[GTER] Fwd: [Isoc-br] Why the World Must Resist Calls to Undermine the Internet

[Danton Nunes]

A posição da ISOC, que eu acho que deve ser levada a sério.

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	[Isoc-br] Why the World Must Resist Calls to Undermine the Internet
Date: 	Wed, 2 Mar 2022 15:11:34 -0300
From: 	Flávio Rech Wagner <flavio at inf.ufrgs.br>
To: 	ISOC Brasil <isoc-br at listas.tiwa.net.br>



*Why the World Must Resist Calls to Undermine the Internet*

https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2022/03/why-the-world-must-resist-calls-to-undermine-the-internet/

By Andrew Sullivan

ISOC President and Chief Executive Officer


It seems that every time there is a large political event in the world, someone 
calls for someone else to be excluded from the Internet. The latest call to cut 
people off comes in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

The Internet Society must resist these calls, no matter how tempting. The 
Internet remains our best hope to communicate among the peoples of the world.

The calls to cut Russia off are coming at multiple levels:

   * There is pressure on global social media giants to block Russian content to
     stop disinformation from circulating.
   * Others think networks around the world should block Russian communication by
     blocking their BGP announcements. BGP, the Border Gateway Protocol, is the
     network protocol that allows the various networks that make up the Internet
     to negotiate their communications—effectively, it is the “inter” part of
     “the Internet.”  Attempting to convince all the networks in the world to
     reject some BGP announcements on political grounds is unprecedented.
   * Still others think the physical connections from Russian networks should be
     severed. It is not possible to communicate through cables that have been
     broken. Cut the cables, and Russia will be isolated.

These proposals miss something fundamental about the Internet: it was never 
designed to respect country borders. The idea of unplugging a country is as 
wrong when people want to do it to /another/ country as it is when governments 
want to do it to their own.

Internet connectivity means anyone with access can use the Internet to 
communicate. This means aggressors and opponents alike. Unlike most historical 
communication methods, the Internet is astonishingly resilient when conditions 
for connection are bad. It’s not magic. It won’t end wars or invasions. But it 
is a great tool for humans to use against their oppressors.

The Internet allows people who otherwise would be silenced to speak, so it 
should be no surprise that there are people the world over trying to undermine 
the Internet.

Russia has been trying for over a decade, with limited evidence of success 
(whatever the Kremlin has said), to be able to unplug from the Internet. Some 
governments impose Internet shutdowns that harm the interests of their citizens 
and impede economic development, all in the interests of social control. These 
efforts are not “the Internet with local characteristics,” or any other 
catchphrase. They’re opposition to the Internet. The Internet puts decisions 
about connections into the hands of people who want to connect. It’s a 
frightening idea to those who want to control the messages. But it’s what has 
made the Internet a resource to enrich people’s lives.

In the present case, even on a basic technical level, it is not clear what a 
“Russian network” is, or how one would refuse its communication. The Internet’s 
resilience comes in part from redundancy. There is no hope that every single 
network in the world will refuse traffic from networks originating in Russia. 
Indeed, it is almost certain that communications that originate from any 
government-controlled network sources will make it to the wider Internet. The 
origins will probably be even more obscured than they otherwise might be. In an 
already-connected world, it will be really hard to deny someone connectivity 
completely, especially when they have the resources of a nation-state. Trying to 
block one country’s networks could harm its government, but it could harm its 
domestic dissent, too.

Once large network operators start demonstrating an ability to make routing 
decisions on political grounds, other governments will notice. This will attract 
regulatory requirements to shape network interconnection in real time along 
political lines. If we travel that path, in short order the network of networks 
will not exist. In its place we would have a different network design built 
around national gateways, broken up on geopolitical lines, and just as dynamic 
and robust as other multilateral, regulation-based systems. The Internet has 
done a lot to erode those systems because it is more efficient and effective. 
We’d give that up.

Without the Internet, the rest of the world would not know of atrocities 
happening in other places. And without the Internet, ordinary citizens of many 
countries wouldn’t know what was being carried out in their name. Our best hope, 
however dim, is that those supporting an aggressive regime will change their 
support. More information can help, even as disinformation circulates. We need a 
better understanding of what is and is not disinformation. Cutting a whole 
population off the Internet will stop disinformation coming from that 
population—but it also stops the flow of truth.

We must not ease the path for those who hate the Internet and its ability to 
empower people. We must fight the suppression of the Internet. This means making 
sure connectivity does not stop for anyone. It means ensuring that strong 
encryption, which protects ordinary communications, but also allows political 
discourse in the face of censorship, is always available. It means making sure 
the critical properties of the Internet are not undermined by legislation, no 
matter how well-meaning. It means making interconnections cheap and easy and 
ubiquitous, so that all networks are reliable and robust systems that can be 
made from unreliable parts.It means dedicating ourselves to ensuring that the 
Internet is for everyone <https://www.internetsociety.org/mission/>.

Far too many people all over the world are living under conflict. All should 
have access to the greatest communication tool ever invented. The Internet is a 
tool to help them understand what is going on, and to communicate their 
struggle. It is a tool for the oppressed to show their oppression. If we try to 
bend it only to the will of governments, we will break it, losing all of these 
opportunities. People invaded by a foreign power deserve the Internet. But we 
cannot be selective about who has access.


           We must never waver from this vision. The Internet is for everyone.




-- 
Prof. Flávio Rech Wagner		
Presidente da Internet Society Brasil
flavio at inf.ufrgs.br,info at isoc.org.br           https://www.isoc.org.br 
                Twitter: @ISOCBrasil
https://www.facebook.com/isocbrasil/            https://www.youtube.com/isocbrasil
https://www.instagram.com/isocbrasil/ 
https://www.linkedin.com/company/isoc-brasil/
-------------- next part --------------
_____
Isoc-br mailing list
Isoc-br at listas.tiwa.net.br
https://listas.tiwa.net.br/listinfo/isoc-br
Descadastrar: envie email a Isoc-br-unsubscribe at listas.tiwa.net.br