[MASOCH-L] Fw: The return of the spf-announce mailing list.
Antonio Carlos Pina
apina at infolink.com.br
Thu May 5 22:57:43 BRT 2005
Pessoal, como esse papo rolou por aqui algumas vezes...
Está aí para vosso deleite.
ps: O cross é porque já vi dúvidas nas duas listas, sobre implementação em
uma e eficácia em outra ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "wayne" <wayne at schlitt.net>
To: <spf-announce at v2.listbox.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 12:07 AM
Subject: The return of the spf-announce mailing list.
> Sender Policy Framework (SPF) News
> by Wayne, May 4, 2005
> If you are receiving this email, it means that you have subscribed to
> the spf-announce mailing list. Sadly, the last announcement was sent
> over a year ago, and I am mostly to blame for this. I apologize. We
> are attempting to restart this list, so expect least a couple of
> emails to be posted in the next week or so.
> If you are no longer interested in following the SPF email
> anti-forgery system, please use link at the bottom of the message to
> stop the emails. If, for some reason, that doesn't work, feel free to
> email me.
> The past year has been very hectic. Here is a list of some of the
> things that have happened:
> * SPF has been renamed from "Sender Permitted From" to "Sender Policy
> Framework" to better reflect how SPF can be used to create policy
> about how your domain is used.
> * The number of domains that have published SPF records has grown from
> an estimated 60,000 a year ago, to over a million today. (A factor
> of 15.)
> * The number of email checked against SPF records is harder to
> measure, but my best estimate is it has grown by a factor of 10.
> * Many new products use SPF, including SpamAssassin v3.0.
> * The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) created and then shut
> down a Working Group with the task of tackling the problem of Email
> Authentication. SPF and several other proposals were considered,
> but in the end none of them were adopted by the Working Group.
> Instead there was an attempted merger between, SPF and another
> proposal called Caller-ID, with many changes to both systems. In
> the end, technical problems with this merged standard, called
> SenderID, caused the working group to be shut down.
> * A revised SPF standard is now nearly finished, after much work from
> two editors (Mark Lentczner and myself), and hundreds of comments
> and corrections from dozens of people. The goal of this latest
> draft is to standardize what SPF was like a year ago. While SPF is
> not perfect, you can't keep changing a standard and still have it be
> * In order to try and become more organized, the SPF community elected
> a council to make decisions. One thing that the council is trying
> to do is to broaden the number of people who can help out with the
> advancement of SPF. This should make life a little less hectic for
> some of us.
> To unsubscribe from this list, or change the email address where you
> please go to
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.3 - Release Date: 03/05/2005
More information about the masoch-l