[GTER] BGP Multi

Thu May 21 13:15:42 -03 2015

Eu sinceramente desconhecia esse modelo de negócios no Brasil. 

A
quem comprou e/ou compra burstable, poderia dar uma informação de
custos/mega quando comparado ao dedicado convencional? 

Com certeza o
valor não será o mesmo... a pergunta é, compensa? 

---

Att 

Márcio
Elias Hahn do Nascimento
(48) 8469-1819 / 3524-0700 -
marcio at sulinternet.net
INOC-BR: 52977*100
GERÊNCIA DE RECURSOS DE TIC -
Sul Internet [2] 

 [2] 

Em 21/05/2015 12:33, Antonio Carlos Pina via
gter escreveu: 

> Return-Path: <antoniocarlospina at gmail.com>
>
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
> Delivered-To:
gter at eng.registro.br
> Received: from localhost (localhost
[127.0.0.1])
> by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515D2162C46
>
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:27:24 -0300 (BRT)
>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eng.registro.br
> X-Spam-Flag:
NO
> X-Spam-Score: -0.798
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-0.798 tagged_above=-9999 required=4
> tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
> FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001,
> RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
SPF_PASS=-0.001]
> autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
> Received: from
eng.registro.br ([127.0.0.1])
> by localhost (eng.registro.br
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
> with ESMTP id KFTHQpScoSda for
<gter at eng.registro.br>;
> Thu, 21 May 2015 12:27:22 -0300 (BRT)
>
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom;
client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232; helo=mail-qg0-x232.google.com;
envelope-from=antoniocarlospina at gmail.com; receiver=gter at eng.registro.br

> DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.2.0 eng.registro.br 87484162C1A
>
Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232])
> (using TLSv1.2 with cipher
ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
> (No client certificate
requested)
> by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87484162C1A
>
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:27:21 -0300 (BRT)
>
Received: by qgew3 with SMTP id w3so42070542qge.2
> for
<gter at eng.registro.br>; Thu, 21 May 2015 08:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
>
X-Received: by 10.229.174.202 with SMTP id
u10mr4730191qcz.4.1432222040168;
> Thu, 21 May 2015 08:27:20 -0700
(PDT)
> Received: from [179.241.143.254]
(179-241-143-254.3g.claro.net.br. [179.241.143.254])
> by mx.google.com
with ESMTPSA id 64sm917611qkw.13.2015.05.21.08.27.15
> for
<gter at eng.registro.br>
> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA
bits=128/128);
> Thu, 21 May 2015 08:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Antonio
Carlos Pina <antoniocarlospina at gmail.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
>
Subject: Re: [GTER] BGP Multi
> Message-Id:
<B7054E9E-C35D-4409-8FC4-165FCA50CF1F at gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 May
2015 12:27:11 -0300
> References:
<CAEK67VHWNKiS=NnBxGJgmOmhhP7gEygQcC5svtRsLiz0YGQnmQ at mail.gmail.com>
<SNT152-W41F6BA2148DD4194734655F5C20 at phx.gbl>
<89lxibgjvij25k4or2rspfkh.1432158367698 at email.android.com>
<CAATqwBcU0Y5XCv0OBishAgYe2CNegqFpGVRxVwbW=pqnV=wh5Q at mail.gmail.com>
<SNT152-W537161F9966033D30FECFBF5C20 at phx.gbl>
<CAJB2g-H7OxDYLopt3w=q0kkw_T_AU7_CKGX6BXD8uA2vdBcQ=g at mail.gmail.com>
<SNT152-W958BF87BBB837DDAFE407BF5C20 at phx.gbl>
<CAJB2g-HGDw+qZ6hLe6ng24h2o-v_mdLafTV-FQNdwnm085REQw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k2cSif0bYse6RE-GEtmC0Ms4-9LRfvTKOO4LZ1r2odMEg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJB2g-GbP4sJfm3it9PA3aYJ0VN3ieHhUc-d+Y+Qc0Kyem6MEQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSzggEOnudS-AiPrMMRVGHewpgrHJAU2s8-tDU0Qs-kHQ at mail.gmail.com>
>
In-Reply-To:
<CAKEr4RSzggEOnudS-AiPrMMRVGHewpgrHJAU2s8-tDU0Qs-kHQ at mail.gmail.com>
>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12F70)
>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:33:48 -0300
> Content-Type:
text/plain;
> charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20
> 
>
Compro da internexa e j=C3=A1 comprei da brasiltelecom e da
globalcrossing (=
> atual level3)
> 
> Abs
> 
>> Em 21/05/2015, =C3=A0s
10:50, Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas at gmail.com> e=
> 
> screveu:
> 
>>
=20 Quem vende rajada no Brasil? A n=C3=A3o ser tr=C3=A2nsito comprado
em bilateral no PTT, pelas bandas do=
> 
> Paran=C3=A1 eu
> n=C3=A3o
conhe=C3=A7o. =20 Em 20 de maio de
> 
>> ockquote> 
>> 
>> :
>> =20
> "
style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px;
width:100%">Nao tinha pensado nisso. Link burst
> 
>>
com">rubensk at gmail.com>: =20 
>> 
>>> 2015-05-20 23:31 GMT-03:00 Rafael
Possamai <rafael at gav.ufsc.br>: =20 
>>> 
>>>> Doi na alma pagar por 2 e
soh usar 1, mas o que eu tinha em mente eh se=
> ding-left:5px;
border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%">seu link
cair em horario de pico, i
> 
>> ote type="cite"
style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px;
width:100%"> que eu entendo, a ba
> undo cairia pela metade
supostamente. =20 A alternativa para isso =C3=A9 commited+burstable. Usa
banda commited do= 
> 
> s dois
> upstreams sempre; quando um deles cai,
usa burstable da outro. Enquanto= 
> 
>> 5px; width:100%"> 
>> 
>>> os

>>> 
>>>> momentos de falha couberem no 95-percentil, sem custo
adicional exceto o=
> f 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%">de ter
uma capacidade de enlace maior do que a commited. =20 =20 Rubens -- gter
list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1] -- gter list
https://e
> 
>> e Controle e Automa=C3=A7=C3=A3o -- gter list
https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1] 
>> 
>> --
>> gter
list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1]
> 
>> 
> 
>> 

Links:
------
[1] https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
[2]
http://www.sulinternet.net