>> 
>> rubens at brisanet.com.br
>>> Return-Path: <cert at cert.br>
>>> X-Original-To:
>> admin at brisanet.com.br
>>> Delivered-To: rubens at brisanet.com.br
>>> 
>> Received-SPF: pass (cert.br: 200.160.7.2 is authorized to use
>>> 
>> 'cert at cert.br' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'mx' matched))
>>> 
>> receiver=email; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="cert at cert.br";
>>> 
>> helo=woq.cert.br; client-ip=200.160.7.2
>>> Received: from woq.cert.br
>> (woq.cert.br [200.160.7.2])
>>> by email.brisanet.com.br (Postfix) with
>> ESMTP id D65BF6024B8
>>> for <admin at brisanet.com.br>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014
>> 17:05:13 -0300 (BRT)
>>> Received: from kahless.cert.br (kahless.cert.br
>> [IPv6:2001:12ff:0:7001::126])
>>> (using TLSv1.2 with cipher
>> AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
>>> (No client certificate requested)
>>> 
>> by woq.cert.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6014441AC69;
>>> Fri, 22 Aug 2014
>> 17:18:54 -0300 (BRT)
>>> Received: by kahless.cert.br (Postfix, from
>> userid 10000)
>>> id 226D34CEB48; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:18:54 -0300 (BRT)
>>> 
>> From: "CERT.br" <cert at cert.br>
>>> To: notices.sony at ip-echelon.com,
>> admin at brisanet.com.br
>>> Subject: Unauthorized Distribution of the
>> Copyrighted Motion Picture Entitled
>>> "The Amazing Spider-Man 2" - Case
>> ID 165751376
>>> Reply-To: notices.sony at ip-echelon.com
>>> MIME-Version:
>> 1.0
>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>> boundary="1408738129.EEf12127.18481";
>>> charset="us-ascii"
>>> Cc:
>> cert at cert.br
>>> In-Reply-To:
>> 8047cfa4bf24b818fed5661a74d876b4-1408738129 at ip-echelon.com
>>> Message-Id:
>> <20140822201854.226D34CEB48 at kahless.cert.br>
>>> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014
>> 17:18:54 -0300 (BRT)
>>> 
>>> --1408738129.EEf12127.18481
>>> MIME-Version:
>> 1.0
>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>> Content-Type: text/plain
>>> 
>>> 
>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> we are forwarding your email to the proper contacts for this
>> network so
>>> they can handle this incident.
>>> 
>>> Thank you for reporting
>> this incident,
>>> --
>>> CERT.br
>>> <cert at cert.br>http://www.cert.br/ [2]
>>> 
>> 
>>> 
>> =======================================================================
>>> 
>> 
>>> ----- Original message headers -----
>>> Message-Id:
>> 8047cfa4bf24b818fed5661a74d876b4-1408738129 at ip-echelon.com
>>> From:
>> IP-Echelon Compliance <notices.sony at ip-echelon.com>
>>> Subject:
>> Unauthorized Distribution of the Copyrighted Motion Picture
>>> Entitled
>> "The Amazing Spider-Man 2" - Case ID 165751376
>>> To: cert at cert.br
>>> 
>> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:08:49 +0000
>>> 
>>> --1408738129.EEf12127.18481
>>> 
>> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:08:49 +0000
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>>> Content-Disposition:
>> inline
>>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> 
>> 2014-08-22
>>> 
>>> Brisanet Servicos De Telecomunicacoes Ltda
>>> 
>>> RE:
>> Unauthorized Distribution of the Copyrighted Motion Picture
>>> Entitled
>> "The Amazing Spider-Man 2".
>>> 
>>> Dear cert at cert.br:
>>> 
>>> We are writing
>> this letter on behalf of Columbia Pictures Industries,
>>> Inc. ("Rights
>> Holder") who own certain rights under copyright law in
>>> the title The
>> Amazing Spider-Man 2.
