[GTER] Hardware ServerU L-100 / L-800

George Santana george at t2web.com.br
Wed Feb 25 09:12:38 -03 2015


Alguem os usa com Vmware?

Ql a media de preço do L-100 e L-800?

Att,

Em quarta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2015, Ricardo Landim <
ricardolan at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Com um L-800 da pra fazer quanto no bgp? conseguiria aguentar duas rotas
> full cada uma com 1gbps?
>
> Em 24 de fevereiro de 2015 20:08, Patrick Tracanelli <
> eksffa at freebsdbrasil.com.br <javascript:;>> escreveu:
>
> >
> > > On 24/02/2015, at 19:25, casfre at gmail.com <javascript:;> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2015-02-24 17:36 GMT-03:00 Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer at gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>:
> > >
> > >> 2015-02-24 16:41 GMT-03:00 Jonatas M. Victor <jonatasmv at gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>:
> > >>
> > >>>  Srs,
> > >>>
> > >>>   Alguém já utilizou esse hardware para aplicações de roteamento?
> Qual
> > a
> > >>> impressão
> > >>> de atendimento pré e pós venda, garantia e no funcionamento no
> > dia-a-dia
> > >> ?
> > >>>
> > >>>  Obrigado,
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> eu tenho rodado pra BGP, firewall e IDS ambas L100 e L800
> > >>
> > >
> > > Há alguma dessas situações de firewall onde tenha muitas regras (+200
> por
> > > exemplo) e com conntrack (ou correspondente nos BSDs) ativo? Se
> > afirmativo
> > > e tiver condições de compartilhar, eu gostaria de saber, porque tenho
> > muito
> > > interesse nas L-800 e para aplicações como as que descreveu.
> > >
> > > Obrigado.
> > >
> > > Cássio
> > > —
> >
> >
> > Cassio, boa noite.
> >
> > Se quiser algo específico me mande uma msg em pvt, mas de forma
> > generalista o que voce pediu segue algumas saídas:
> >
> > States do PF:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# pfctl -ss | wc -l
> >    128869
> >
> > Regras de NAT no PF:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# pfctl -sn | wc -l
> >      602
> >
> > Regras de filtro no PF:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# pfctl -sr | wc -l
> >    382
> >
> > States no IPFW:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# ipfw -d show | wc -l
> >     112575
> >
> > Regras no IPFW:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# ipfw list | wc -l
> >    293
> >
> > Ambos firewall na mesma maquina. Segue saída do top:
> >
> > (root at fw1)~# top -d3 -PSH
> > last pid:  5621;  load averages:  0.39,  0.45,  0.42
> >                         up 2+00:44:05  20:07:44
> > 355 processes: 9 running, 280 sleeping, 66 waiting
> > CPU 0:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.4% system,  5.9% interrupt, 93.7% idle
> > CPU 1:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  5.5% interrupt, 94.5% idle
> > CPU 2:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  3.9% interrupt, 96.1% idle
> > CPU 3:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.4% system,  3.5% interrupt, 96.1% idle
> > CPU 4:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.4% system,  1.6% interrupt, 98.0% idle
> > CPU 5:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.4% system,  3.1% interrupt, 96.5% idle
> > CPU 6:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.8% system,  1.6% interrupt, 97.6% idle
> > CPU 7:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.8% interrupt, 99.2% idle
> > Mem: 9088K Active, 63M Inact, 1486M Wired, 1132K Cache, 2341M Free
> > ARC: 569M Total, 96M MFU, 153M MRU, 1424K Anon, 14M Header, 306M Other
> > Swap: 2048M Total, 2048M Free
> >
> >   PID USERNAME      PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE   C   TIME    WCPU
> COMMAND
> >    11 root          155 ki31     0K   128K CPU7    7  46.7H 100.00%
> > idle{idle: cpu7}
> >    11 root          155 ki31     0K   128K CPU4    4  46.6H 100.00%
> > idle{idle: cpu4}
> >    11 root          155 ki31     0K   128K CPU6    6  46.5H 100.00%
> > idle{idle: cpu6}
> >    11 root          155 ki31     0K   128K CPU2    2  44.6H  99.76%
> > idle{idle: cpu2}
> >    11 root          155 ki31     0K   128K CPU5    5  46.7H  99.66%
> > idle{idle: cpu5}
> >    11 root          155 ki31     0K   128K RUN     3  44.5H  98.83%
> > idle{idle: cpu3}
> >    11 root          155 ki31     0K   128K CPU1    1  44.4H  97.41%
> > idle{idle: cpu1}
> >    11 root          155 ki31     0K   128K CPU0    0  44.2H  95.02%
> > idle{idle: cpu0}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    0 124:53   3.86%
> > intr{irq256: igb0:que}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    2 116:35   2.93%
> > intr{irq258: igb0:que}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    2 108:46   2.69%
> > intr{irq268: igb2:que}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    3 119:02   2.15%
> > intr{irq259: igb0:que}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    1 128:59   1.81%
> > intr{irq257: igb0:que}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    0 109:53   1.76%
> > intr{irq266: igb2:que}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    3 107:57   1.71%
> > intr{irq269: igb2:que}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    5 101:10   1.07%
> > intr{irq271: igb2:que}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    4 106:17   0.93%
> > intr{irq270: igb2:que}
> >    14 root          -16    -     0K    16K -       0  33:15   0.93%
> > rand_harvestq
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    7 105:52   0.83%
> > intr{irq273: igb2:que}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    1 104:48   0.83%
> > intr{irq267: igb2:que}
> >    12 root          -92    -     0K  1056K WAIT    3  11:23   0.34%
> > intr{irq287: igb4:que}
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Tracanelli
> >
> > FreeBSD Brasil LTDA.
> > Tel.: (31) 3516-0800
> > 316601 at sip.freebsdbrasil.com.br <javascript:;>
> > http://www.freebsdbrasil.com.br
> > "Long live Hanin Elias, Kim Deal!"
> >
> > --
> > gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
> --
> gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter



-- 
George Santana

T2web Soluções Tecnológicas

Phone: +55 (82) 3033-3000
Mobile: +55 (82) 9967-9057

http://www.t2web.com.br



More information about the gter mailing list