[GTER] Hardware ServerU L-100 / L-800
George Santana
george at t2web.com.br
Wed Feb 25 09:12:38 -03 2015
Alguem os usa com Vmware?
Ql a media de preço do L-100 e L-800?
Att,
Em quarta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2015, Ricardo Landim <
ricardolan at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Com um L-800 da pra fazer quanto no bgp? conseguiria aguentar duas rotas
> full cada uma com 1gbps?
>
> Em 24 de fevereiro de 2015 20:08, Patrick Tracanelli <
> eksffa at freebsdbrasil.com.br <javascript:;>> escreveu:
>
> >
> > > On 24/02/2015, at 19:25, casfre at gmail.com <javascript:;> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2015-02-24 17:36 GMT-03:00 Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer at gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>:
> > >
> > >> 2015-02-24 16:41 GMT-03:00 Jonatas M. Victor <jonatasmv at gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>:
> > >>
> > >>> Srs,
> > >>>
> > >>> Alguém já utilizou esse hardware para aplicações de roteamento?
> Qual
> > a
> > >>> impressão
> > >>> de atendimento pré e pós venda, garantia e no funcionamento no
> > dia-a-dia
> > >> ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Obrigado,
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> eu tenho rodado pra BGP, firewall e IDS ambas L100 e L800
> > >>
> > >
> > > Há alguma dessas situações de firewall onde tenha muitas regras (+200
> por
> > > exemplo) e com conntrack (ou correspondente nos BSDs) ativo? Se
> > afirmativo
> > > e tiver condições de compartilhar, eu gostaria de saber, porque tenho
> > muito
> > > interesse nas L-800 e para aplicações como as que descreveu.
> > >
> > > Obrigado.
> > >
> > > Cássio
> > > —
> >
> >
> > Cassio, boa noite.
> >
> > Se quiser algo específico me mande uma msg em pvt, mas de forma
> > generalista o que voce pediu segue algumas saídas:
> >
> > States do PF:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# pfctl -ss | wc -l
> > 128869
> >
> > Regras de NAT no PF:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# pfctl -sn | wc -l
> > 602
> >
> > Regras de filtro no PF:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# pfctl -sr | wc -l
> > 382
> >
> > States no IPFW:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# ipfw -d show | wc -l
> > 112575
> >
> > Regras no IPFW:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# ipfw list | wc -l
> > 293
> >
> > Ambos firewall na mesma maquina. Segue saída do top:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# top -d3 -PSH
> > last pid: 5621; load averages: 0.39, 0.45, 0.42
> > up 2+00:44:05 20:07:44
> > 355 processes: 9 running, 280 sleeping, 66 waiting
> > CPU 0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 5.9% interrupt, 93.7% idle
> > CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 5.5% interrupt, 94.5% idle
> > CPU 2: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 3.9% interrupt, 96.1% idle
> > CPU 3: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 3.5% interrupt, 96.1% idle
> > CPU 4: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 1.6% interrupt, 98.0% idle
> > CPU 5: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 3.1% interrupt, 96.5% idle
> > CPU 6: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 1.6% interrupt, 97.6% idle
> > CPU 7: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.8% interrupt, 99.2% idle
> > Mem: 9088K Active, 63M Inact, 1486M Wired, 1132K Cache, 2341M Free
> > ARC: 569M Total, 96M MFU, 153M MRU, 1424K Anon, 14M Header, 306M Other
> > Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free
> >
> > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU
> COMMAND
> > 11 root 155 ki31 0K 128K CPU7 7 46.7H 100.00%
> > idle{idle: cpu7}
> > 11 root 155 ki31 0K 128K CPU4 4 46.6H 100.00%
> > idle{idle: cpu4}
> > 11 root 155 ki31 0K 128K CPU6 6 46.5H 100.00%
> > idle{idle: cpu6}
> > 11 root 155 ki31 0K 128K CPU2 2 44.6H 99.76%
> > idle{idle: cpu2}
> > 11 root 155 ki31 0K 128K CPU5 5 46.7H 99.66%
> > idle{idle: cpu5}
> > 11 root 155 ki31 0K 128K RUN 3 44.5H 98.83%
> > idle{idle: cpu3}
> > 11 root 155 ki31 0K 128K CPU1 1 44.4H 97.41%
> > idle{idle: cpu1}
> > 11 root 155 ki31 0K 128K CPU0 0 44.2H 95.02%
> > idle{idle: cpu0}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 0 124:53 3.86%
> > intr{irq256: igb0:que}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 2 116:35 2.93%
> > intr{irq258: igb0:que}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 2 108:46 2.69%
> > intr{irq268: igb2:que}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 3 119:02 2.15%
> > intr{irq259: igb0:que}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 1 128:59 1.81%
> > intr{irq257: igb0:que}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 0 109:53 1.76%
> > intr{irq266: igb2:que}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 3 107:57 1.71%
> > intr{irq269: igb2:que}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 5 101:10 1.07%
> > intr{irq271: igb2:que}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 4 106:17 0.93%
> > intr{irq270: igb2:que}
> > 14 root -16 - 0K 16K - 0 33:15 0.93%
> > rand_harvestq
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 7 105:52 0.83%
> > intr{irq273: igb2:que}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 1 104:48 0.83%
> > intr{irq267: igb2:que}
> > 12 root -92 - 0K 1056K WAIT 3 11:23 0.34%
> > intr{irq287: igb4:que}
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Tracanelli
> >
> > FreeBSD Brasil LTDA.
> > Tel.: (31) 3516-0800
> > 316601 at sip.freebsdbrasil.com.br <javascript:;>
> > http://www.freebsdbrasil.com.br
> > "Long live Hanin Elias, Kim Deal!"
> >
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
George Santana
T2web Soluções Tecnológicas
Phone: +55 (82) 3033-3000
Mobile: +55 (82) 9967-9057
http://www.t2web.com.br
More information about the gter
mailing list