>>> 
>>> You are receiving this notice because your
>> Internet account was
>>> identified as having been used recently to copy
>> and/or distribute
>>> illegally the copyrighted motion pictures and/or
>> television shows
>>> listed at the bottom of this notice. This notice
>> provides you with the
>>> information you need in order to take immediate
>> action that can
>>> prevent serious legal and other consequences. These
>> actions include:
>>> 
>>> 1. Stop downloading or uploading without
>> authorization any motion
>>> pictures or TV shows owned or distributed by
>> Rights Holder; and
>>> 
>>> 2. Permanently delete from your computer(s) all
>> unauthorized copies
>>> you may have already made of these movies and TV
>> shows.
>>> 
>>> If this notice is being received by an Internet Service
>> Provider
>>> (ISP), please forward the notice to the individual associated
>> with the
>>> activities.
>>> 
>>> The unauthorized distribution or public
>> performance of copyrighted
>>> works constitutes copyright infringement
>> under the Copyright Act,
>>> Title 17 U.S Code Section 106(3)-(4). This
>> conduct may also violate
>>> the Berne Convention for the Protection of
>> Literary and Artistic Works
>>> and The Universal Copyright Convention, as
>> well as bilateral treaties
>>> with other countries that allow for
>> protection of Rights Holder
>>> copyrighted works even beyond U.S
>> borders.
>>> 
>>> Below is the detail for your reference:
>>> 
>>> -
>> ------------- Infringement Details ----------------------------------
>>> 
>> Title: The Amazing Spider-Man 2
>>> Timestamp: 2014-08-22T19:20:41Z
>>> IP
>> Address: 177.37.138.36
>>> Port: 18294
>>> Type: BitTorrent
>>> Torrent Hash:
>> df8feb8f0b8ef2ef33a18739735f501dc7bdf230
>>> Filename:
>> [TOP10FILMES]-O.Espetacular.Homem.Aranha.2.2014.BDRip.XviD.Dual.TOM
>>> 
>> Filesize: 939 MB
>>> -
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>> 
>>> Copyright infringement also violates your ISP`s terms of service
>> and
>>> could lead to limitation or suspension of your Internet service.
>> You
>>> should take immediate action to prevent your Internet account
>> from
>>> being used for illegal activities.
>>> 
>>> An MPAA website,
>> www.respectcopyrights.org [3], offers step-by-step
>>> instructions to
>> ensure that your Internet account is not being used to
>>> violate the
>> copyright laws. Also, the site can point you to an array
>>> of legal
>> choices for enjoying movies and TV shows online. Please
>>> contact us at
>> the above listed address or by replying to this email
>>> should you have
>> any questions.
>>> 
>>> We are providing this notice based on our good faith
>> belief that the
>>> use of motion pictures and television programs owned
>> by Rights Holder
>>> in the manner complained of is not authorized by the
>> copyright owners,
>>> their agents, or the law. The information in this
>> notification is
>>> accurate. Under penalty of perjury, we are authorized
>> to act on behalf
>>> of the owners of the exclusive rights that are being
>> infringed. This
>>> letter is without prejudice to the rights and remedies
>> of Rights
>>> Holder, all of which are expressly reserved.
>>> 
>>> 
>> AUTHORIZATION LETTER FOR PROOF
>>> 
>>> DIGITAL SIGNATURE FOR COPYRIGHT
>> CLAIM
>>> Authorized Online Anti-movie Piracy Partners for Columbia
>> Pictures
>>> Industries, Inc.
>>> 
>>> Adrian Leatherland
>>> CEO
>>> IP-Echelon
>>> 
>> Email: copyright at ip-echelon.com
>>> Address: 6715 Hollywood Blvd, Los
>> Angeles, 90028, United States
>>> 
>>> INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OWNERS:
>>> 
>> Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.,
>>> 
>>> Your prompt response is this
>> matter is highly appreciated.
>>> 
>>> <?xml version="1.0"
>> encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>> <Infringement
>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.acns.net/v1.2/ACNS2v1_2.xsd [4]"
>>> 
>> xmlns="http://www.acns.net/ACNS [5]"
>>> 
>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance [6]">
>>> <Case>
>>> 
>> <ID>165751376</ID>
>>> <Status>Open</Status>
>>> 
>> <Severity>Normal</Severity>
>>> </Case>
>>> <Complainant>
>>> <Entity>Columbia
>> Pictures Industries, Inc.</Entity>
>>> <Contact>IP-Echelon -
>> Compliance</Contact>
>>> <Address>6715 Hollywood Blvd
>>> Los Angeles CA
>> 90028
>>> United States of America</Address>
>>> <Phone>+1 (310) 606
>> 2747</Phone>
>>> <Email>copyright at ip-echelon.com</Email>
>>> 
>> </Complainant>
>>> <Service_Provider>
>>> <Entity>Brisanet Servicos De
>> Telecomunicacoes Ltda</Entity>
>>> <Contact/>
>>> <Address/>
>>> <Phone/>
>>> 
>> <Email>cert at cert.br</Email>
>>> </Service_Provider>
>>> <Source>
>>> 
>> <TimeStamp>2014-08-22T19:20:41Z</TimeStamp>
>>> 
>> <IP_Address>177.37.138.36</IP_Address>
>>> <Port>18294</Port>
>>> 
>> <Type>BitTorrent</Type>
>>> <Subtype Basetype="P2P"
>> Protocol="BITTORRENT"/>
>>> <UserName/>
>>> <Number_Files>1</Number_Files>
>>> 
>> </Source>
>>> <Content>
>>> <Item>
>>> 
>> <TimeStamp>2014-08-22T19:20:41Z</TimeStamp>
>>> <Title>The Amazing
>> Spider-Man 2</Title>
>>> 
>> 
>> <FileName>[TOP10FILMES]-O.Espetacular.Homem.Aranha.2.2014.BDRip.XviD.Dual.TOM</FileName>
>>> 
>> <FileSize>984840081</FileSize>
>>> 
>> <InfoHash>df8feb8f0b8ef2ef33a18739735f501dc7bdf230</InfoHash>
>>> 
>> </Item>
>>> </Content>
>>> <History/>
>>> <Notes/>
>>> <Type
>> Retraction="false"/>
>>> <Verification/>
>>> </Infringement>
>>> 
>>> -----BEGIN
>> PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG
>>> 
>>> 
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT96NRAAoJEN5LM3Etqs/W0TcH+gPbYJE9hmTmjFo1hYzFNclL
>>> 
>> 6wnJ0wemwNcb9e3AxC5HT19hIOa+kul2ptSQQ/zy8pXFjodP5Czv+d6XX8V1mG0y
>>> 
>> /cm8rj9vy9UbAOLF50yEuQctbuxikquvpMTqMcWiiYj7rvpdCz9iBd+8V/51tw00
>>> 
>> FE5TeukUtbY+2OWGj9yHnh9d6BXB7nb0C1VlDiNRk+PmqW46KxEjjUfpgJ3ZGDjc
>>> 
>> trza63Z73+cYei5fmP/92LcrAC+LJwTkR+beJQSHZKFgC61GgatSw+dlQWV155j5
>>> 
>> DQxyJ8lwyRETTK4in/1xgMhXOSBoPN0khpNqM1EosJ2v5asp+d1q/rrAalYjN+M=
>>> 
>> =xcjb
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> 
>>> --1408738129.EEf12127.18481
>>> 
>> Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:08:49 +0000
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> 
>> Content-Type: application/xml; charset="UTF-8"
>>> Content-Disposition:
>> attachment; filename="165751376.xml"
>>> 
>>> <?xml version="1.0"
>> encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>> <Infringement
>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.acns.net/v1.2/ACNS2v1_2.xsd [4]"
>>> 
>> xmlns="http://www.acns.net/ACNS [5]"
>>> 
>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance [6]">
>>> <Case>
>>> 
>> <ID>165751376</ID>
>>> <Status>Open</Status>
>>> 
>> <Severity>Normal</Severity>
>>> </Case>
>>> <Complainant>
>>> <Entity>Columbia
>> Pictures Industries, Inc.</Entity>
>>> <Contact>IP-Echelon -
>> Compliance</Contact>
>>> <Address>6715 Hollywood Blvd
>>> Los Angeles CA
>> 90028
>>> United States of America</Address>
>>> <Phone>+1 (310) 606
>> 2747</Phone>
>>> <Email>copyright at ip-echelon.com</Email>
>>> 
>> </Complainant>
>>> <Service_Provider>
>>> <Entity>Brisanet Servicos De
>> Telecomunicacoes Ltda</Entity>
>>> <Contact/>
>>> <Address/>
>>> <Phone/>
>>> 
>> <Email>cert at cert.br</Email>
>>> </Service_Provider>
>>> <Source>
>>> 
>> <TimeStamp>2014-08-22T19:20:41Z</TimeStamp>
>>> 
>> <IP_Address>177.37.138.36</IP_Address>
>>> <Port>18294</Port>
>>> 
>> <Type>BitTorrent</Type>
>>> <Subtype Basetype="P2P"
>> Protocol="BITTORRENT"/>
>>> <UserName/>
>>> <Number_Files>1</Number_Files>
>>> 
>> </Source>
>>> <Content>
>>> <Item>
>>> 
>> <TimeStamp>2014-08-22T19:20:41Z</TimeStamp>
>>> <Title>The Amazing
>> Spider-Man 2</Title>
>>> 
>> 
>> <FileName>[TOP10FILMES]-O.Espetacular.Homem.Aranha.2.2014.BDRip.XviD.Dual.TOM</FileName>
>>> 
>> <FileSize>984840081</FileSize>
>>> 
>> <InfoHash>df8feb8f0b8ef2ef33a18739735f501dc7bdf230</InfoHash>
>>> 
>> </Item>
>>> </Content>
>>> <History/>
>>> <Notes/>
>>> <Type
>> Retraction="false"/>
>>> <Verification/>
>>> </Infringement>
>>> 
>>> 
>> --1408738129.EEf12127.18481--
>>> 
>>> Rubens Marins
>>> Administrador de
>> Sistemas
>>> rubens.marins at gmail dot com
>>> 
>>> 2014-08-22 16:15
>> GMT-03:00 Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>>> Cara,
>> certeza que a origem é do CERT? Em 22 de agosto de 2014 11:38, Rubens
>> Marins Schner < rubens at brisanet.com.br> escreveu:
>>>> 
>>>>> Temos
>> recebido emails do CERT.br sobre problemas de copyright,ou seja, alguem
>> dentro da nossa rede fazendo download de conteudo "indevido". Em
>> primeiro lugar eu acho que nao deve ser reponsabilidade do CERT.br
>>>> 
>> ficar
>>>> 
>>>>> policiando a questao de copyright, eu entendo que eles
>> estao encaminhando os emails que recebem, mas eu nao acho que se aplica,
>> por que afinal de contas, se o CERT.br comecar a receber propagandas
>> direcionadas a Nossa Instituicao, mas chegar na caixa do CERT.br, tenho
>> certeza que eles nao
>>>> vao emails sobre copyright, que nos simplesmente
>> ignoramos. PS: Estou mandando esse email para a
>>>> 
>>>>> quote> CERT.br.
>> Rubens Marins Administrador de Sistemas rubens.marins at gmail dot c
>>>> 
>> st https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1] -- Douglas Fernando
>> Fischer Engº de Controle e Automação -- gter l
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> gter
>> list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> [2]
>> http://www.cert.br/
>> [3] http://www.respectcopyrights.org
>> [4]
>> http://www.acns.net/v1.2/ACNS2v1_2.xsd
>> [5] http://www.acns.net/ACNS
>> [6]
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
>> [7]
>> http://www.sulinternet.net
>> --
>> gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> 
>> --
>> gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> 
> --
> gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter