[GTER] Colocation
Juliano
mirandolli at gmail.com
Thu Feb 14 22:07:21 -02 2013
Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
Alguma recomendação?
Obrigado
Att.
Juliano
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp274600obb;
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:47:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.151.76 with SMTP id a52mr1279889yhk.107.1360900054250;
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:47:34 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u19si3328045ane.152.2013.02.14.19.47.34;
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:47:34 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id E791E45185;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:47:29 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ve0-f177.google.com (mail-ve0-f177.google.com
[209.85.128.177])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523BA450AC
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:25:58 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m1so2743632ves.22
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:25:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=j8n3SgcutsuEBGOT5FsyRh0Xk604FdGOwkVtYzsYCjk=;
b=UKqid8CRCtaAF443WhHV71fhIc5kcHRUWkaDOOaXl7QUNOlysEqEd7FpUZR84y/x+M
IxO6nKCsMxDVmyix1lNqntHMZ0dvLz9QziWDGx+E3+BG5hFdq2+rc9apcLOvo175TJ2h
NVY8s7nemVFu/CHZkKUphR8K0kvAhjPJ12N4tdfFJbV2aT1mEf5R9Awq1HyhJZ/y2l5e
nQ0XxLWBhVxB/udiN+f2p3hjecEoXe9hh2R+b5Wu49n8uUOq/TPrLSf7HmMlem8zMTWs
72flvXuzT03Go9e5qGX3AKB5ELk0jd4z2YxHiwKovrs99unSBbQdREE7mlBXkNLglVlU
toVg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.38.234 with SMTP id j10mr1268335vdk.0.1360898756711; Thu,
14 Feb 2013 19:25:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.80.36 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:25:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:25:56 -0300
Message-ID: <CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
From: Antonio Junior <anjunior at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:47:27 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter/>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: "gter" <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Conheci o data center da MOB essa semana, fiquei impressionado.
É um data center container
http://www.mobtelecom.com.br/mob_corporativo/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=2&Itemid=85
--
Att,
Antonio Junior
Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 21:07, Juliano <mirandolli at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
> Alguma recomendação?
>
> Obrigado
>
> Att.
> Juliano
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp1618obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:16:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.4.21 with SMTP id g21mr691768ani.11.1360927010435;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f39si10580262anj.95.2013.02.15.03.16.50;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3209F11F787;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:16:46 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06C011F770
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:30:56 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 16so2609088wgi.3
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:30:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh»BhGPDwKpzqaqESnOoP97ra9nVSp9/jBnrvLERlGuc=;
b=GHVnHO4KNz/IzeP577JibeSl4xaGuMhPjxP71Wn9jArLKjx2V2bcFf2ZLNKjBSqqNK
HAVm7TUg/dctl0Mp8jATicXKOkElDAWAQM6nn4XLwKyr9RPe4PiSahE4ZCmQVmP9L/zz
e3RW68mcOzfpCqu5IpeTMnpT3hFr22LZrZjjXmQIf1sJ+3dnDs32mSq9H5TJ1fn90J8b
3iYhzMfhIm4kBGLgqE27ebmzI3hhENrIpdiK0vuT1/CY3ucsQT1ZKr6YKwIdSqLHBQiE
q33MQExyDF8jE2rknp2y5ai1+w9As2N9ciwNEJ7tOaRdAj9Wkj+tRdmgynV44rQNmSJq
1Qww=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.106.231 with SMTP id gx7mr3161948wib.4.1360924254818;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.88.196 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:30:54 -0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: rWMdx6V0cnaN0sqZMzMBT4xIxPI
Message-ID: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_Gutierres_-_Operação_de_Redes? <leonardo at vibeti.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:16:43 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: [GTER] POWERDNS Duvidas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Bom dia
Recentemente estou usando powerdns dois servidores virtualizados master e
slave.
Gostaria de saber se alguem mais usa, e pode me dar uma dica de
configuração de DNS recursivo, sendo que ja criei a zona native
1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa,
criei dentro desta zona record do Tipo PTR para o IP desejado e record do
tipo NS apontando para os DNS.
Onrigado
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp1635obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:17:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.148.50 with SMTP id u38mr2454340yhj.18.1360927030911;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g20si24550294anp.125.2013.02.15.03.17.10;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF60211F797;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:16:59 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from pampa.tcheturbo.com.br (pampa.tcheturbo.com.br [187.108.17.2])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F11B11F770
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:54:45 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by pampa (Postfix, from userid 110)
id 1E05E48A284; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:55:23 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from webmail.tcheturbo.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pampa (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC7648A26C
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:55:22 -0200 (BRST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:55:22 -0200
From: pbraian <pbraian at tcheturbo.com.br>
To: <gter at eng.registro.br>
Message-ID: <021417d9ca7b2cd435475534c5d3f9a2 at tcheturbo.com.br>
X-Sender: pbraian at tcheturbo.com.br
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1-rc2
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:16:58 -0200
Subject: [GTER] VLAN em radios SIAE
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
CiBCb2Egbm9pdGUsCgogR29zdGFyaWEgZGUgc2FiZXIgc2UgYWxndW0gZG9zIHNlbmhvcmVzIGrD
oSBjb25maWd1cm91IFZMQU5zIGVtIHLDoWRpb3MKIEFMQyBQbHVzMmUsIGRhIFNJQUUuIFByZWNp
c28gY3JpYXIgdW1hIFZMQU4gZG8gdGlwbyAiYWNjZXNzIiwgcG9yw6ltCiBuw6NvCiBlc3RvdSBj
b25zZWd1aW5kbywgZSBvIHN1cG9ydGUgZGEgZW1wcmVzYSB0YW1iw6ltIG7Do28gY29uc2VndWl1
IG1lCiBleHBsaWNhciBjb21vIGZhesOqLWxvLgoKIEZpY2FyZWkgbXVpdG8gZ3JhdG8gY2FzbyBh
bGd1w6ltIHBvc3NhIG1lIGRhciBhbGd1bWEgZGljYSBkZSBjb21vCiBmYXplci4KCiBBdHQuIEJy
YWlhbgotLQpndGVyIGxpc3QgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly9lbmcucmVnaXN0cm8uYnIvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0
aW5mby9ndGVy
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp1895obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:25:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.122.238 with SMTP id t74mr2326771yhh.78.1360927513076;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:25:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k65si8078152yhj.153.2013.02.15.03.25.12;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:25:13 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6CB11F7A6;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:25:09 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from pontanegra.logicasistemas.com.br
(pontanegra.logicasistemas.com.br [189.89.79.140])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id A152411F78A
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:19:28 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from correio.logicasistemas.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pontanegra.logicasistemas.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3E28744148EF
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:19:28 -0300 (BRT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:19:28 -0200
From: Daniel Passos Martins <daniel at logicasistemas.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
In-Reply-To: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5f9fa65bec268b5185b4600a2ab3b1c7 at logicasistemas.com.br>
X-Sender: daniel at logicasistemas.com.br
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.4
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:25:08 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] POWERDNS Duvidas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
IAoKRXUgasOhIHVzZWkgZWxlIGUgw6kgbXVpdG8gYm9tLgpWYyBlc3TDoSBwcmVjaXNhbmRvIGRl
IHF1ZSBubwpQb3dlckROUz8KRXN0w6EgdXNhbmRvIGVsZSBpbnRlZ3JhZG8gYW8gbXlzcWw/IAoK
LS0tCgpEYW5pZWwgUGFzc29zCk1hcnRpbnMKTMOzZ2ljYSBTaXN0ZW1hcyAtIE5hdGFsL1JOCjg0
IDMyMjMuNTAwOSAtIDkxNzEuMTAyMApDb25oZcOnYSBvClJpbyBHcmFuZGUgZG8gTm9ydGUgCgpF
bSAxNS8wMi8yMDEzIDA4OjMwLCBMZW9uYXJkbyBHdXRpZXJyZXMgLSBPcGVyYcOnw6NvCmRlIFJl
ZGVzIGVzY3JldmV1OiAKCj4gQm9tIGRpYQo+IAo+IFJlY2VudGVtZW50ZSBlc3RvdSB1c2FuZG8g
cG93ZXJkbnMKZG9pcyBzZXJ2aWRvcmVzIHZpcnR1YWxpemFkb3MgbWFzdGVyIGUKPiBzbGF2ZS4K
PiBHb3N0YXJpYSBkZSBzYWJlciBzZQphbGd1ZW0gbWFpcyB1c2EsIGUgcG9kZSBtZSBkYXIgdW1h
IGRpY2EgZGUKPiBjb25maWd1cmHDp8OjbyBkZSBETlMKcmVjdXJzaXZvLCBzZW5kbyBxdWUgamEg
Y3JpZWkgYSB6b25hIG5hdGl2ZQo+IDFYWC5YWC4xODcuaW4tYWRkci5hcnBhLAo+CmNyaWVpIGRl
bnRybyBkZXN0YSB6b25hIHJlY29yZCBkbyBUaXBvIFBUUiBwYXJhIG8gSVAgZGVzZWphZG8gZSBy
ZWNvcmQKZG8KPiB0aXBvIE5TIGFwb250YW5kbyBwYXJhIG9zIEROUy4KPiAKPiBPbnJpZ2Fkbwo+
IC0tCj4gZ3RlciBsaXN0Cmh0dHBzOi8vZW5nLnJlZ2lzdHJvLmJyL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8v
Z3RlciBbMV0KIAoKTGlua3M6Ci0tLS0tLQpbMV0KaHR0cHM6Ly9lbmcucmVnaXN0cm8uYnIvbWFp
bG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9ndGVyCi0tCmd0ZXIgbGlzdCAgICBodHRwczovL2VuZy5yZWdpc3Ryby5i
ci9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2d0ZXI
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp6685obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:31:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.190.98 with SMTP id d62mr2937434yhn.8.1360935098964;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c67si8374626yhe.136.2013.02.15.05.31.38;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE7C11F7C6;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:30:47 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from connectoway.com.br (gambitwave.connectoway.com.br [177.36.4.20])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 725F711F777
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:01:04 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from TI01 by connectoway.com.br (MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.0.R)
with ESMTP id md50000621372.msg
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:58:41 -0300
From: "Rodrigo Augusto" <rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br>
To: "'Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes'"
<gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:59:02 -0300
Message-ID: <C93E5588AA944A368C02AA3A2F40C351 at TI01>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
thread-index: Ac4Lbc2n4CpRooanSVyQfcdPJAqmhAABdmcg
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609
X-Authenticated-Sender: rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br
X-Spam-Processed: gambitwave, Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:58:41 -0300
(not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-MDRemoteIP: 177.36.4.18
X-Return-Path: rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gter at eng.registro.br
X-MDAV-Processed: gambitwave, Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:58:49 -0300
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:30:46 -0200
Subject: [GTER] RES: POWERDNS Duvidas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Leonardo, instalou o power admin? Com ele é bem fácil de gerenciar
isto...podes criar contas e deixar na Mao de mais pessoas administrar
isto...outra coisa, quando fui criar as zonas reversas foi bem fácil junto
ao registro.br para poder delegar....
-----Mensagem original-----
De: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em
nome de Leonardo Gutierres - Operação de Redes
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2013 07:31
Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
Assunto: [GTER] POWERDNS Duvidas
Bom dia
Recentemente estou usando powerdns dois servidores virtualizados master e
slave.
Gostaria de saber se alguem mais usa, e pode me dar uma dica de
configuração de DNS recursivo, sendo que ja criei a zona native
1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa,
criei dentro desta zona record do Tipo PTR para o IP desejado e record do
tipo NS apontando para os DNS.
Onrigado
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp6671obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:31:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.113.180 with SMTP id a40mr2816538yhh.35.1360935071730;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:31:11 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v3si10686354ani.181.2013.02.15.05.31.10;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:31:11 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id F330011F7C2;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:30:05 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com
[209.85.212.180])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C50511F777
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:59:53 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hi8so1051661wib.1
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:59:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=ipnqoLIpDTweHjfqch9bCRhcuyfT4WxTtGsze+0VxyI=;
b=uKTQoSEoh9CCw239ccKD9Tf1lS4Tfc7U808g6GQrDkMwxPA35+r5zA8970+zLhYXBN
3gMaRyYtlI58wfCbZwu8kai2YU9BAnB27w44h828PM5App90gahs/egHFBWnBBJ+9p7p
zyW5pxsg9SGCgPDQEzoQNoXdkHRExiC8d5FRosT3JcWJ3fc0CimAnv8PQjgEXcvUNkNt
i0vF6RBfrisYEZrfN/dnJclRshi78adEOBP8FgoNlhAFXLM1k0neDCvFiEH7/68yJAY6
JIsYnql5MMvy4pdMRTTjkp4HW34vpuTKZrJb4OGqsE30cy2bJXXmQfEHvr4xesUhpmJz
TbAw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.106.231 with SMTP id gx7mr3662119wib.4.1360929591337;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.88.196 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:59:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5f9fa65bec268b5185b4600a2ab3b1c7 at logicasistemas.com.br>
References: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
<5f9fa65bec268b5185b4600a2ab3b1c7 at logicasistemas.com.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:59:51 -0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: M6LgUIPhUy8zRL5BUlj3AcZCifM
Message-ID: <CAGiBWQC6DkoNptbvrqoeidN2DGKAGRopnaF=aXbe1GU_Ng4ckg at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_Gutierres_-_Operação_de_Redes? <leonardo at vibeti.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:30:04 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] POWERDNS Duvidas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Bom dia
Sim esta integrado com Mysql e estou usando poweradmin para administração
do mesmo.
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:19, Daniel Passos Martins <
daniel at logicasistemas.com.br> escreveu:
>
>
> Eu já usei ele e é muito bom.
> Vc está precisando de que no
> PowerDNS?
> Está usando ele integrado ao mysql?
>
> ---
>
> Daniel Passos
> Martins
> Lógica Sistemas - Natal/RN
> 84 3223.5009 - 9171.1020
> Conheça o
> Rio Grande do Norte
>
> Em 15/02/2013 08:30, Leonardo Gutierres - Operação
> de Redes escreveu:
>
> > Bom dia
> >
> > Recentemente estou usando powerdns
> dois servidores virtualizados master e
> > slave.
> > Gostaria de saber se
> alguem mais usa, e pode me dar uma dica de
> > configuração de DNS
> recursivo, sendo que ja criei a zona native
> > 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa,
> >
> criei dentro desta zona record do Tipo PTR para o IP desejado e record
> do
> > tipo NS apontando para os DNS.
> >
> > Onrigado
> > --
> > gter list
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp6620obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:29:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.124.208 with SMTP id x56mr2732867yhh.67.1360934996487;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:29:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l41si8252927yho.40.2013.02.15.05.29.56;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:29:56 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@onda.net.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E18B11F7AF;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:29:34 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from cube.onda.net.br
(2001-12ac-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0005.v6.onda.net.br [IPv6:2001:12ac::5])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32D8A11F789
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:13:38 -0200 (BRST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onda.net.br;
sÞfault;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
bh=eWyyWbTXg0qhyGDZfM8vpzbkPkd0pSLW6YUNLii/lck=;
b=kPFRgI4zv8xHnboOkwNLm2qIFwM4XZQWR8+z02PDdDk5zvpNAZx1BJpKQkVdOObFH5Lx5pqSoStB2yFL8/FSFxR/T929ApWLr+KHf5J3BPQ0ei01BB/OS4fV0ldkEcYg;
Received: from static-189-84-12-3.v4.onda.net.br ([189.84.12.3]:64903
helo=[192.168.2.250])
by cube.onda.net.br with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexandre at onda.net.br>)
id 1U6KAa-0007vv-En
for gter at eng.registro.br; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:13:36 -0200
Message-ID: <511E2667.9070206 at onda.net.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:13:27 -0200
From: "Alexandre J. Correa (Onda)" <alexandre at onda.net.br>
Organization: Onda Internet Ltda.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <021417d9ca7b2cd435475534c5d3f9a2 at tcheturbo.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <021417d9ca7b2cd435475534c5d3f9a2 at tcheturbo.com.br>
X-cPanel-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-cPanel-MailScanner-ID: 1U6KAa-0007vv-En
X-cPanel-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
Provider for details
X-cPanel-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-cPanel-MailScanner-From: alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Spam-Status: No
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cube.onda.net.br
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eng.registro.br
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - onda.net.br
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cube.onda.net.br: authenticated_id:
alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:29:33 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] VLAN em radios SIAE
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp6604obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:29:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.87.8 with SMTP id p8mr772471anl.60.1360934964541;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:29:24 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q15si3455982ank.150.2013.02.15.05.29.24;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:29:24 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8583C11F7A4;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:29:12 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C3211F789
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:15:08 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 17so4529666iea.40
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:15:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=OorFJCKOw/4R/Y+YKT7juHnVy0WGm0LTL9IXb5Dq7j0=;
b=COc1vhlrqrDmsAxJsNlq4jurdS/DisN0CisOuNS2TQsGKJdYxMO+olDEO1txTU4m6w
bYByC0nyZ7PBJljxYWqe1ALlYmEoBQI57sFqwBz0ZycpGC4w9Pg06+Is+hUme5xbhjXb
0N0JtmZ+FEiMjjiPE6TNUkWMsh3ZwoqNf6tF2y64+obTZIWLNUXAx+HY2Cu+NC0oDuTI
3v+WiwyTVtS0b11ICPlYpfwv+1TgOQNL7TujliSs7JdWqiiOu5J/FM5eMKs27sgcBDe3
IlX1VXPNY7UyqYbVuegjYuSmqt5eh7xgLCAZ6AnxeU+YOKba6+NeKgTFY2gvG2fNcBdz
vMfQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.195.134 with SMTP id ie6mr1275643igc.6.1360930496332;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:14:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.41.106 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:14:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPFY92FAu6v1VLOPj6pg5boMdkR_VPMSbeiK3Z2+7Z_tYtgP-g at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPFY92FxA-t2f65KS7zGCny4UcV8+y19Dd9MmGeF+QFBi13c4A at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ETKamQ9yNqSTtPfivoJ45eW1ozrvn8W29XkTggdGOFPiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPFY92FAu6v1VLOPj6pg5boMdkR_VPMSbeiK3Z2+7Z_tYtgP-g at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:14:56 -0300
Message-ID: <CAMkf-ERTQw8Nxiß8uVyHt2PHt4oanmpStydnRVhUtPnZ7Juw at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rôney_Eduardo?= <roneyeduardosantos at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:29:11 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Transparent Proxy - Juniper Mx5-t
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 19:14, Marcos TP <markinn at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Eu fiz algo similar ao que você indicou .
> A pergunta agora seria onde cadastrar o filtro . Nas interfaces de entrada
> ISP certo ?
>
Seguinte:
1) Quando in-interface=LAN_(tráfego dos clientes),
src-address=Seu-bloco-IP, dst-address=0.0.0.0/0, dst-port=80,
define-next-hop=IP-MARA
2) Quando in-interface=WAN_(trânsito(s) ou PTT(s)), src-address=0.0.0.0/0,
src-port=80, dst-address=Seu-bloco-IP, define-next-hop=IP-MARA
--
Rôney Eduardo
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp6657obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:30:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.149.8 with SMTP id w8mr2804567yhj.71.1360935049400;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:30:49 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o9si8408950yhm.82.2013.02.15.05.30.49;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:30:49 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF6E11F7BE;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:29:55 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com (mail-oa0-f52.google.com
[209.85.219.52])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4475911F78A
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:28:23 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k14so3698945oag.11
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:28:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=WUst4LHVb1wqwMlBXyDu0Q1dW30QrD17jFkn/lk3Yf8=;
b=CGbIg9nQ8j6qo6HwKiwWtqcP7JQN655UAKT7Ff0bsXpiv5n2GJl5VEO6le9qrgQ8ZU
0EOCRoIz+V9pw3b6C1FdSTc4NiaAQm69XeESxpos8GGZE8z84feeG8pBV2Nk8ODiw9kr
tSdWHvxl4y+ndbd+f0tQlNAkeRLxCKUQV9P/vbaAyMX2Ic+cAKgkvvIYYeFkD//4L1zm
RaHBbneGeNfRJZTr+H4vErhLKwSHFhsWSoKJJV0W4Ob9lRkg6xuIRQXcfGov3a3tfGdH
6oivIBxGeuXisl+L6wCXRW1CXd6Ij3g8B6q79MwiGbmXm4agFiFvf2Ry9JugYHK4kUlp
F0oA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.28.228 with SMTP id e4mr1591598oeh.111.1360931301916;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:28:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.131.77 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:28:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:28:21 -0200
Message-ID: <CAGxniCXhOPG79QZxD5zqJ0=3i+qVWxhTGtjX906yB3LEWuHxeQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Lend <lend.sp at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:29:53 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
recomendo alog de tambore o dc é novo e bem moderno, bom SLA, e o preço é
justo.
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 01:25, Antonio Junior <anjunior at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Conheci o data center da MOB essa semana, fiquei impressionado.
> É um data center container
>
> http://www.mobtelecom.com.br/mob_corporativo/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=2&Itemid=85
>
>
> --
> Att,
>
> Antonio Junior
>
> Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 21:07, Juliano <mirandolli at gmail.com> escreveu:
> > Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
> > Alguma recomendação?
> >
> > Obrigado
> >
> > Att.
> > Juliano
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Leandro Souza
(11)6716-2967 - OI
(11)7188-1172 - VIVO
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp6633obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:30:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.183.8 with SMTP id p8mr2859744yhm.32.1360935019721;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s9si18464350ano.15.2013.02.15.05.30.19;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:30:19 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358E911F7B8;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:29:46 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-yh0-x22b.google.com (yh-in-x022b.1e100.net
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22b])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF91F11F78A
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:31:46 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z6so507046yhz.2
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:31:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer
:thread-index:content-language:x-gm-message-state;
bh=Mj4y9bbGKEIAvUPNPc5M2ztVBJNCzbsm3ZbDnpCRpc4=;
bµDuL+e8+DC5rdJiG+i6gzIF5GG3z25XzaQJSZaQfSWet4h9rppQtaQvXxO9oB7khj
WBEV+YN/Fwx9RzEyDSkPiGby8cECdFvXhdUc/6p/2pEVlJsCVeexgkCcStGlZejKO+ai
OJSg9ZHz+wO/YcAT/WbrRUrIItH5ZVZNXxx3M4OxOJ+8sbJ83X/uWuck9Sv2Vsz9dODJ
nuph56F2bFoVTZqCCJdFk0+w6BvfXCD+g7i235fypQvVfYasjmmFankGH6F7owbd+lQs
0HDU5lOh8Ou1rRIp/6RcEtucwwezJFDQF89XQtZr5VylXmWHzlgCzmQWFyaI1JSZqxNb
QHRQ=
X-Received: by 10.236.134.136 with SMTP id s8mr2722530yhi.13.1360931505685;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:31:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NocInfoweb ([177.10.249.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x8sm79297228yhn.12.2013.02.15.04.31.42
(version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits8/128);
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:31:44 -0800 (PST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jociano_Araújo_-_Infoweb_Banda_Larga? <jociano at infowebbandalarga.com.br>
To: "'Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes'"
<gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:31:32 -0300
Message-ID: <005601ce0b78$65fd4040$31f7c0c0$@infowebbandalarga.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIYOAa5nRcnHPMDV3Obz1St/xxYdgI1NZzRl9TWy3AContent-Language: pt-br
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk8pzZN7KTmNqThZLlUU8XdWkrGJUPPfNOAhOfSY4hJFnggvED/rqwRnI64Wkpsasw/+X3H
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:29:44 -0200
Subject: [GTER] RES: Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Em Fortaleza tem o pessoal da Wirelink com um baita Data Center, eles tem
conectividade com varias operadoras e estão no PTT-CE e SP.
Jociano Araújo – Sócio Diretor
jociano [arroba] infowebbandalarga.com.br
www.infowebbandalarga.com.br
Fone: (86)3214-4225 / 9915-2627
Teresina - Piauí
-----Mensagem original-----
De: gter [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em nome de Antonio Junior
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2013 00:26
Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
Assunto: Re: [GTER] Colocation
Conheci o data center da MOB essa semana, fiquei impressionado.
É um data center container
http://www.mobtelecom.com.br/mob_corporativo/index.php?option=com_k2&view=it
em&layout=item&id=2&Itemid=85
--
Att,
Antonio Junior
Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 21:07, Juliano <mirandolli at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
> Alguma recomendação?
>
> Obrigado
>
> Att.
> Juliano
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp11371obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:13:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.16.2 with SMTP id t2mr916696ani.6.1360941218394;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si8665419yhi.102.2013.02.15.07.13.37;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:13:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F08F11F79C;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:13:28 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from connectoway.com.br (gambitwave.connectoway.com.br [177.36.4.20])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51F611F79C
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:40:43 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from TI01 by connectoway.com.br (MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.0.R)
with ESMTP id md50000621773.msg
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:39:21 -0300
From: "Rodrigo Augusto" <rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br>
To: "'Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes'"
<gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
<5f9fa65bec268b5185b4600a2ab3b1c7 at logicasistemas.com.br>
<CAGiBWQC6DkoNptbvrqoeidN2DGKAGRopnaF=aXbe1GU_Ng4ckg at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGiBWQC6DkoNptbvrqoeidN2DGKAGRopnaF=aXbe1GU_Ng4ckg at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:39:44 -0300
Message-ID: <28E5A23C64854C36B396402621FBE1B9 at TI01>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
thread-index: Ac4LgJExgFoU5y/JRSGyo28bQ6jpEgAAKAVA
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609
X-Authenticated-Sender: rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br
X-Spam-Processed: gambitwave, Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:39:21 -0300
(not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-MDRemoteIP: 177.36.4.18
X-Return-Path: rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gter at eng.registro.br
X-MDAV-Processed: gambitwave, Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:39:24 -0300
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:13:26 -0200
Subject: [GTER] RES: POWERDNS Duvidas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Leonardo, voce deve esta falando em reverso não?!
Dentro dessa zona reversa crie 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa do tipo NS apontando
para ns1.nomedoservidorns.com.br
Depois cria 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa do tipo PTR para o nome do servidor em
questão...
Já fez a alteração lá no registro.br ? ele já sabe quem é esse servidor NS ?
-----Mensagem original-----
De: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em
nome de Leonardo Gutierres - Operação de Redes
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:00
Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
Assunto: Re: [GTER] POWERDNS Duvidas
Bom dia
Sim esta integrado com Mysql e estou usando poweradmin para administração
do mesmo.
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:19, Daniel Passos Martins <
daniel at logicasistemas.com.br> escreveu:
>
>
> Eu já usei ele e é muito bom.
> Vc está precisando de que no
> PowerDNS?
> Está usando ele integrado ao mysql?
>
> ---
>
> Daniel Passos
> Martins
> Lógica Sistemas - Natal/RN
> 84 3223.5009 - 9171.1020
> Conheça o
> Rio Grande do Norte
>
> Em 15/02/2013 08:30, Leonardo Gutierres - Operação
> de Redes escreveu:
>
> > Bom dia
> >
> > Recentemente estou usando powerdns
> dois servidores virtualizados master e
> > slave.
> > Gostaria de saber se
> alguem mais usa, e pode me dar uma dica de
> > configuração de DNS
> recursivo, sendo que ja criei a zona native
> > 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa,
> >
> criei dentro desta zona record do Tipo PTR para o IP desejado e record
> do
> > tipo NS apontando para os DNS.
> >
> > Onrigado
> > --
> > gter list
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp11351obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:13:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.88.72 with SMTP id z48mr3245530yhe.51.1360941200265;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:13:20 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si8671239yhk.20.2013.02.15.07.13.19;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:13:20 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id A993811F794;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:13:15 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (mail-vc0-f175.google.com
[209.85.220.175])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B751B11F794
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:51:07 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id fw7so2144548vcb.20
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:51:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=MnibMV5oyumsgpXNzpwwda0MgjBUET++SI4rv2bkpro=;
b=onRE0UZFH2RWKTsEvpJ+t7tf2E8CAoOI6oma4XbpS3lJeibY7UbTDzbG7wB/9TXkp9
+DU+gqQvH5f1MxBbRhZySKl0Oxep4FLWM7X3L3/aQFqBDa4mgB4NE6YtgmqvwC0M3vr2
pGkd8czYlLLmkhA1YHgGcWs+GNLd3CInbC/pSz3k2l/lwfngAN94wumcDebmENDV3BiV
ZvInNhMpxtC9/0VACTNKm/Ar6yhRr9ThvzWpwQ4Dkjs7KIs3IouCv6xrs5detilL07TS
pg9Cn8m7AASW6IQnp6YQ7But3CAyCfk+JEBaYkJLOC6yka37JUcXdNe9fKgty5NYghaP
CoNw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.149.81 with SMTP id s17mr3195961vcv.31.1360936266371;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:51:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.254.104 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 05:51:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGxniCXhOPG79QZxD5zqJ0=3i+qVWxhTGtjX906yB3LEWuHxeQ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGxniCXhOPG79QZxD5zqJ0=3i+qVWxhTGtjX906yB3LEWuHxeQ at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:51:05 -0200
Message-ID: <CABR=JGc7Hz59wSQempEjZCQi8Bpt7ArG_Ddrqw4OrgNo1a+3bQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Mihran Junior <mihran.kjunior at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:13:13 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Senhores,
Aproveitando o tema, estou com a mesma necessidade, mas para um projeto
maior, envolvendo preferencialmente um espaco dedicado (cage) em SP.
Saberiam me dizer quais provedores ainda trabalham com este modelo?
Abs
Mihran
On Friday, February 15, 2013, Lend <lend.sp at gmail.com> wrote:
> recomendo alog de tambore o dc é novo e bem moderno, bom SLA, e o preço é
> justo.
>
>
>
>
>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 01:25, Antonio Junior <anjunior at gmail.com
>escreveu:
>
>> Conheci o data center da MOB essa semana, fiquei impressionado.
>> É um data center container
>>
>>
http://www.mobtelecom.com.br/mob_corporativo/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=2&Itemid=85
>>
>>
>> --
>> Att,
>>
>> Antonio Junior
>>
>> Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 21:07, Juliano <mirandolli at gmail.com>
escreveu:
>> > Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
>> > Alguma recomendação?
>> >
>> > Obrigado
>> >
>> > Att.
>> > Juliano
>> > --
>> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> Leandro Souza
> (11)6716-2967 - OI
> (11)7188-1172 - VIVO
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Mihran K. Junior
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp11330obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:12:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.127.179 with SMTP id d39mr3321371yhi.20.1360941173429;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:12:53 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m23si8585094yhl.12.2013.02.15.07.12.53;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:12:53 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFECC11F78F;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:12:38 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from inexo.com.br (newquantum.inexo.com.br [187.17.38.36])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B85711F783
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:33:19 -0200 (BRST)
Received: (qmail 16247 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2013 14:33:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zaphod.inexo.com.br)
(2001:12c4:f0da:005e:0223:7dff:fe43:e7fb)
by 2001:12c4:f0da:005e:0000:0000:b010:c0c0 with SMTP;
15 Feb 2013 14:33:11 -0000
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:33:18 -0200 (BRST)
From: Danton Nunes <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>
X-X-Sender: danton at zaphod.inexo.com.br
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
In-Reply-To: <511E2667.9070206 at onda.net.br>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302151232370.15867 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
References: <021417d9ca7b2cd435475534c5d3f9a2 at tcheturbo.com.br>
<511E2667.9070206 at onda.net.br>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:12:37 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] VLAN em radios SIAE
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
T24gRnJpLCAxNSBGZWIgMjAxMywgQWxleGFuZHJlIEouIENvcnJlYSAoT25kYSkgd3JvdGU6Cgo+
IGEgbWVsaG9yIGZvcm1hIGRlIHJlc29sdmVyIGlzc28gZWggZGVpeGFyIG8gcmFkaW8gdHJhbnNw
YXJlbnRlIGUgY29sb2NhciAKPiAyIHN3aXRjaHMgb3Ugcm90ZWFkb3JlcyBuYXMgcG9udGFzIGZh
emVuZG8gZXNzZSAnc2VydmnDp28nIC4uLgoKc2ltLCBtYXMgY3VpZGFkbyBjb20gYSBNVFUuIE8g
csOhZGlvIHRlbSBxdWUgYWNvbW9kYXIgbyAndGFnJyBkYXMgVkxBTnMuCi0tCmd0ZXIgbGlzdCAg
ICBodHRwczovL2VuZy5yZWdpc3Ryby5ici9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2d0ZXI
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp11316obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:12:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.131.169 with SMTP id m29mr3014089yhi.114.1360941146409;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m23si8583861yhl.51.2013.02.15.07.12.25;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D742011F780;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:12:18 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-gg0-x22d.google.com (mail-gg0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c02::22d])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F89011F771
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:02:13 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-gg0-f173.google.com with SMTP id b6so106146ggm.32
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:02:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to;
bh=h/+o/1TpuL+EeNulH7Gn2v/obkUNwJZA+R7jIwetvOg=;
b=q7m3OD+67BDWat2jmsIeZrm4sY9tTjGwkVIZHypyqp/cZ7+ui9KhEf8+sYtlv3gqvR
aS7Q/aaXL+jOq5QkFl8y+bjrGHaB/b8dLssMYElw/fsrlmde5ocQNT24j3NyaGK/KAOe
SFff/X5Fl3YgMpTl3PHrlCzYFI9fCAwhj+3kW93Ttq6nNCHtGo/8t8RkxN25/Qt4qrOz
b/AzM02T7bHsKfCasPMYH+i7Li6Rf61sDqMZs8JRQryCJEmZAtr3dGhxklljrLQXyAhO
MwVPUc8OlV2atq5teIWNO/+cHYUsFFfLq9bbKoNU91o3L6cd1Z6VetakSnzHFr10b9L/
AfyQ=
X-Received: by 10.101.129.37 with SMTP id g37mr913996ann.15.1360940531723;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.89.245] ([177.16.247.44])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z41sm33245575yhh.8.2013.02.15.07.02.08
(version=TLSv1 cipherìDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits8/128);
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:02:10 -0800 (PST)
References: <CAPFY92FxA-t2f65KS7zGCny4UcV8+y19Dd9MmGeF+QFBi13c4A at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ETKamQ9yNqSTtPfivoJ45eW1ozrvn8W29XkTggdGOFPiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPFY92FAu6v1VLOPj6pg5boMdkR_VPMSbeiK3Z2+7Z_tYtgP-g at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ERTQw8Nxiß8uVyHt2PHt4oanmpStydnRVhUtPnZ7Juw at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMkf-ERTQw8Nxiß8uVyHt2PHt4oanmpStydnRVhUtPnZ7Juw at mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <A8E3A46A-62F9-4ABE-9168-4755B8BF3717 at gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A405)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Bruno_Araújo?= <bjaraujo at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 12:02:06 -0300
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:12:16 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] Transparent Proxy - Juniper Mx5-t
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Vm91IG5vdmF0byBlbSByb3RlYW1lbnRvIG1hcyBubyBtZXUgZW50ZW5kaW1lbnRvIGlzc28gbnVu
Y2EgZnVuY2lvbmFyw6EgY29tIHRwcm94eSBwb2lzIG8gcHJveHkgc29saWNpdGEgY29tIGlwIGRv
IGNsaWVudGUgZSBhIHJlc3Bvc3RhIGlyw6EgcGFyYSBvIGNsaWVudGUuIFRlbnRhciByZWRpcmVj
aW9uYXIgYXMgcmVzcG9zdGFzIMOgIHBvcnRhIDgwIHBhcmEgbyBwcm94eSDDqSBpbsO6dGlsIHBv
aXMgYSByZXNwb3N0YSBzZXLDoSBlbSBwb3J0YSBhbGVhdMOzcmlhIGRpZmVyZW50ZSBkYSA4MC4g
VHByb3h5IGZ1bmNpb25hcsOhIHNlIG8gcHJveHkgZXN0aXZlciBlbSAic8OpcmllIiBlbnRyZSBh
IHNhw61kYSBlIG9zIGNsaWVudGUuIAoKVGVudGUgYXRpdmFyIHdjY3AuCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19f
X18KQnJ1bm8gQXJhw7pqbwoKCkFudGVzIGRlIGltcHJpbWlyLCB2ZXJpZmlxdWUgc2UgdGVtIHBh
cGVsIGUgdGludGEgc3VmaWNpZW50ZSBuYSBpbXByZXNzb3JhLgoKRW0gMTUvMDIvMjAxMywgw6Bz
IDA5OjE0LCBSw7RuZXkgRWR1YXJkbyA8cm9uZXllZHVhcmRvc2FudG9zQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4gZXNj
cmV2ZXU6Cgo+IEVtIDE0IGRlIGZldmVyZWlybyBkZSAyMDEzIDE5OjE0LCBNYXJjb3MgVFAgPG1h
cmtpbm5AZ21haWwuY29tPiBlc2NyZXZldToKPiAKPj4gRXUgZml6IGFsZ28gc2ltaWxhciBhbyBx
dWUgdm9jw6ogaW5kaWNvdSAuCj4+IEEgcGVyZ3VudGEgYWdvcmEgc2VyaWEgb25kZSBjYWRhc3Ry
YXIgbyBmaWx0cm8gLiBOYXMgaW50ZXJmYWNlcyBkZSBlbnRyYWRhCj4+IElTUCBjZXJ0byA/Cj4+
IAo+IAo+IAo+IFNlZ3VpbnRlOgo+IAo+ICAxKSBRdWFuZG8gaW4taW50ZXJmYWNlPUxBTl8odHLD
oWZlZ28gZG9zIGNsaWVudGVzKSwKPiBzcmMtYWRkcmVzcz1TZXUtYmxvY28tSVAsIGRzdC1hZGRy
ZXNzPTAuMC4wLjAvMCwgZHN0LXBvcnQ9ODAsCj4gZGVmaW5lLW5leHQtaG9wPUlQLU1BUkEKPiAK
PiAgMikgUXVhbmRvIGluLWludGVyZmFjZT1XQU5fKHRyw6Juc2l0byhzKSBvdSBQVFQocykpLCBz
cmMtYWRkcmVzcz0wLjAuMC4wLzAsCj4gc3JjLXBvcnQ9ODAsIGRzdC1hZGRyZXNzPVNldS1ibG9j
by1JUCwgZGVmaW5lLW5leHQtaG9wPUlQLU1BUkEKPiAKPiAtLQo+IFLDtG5leSBFZHVhcmRvCj4g
LS0KPiBndGVyIGxpc3QgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly9lbmcucmVnaXN0cm8uYnIvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5m
by9ndGVyCi0tCmd0ZXIgbGlzdCAgICBodHRwczovL2VuZy5yZWdpc3Ryby5ici9tYWlsbWFuL2xp
c3RpbmZvL2d0ZXI
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp11759obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:22:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.183.168 with SMTP id q28mr3095910yhm.131.1360941725243;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w17si23442124anh.59.2013.02.15.07.22.04;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@onda.net.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8C311F791;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:21:53 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from cube.onda.net.br
(2001-12ac-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0005.v6.onda.net.br [IPv6:2001:12ac::5])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29F1011F779
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:16:01 -0200 (BRST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onda.net.br;
sÞfault;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
bh=m+D5evrUMKWeuObT5k2VRZasig9PNGqXEGuXkmbMg5I=;
b=QcIihCGy7K3WEv8vMwGRdnIcdyO/AuaD7wOj+Vr8ur7zodC/ln+DvUgR//4CZifwf96fGlnNPypMWkpOTiRdp3deiWjUBCVVAIPxE9G5XxufB6pTDJPEWSCJPZvEtiV3;
Received: from static-189-84-12-3.v4.onda.net.br ([189.84.12.3]:49922
helo=[192.168.2.250])
by cube.onda.net.br with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexandre at onda.net.br>)
id 1U6N12-0001d7-Gt
for gter at eng.registro.br; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:15:56 -0200
Message-ID: <511E5122.1080108 at onda.net.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:15:46 -0200
From: "Alexandre J. Correa (Onda)" <alexandre at onda.net.br>
Organization: Onda Internet Ltda.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <021417d9ca7b2cd435475534c5d3f9a2 at tcheturbo.com.br>
<511E2667.9070206 at onda.net.br>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302151232370.15867 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302151232370.15867 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
X-cPanel-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-cPanel-MailScanner-ID: 1U6N12-0001d7-Gt
X-cPanel-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
Provider for details
X-cPanel-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-cPanel-MailScanner-From: alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Spam-Status: No
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cube.onda.net.br
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eng.registro.br
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - onda.net.br
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cube.onda.net.br: authenticated_id:
alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:21:51 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] VLAN em radios SIAE
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp11776obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:22:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.183.168 with SMTP id q28mr3097325yhm.131.1360941746737;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r20si24800489ann.45.2013.02.15.07.22.26;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F72411F7B5;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:22:02 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (ie-in-x022f.1e100.net
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E57411F779
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:19:02 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c12so4935579ieb.34
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:18:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh›/fFnj32m1UxwOpH+VB4UUmKAM0tcdXeS7JiBNc+xI=;
b=QFnWqpM4AFhAXY6VEPrumU97LfCO2op1RtHUfQufdOKSyUBQtG7fRnkzwYFpvEZ8w8
+fghe8jwkcriWxRIuoYVbWAFcio3bziTpQAGk2tG3YVO8XIEgwPPWwP9/P7+fu6DHfmF
C9eWR1xvtRtQRuYCw6kUT9dLhpiSo61bUR0Uc7ghOSjW9x8QiPbPBCaBZFkoZiP503/T
aaNHjmqLZS5XnSZNsc1J5icQRu3oTw2Mba93Vzk+1DZfx/snLn85zYkh0FNDfqvYDEsE
EV+gUeQFwybuY7/61W+//x5nFuOcJhjUo2x5mYtWsTGcTgtfB5KKvcb/26DrmZ1NyYna
RaXg=
X-Received: by 10.50.181.136 with SMTP id dw8mr2844535igc.39.1360941529124;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:18:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.157.196 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:18:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <A8E3A46A-62F9-4ABE-9168-4755B8BF3717 at gmail.com>
References: <CAPFY92FxA-t2f65KS7zGCny4UcV8+y19Dd9MmGeF+QFBi13c4A at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ETKamQ9yNqSTtPfivoJ45eW1ozrvn8W29XkTggdGOFPiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPFY92FAu6v1VLOPj6pg5boMdkR_VPMSbeiK3Z2+7Z_tYtgP-g at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ERTQw8Nxiß8uVyHt2PHt4oanmpStydnRVhUtPnZ7Juw at mail.gmail.com>
<A8E3A46A-62F9-4ABE-9168-4755B8BF3717 at gmail.com>
From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:18:28 -0200
Message-ID: <CAKEr4RRMvXNf0eFRxc63vVQtW8PtWpj=mrd2Ren1ELkC9RiYJA at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:22:00 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Transparent Proxy - Juniper Mx5-t
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
SRC!=DST
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 13:02, Bruno Araújo <bjaraujo at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Vou novato em roteamento mas no meu entendimento isso nunca funcionará com
> tproxy pois o proxy solicita com ip do cliente e a resposta irá para o
> cliente. Tentar redirecionar as respostas à porta 80 para o proxy é inútil
> pois a resposta será em porta aleatória diferente da 80. Tproxy funcionará
> se o proxy estiver em "série" entre a saída e os cliente.
>
> Tente ativar wccp.
>
> _______________
> Bruno Araújo
>
>
> Antes de imprimir, verifique se tem papel e tinta suficiente na impressora.
>
> Em 15/02/2013, às 09:14, Rôney Eduardo <roneyeduardosantos at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> > Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 19:14, Marcos TP <markinn at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
> >
> >> Eu fiz algo similar ao que você indicou .
> >> A pergunta agora seria onde cadastrar o filtro . Nas interfaces de
> entrada
> >> ISP certo ?
> >>
> >
> >
> > Seguinte:
> >
> > 1) Quando in-interface=LAN_(tráfego dos clientes),
> > src-address=Seu-bloco-IP, dst-address=0.0.0.0/0, dst-port=80,
> > define-next-hop=IP-MARA
> >
> > 2) Quando in-interface=WAN_(trânsito(s) ou PTT(s)), src-address=
> 0.0.0.0/0,
> > src-port=80, dst-address=Seu-bloco-IP, define-next-hop=IP-MARA
> >
> > --
> > Rôney Eduardo
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Douglas Fernando Fischer
Engº de Controle e Automação
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp16189obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:54:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.49.10 with SMTP id b10mr1014499ank.22.1360947263973;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si8951048yhk.124.2013.02.15.08.54.23;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA77C11F7CE;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:53:55 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-gg0-x236.google.com (gg-in-x0236.1e100.net
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c02::236])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB91F11F779
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:28:38 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-gg0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d1so113964ggn.27
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:28:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=m3wRmGyQw17sMwp46H7HIACn9a1D1CWqsmOrHRTmwUQ=;
b=V8A335uoC6DyEdyo5shHvPPDCVzJZWBuQ35iyBZE8HO4eoAB/gXXsUsczBIuTpWs0R
3YmjPrdWmXM2lYl/qTGeHsPhtcui3LD2/3u86PF8rXPNhLSY3Ib8AplWyLBAga4CdDI0
8HNd0wzv6hsOz7WmrWjKlThGXZ5jhZKBX6d8Wk4RgHKHVuhxN6uI6GJH7nk666ozTD4N
Ob/FCDWMkChVLbaGD7F/yuBfZ7sJxGG904NaY10Pfo+VMLZiesoXiDwTgp7+p6Wl1twz
y6EQW8jvWTXW8UBfA437d3ePsjNiuUL7gfbrNqxjfINiYztbmSMn9SkW3epRLpaCYeqd
pl9Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.198.132 with SMTP id eo4mr246711qcb.86.1360942117564;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.171.94 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:28:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511E5122.1080108 at onda.net.br>
References: <021417d9ca7b2cd435475534c5d3f9a2 at tcheturbo.com.br>
<511E2667.9070206 at onda.net.br>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302151232370.15867 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<511E5122.1080108 at onda.net.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:28:37 -0200
Message-ID: <CAHf3uWwLeYxezVryXbOssAfSyM8u-ejšG4fab6zLfFXLcP=g at mail.gmail.com>
From: Eduardo Schoedler <listas at esds.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlfNw3PiAjYMe1hVac3YBeYZI9OnuhIP/w85Q/YPQzd3nlFcDWH4uyyIAbdsmpPsWUy3HlD
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:53:54 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] VLAN em radios SIAE
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Dá e sobra, se não tiver nenhum outro overhead.
--
Eduardo Schoedler
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 13:15, Alexandre J. Correa (Onda) <
alexandre at onda.net.br> escreveu:
> Bem lembrado... o Max Packet Size dessa IDU/RADIO default são 2048 bytes
>
> On 15/02/2013 12:33, Danton Nunes wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Alexandre J. Correa (Onda) wrote:
>>
>> a melhor forma de resolver isso eh deixar o radio transparente e colocar
>>> 2 switchs ou roteadores nas pontas fazendo esse 'serviço' ...
>>>
>>
>> sim, mas cuidado com a MTU. O rádio tem que acomodar o 'tag' das VLANs.
>>
>
> --
> Sds.
> Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp16229obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:55:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.120.101 with SMTP id o65mr3536929yhh.57.1360947304214;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si8946190yhi.50.2013.02.15.08.55.03;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602D911F7DE;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:54:29 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com
[209.85.212.174])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41B8B11F79D
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:35:01 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hi8so1309202wib.7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:34:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=5JdtPX7lxdaQpSoD08d9nV4noOmNbmnoe3emGUp9uzQ=;
bÞhNSo7xRHT0M7lIpSaY6MF7QTJP1i8U+w8yAk9BLAyDeHU6Fg0jfqq9OkmRjQiste
UUjj3/E/4ENb56ZkrzvZfUeED6+7Is2OCwsQ0QzbqUxYAeS1jMVWrRrrFVIfD84lRRgv
jwsfejKjBXDQq794Wfj0AP4fIldUGKxQuMyz7Gaq2dofqEVFStdnL2bH5keNbf7KMQs7
bCkeAyOkYaUpyhBh7JB+wG81KsWBOqqao33uCX0sKWXAkH2borjAYvcTuv+Nw58WwNQ+
W6eB9BzcfRGlJPeJipOomiWApA6MR83Nm1Nt5ykxr3nikaTl2gnbvEuap97Bl1gRSki/
iRyg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.75.110 with SMTP id b14mr6847652wiw.21.1360942499239;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:34:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.88.196 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:34:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <28E5A23C64854C36B396402621FBE1B9 at TI01>
References: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
<5f9fa65bec268b5185b4600a2ab3b1c7 at logicasistemas.com.br>
<CAGiBWQC6DkoNptbvrqoeidN2DGKAGRopnaF=aXbe1GU_Ng4ckg at mail.gmail.com>
<28E5A23C64854C36B396402621FBE1B9 at TI01>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:34:59 -0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: LsiEx3_VJ7BrdpUYNprknDS97i4
Message-ID: <CAGiBWQCEX1MDXgmXfNNqYXwSCWZDVZg_8eo4kwozWF7ing1Npw at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_Gutierres_-_Operação_de_Redes? <leonardo at vibeti.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:54:27 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] RES: POWERDNS Duvidas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Boa tarde Tarde Rodrigo
Isto estou falando de reverso fiz exatamente isto que você citou e na
registro BR ja coloquei meus dois DNS.
Seguinte quando criei dentro das zona in-addr.arpa do tipo NS os IP ficara
com terminação 0 exemplo 0.XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa esta certo?
Quanto tempo leva pra propagar os reversos.
Obrigado pela ajuda
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 11:39, Rodrigo Augusto
<rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br>escreveu:
> Leonardo, voce deve esta falando em reverso não?!
> Dentro dessa zona reversa crie 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa do tipo NS apontando
> para ns1.nomedoservidorns.com.br
> Depois cria 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa do tipo PTR para o nome do servidor em
> questão...
> Já fez a alteração lá no registro.br ? ele já sabe quem é esse servidor
> NS ?
>
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em
> nome de Leonardo Gutierres - Operação de Redes
> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:00
> Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> Assunto: Re: [GTER] POWERDNS Duvidas
>
> Bom dia
>
> Sim esta integrado com Mysql e estou usando poweradmin para administração
> do mesmo.
>
>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:19, Daniel Passos Martins <
> daniel at logicasistemas.com.br> escreveu:
>
> >
> >
> > Eu já usei ele e é muito bom.
> > Vc está precisando de que no
> > PowerDNS?
> > Está usando ele integrado ao mysql?
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Daniel Passos
> > Martins
> > Lógica Sistemas - Natal/RN
> > 84 3223.5009 - 9171.1020
> > Conheça o
> > Rio Grande do Norte
> >
> > Em 15/02/2013 08:30, Leonardo Gutierres - Operação
> > de Redes escreveu:
> >
> > > Bom dia
> > >
> > > Recentemente estou usando powerdns
> > dois servidores virtualizados master e
> > > slave.
> > > Gostaria de saber se
> > alguem mais usa, e pode me dar uma dica de
> > > configuração de DNS
> > recursivo, sendo que ja criei a zona native
> > > 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa,
> > >
> > criei dentro desta zona record do Tipo PTR para o IP desejado e record
> > do
> > > tipo NS apontando para os DNS.
> > >
> > > Onrigado
> > > --
> > > gter list
> > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1]
> >
> >
> > Links:
> > ------
> > [1]
> > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp16155obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:53:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.114.13 with SMTP id b13mr3746585yhh.11.1360947217763;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:53:37 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a27si8918637yhn.93.2013.02.15.08.53.37;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:53:37 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F6D11F7BA;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:53:32 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3FBC11F79D
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:37:27 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k11so4879660iea.24
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:37:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=JMSi/0KbHCgYWCTgQyd5DhPJMdorKE9zzuEo7zWKZ1Y=;
bø0StBXVyWL8RwmS1GYDhvJ/plYIDf3PZ5F7PczDpMHIKowEfzEWSyRhy8dajnh/Ib
d6Ld3DhagPzN0WZ0GfBL8C22EDNLOe1iWeCsVNa3zyTTZFA2eI8j7HkFzI8WIJI388GE
yJf9iGCCUZyBFPRsmngf0a51Dl+KMkMyy8hfDh/ZKwBGVFMSKB9DlBPt8QKqWK9w/7Ft
sj8j6gfTaaCzozLYjOg/mD3gKunfNVY4qP/lXnQnSiOpXXH4ID1mrvLtBkwCCXCKJrA9
e+NfLGkkc66G7lHeDBg3LKK9SQloSYJF5tPhQbDyolE3noi+tnFqeczEe/4hTJ+A2e1y
+3nw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.29.69 with SMTP id q5mr1810806icc.54.1360942643249; Fri,
15 Feb 2013 07:37:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.125.72 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:37:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.125.72 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:37:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABR=JGc7Hz59wSQempEjZCQi8Bpt7ArG_Ddrqw4OrgNo1a+3bQ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGxniCXhOPG79QZxD5zqJ0=3i+qVWxhTGtjX906yB3LEWuHxeQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CABR=JGc7Hz59wSQempEjZCQi8Bpt7ArG_Ddrqw4OrgNo1a+3bQ at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:37:23 -0200
Message-ID: <CAFAfM5rgdN-1SkOvC6SWZ=Vd=1hQRg+omgkdDJqVoE6=SG4a2g at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rafael Cresci <cresci at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:53:30 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Tem ideua de tamanho do cage ja?
On Feb 15, 2013 1:13 PM, "Mihran Junior" <mihran.kjunior at gmail.com> wrote:
> Senhores,
>
> Aproveitando o tema, estou com a mesma necessidade, mas para um projeto
> maior, envolvendo preferencialmente um espaco dedicado (cage) em SP.
> Saberiam me dizer quais provedores ainda trabalham com este modelo?
>
> Abs
> Mihran
>
>
> On Friday, February 15, 2013, Lend <lend.sp at gmail.com> wrote:
> > recomendo alog de tambore o dc é novo e bem moderno, bom SLA, e o preço é
> > justo.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 01:25, Antonio Junior <anjunior at gmail.com
> >escreveu:
> >
> >> Conheci o data center da MOB essa semana, fiquei impressionado.
> >> É um data center container
> >>
> >>
>
> http://www.mobtelecom.com.br/mob_corporativo/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=2&Itemid=85
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Att,
> >>
> >> Antonio Junior
> >>
> >> Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 21:07, Juliano <mirandolli at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
> >> > Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
> >> > Alguma recomendação?
> >> >
> >> > Obrigado
> >> >
> >> > Att.
> >> > Juliano
> >> > --
> >> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >> --
> >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Leandro Souza
> > (11)6716-2967 - OI
> > (11)7188-1172 - VIVO
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
> --
> Mihran K. Junior
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp16244obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:55:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.158.138 with SMTP id q10mr3535512yhk.59.1360947323079;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:55:23 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l41si8785588yho.53.2013.02.15.08.55.22;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:55:23 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411F311F7E1;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:54:40 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E42711F79D
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:40:41 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 16so2904675wgi.27
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:40:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=ckBqHTNF1c6KVT7AgbBdFMk49+mJY/v4QhtXA5i4kUY=;
b=rst0k4JdcIcshw4iEYWwTByr9jhNELH6nHWZ20CsXTq6t7XdC332qqamGW7kS9Pct8
ge1nAS9uZAcAPuIqI9obSHh/jK2p2lPQiRvT6kQ2t7FZiX6ed2wLb10rTooUSA/lq1sS
De0B87IpblYmirT8jbUjERGutMWZOrZMD9llAbv9ifjLdeUMZi7vFJa3kYRVGkI2TeeG
1b4L3WFCb487O5xgFpm0VngJUXdC+8WhRMC4YRAezUwt/KZbRgxFfTOxsB8e7RTTRH/4
rJJAYHD2XTYdS6k0lvIht5DYdPpFV44zQ+Q3wguZ5syTPl6FYedT7opL5uS/JTQkHxNu
6EGg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.83.105 with SMTP id p9mr5046487wjy.56.1360942840130;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:40:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.88.196 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:40:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGiBWQCEX1MDXgmXfNNqYXwSCWZDVZg_8eo4kwozWF7ing1Npw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
<5f9fa65bec268b5185b4600a2ab3b1c7 at logicasistemas.com.br>
<CAGiBWQC6DkoNptbvrqoeidN2DGKAGRopnaF=aXbe1GU_Ng4ckg at mail.gmail.com>
<28E5A23C64854C36B396402621FBE1B9 at TI01>
<CAGiBWQCEX1MDXgmXfNNqYXwSCWZDVZg_8eo4kwozWF7ing1Npw at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:40:40 -0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8mO3rM2xVP971YHZI1RWQk3lTzM
Message-ID: <CAGiBWQAvRkEbcRmn+kWzDr4GaHaJVYwGXrrafZUWmQfwz0x1cg at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_Gutierres_-_Operação_de_Redes? <leonardo at vibeti.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:54:38 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] RES: POWERDNS Duvidas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Boa tarde
Seguinte pessoal obrigado a ajuda de todos
Realmente em recursos de numeração tem que delegar.
Irei testar qualquer duvida aviso
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 13:34, Leonardo Gutierres - Operação de Redes <
leonardo at vibeti.com.br> escreveu:
> Boa tarde Tarde Rodrigo
>
> Isto estou falando de reverso fiz exatamente isto que você citou e na
> registro BR ja coloquei meus dois DNS.
> Seguinte quando criei dentro das zona in-addr.arpa do tipo NS os IP ficara
> com terminação 0 exemplo 0.XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa esta certo?
> Quanto tempo leva pra propagar os reversos.
>
> Obrigado pela ajuda
>
>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 11:39, Rodrigo Augusto <rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br
> > escreveu:
>
> Leonardo, voce deve esta falando em reverso não?!
>> Dentro dessa zona reversa crie 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa do tipo NS
>> apontando
>> para ns1.nomedoservidorns.com.br
>> Depois cria 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa do tipo PTR para o nome do servidor em
>> questão...
>> Já fez a alteração lá no registro.br ? ele já sabe quem é esse servidor
>> NS ?
>>
>>
>> -----Mensagem original-----
>> De: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em
>> nome de Leonardo Gutierres - Operação de Redes
>> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:00
>> Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
>> Assunto: Re: [GTER] POWERDNS Duvidas
>>
>> Bom dia
>>
>> Sim esta integrado com Mysql e estou usando poweradmin para administração
>> do mesmo.
>>
>>
>> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:19, Daniel Passos Martins <
>> daniel at logicasistemas.com.br> escreveu:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Eu já usei ele e é muito bom.
>> > Vc está precisando de que no
>> > PowerDNS?
>> > Está usando ele integrado ao mysql?
>> >
>> > ---
>> >
>> > Daniel Passos
>> > Martins
>> > Lógica Sistemas - Natal/RN
>> > 84 3223.5009 - 9171.1020
>> > Conheça o
>> > Rio Grande do Norte
>> >
>> > Em 15/02/2013 08:30, Leonardo Gutierres - Operação
>> > de Redes escreveu:
>> >
>> > > Bom dia
>> > >
>> > > Recentemente estou usando powerdns
>> > dois servidores virtualizados master e
>> > > slave.
>> > > Gostaria de saber se
>> > alguem mais usa, e pode me dar uma dica de
>> > > configuração de DNS
>> > recursivo, sendo que ja criei a zona native
>> > > 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa,
>> > >
>> > criei dentro desta zona record do Tipo PTR para o IP desejado e record
>> > do
>> > > tipo NS apontando para os DNS.
>> > >
>> > > Onrigado
>> > > --
>> > > gter list
>> > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1]
>> >
>> >
>> > Links:
>> > ------
>> > [1]
>> > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> > --
>> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>
>>
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>
>
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp16128obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:53:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.122.238 with SMTP id t74mr3472677yhh.78.1360947190825;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d33si24901645anp.67.2013.02.15.08.53.10;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id F018611F79F;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:53:06 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com
[209.85.160.44])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D7E311F775
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:51:48 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id wz12so652483pbc.3
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:51:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=6M9wUJ95gcwVxdseIdfbtgqxalBx39b8asQJDtsZ6DE=;
b=Nij5UGmRy/DJ0NyJS1BycHdIZKTvKKlnfLbf3chVibiCcI+KfmxFFVmGo9qFe5GO+f
fxPllUH/xV4/XGcPy3lWLdl/xDTO272s4f4fUt/2JIFyndHyXBttVSbK4fA+Pgul8zTK
Xjw1m9XIrzDjYlfUvNxEVBgbBBUliK3wBnPV2sAU9DQXXpz/iC2zkKctvbPSMMcT+1XR
FBZd2Qbz0ZOLQLAHiboJ7BG2lcq/NmLFYVne6i8no8ntCcf2xz6wgye5I1ywvDFiVw0D
vfvBxIx0Vrlip8nrlTfYr2fISqdNClZ4ui60k45JQfHf2fxaIKhTCs83JJ0lQgVQK9OA
JnvA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.189.71 with SMTP id gg7mr7260680pbc.15.1360943506080;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.126.13 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:51:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKEr4RRMvXNf0eFRxc63vVQtW8PtWpj=mrd2Ren1ELkC9RiYJA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPFY92FxA-t2f65KS7zGCny4UcV8+y19Dd9MmGeF+QFBi13c4A at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ETKamQ9yNqSTtPfivoJ45eW1ozrvn8W29XkTggdGOFPiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPFY92FAu6v1VLOPj6pg5boMdkR_VPMSbeiK3Z2+7Z_tYtgP-g at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ERTQw8Nxiß8uVyHt2PHt4oanmpStydnRVhUtPnZ7Juw at mail.gmail.com>
<A8E3A46A-62F9-4ABE-9168-4755B8BF3717 at gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RRMvXNf0eFRxc63vVQtW8PtWpj=mrd2Ren1ELkC9RiYJA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:51:45 -0200
Message-ID: <CAPFY92FBiWxM5nr5s=NUsO6NG7Zt1mV8uKbz+L0PZ5vSsp8Q9g at mail.gmail.com>
From: Marcos TP <markinn at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:53:04 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Transparent Proxy - Juniper Mx5-t
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Caros ,
testei as soluções apresentadas e gostaria de informar que ainda não
consegui o resultado que queria .
Irei relatar algumas novas informações
No meu proxy , existe uma ferramenta que testa spoof de ip .
Eu consigo ver se o proxy consegue assumir o ip origem do cliente .
Em todos os testes está dando falha .
Tendo isso como informação , estou deduzindo que o filtro de retorno das
requisições está funcionando , porem a rota está se perdendo
no meu roteador , pois não retorna até o proxy .
O contador do filtro está incrementando , porem pelo tcpdump do proxy , o
pacote não retorna do site até ele .
Acho que o Juniper está priorizando os roteamentos padrões e ignora a rotas
instancia que criai para voltar ao cache .
Veja o filtro de saida :
filter Cachemara_Internet {
term dest_80 {
from {
destination-address {
classe-filtrada-para passar pelo proxy/32;
}
protocol tcp;
source-port 80;
}
then {
count entrada;
log;
routing-instance Cachemara_Internet;
}
}
term default {
then accept;
}
}
instancia
routing-instances {
Cachemara_Internet {
instance-type forwarding;
routing-options {
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 {
next-hop ip do cachemara;
preference 1;
}
}
}
}
A minha rib está :
rib-groups {
Cachemara_Internet {
import-rib [ inet.0 Cachemara_Subscriber.inet.0
Cachemara_Internet.inet.0 ];
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 13:18, Douglas Fischer
<fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
> SRC!=DST
>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 13:02, Bruno Araújo <bjaraujo at gmail.com
> >escreveu:
>
> > Vou novato em roteamento mas no meu entendimento isso nunca funcionará
> com
> > tproxy pois o proxy solicita com ip do cliente e a resposta irá para o
> > cliente. Tentar redirecionar as respostas à porta 80 para o proxy é
> inútil
> > pois a resposta será em porta aleatória diferente da 80. Tproxy
> funcionará
> > se o proxy estiver em "série" entre a saída e os cliente.
> >
> > Tente ativar wccp.
> >
> > _______________
> > Bruno Araújo
> >
> >
> > Antes de imprimir, verifique se tem papel e tinta suficiente na
> impressora.
> >
> > Em 15/02/2013, às 09:14, Rôney Eduardo <roneyeduardosantos at gmail.com>
> > escreveu:
> >
> > > Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 19:14, Marcos TP <markinn at gmail.com>
> > escreveu:
> > >
> > >> Eu fiz algo similar ao que você indicou .
> > >> A pergunta agora seria onde cadastrar o filtro . Nas interfaces de
> > entrada
> > >> ISP certo ?
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > Seguinte:
> > >
> > > 1) Quando in-interface=LAN_(tráfego dos clientes),
> > > src-address=Seu-bloco-IP, dst-address=0.0.0.0/0, dst-port=80,
> > > define-next-hop=IP-MARA
> > >
> > > 2) Quando in-interface=WAN_(trânsito(s) ou PTT(s)), src-address=
> > 0.0.0.0/0,
> > > src-port=80, dst-address=Seu-bloco-IP, define-next-hop=IP-MARA
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rôney Eduardo
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Douglas Fernando Fischer
> Engº de Controle e Automação
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp16210obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:54:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.144.36 with SMTP id m24mr3452218yhj.104.1360947284191;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e69si8906659yhm.91.2013.02.15.08.54.43;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E08811F7D6;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:54:14 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-yh0-x22b.google.com (mail-yh0-x22b.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22b])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7ECF11F782
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:04:56 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z6so548109yhz.16
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:04:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id
:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer
:thread-index:x-mimeole;
bh=FyIa6XVCZATdkpxViug6Mm8apPKr7i46L63Qa8mqBBw=;
b=MbZ2OWenwYhjvuygBHi1EwF+C/iBM572EO3sseNTkxRyd5HfRniYdfPPFG2sZqGTwd
7A4Nr/POfmApLdIp4lLlsYSOP4p2ckrKisCXhb/VXZLaWq/isrlCTXWC5tMJtu+CkIM6
A/kgLZ46WB6joewoIiqi2seXuYKZ95YGMSh4QiLJAQm+HfJeW5b1OpNliBgEDvvTxrnh
1QoKmFszPg5P0BfLGX1eRSASHf1s19G1Gp3uoE1Vxkez8Wq4NVYSTrzdfNbIhUx1g6Gk
OqjFl97OAILSEOe3KbI5rX5WZd6g66Ta0X8hkLGYStayoyxNdXQm3goN5EJvWTQkhJtw
AvFg=
X-Received: by 10.236.81.7 with SMTP id l7mr3316178yhe.112.1360944295676;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:04:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NOTETLD ([177.139.94.62])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x16sm90371877yhj.6.2013.02.15.08.04.53
(version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits8/128);
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:04:54 -0800 (PST)
From: "lscrlstld" <lscrlstld at gmail.com>
To: "'Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes'"
<gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:04:53 -0200
Message-ID: <EDE94863B35A4FB48B6C2ECAD4061338 at NOTETLD>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Ac4LLzFeAJLaYrizQq+s2h2HO6XVuQAZblkA
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:54:13 -0200
Subject: [GTER] RES: Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
> > Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
> > Alguma recomendação?
> >
> > Obrigado
> >
A Ascenty estava construindo um IDC Tier III Campinas, talvez esteja pronto.
Na época o preço estava normal, não tinham entrado naquela loucura de
"preços altos e racks vazios" que alguns IDCs com febre de 40 graus tentaram
praticar o ano passado.
Vale a pena verificar, foge do eixo SP/RJ e principalmente do transito
infernal de SP.
Há tb a CTBC/Algar em Campinas.
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp16179obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:54:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.142.4 with SMTP id h4mr3543895yhj.58.1360947245312;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:54:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k65si8864686yhj.127.2013.02.15.08.54.04;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:54:05 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC51711F7D0;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:53:39 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258F211F7A2
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:16:43 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f176.google.com with SMTP id k13so4861162iea.7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:16:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=r/7KkXwkkjkuQO4U/LJ2xLW4JChru09Jcvb3iPfegRc=;
b=RaYo4xtvwusz9BE5A/XMbynTthwZCxIDBZImtZu4B33ni/lENlpkqyt4AcjPUAIbv7
Hy6QbC98nK8AXd9UboPWghzWgvkwHhCLW6DnLgoqP4TRtbZvwbZmqweZNc/UCxeD74xb
2J62MYWGxNRfBDg+tFEd81wQplIV8OOxFxAg8fMx293xjIBbAsfrsQOWWZbwTW2VUzKb
zfwDkjWKgqKZ3kMV5S4JnEJzN579hNSFLAvXe8R31lnD42rVTLl2wrgn754MUpxYM7s9
n9v8vi9k+lhW/3etFv/yNbTaPdf8LamPjjFyCupP66v29VUtMO/cj/VCskiLKExzpLUt
r7uw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.151.166 with SMTP id ur6mr2224155igb.66.1360945001624;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.53.100 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:16:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABR=JGc7Hz59wSQempEjZCQi8Bpt7ArG_Ddrqw4OrgNo1a+3bQ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGxniCXhOPG79QZxD5zqJ0=3i+qVWxhTGtjX906yB3LEWuHxeQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CABR=JGc7Hz59wSQempEjZCQi8Bpt7ArG_Ddrqw4OrgNo1a+3bQ at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:16:41 -0200
Message-ID: <CAAT-R6W9C+RdeEjq5Lmy7TEkzoSkUWH9ANHnDM6svwbfNov3pg at mail.gmail.com>
From: Felipe <felipe.zatta at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:53:37 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Por curiosidade, quanto se paga aproximadamente por esse serviço?
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 11:51, Mihran Junior
<mihran.kjunior at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Senhores,
>
> Aproveitando o tema, estou com a mesma necessidade, mas para um projeto
> maior, envolvendo preferencialmente um espaco dedicado (cage) em SP.
> Saberiam me dizer quais provedores ainda trabalham com este modelo?
>
> Abs
> Mihran
>
>
> On Friday, February 15, 2013, Lend <lend.sp at gmail.com> wrote:
> > recomendo alog de tambore o dc é novo e bem moderno, bom SLA, e o preço é
> > justo.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 01:25, Antonio Junior <anjunior at gmail.com
> >escreveu:
> >
> >> Conheci o data center da MOB essa semana, fiquei impressionado.
> >> É um data center container
> >>
> >>
>
> http://www.mobtelecom.com.br/mob_corporativo/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=2&Itemid=85
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Att,
> >>
> >> Antonio Junior
> >>
> >> Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 21:07, Juliano <mirandolli at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
> >> > Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
> >> > Alguma recomendação?
> >> >
> >> > Obrigado
> >> >
> >> > Att.
> >> > Juliano
> >> > --
> >> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >> --
> >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Leandro Souza
> > (11)6716-2967 - OI
> > (11)7188-1172 - VIVO
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
> --
> Mihran K. Junior
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Felipe Zatta
(11) 7226-0734
www.zattainfor.p8.com.br
msn: felipe at p8.com.br
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp17266obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:18:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.141.74 with SMTP id f50mr3692932yhj.73.1360948685023;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:18:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c10si24932700anp.134.2013.02.15.09.18.04;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:18:05 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5374911F7DD;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:18:00 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from smtpar3.telefonica.com (smtpar3.telefonica.com [200.106.242.18])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF9B11F78A
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:08:42 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from smtpar3.telefonica.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90635160175
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:11:03 -0200 (ARST)
Received: from ARCRSMSP021.latam.telefonica.corp (unknown [10.167.136.76])
by smtpar3.telefonica.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E4E1601BA
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:11:03 -0200 (ARST)
Received: from BRTSVMSP017.latam.telefonica.corp (10.236.3.30) by
ARCRSMSP021.latam.telefonica.corp (10.167.136.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:08:38 -0300
Received: from BRTSCMSP030.latam.telefonica.corp ([169.254.1.104]) by
BRTSVMSP017.latam.telefonica.corp ([10.236.3.30]) with mapi; Fri, 15 Feb 2013
15:08:30 -0200
From: "Richard Molina" <richardm.molina at telefonica.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:08:28 -0200
Thread-Topic: [GTER] DHCP Address Reservation - Junos SRX
Thread-Index: Ac4K55a1T9qN3eukR/ut68A3YuPCngAtz6Fg
Message-ID: <FD2AAA95B138544AB7334D56ED4E5EC201FE217D60 at BRTSCMSP030.latam.telefonica.corp>
References: <CAJC0x0Fx8cunfk4PbYydhQpgpGwczt8yesDyspF=qgBPNPoq8Q at mail.gmail.com>
<CAHdsvN52CK0k_N8gi2qgd2rfAxVk64tqWfj66vi5SkwnpQXPiA at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHdsvN52CK0k_N8gi2qgd2rfAxVk64tqWfj66vi5SkwnpQXPiA at mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: pt-BR, en-US
Content-Language: pt-BR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: pt-BR, en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-8.2.0.1391-7.0.0.1014-19640.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--54.497-4.5-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--54.497-4.5-31-10; No--54.497-5.0-31-10;
No--54.497-7.0-31-10
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No;No;No
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-8.2.0.1391-7.0.1014-19640.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--54.497100-5.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: hCh0oeymdwBWFvP6IOW2DeLdprnA5EQR0azm64vJSibH9uSDdG8zXuB2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X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:17:58 -0200
Subject: [GTER] RES: DHCP Address Reservation - Junos SRX
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp17304obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:18:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.124.208 with SMTP id x56mr3612408yhh.67.1360948732278;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si9021127yhk.137.2013.02.15.09.18.51;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3BD11F7F8;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:18:49 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from blu0-omc1-s32.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s32.blu0.hotmail.com
[65.55.116.43])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D3711F7BC
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:15:03 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from BLU170-DS22 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s32.blu0.hotmail.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:15:00 -0800
X-EIP: [Wq49aiICyN2eqFUuvQ1lKUvSCyMNDHv6]
X-Originating-Email: [fabio_schorn at hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU170-DS2262A19BAB41506E57DE8CF80E0 at phx.gbl>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fábio_Schorn?= <fabio_schorn at hotmail.com>
To: "'Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes'"
<gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:15:02 -0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIYOAa5nRcnHPMDV3Obz1St/xxYdpfmzsVg
Content-Language: pt-br
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Feb 2013 17:15:00.0684 (UTC)
FILETIME=[FCA720C0:01CE0B9F]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:18:47 -0200
Subject: [GTER] RES: Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Da uma olhada no site e agenda uma visita em um dos datacenters da lista.
http://www.datacenter9.com/datacenters
-----Mensagem original-----
De: gter [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em nome de Juliano
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2013 22:07
Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
Assunto: [GTER] Colocation
Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
Alguma recomendação?
Obrigado
Att.
Juliano
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
-----
Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem.
Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
Versão: 2013.0.2899 / Banco de dados de vírus: 2639/6105 - Data de
Lançamento: 02/15/13
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp17314obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:19:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.54.197 with SMTP id i45mr3651070yhc.90.1360948751261;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r68si9658010yhk.21.2013.02.15.09.19.10;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA2F11F7FF;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:19:05 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from host13.laniway.com.br (host13.laniway.com.br [200.198.186.138])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0841111F7CF
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:16:57 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from host59.laniway.com.br
(static.200.198.186.246.datacenter1.com.br [200.198.186.246])
by host13.laniway.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02113155FCA
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:16:57 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from JoseLuizPC (unknown [177.64.84.77])
by host59.laniway.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E8EB712190
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:16:56 -0200 (BRST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?José_Luiz_Vieira?= <jvieira at eliteacs.com.br>
To: "'Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes'"
<gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGxniCXhOPG79QZxD5zqJ0=3i+qVWxhTGtjX906yB3LEWuHxeQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CABR=JGc7Hz59wSQempEjZCQi8Bpt7ArG_Ddrqw4OrgNo1a+3bQ at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABR=JGc7Hz59wSQempEjZCQi8Bpt7ArG_Ddrqw4OrgNo1a+3bQ at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:16:59 -0200
Message-ID: <007101ce0ba0$439b7ee0$cad27ca0$@eliteacs.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIYOAa5nRcnHPMDV3Obz1St/xxYdgI1NZzRAMjUah8DFIyFpZe2OkJg
Content-Language: pt-br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:19:04 -0200
Subject: [GTER] RES: Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Pessoal, ao que parece a opção de colocation está cada vez mais escassa e
cara.
O que acham da opção de locação de um datacenter em container, com todas as
características de um TIERIII, entrega imediata. CAPEX mínimo, OPEX menor
que a solução em datacenter convencional?
Tem a desvantagem do espaço que ocupa, mas é uma solução para o "quintal de
casa".
Att.
José Luiz Vieira.
Diretor Técnico.
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Mihran Junior [mailto:mihran.kjunior at gmail.com]
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2013 11:51
Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
Assunto: Re: [GTER] Colocation
Senhores,
Aproveitando o tema, estou com a mesma necessidade, mas para um projeto
maior, envolvendo preferencialmente um espaco dedicado (cage) em SP.
Saberiam me dizer quais provedores ainda trabalham com este modelo?
Abs
Mihran
On Friday, February 15, 2013, Lend <lend.sp at gmail.com> wrote:
> recomendo alog de tambore o dc é novo e bem moderno, bom SLA, e o
> preço é justo.
>
>
>
>
>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 01:25, Antonio Junior <anjunior at gmail.com
>escreveu:
>
>> Conheci o data center da MOB essa semana, fiquei impressionado.
>> É um data center container
>>
>>
http://www.mobtelecom.com.br/mob_corporativo/index.php?option=com_k2&view=it
em&layout=item&id=2&Itemid=85
>>
>>
>> --
>> Att,
>>
>> Antonio Junior
>>
>> Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 21:07, Juliano <mirandolli at gmail.com>
escreveu:
>> > Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
>> > Alguma recomendação?
>> >
>> > Obrigado
>> >
>> > Att.
>> > Juliano
>> > --
>> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> Leandro Souza
> (11)6716-2967 - OI
> (11)7188-1172 - VIVO
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Mihran K. Junior
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp19777obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:18:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.145.42 with SMTP id o30mr3929199yhj.34.1360952315341;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:18:35 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si9173299yhi.141.2013.02.15.10.18.34;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:18:35 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD18411F7C4;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:18:13 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com (mail-vb0-f46.google.com
[209.85.212.46])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC3211F7A8
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:22:08 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b13so2292253vby.5
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:22:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=mH2p9RnJYNNiZD6wBGP6apsFyPoquOGZX0Ds8+wVqlU=;
bÓ0W8N1d0FwRlSlmiTqS1oxTy3DLt8f9zzgjwuraYygqgOVNXQ2evkUi+4mqK4ftos
8BQLqmGnA3FKVyQYAKBUYNwQ3V8P5RZCdCbCe7+fAv9x/MLhdiVyV/H9kdd+NDpIg2HD
mlu36XkHSFsaPW8aYYPH68VzoDjcMFeRxkSNZOEg7EHUbYM10OUtBIyyk43IfJi9A10d
J5iykgiImkN3T6jEY6XHnCsB3BmV8s6Y85UHtA83VV3CrpYl5MTE/ao2n2h4sGl8Q9Wu
pnZBsIMAsddwf3vWVesHZEEco1YozxiFNfzTu7hqV+smBbzQWGphEXPgUbAY+tw7xXMm
rgjg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.220.66 with SMTP id pu2mr4171501vec.60.1360948926400;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:22:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.254.104 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:22:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFAfM5rgdN-1SkOvC6SWZ=Vd=1hQRg+omgkdDJqVoE6=SG4a2g at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGxniCXhOPG79QZxD5zqJ0=3i+qVWxhTGtjX906yB3LEWuHxeQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CABR=JGc7Hz59wSQempEjZCQi8Bpt7ArG_Ddrqw4OrgNo1a+3bQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAFAfM5rgdN-1SkOvC6SWZ=Vd=1hQRg+omgkdDJqVoE6=SG4a2g at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:22:06 -0200
Message-ID: <CABR=JGedj=DP2ZbtK7Om=f=W-wX0bz-8bgkn47kgWGEf1eHMeQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Mihran Junior <mihran.kjunior at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:18:12 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Rafael, tudo bem?
Aproximadamente 41m2, hospedando 14-16 racks.
Abs
Mihran
On Friday, February 15, 2013, Rafael Cresci <cresci at gmail.com> wrote:
> Tem ideua de tamanho do cage ja?
> On Feb 15, 2013 1:13 PM, "Mihran Junior" <mihran.kjunior at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Senhores,
>>
>> Aproveitando o tema, estou com a mesma necessidade, mas para um projeto
>> maior, envolvendo preferencialmente um espaco dedicado (cage) em SP.
>> Saberiam me dizer quais provedores ainda trabalham com este modelo?
>>
>> Abs
>> Mihran
>>
>>
>> On Friday, February 15, 2013, Lend <lend.sp at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > recomendo alog de tambore o dc é novo e bem moderno, bom SLA, e o
preço é
>> > justo.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 01:25, Antonio Junior <anjunior at gmail.com
>> >escreveu:
>> >
>> >> Conheci o data center da MOB essa semana, fiquei impressionado.
>> >> É um data center container
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
http://www.mobtelecom.com.br/mob_corporativo/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=2&Itemid=85
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Att,
>> >>
>> >> Antonio Junior
>> >>
>> >> Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 21:07, Juliano <mirandolli at gmail.com>
>> escreveu:
>> >> > Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
>> >> > Alguma recomendação?
>> >> >
>> >> > Obrigado
>> >> >
>> >> > Att.
>> >> > Juliano
>> >> > --
>> >> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> >> --
>> >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Leandro Souza
>> > (11)6716-2967 - OI
>> > (11)7188-1172 - VIVO
>> > --
>> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Mihran K. Junior
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Mihran K. Junior
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp19763obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:18:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.138.109 with SMTP id z73mr3906481yhi.72.1360952289649;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:18:09 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j21si17636171ann.146.2013.02.15.10.18.09;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:18:09 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEC611F7A8;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:18:01 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-da0-f45.google.com (mail-da0-f45.google.com
[209.85.210.45])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5239311F78A
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:05:45 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-da0-f45.google.com with SMTP id w4so1509291dam.18
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:05:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bhÇy2n04F4dKHqCP2ELvjAjNQeL2KN/ojsjCj9AZWcnw=;
bOfAQfIhMmLgpR2vjniilMqW1pJ5U72TcV+/8GtOEbCSfigniDVBzH1RZY/5vZeJB
sE+LFpAJoLSPjkA2SxRJM8DNtyUIRVf382QWM+HlVIOT8qKXQ3DLgWjRYL4C2n8WIzoh
yIM+6or+K7fRwrUm7UxA3qY0c34NJe+yEOx+/D2KmO/ULz/PQZfHNeCjYt6HjgBJdhna
QYjEbHixLcMVlbamHs9GG/HL8oSRbnq4OjJkz9/Lbkc79s1rC7zZS+SgFG61j3mFhnVL
BemvXPQ6fYf1c1DefBLVZPg48FAQP+PUuNSMmQXi10XE68GXQ/x7UVbMtDW5/e4SikfR
JGGA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.10.106 with SMTP id h10mr7587774pab.35.1360951543059;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:05:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.126.13 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:05:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPFY92FBiWxM5nr5s=NUsO6NG7Zt1mV8uKbz+L0PZ5vSsp8Q9g at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPFY92FxA-t2f65KS7zGCny4UcV8+y19Dd9MmGeF+QFBi13c4A at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ETKamQ9yNqSTtPfivoJ45eW1ozrvn8W29XkTggdGOFPiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPFY92FAu6v1VLOPj6pg5boMdkR_VPMSbeiK3Z2+7Z_tYtgP-g at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ERTQw8Nxiß8uVyHt2PHt4oanmpStydnRVhUtPnZ7Juw at mail.gmail.com>
<A8E3A46A-62F9-4ABE-9168-4755B8BF3717 at gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RRMvXNf0eFRxc63vVQtW8PtWpj=mrd2Ren1ELkC9RiYJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPFY92FBiWxM5nr5s=NUsO6NG7Zt1mV8uKbz+L0PZ5vSsp8Q9g at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:05:42 -0200
Message-ID: <CAPFY92EbCzho2h3EVr8uoL86ezZcP_0ONkVW_mD7HCBYfehNdQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Marcos TP <markinn at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:18:00 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Transparent Proxy - Juniper Mx5-t
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Caros , sucesso
O filtro acima funciona perfeitamente .
O meu problema era nas rotas das instancias criadas no group-rib
Ao rodar o run show route table Cachemara_Internet apareciam todas as
rotas direct , onde na verdade deveria aparecer somente a rota default
e a rota da rede do cache .
Obrigado pela ajuda
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 13:51, Marcos TP <markinn at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Caros ,
>
> testei as soluções apresentadas e gostaria de informar que ainda não
> consegui o resultado que queria .
> Irei relatar algumas novas informações
>
> No meu proxy , existe uma ferramenta que testa spoof de ip .
> Eu consigo ver se o proxy consegue assumir o ip origem do cliente .
> Em todos os testes está dando falha .
>
> Tendo isso como informação , estou deduzindo que o filtro de retorno das
> requisições está funcionando , porem a rota está se perdendo
> no meu roteador , pois não retorna até o proxy .
> O contador do filtro está incrementando , porem pelo tcpdump do proxy , o
> pacote não retorna do site até ele .
>
> Acho que o Juniper está priorizando os roteamentos padrões e ignora a
> rotas instancia que criai para voltar ao cache .
>
>
> Veja o filtro de saida :
> filter Cachemara_Internet {
> term dest_80 {
> from {
> destination-address {
> classe-filtrada-para passar pelo proxy/32;
> }
> protocol tcp;
> source-port 80;
> }
> then {
> count entrada;
> log;
> routing-instance Cachemara_Internet;
> }
> }
> term default {
> then accept;
> }
> }
>
>
> instancia
>
> routing-instances {
> Cachemara_Internet {
> instance-type forwarding;
> routing-options {
> static {
> route 0.0.0.0/0 {
> next-hop ip do cachemara;
> preference 1;
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> A minha rib está :
>
> rib-groups {
> Cachemara_Internet {
> import-rib [ inet.0 Cachemara_Subscriber.inet.0
> Cachemara_Internet.inet.0 ];
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 13:18, Douglas Fischer <
> fischerdouglas at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> SRC!=DST
>>
>> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 13:02, Bruno Araújo <bjaraujo at gmail.com
>> >escreveu:
>>
>> > Vou novato em roteamento mas no meu entendimento isso nunca funcionará
>> com
>> > tproxy pois o proxy solicita com ip do cliente e a resposta irá para o
>> > cliente. Tentar redirecionar as respostas à porta 80 para o proxy é
>> inútil
>> > pois a resposta será em porta aleatória diferente da 80. Tproxy
>> funcionará
>> > se o proxy estiver em "série" entre a saída e os cliente.
>> >
>> > Tente ativar wccp.
>> >
>> > _______________
>> > Bruno Araújo
>> >
>> >
>> > Antes de imprimir, verifique se tem papel e tinta suficiente na
>> impressora.
>> >
>> > Em 15/02/2013, às 09:14, Rôney Eduardo <roneyeduardosantos at gmail.com>
>> > escreveu:
>> >
>> > > Em 14 de fevereiro de 2013 19:14, Marcos TP <markinn at gmail.com>
>> > escreveu:
>> > >
>> > >> Eu fiz algo similar ao que você indicou .
>> > >> A pergunta agora seria onde cadastrar o filtro . Nas interfaces de
>> > entrada
>> > >> ISP certo ?
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Seguinte:
>> > >
>> > > 1) Quando in-interface=LAN_(tráfego dos clientes),
>> > > src-address=Seu-bloco-IP, dst-address=0.0.0.0/0, dst-port=80,
>> > > define-next-hop=IP-MARA
>> > >
>> > > 2) Quando in-interface=WAN_(trânsito(s) ou PTT(s)), src-address=
>> > 0.0.0.0/0,
>> > > src-port=80, dst-address=Seu-bloco-IP, define-next-hop=IP-MARA
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Rôney Eduardo
>> > > --
>> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> > --
>> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Douglas Fernando Fischer
>> Engº de Controle e Automação
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>
>
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp20974obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:50:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.138.42 with SMTP id z30mr3962443yhi.101.1360954244323;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:50:44 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h13si25034172anb.104.2013.02.15.10.50.43;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:50:44 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A6511F7E3;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:50:41 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com
[209.85.214.180])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A340911F776
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:21:02 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ef5so3800922obb.39
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:21:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=br5LXv+PbI9c8Z0KLj46fzLqm+TCow+CGLQQGLNPRIw=;
b=uOTkK/3/0nqJ7YagqC4t/Qn2qE5dVx+v+WC+Zluyyq+LYuIWjRg97nfQKsNFpjXN8H
WsfLIgeq4UtjJrqqPVKgF7s0qStnpYCehotOUsFGfMl9FXDUvEuthyEtpbX8V0dvNxjr
ciWlCuO0DgO5Ai5aiDi1NrApG0vy330KpONffn+yisT6Khj4w+eO1IWIS+nrwpBaJ8G2
GS67WeSdkw+s3YXk6+L1whm39AYU+H3wUl/3VrxHI7qZ+cQc18nCbamnKW4zObG2aeg7
Udim8m7M9IaG+9wIH/q3zS7OiaJvV6CPiftJAou71o+oBzbymSVrNIje4glN0OKGrjpf
yw5Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.43.103 with SMTP id v7mr2447822obl.17.1360952461097;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:21:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.28.198 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:21:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <A8E3A46A-62F9-4ABE-9168-4755B8BF3717 at gmail.com>
References: <CAPFY92FxA-t2f65KS7zGCny4UcV8+y19Dd9MmGeF+QFBi13c4A at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ETKamQ9yNqSTtPfivoJ45eW1ozrvn8W29XkTggdGOFPiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPFY92FAu6v1VLOPj6pg5boMdkR_VPMSbeiK3Z2+7Z_tYtgP-g at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ERTQw8Nxiß8uVyHt2PHt4oanmpStydnRVhUtPnZ7Juw at mail.gmail.com>
<A8E3A46A-62F9-4ABE-9168-4755B8BF3717 at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:21:00 -0200
Message-ID: <CAGFn2k0r4JuH-wr88tmJ26HDS_Yx9FEcAY0Dk6Erir9DmJ50Lg at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:50:39 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] Transparent Proxy - Juniper Mx5-t
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
2013/2/15 Bruno Araújo <bjaraujo at gmail.com>:
> Vou novato em roteamento mas no meu entendimento isso nunca funcionará com tproxy pois o proxy solicita com ip do cliente e a resposta irá para o cliente. Tentar redirecionar as respostas à porta 80 para o proxy é inútil pois a resposta será em porta aleatória diferente da 80. Tproxy funcionará se o proxy estiver em "série" entre a saída e os cliente.
>
> Tente ativar wccp.
WCCP tradicional, que usa GRE, é um tremendo overhead tanto para o
roteador quanto o proxy. Ele só faz sentido para proxies distantes do
roteador na topologia de rede.
PBR, ou WCCPv2 usando encaminhamento Layer2 tanto para o
redirecionamento quanto para o retorno do tráfego, são as maneiras
mais interessantes de resolver isso.
Rubens
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp20991obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:51:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.150.41 with SMTP id y29mr3924868yhj.75.1360954272218;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:51:12 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c67si9215297yhe.110.2013.02.15.10.51.11;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:51:12 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F6C11F7F9;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:51:09 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com
[209.85.214.176])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D5C11F7B7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:42:33 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id v19so3824859obq.7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:42:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Jb45rath0jrrfJfl0uz0dkmWQ4h0yxsyPqXqw4RjoaI=;
b=kgZK9ze4Kdz32KuITRo5xE2QeHVoKhnbq2nkYaeipZkcouQMd8BUQVPL6tZPY79cTb
UL/xUFibnB3Dwj1FOcVRgmKSPPfZtL1Ozf6P9xNK4sMfNWxMr8rUmvePTwCIbCgkflU5
W+p2FFN4bbZuQvuKrMWCtjKZ+Wmdbox7sJV+g4gYHqNT4YM7oc225DP7qXDdyJbKhb/w
84qRBG97V7J2RGogVVOXvkLTI3cfV4G3HgNIoCBq06fKjEI/BRMFnTXKtWFG1405zXPi
a6HtkLp7okFqrvbOyCGnbrwV9GyCHZzfdzsgGOSkBebp/g7rCYlfrmNY4n5S/1nhU144
DR7A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.159.5 with SMTP id wy5mr2508571obb.31.1360953752468;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:42:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.91.168 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:42:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABR=JGedj=DP2ZbtK7Om=f=W-wX0bz-8bgkn47kgWGEf1eHMeQ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGxniCXhOPG79QZxD5zqJ0=3i+qVWxhTGtjX906yB3LEWuHxeQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CABR=JGc7Hz59wSQempEjZCQi8Bpt7ArG_Ddrqw4OrgNo1a+3bQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAFAfM5rgdN-1SkOvC6SWZ=Vd=1hQRg+omgkdDJqVoE6=SG4a2g at mail.gmail.com>
<CABR=JGedj=DP2ZbtK7Om=f=W-wX0bz-8bgkn47kgWGEf1eHMeQ at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:42:32 -0200
Message-ID: <CAFzheD5=Bz9seUAjjgZFJHSadn0vCTXebm6QDsXsn22Vgk5Ogw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Filipe Alvarez <filipealvarez at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:51:06 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 15:22, Mihran Junior
<mihran.kjunior at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Rafael, tudo bem?
>
> Aproximadamente 41m2, hospedando 14-16 racks.
Nossa, tudo isso trafega só 20mbits ?
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp26776obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:48:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.141.97 with SMTP id f61mr4559662yhj.69.1360964937790;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:48:57 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p11si972009anm.145.2013.02.15.13.48.57;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:48:57 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE0211F819;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:48:54 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from conta21.wb.com.br (unknown [187.84.112.23])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C9011F7BF
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:07:38 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from [201.36.98.179] (helo=[192.168.30.183])
by conta21.wb.com.br with esmtpa (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <manoel at vetor.com.br>) id 1U6QdC-0002PS-DL
for gter at eng.registro.br; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:07:34 -0200
Message-ID: <511E88AF.3070109 at vetor.com.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:12:47 -0200
From: manoel Wanderley <manoel at vetor.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<BLU170-DS2262A19BAB41506E57DE8CF80E0 at phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU170-DS2262A19BAB41506E57DE8CF80E0 at phx.gbl>
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - conta21.wb.com.br
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eng.registro.br
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vetor.com.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:48:51 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] RES: Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Este link dos datacenters está muito desatualizado
> Da uma olhada no site e agenda uma visita em um dos datacenters da lista.
>
> http://www.datacenter9.com/datacenters
>
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: gter [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em nome de Juliano
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2013 22:07
> Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> Assunto: [GTER] Colocation
>
> Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
> Alguma recomendação?
>
> Obrigado
>
> Att.
> Juliano
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
> -----
> Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem.
> Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
> Versão: 2013.0.2899 / Banco de dados de vírus: 2639/6105 - Data de
> Lançamento: 02/15/13
>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp26802obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:49:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.130.178 with SMTP id k38mr4444071yhi.117.1360964983356;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:49:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si9706489yhi.102.2013.02.15.13.49.43;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:49:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC1511F824;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:49:20 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ia0-x236.google.com (ia-in-x0236.1e100.net
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::236])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7D9711F79A
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:26:02 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w33so3619518iag.27
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:26:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh¤S3TydXTvIELpio/Tgwa0RH+CMQKmJEdXE3I09c8BY=;
b=YErCoRQIM1MG0dmXlH/Kkl1NKccnUqQ8bt2hb7SjySzwoBC0gqMizn1T25X3r1Gl1D
XbJ9GHA96lgPhTIPKxv6vqZrHyijje1DVVv9i69qm5BykEEHDveTqV4Vqp2i+9rWqQMI
sUzSk/ChI87iTNVu3THpyy0g3a10HkHy+b/4+jMzLws4gB5HTcbu7Rni+c7wmMaebmJp
Czs86EBH+w2tZtukdBpZ+cJvl8TTP1ARleo8yPiQeWI1Q1kXh8R+4oq8F/rWZImX226v
Lxi9iqXhkC4BLiJjzwg1eH6usW+CoIPu5Stl1xXvMBNhjMjB8ko8WjuMI/HPaZ8ARxae
KiyA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.195.134 with SMTP id ie6mr2325521igc.6.1360956360936;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:26:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.41.106 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:26:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <A8E3A46A-62F9-4ABE-9168-4755B8BF3717 at gmail.com>
References: <CAPFY92FxA-t2f65KS7zGCny4UcV8+y19Dd9MmGeF+QFBi13c4A at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ETKamQ9yNqSTtPfivoJ45eW1ozrvn8W29XkTggdGOFPiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPFY92FAu6v1VLOPj6pg5boMdkR_VPMSbeiK3Z2+7Z_tYtgP-g at mail.gmail.com>
<CAMkf-ERTQw8Nxiß8uVyHt2PHt4oanmpStydnRVhUtPnZ7Juw at mail.gmail.com>
<A8E3A46A-62F9-4ABE-9168-4755B8BF3717 at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:26:00 -0300
Message-ID: <CAMkf-ETcJ_Xys6d_TZNABGM4oLEhxGXgPy6teyCKm9bj+kQ8FQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rôney_Eduardo?= <roneyeduardosantos at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:49:18 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Transparent Proxy - Juniper Mx5-t
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 12:02, Bruno Araújo <bjaraujo at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Vou novato em roteamento mas no meu entendimento isso nunca funcionará com
> tproxy pois o proxy solicita com ip do cliente e a resposta irá para o
> cliente. Tentar redirecionar as respostas à porta 80 para o proxy é inútil
> pois a resposta será em porta aleatória diferente da 80. Tproxy funcionará
> se o proxy estiver em "série" entre a saída e os cliente.
>
>
Bruno, não é aleatório pois os servidores web da Internet sempre vão
responder com src-port=80, é por esse parâmetro que o match é feito.
--
Rôney Eduardo
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp26785obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:49:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.123.208 with SMTP id v56mr4675065yhh.52.1360964957578;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:49:17 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r68si10348236yhk.99.2013.02.15.13.49.17;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:49:17 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BDF11F815;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:49:08 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from connectoway.com.br (gambitwave.connectoway.com.br [177.36.4.20])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD23B11F7D1
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:47:59 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from TI01 by connectoway.com.br (MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.0.R)
with ESMTP id md50000622938.msg
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:45:57 -0300
From: "Rodrigo Augusto" <rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br>
To: "'Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes'"
<gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
<5f9fa65bec268b5185b4600a2ab3b1c7 at logicasistemas.com.br>
<CAGiBWQC6DkoNptbvrqoeidN2DGKAGRopnaF=aXbe1GU_Ng4ckg at mail.gmail.com>
<28E5A23C64854C36B396402621FBE1B9 at TI01>
<CAGiBWQCEX1MDXgmXfNNqYXwSCWZDVZg_8eo4kwozWF7ing1Npw at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGiBWQCEX1MDXgmXfNNqYXwSCWZDVZg_8eo4kwozWF7ing1Npw at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:46:21 -0300
Message-ID: <DA76C0F722A743E79495D5D1A98CA040 at TI01>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Ac4LnTBkN6CLWLNRTPaJRKRe9eoWoAAF3rag
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609
X-Authenticated-Sender: rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br
X-Spam-Processed: gambitwave, Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:45:57 -0300
(not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-MDRemoteIP: 177.36.4.18
X-Return-Path: rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gter at eng.registro.br
X-MDAV-Processed: gambitwave, Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:46:00 -0300
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:49:06 -0200
Subject: [GTER] RES: RES: POWERDNS Duvidas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Tira o " 0 " ....coloca sem a terminação.... na época não consegui fazer com
um bloco maior que /24...entao adotei como padrão fazer tudo pelo /24....
1.60.177.in-addr.arpa master 2 blablabla
2.60.177.in-addr.arpa master 2 blablabla
Depois é só delegar no registro.br os blocos menores que /24...
-----Mensagem original-----
De: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em
nome de Leonardo Gutierres - Operação de Redes
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2013 12:35
Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
Assunto: Re: [GTER] RES: POWERDNS Duvidas
Boa tarde Tarde Rodrigo
Isto estou falando de reverso fiz exatamente isto que você citou e na
registro BR ja coloquei meus dois DNS.
Seguinte quando criei dentro das zona in-addr.arpa do tipo NS os IP ficara
com terminação 0 exemplo 0.XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa esta certo?
Quanto tempo leva pra propagar os reversos.
Obrigado pela ajuda
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 11:39, Rodrigo Augusto
<rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br>escreveu:
> Leonardo, voce deve esta falando em reverso não?!
> Dentro dessa zona reversa crie 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa do tipo NS
apontando
> para ns1.nomedoservidorns.com.br
> Depois cria 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa do tipo PTR para o nome do servidor em
> questão...
> Já fez a alteração lá no registro.br ? ele já sabe quem é esse servidor
> NS ?
>
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em
> nome de Leonardo Gutierres - Operação de Redes
> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:00
> Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> Assunto: Re: [GTER] POWERDNS Duvidas
>
> Bom dia
>
> Sim esta integrado com Mysql e estou usando poweradmin para administração
> do mesmo.
>
>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:19, Daniel Passos Martins <
> daniel at logicasistemas.com.br> escreveu:
>
> >
> >
> > Eu já usei ele e é muito bom.
> > Vc está precisando de que no
> > PowerDNS?
> > Está usando ele integrado ao mysql?
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Daniel Passos
> > Martins
> > Lógica Sistemas - Natal/RN
> > 84 3223.5009 - 9171.1020
> > Conheça o
> > Rio Grande do Norte
> >
> > Em 15/02/2013 08:30, Leonardo Gutierres - Operação
> > de Redes escreveu:
> >
> > > Bom dia
> > >
> > > Recentemente estou usando powerdns
> > dois servidores virtualizados master e
> > > slave.
> > > Gostaria de saber se
> > alguem mais usa, e pode me dar uma dica de
> > > configuração de DNS
> > recursivo, sendo que ja criei a zona native
> > > 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa,
> > >
> > criei dentro desta zona record do Tipo PTR para o IP desejado e record
> > do
> > > tipo NS apontando para os DNS.
> > >
> > > Onrigado
> > > --
> > > gter list
> > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1]
> >
> >
> > Links:
> > ------
> > [1]
> > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp26809obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:50:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.123.109 with SMTP id u73mr4470289yhh.108.1360965000194;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:50:00 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si9713768yhk.20.2013.02.15.13.49.59;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:50:00 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2702111F827;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:49:34 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from smtp.asbyte.com.br (smtp.asbyte.com.br [187.94.224.228])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA9411F7D1
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:47:08 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from smtp.asbyte.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.asbyte.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BBA56F8F6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:47:07 -0200 (BRST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at asbyte.com.br
Received: from smtp.asbyte.com.br ([127.0.0.1])
by smtp.asbyte.com.br (smtp.asbyte.com.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024) with ESMTP id QMWufbKWbl3w for <gter at eng.registro.br>;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:47:06 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from natalie.asbyte.com.br (unknown [192.168.0.111])
(Authenticated sender: victorio at asbyte.com.br)
by smtp.asbyte.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8B12856F87F
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:47:06 -0200 (BRST)
Message-ID: <511E90BA.5030402 at asbyte.com.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:47:06 -0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?VmljdMOzcmlv?= <victorio at asbyte.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAFxccmx+oYJZHKyFrkt_U85QKdKTTNw75Pd0exsunYB63NWxJw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RT7+kTzDe6=mE-kP+6ZE19MqXBfqBi6i2SHUS=NLQyjgw at mail.gmail.com>
<BLU002-W2268733ABE548B4FF8D7358DC080 at phx.gbl>
<F5981374-F1A3-4E08-9F5B-DC9F8DE596A2 at esds.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <F5981374-F1A3-4E08-9F5B-DC9F8DE596A2 at esds.com.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:49:31 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER]
=?utf-8?q?Problema_com_Auto_Negociação_entre_mik? =?utf-8?q?rotik?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp31927obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.141.144 with SMTP id g16mr5332654yhj.118.1360976653867;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x69si10969948yhd.68.2013.02.15.17.04.13;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:13 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@deltatele.com.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC38011F7D9;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:04:02 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ia0-x236.google.com (mail-ia0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::236])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F335011F805
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:57:18 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w33so3716785iag.13
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:57:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
dÞltatele.com.br; s=mailauth;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=SX4jqGOgHHp3VUV5B0Li5slbO/NpLd5Wj6rMBxqPzPI=;
b=gp8DFh4+IRxG2I2yRA+zexpCdPcUiM/2+aWK7zWlPgW1OaYgZR+gDpCFQP0Idxlr76
5R+5tKZpOOfGIV0XidrU0wXytAtoPaDqngryWaqzZxtBewJvls+Ompsww3MZVczq9tYc
kxmM2d1ynIVdrR1xIqV47y1XLwgxOzm8b4RhoX-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=SX4jqGOgHHp3VUV5B0Li5slbO/NpLd5Wj6rMBxqPzPI=;
b=VnUkCSXWEfDNWgBLrK8didT720wDOgt894z6mkkx9Zi/asXE9BdMurp6mViEDc5zZo
g2Jcfu8gxPRzep2Enex3XxdJR8UPLV6hMud8D/ElZN0pVn4ziv+rwmbNE2Y+a/FpaLGY
lbBlzGY1cuuCJsGo13pXb2Zu9nDV+cFNAQ3GfGmUIW1uhDrhonPOEFatN6oFZ6nEXvkh
maRWVB+0Jc8BOKIUmA/Qqxr4eDpPXV0dZeQrMSnBIjiNuQT7OGvY/hGdFxUJL0eWhVLW
qhLBMiAT4rX0qUPWQwv4hS6XQmRsQMAHIhb5pw8LdyZt/rn3DWRRk6l1BOgSUDPfo5NA
B/2w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.136.67 with SMTP id s3mr2627354ict.31.1360965437420; Fri,
15 Feb 2013 13:57:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.12.12 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:57:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511E90BA.5030402 at asbyte.com.br>
References: <CAFxccmx+oYJZHKyFrkt_U85QKdKTTNw75Pd0exsunYB63NWxJw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RT7+kTzDe6=mE-kP+6ZE19MqXBfqBi6i2SHUS=NLQyjgw at mail.gmail.com>
<BLU002-W2268733ABE548B4FF8D7358DC080 at phx.gbl>
<F5981374-F1A3-4E08-9F5B-DC9F8DE596A2 at esds.com.br>
<511E90BA.5030402 at asbyte.com.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:57:17 -0200
Message-ID: <CAM6w-CCp-ZXgi+cUpT0X7XLLYuoDmi5r8cRk5-Qta=xX+0RAmQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Jean Carlos Bartzen <jean at deltatele.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJ6kK7q+zeZN6Fw5RxGuNyuzcdoQfli8I/ELiEuunnIscCqyiOjTOI2cmbRnYaWvLZaonJ
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:04:00 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER]
=?iso-8859-1?q?Problema_com_Auto_Negociação_entre_mikr? =?iso-8859-1?q?otik?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp31941obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.162.197 with SMTP id y45mr5475382yhk.110.1360976683416;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d33si25517431anp.67.2013.02.15.17.04.43;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:04:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A9111F7D8;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:04:39 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (ie-in-x0235.1e100.net
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2FED11F818
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:01:34 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 17so5317857iea.40
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:01:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bhKC+n6WojRCY2tbZRkZBJgwvOQtwFGVMlpWZ4/t3nCA=;
b=Oc0ZOJteCinf4ElfNx9iHWIGc2i4Q1Cg5XHs/FDTY0UdLCWfstowHQ/kMwCoOuegnq
x1S+r+XUCZhDq47PitQ72GzbWs6O/z+fpCv0wOf5NC0yF0Oac7NOKfERruN4A9jXC6M+
VjLcLAc+Q+Mc3Q4Poofve8GZRCHuWD1UvPCz5tysb6y+XzpC5WBAYfbGGgaK3DK7A+FF
FKfEvF0Co2EawurcBHsYVVAGo4uVPYSySpe8bL7IDQgGylFkR+4T6ig+gy0T4AoEx+b3
XfnQ97UCFOu1W2Gm7MgV/IBxvYTeh7laVAElGqD15dzHwMOhWboQdNxpVXZyVEIlRym1
t3gA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.194.229 with SMTP id hz5mr2903932igc.111.1360965692911;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:01:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.163.97 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:01:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:01:32 -0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QwYPDBUVXa4bDvZ4jSAh1cmx-r4
Message-ID: <CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Mauricio Cardoso Dambros <mauricio at mauriciotelecom.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:04:38 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Exatamente, mas devemos lembrar que também há um overhead quando
"encapsulamos" o TDM em IP.
O throughput total pode ser calculado. As variáveis do calculo são o número
de timeslots, jitter-buffer e packet-delay.
Um E1 unframed com 32 timeslots utiliza aproximadamente 2,5 Mbps, podendo
variar para mais ou menos.
Também me coloco a disposição para demais esclarecimentos.
[]´s
Maurício . . .
Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 09:38, DATACOM - Marcelo.Veriato <
marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br> escreveu:
>
> A configuração de timeslots determina quantos timeslots TDM serão
> transmitidos no bundle. No lado do Ethernet essa configuração implica na
> quantidade de dados transmitidos: cada timeslot representa 64kbits de dados
> por bundle. Por exemplo: uma configuração de TDM unframed com 32 timeslots
> no bundle resulta em uma utilização de banda de 2048kbit/s; dois bundles
> com essa mesma configuração resultam em uma utilização de banda de
> 4096kbit/s.
>
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp32463obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:24:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.71.228 with SMTP id r64mr5547299yhd.56.1360977882551;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:24:42 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si10408740yhk.7.2013.02.15.17.24.42;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:24:42 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DEE11F7D7;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:24:38 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from pampa.tcheturbo.com.br (pampa.tcheturbo.com.br [187.108.17.2])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BB711F801
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:25:22 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by pampa (Postfix, from userid 110)
id 495A948A6C6; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:26:02 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (unknown [186.209.140.237])
by pampa (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E27C848A6BB
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:26:01 -0200 (BRST)
Message-ID: <511EB5D0.6080606 at tcheturbo.com.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:25:20 -0200
From: Braian <pbraian at tcheturbo.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <021417d9ca7b2cd435475534c5d3f9a2 at tcheturbo.com.br>
<511E2667.9070206 at onda.net.br>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302151232370.15867 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302151232370.15867 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:24:37 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] VLAN em radios SIAE
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp32025obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:07:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.151.76 with SMTP id a52mr5375810yhk.107.1360976863043;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q15si4308103ank.150.2013.02.15.17.07.42;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:07:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA4711F7DF;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:07:39 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from smtp-admin84.kinghost.net (smtp-admin84.kinghost.net
[189.38.84.84])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D4211F7F5
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:52:25 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from smtp-admin.kinghost.net (smtp-gw-04 [127.0.0.1])
by smtp-admin84.kinghost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0B54FACE;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:52:24 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from [10.9.1.160] (unknown [10.5.5.10])
(Authenticated sender: juliano at cyberweb.com.br)
by smtp-admin.kinghost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4347D4F87C;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:52:24 -0200 (BRST)
Message-ID: <511EBC11.3090600 at kinghost.com.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:52:01 -0200
From: Juliano Primavesi | KingHost <juliano at kinghost.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sidnei Trindade | GIGA <sidnei.trindade at giga.com.br>,
Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <53124.189.38.85.10.1360931033.squirrel at webmail.giga.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <53124.189.38.85.10.1360931033.squirrel at webmail.giga.com.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:07:38 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] infra eletrica do Blum
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: juliano at kinghost.com.br,
Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Ficou bom, mas era melhor ter enterrado essa barra...
Juliano
Em 15/02/2013 10:23, Sidnei Trindade | GIGA escreveu:
> segue fotos como era e como ficou
>
>
> Sidnei Trindade
> Líder Técnico de Instalação
> sidnei.trindade at giga.com.br
>
> 51 3301-5458 (Porto Alegre)
> 54 3282-9524 (Canela)
>
> A Processa agora é GIGA!
>
> GIGA Telecom
> http://www.giga.com.br
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp32034obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:08:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.162.197 with SMTP id y45mr5490692yhk.110.1360976883865;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q12si25513833anm.112.2013.02.15.17.08.03;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E93D11F7ED;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:07:59 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5893F11F779
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:06:33 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so3394489wey.0
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:06:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=OeT5R5ZVQcSlGa6PwqUdMQtMqe7ljGiZZpL2afL+DJI=;
b=WPljQO63IZDsk4/uhcct9m2pbnCT1YMH52ekkIZy1FSsdx+eaIP/WSqygPL/IwDeIR
oGKOhVQ3BhQ9H4qv096v1R9LWZS3MA8lkfx2PaSexh67y6GEyt2dAh71zeQzRv1/1by8
sjX7ogGgRJraBVH/DvZxviXVh3/o5rHsA1pfnPrsn1sk6DPCBjZGVWoICdtYv6z1wd96
yvsK+7cg4jM8v0VNVK2gyAhKrfrJRLfzDh/KUDxcshyHVwHknu2IPwSQVSRe14ql6r2x
eoE1JtBV6egidFY3/lr1/No38CPpPZDiuTzkzb5wLb2PtNzIKuLfs5Ddv2D2diI5anjL
6eoA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.75.196 with SMTP id e4mr7166111wjw.44.1360969588469;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:06:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.88.196 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:06:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DA76C0F722A743E79495D5D1A98CA040 at TI01>
References: <CAGiBWQCssXhjhaW5DqaYZWCkno4wsHyDRHWw0-Ed_0Z1pekRjw at mail.gmail.com>
<5f9fa65bec268b5185b4600a2ab3b1c7 at logicasistemas.com.br>
<CAGiBWQC6DkoNptbvrqoeidN2DGKAGRopnaF=aXbe1GU_Ng4ckg at mail.gmail.com>
<28E5A23C64854C36B396402621FBE1B9 at TI01>
<CAGiBWQCEX1MDXgmXfNNqYXwSCWZDVZg_8eo4kwozWF7ing1Npw at mail.gmail.com>
<DA76C0F722A743E79495D5D1A98CA040 at TI01>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:06:28 -0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: zDrH3iVCM-NkEhvVF1OikJf5CbU
Message-ID: <CAGiBWQBp_8VV+p9xiSnq5cVoO2KfymRS+waLN+nCo_D6J=+Eeg at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_Gutierres_-_Operação_de_Redes? <leonardo at vibeti.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:07:57 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] RES: RES: POWERDNS Duvidas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Boa noite Rodrigo
Obrigado pelas dicas segui o problema esta na registro.br.
Mas no record dentro da zona in-addr-arpa, tem os record do type NS,
colocaria o ip dos DNS correto?
Outra coisa no meu server slave ele não sincroniza a zona in-addr-arp com
os novos records adicionado, mas se eu
excluir a zona e criar uma nova slave em 60s (tempo setado para
sincronizar) ele atualiza, ai funciona normalmente.
Passaram por isso? estou fazendo algo errado.
Obrigado a todos
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 17:46, Rodrigo Augusto
<rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br>escreveu:
> Tira o " 0 " ....coloca sem a terminação.... na época não consegui fazer
> com
> um bloco maior que /24...entao adotei como padrão fazer tudo pelo /24....
> 1.60.177.in-addr.arpa master 2 blablabla
>
> 2.60.177.in-addr.arpa master 2 blablabla
>
> Depois é só delegar no registro.br os blocos menores que /24...
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em
> nome de Leonardo Gutierres - Operação de Redes
> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2013 12:35
> Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> Assunto: Re: [GTER] RES: POWERDNS Duvidas
>
> Boa tarde Tarde Rodrigo
>
> Isto estou falando de reverso fiz exatamente isto que você citou e na
> registro BR ja coloquei meus dois DNS.
> Seguinte quando criei dentro das zona in-addr.arpa do tipo NS os IP ficara
> com terminação 0 exemplo 0.XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa esta certo?
> Quanto tempo leva pra propagar os reversos.
>
> Obrigado pela ajuda
>
>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 11:39, Rodrigo Augusto
> <rodrigo at 1telecom.com.br>escreveu:
>
> > Leonardo, voce deve esta falando em reverso não?!
> > Dentro dessa zona reversa crie 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa do tipo NS
> apontando
> > para ns1.nomedoservidorns.com.br
> > Depois cria 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa do tipo PTR para o nome do servidor
> em
> > questão...
> > Já fez a alteração lá no registro.br ? ele já sabe quem é esse servidor
> > NS ?
> >
> >
> > -----Mensagem original-----
> > De: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br]
> Em
> > nome de Leonardo Gutierres - Operação de Redes
> > Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:00
> > Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> > Assunto: Re: [GTER] POWERDNS Duvidas
> >
> > Bom dia
> >
> > Sim esta integrado com Mysql e estou usando poweradmin para administração
> > do mesmo.
> >
> >
> > Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 09:19, Daniel Passos Martins <
> > daniel at logicasistemas.com.br> escreveu:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Eu já usei ele e é muito bom.
> > > Vc está precisando de que no
> > > PowerDNS?
> > > Está usando ele integrado ao mysql?
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Daniel Passos
> > > Martins
> > > Lógica Sistemas - Natal/RN
> > > 84 3223.5009 - 9171.1020
> > > Conheça o
> > > Rio Grande do Norte
> > >
> > > Em 15/02/2013 08:30, Leonardo Gutierres - Operação
> > > de Redes escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Bom dia
> > > >
> > > > Recentemente estou usando powerdns
> > > dois servidores virtualizados master e
> > > > slave.
> > > > Gostaria de saber se
> > > alguem mais usa, e pode me dar uma dica de
> > > > configuração de DNS
> > > recursivo, sendo que ja criei a zona native
> > > > 1XX.XX.187.in-addr.arpa,
> > > >
> > > criei dentro desta zona record do Tipo PTR para o IP desejado e record
> > > do
> > > > tipo NS apontando para os DNS.
> > > >
> > > > Onrigado
> > > > --
> > > > gter list
> > > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter [1]
> > >
> > >
> > > Links:
> > > ------
> > > [1]
> > > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
> >
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp32474obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:25:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.138.33 with SMTP id q33mr1627040ann.9.1360977906160;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:25:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i32si25561376ann.10.2013.02.15.17.25.05;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:25:06 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@onda.net.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5C411F7F3;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:24:48 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from cube.onda.net.br
(2001-12ac-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0005.v6.onda.net.br [IPv6:2001:12ac::5])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1236A11F7B6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:16:07 -0200 (BRST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onda.net.br;
sÞfault;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
bh=AIVX0TusKukiVNHvlHZO+emwrvS92sqdNvVusVbhPdU=;
b=SM5UmzZBcv4A7kCOSxM69FntnPeeeNjc0iNIXpEgbi7u5BO35UhjwhwQU13picSXggjfToSvLwnaUkmJhdNhrNLamxlcvsUxcJt4inGF93Fq0sf8CxgZGuaGHfrtyVv3;
Received: from static-189-84-12-3.v4.onda.net.br ([189.84.12.3]:55719
helo=[192.168.2.250])
by cube.onda.net.br with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexandre at onda.net.br>)
id 1U6WNm-00051L-4W
for gter at eng.registro.br; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:16:02 -0200
Message-ID: <511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:15:49 -0200
From: "Alexandre J. Correa (Onda)" <alexandre at onda.net.br>
Organization: Onda Internet Ltda.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
X-cPanel-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-cPanel-MailScanner-ID: 1U6WNm-00051L-4W
X-cPanel-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
Provider for details
X-cPanel-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-cPanel-MailScanner-From: alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Spam-Status: No
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cube.onda.net.br
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eng.registro.br
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - onda.net.br
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cube.onda.net.br: authenticated_id:
alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:24:47 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
sao exatos 2.6mbit/s com 1000pps !!
On 15/02/2013 20:01, Mauricio Cardoso Dambros wrote:
> Exatamente, mas devemos lembrar que também há um overhead quando
> "encapsulamos" o TDM em IP.
> O throughput total pode ser calculado. As variáveis do calculo são o número
> de timeslots, jitter-buffer e packet-delay.
> Um E1 unframed com 32 timeslots utiliza aproximadamente 2,5 Mbps, podendo
> variar para mais ou menos.
>
> Também me coloco a disposição para demais esclarecimentos.
>
> []´s
> Maurício . . .
>
> Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 09:38, DATACOM - Marcelo.Veriato <
> marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br> escreveu:
>
>> A configuração de timeslots determina quantos timeslots TDM serão
>> transmitidos no bundle. No lado do Ethernet essa configuração implica na
>> quantidade de dados transmitidos: cada timeslot representa 64kbits de dados
>> por bundle. Por exemplo: uma configuração de TDM unframed com 32 timeslots
>> no bundle resulta em uma utilização de banda de 2048kbit/s; dois bundles
>> com essa mesma configuração resultam em uma utilização de banda de
>> 4096kbit/s.
>>
>>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Sds.
Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
Sócio-Administrador
Office: +55 34 3351 3077
Onda Internet
www.onda.net.br
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp745obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:30:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.151.37 with SMTP id d37mr1903338ano.63.1360996207606;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:30:07 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m26si17717427ani.24.2013.02.15.22.30.07;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:30:07 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333DA11F7C0;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 04:29:59 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ea0-f176.google.com (mail-ea0-f176.google.com
[209.85.215.176])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFFBF11F7E5
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:34:53 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id a13so1652361eaa.7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:34:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=z/i0ddkZKpUURwp1Jid7riqM8fPBKOpBtdCTUsGvMl0=;
b=RUyjp2BMeXcYWX/yyZC7hE5u5vSxAuU5Xw30gvvUuoSCdp01DROdgjex8H7hi8T+st
x/zSNJSGZltX8QyZSLmaZk6SIjm6quIAReMZKOHseHdB5Cjpb2+csR1MnIF0vPVCMcsp
fFJfE+VgGXtZow1X27+YjnnksRFbGPr41nFfUc3gVDPanpUwoEUBGw5SCGZIsxVm1fFT
9LfdmV58lQjKbBM3FFGro40DuSd8fxxKUClUk8FamYNXGZzJUQwAYiweIKwIGzri4/0m
0NaVc14i0szcSwzCAryYlm1THpiOHWlr5O//ATkWZ/7idDMCSR2J5k6oKiV0CwsabCtd
cQqA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.178.69 with SMTP id e45mr15104134eem.9.1360978491651;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:34:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.57.142 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:34:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:34:51 -0200
Message-ID: <CAGFn2k1cw=N3Z+rHnmmxqEN7kyA7xADk3UmaTkg=Tk1=LqcsOg at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 04:29:57 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
2013/2/15 Alexandre J. Correa (Onda) <alexandre at onda.net.br>:
> sao exatos 2.6mbit/s com 1000pps !!
Isso na codificação para redes de baixo jitter. Se a rede tiver
jitter, tem que compensar mudando a codificação para algo que pode
ocupar fácil uns 4 Mbps.
Rubens
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp754obb;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:30:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.129.72 with SMTP id g48mr6726592yhi.102.1360996239777;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si11257765yhi.89.2013.02.15.22.30.39;
Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1047E11F7E0;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 04:30:14 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-vb0-f48.google.com (mail-vb0-f48.google.com
[209.85.212.48])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A5CB11F7E5
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 23:47:23 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id fc21so2486748vbb.7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:47:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bhü1HlEHkSCZSZ+QRTYxAgOhLkQqIRrvDCdrBlCFRvFE=;
b=I+Bsod2vbwHIqP3n8K1IPwURMbh4H1hZUnKXy+wnG/Sz5vRMTGKK8+mHg+mlAK0pSY
91hvagofpdoRN4vUuCkkz0JasXt3ITBe8kUzzVHw7VcaSiVa+WB/2fYkdmqcp5XNLdhf
4hTMV474tj1sVB+VsiszF/6uGclotmLwW8JL2DiZGYUrQwdnomAeTOr7a1H/MzujZv9c
4/Yu8H5dtSwhNPioVh9tcGbKhtVgZgqu9ULWu9URdLdAN1sVlAEQ3aXFExtAIEr3Vo2i
3kFEX7KFmtJ+Vx1Yx7idRbVEixtcBn2UaAOatrG3393iB8rpEcKhJkHNSFJkKP2NGPbg
a6aQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.24.98 with SMTP id t2mr5210811vdf.69.1360979241157; Fri,
15 Feb 2013 17:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.228.4 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:47:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:47:21 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rafael Galdino <sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 04:30:13 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
seria os 32*64 + o que pra dar os 2.5Mbps? canais de sinalização?
Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 22:15, Alexandre J. Correa (Onda) <
alexandre at onda.net.br> escreveu:
> sao exatos 2.6mbit/s com 1000pps !!
>
>
>
> On 15/02/2013 20:01, Mauricio Cardoso Dambros wrote:
>
>> Exatamente, mas devemos lembrar que também há um overhead quando
>> "encapsulamos" o TDM em IP.
>> O throughput total pode ser calculado. As variáveis do calculo são o
>> número
>> de timeslots, jitter-buffer e packet-delay.
>> Um E1 unframed com 32 timeslots utiliza aproximadamente 2,5 Mbps, podendo
>> variar para mais ou menos.
>>
>> Também me coloco a disposição para demais esclarecimentos.
>>
>> []´s
>> Maurício . . .
>>
>> Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 09:38, DATACOM - Marcelo.Veriato <
>> marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br**> escreveu:
>>
>> A configuração de timeslots determina quantos timeslots TDM serão
>>> transmitidos no bundle. No lado do Ethernet essa configuração implica na
>>> quantidade de dados transmitidos: cada timeslot representa 64kbits de
>>> dados
>>> por bundle. Por exemplo: uma configuração de TDM unframed com 32
>>> timeslots
>>> no bundle resulta em uma utilização de banda de 2048kbit/s; dois bundles
>>> com essa mesma configuração resultam em uma utilização de banda de
>>> 4096kbit/s.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sds.
>
> Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
> Sócio-Administrador
>
> Office: +55 34 3351 3077
>
> Onda Internet
> www.onda.net.br
>
>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>
--
Att.
Rafael Galdino
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp5473obb;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:09:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.49.10 with SMTP id b10mr2109274ank.22.1361009377005;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d67si11785299yhn.139.2013.02.16.02.09.36;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:09:36 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A8C11F7E5;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:09:28 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-bk0-f43.google.com (mail-bk0-f43.google.com
[209.85.214.43])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C50011F7B7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:56:41 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id jm19so1871655bkc.2
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:56:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=PwhCMGv2ys1ZPGoS4iRQMZLjQdiWfZTBaeNW1m6w+Vk=;
bÏ3JU/EOBcnX0Zd+7jufk0096KW2RSU9SBpJxgzzFLyKbVaUlnvrF6UB6K8E6zTYyC
g7cZeQMK2HfM7UPuli2SLD+q0pddrtBE1znp3XANyk14/RlVNjv64eMYoJYeHzkJqs+s
wR3Eqe9Sav4wNkwnRGbNfXckMouDZsfHJyyAjV1ZpOHfccy6kvO4b2rHSgh659TO3nQJ
rG8ZK0GuzZb7QUyN76Hauv9vfyZkugGtyE7LSk+8nN0pyOPyPMSNdYkOBOUSF413I4+t
JP9POLdT25SR/ScPNC+zDZ1HbF/2/p8T1tiH/inlZdp2HfmMsFX0g0tsGpYqQM6Y/6i4
V3ww=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.204.145.145 with SMTP id d17mr1813911bkv.31.1361004998635;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:56:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.18.198 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:56:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.18.198 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:56:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511E88AF.3070109 at vetor.com.br>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<BLU170-DS2262A19BAB41506E57DE8CF80E0 at phx.gbl>
<511E88AF.3070109 at vetor.com.br>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 05:56:38 -0300
Message-ID: <CAHhBgr3ERPO5H=AJo2o8Pet8wr5xm=9m0HC005r61yu_QwOVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Percival Henriques de Souza <percivalhenriques at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:09:27 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] RES: Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
A level 3 está com Data Center novo em são Paulo
Em 15/02/2013 18:48, "manoel Wanderley" <manoel at vetor.com.br> escreveu:
> Este link dos datacenters está muito desatualizado
>
>> Da uma olhada no site e agenda uma visita em um dos datacenters da lista.
>>
>> http://www.datacenter9.com/**datacenters<http://www.datacenter9.com/datacenters>
>>
>>
>> -----Mensagem original-----
>> De: gter [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.**registro.br<gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>]
>> Em nome de Juliano
>> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2013 22:07
>> Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
>> Assunto: [GTER] Colocation
>>
>> Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
>> Alguma recomendação?
>>
>> Obrigado
>>
>> Att.
>> Juliano
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>
>> -----
>> Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem.
>> Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
>> Versão: 2013.0.2899 / Banco de dados de vírus: 2639/6105 - Data de
>> Lançamento: 02/15/13
>>
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>
>>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.115.165 with SMTP id jp5csp6176obb;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:36:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.154.66 with SMTP id g42mr7518390yhk.120.1361011016986;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si11856234yhi.115.2013.02.16.02.36.55;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C5511F7EA;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:36:51 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com (mail-vb0-f41.google.com
[209.85.212.41])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5AC211F7D1
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:18:50 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l22so2711282vbn.0
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:18:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=qBXYNjKzva7bMAcKRMSrkkrqmtmI/ayyEeV30GnYzdU=;
b=aiPc/G5GSUmH0rW0ezw8WsJVAtGBTidn1KtoHN3HgYwdH3Lk32Mv5BWRkdREaXKTS5
PrOvZNvJlDtOSqFc8sNkSoN0LF0NEn0svm+ELmwEncEi3om04VzQ+RBJCOmYWt65Za7V
o2KUiB82ctStviZVjBmlEladZmtqNGKuiXgCJOatlsn4mA+Ro8u1MjABCT7HusNi4FqB
dcYXvPOY9KvnkQyW3hLYsnCFZabMdAU4kkT+FwAPpTDBx882XBgUfyDMJVm+CgNygg0t
IIGuKXNde0kduTaHBmyghWMXTm+l4cCPY5SLjTQC69ZftIV0yGH5rwQdeWP5uokNbE/N
Snxw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.215.73 with SMTP id hd9mr7219848vcb.19.1361009929121;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:18:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.228.4 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:18:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHhBgr3ERPO5H=AJo2o8Pet8wr5xm=9m0HC005r61yu_QwOVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<BLU170-DS2262A19BAB41506E57DE8CF80E0 at phx.gbl>
<511E88AF.3070109 at vetor.com.br>
<CAHhBgr3ERPO5H=AJo2o8Pet8wr5xm=9m0HC005r61yu_QwOVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 07:18:48 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPefbKpGPWhimDfdAfGgnhpjYaSom8LB0zvwoWRY1L3-pyJhaQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rafael Galdino <sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:36:50 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] RES: Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Alog :)
Em 16 de fevereiro de 2013 05:56, Percival Henriques de Souza <
percivalhenriques at gmail.com> escreveu:
> A level 3 está com Data Center novo em são Paulo
> Em 15/02/2013 18:48, "manoel Wanderley" <manoel at vetor.com.br> escreveu:
>
> > Este link dos datacenters está muito desatualizado
> >
> >> Da uma olhada no site e agenda uma visita em um dos datacenters da
> lista.
> >>
> >> http://www.datacenter9.com/**datacenters<
> http://www.datacenter9.com/datacenters>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Mensagem original-----
> >> De: gter [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.**registro.br<
> gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>]
> >> Em nome de Juliano
> >> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2013 22:07
> >> Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> >> Assunto: [GTER] Colocation
> >>
> >> Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
> >> Alguma recomendação?
> >>
> >> Obrigado
> >>
> >> Att.
> >> Juliano
> >> --
> >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem.
> >> Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
> >> Versão: 2013.0.2899 / Banco de dados de vírus: 2639/6105 - Data de
> >> Lançamento: 02/15/13
> >>
> >> --
> >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> >
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Att.
Rafael Galdino
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp25220obb;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:39:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.129.72 with SMTP id g48mr10693822yhi.102.1361050749329;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r68si14595193yhk.86.2013.02.16.13.39.08;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D249F11F7BF;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:38:57 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (mail-ob0-f171.google.com
[209.85.214.171])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E897311F7BF
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:56:27 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id x4so4491480obh.2
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 07:56:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=Pq8d9FfA2dgaqgbOwsXKwEdkvWAyyDlECLCCqXt2oVs=;
b=aNBqj1UMVoQq0UB9jza0KEpusoi0mbZhXaFoH8BuNsJbpWqBVCX6Blz0q+fZuqjV91
t/qvHIjiLCwhprmkjmv4e6yJG9qMbcIyKW8lSHrl5DApdZcIpSdY53/60kUxJ3zAyqcT
uQS+R8CCVFOY3CoCaGM3+Yj1upicUlkCs1jiAvKApeOrKNOGCN/PSL3OosVlhyYT3JsE
9MnFo2EJ6vgwWOn6f7/nUFIdlzpObw0Hm+Cnnu59YO+fpJuoqL0qJdDIkWsIA7lXDJ0P
eiVm8ajiVVfQMbz/6gP9fr8Dh7xvGWPGT4kjd8Bo/bRX7ueRI0SNnzA2poMSQuMxX6Vn
QSXg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.127.115 with SMTP id nf19mr3788902obb.49.1361030186630;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 07:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.15.135 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 07:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:56:26 -0300
Message-ID: <CALmS6pUh3taJ7Gegghc+pcdqX-fg+5VSE2B03NCfG+ipEfXj5w at mail.gmail.com>
From: Emanuel Martins <emanuel001 at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:38:56 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: [GTER] Software para cadastro de Fibras Opticas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Boa tarde,
Podem me informar um software bom, barato e com versão em portugues de
preferência que é utilizado para cadastro da rede de fibra optica com
utilização de mpas e autocad e estoque do material de fibra.
Agradeço.
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp25245obb;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:40:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.91.163 with SMTP id h23mr11018914yhf.12.1361050825485;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h13si27087026anb.210.2013.02.16.13.40.24;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEDA11F7E4;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:40:20 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from smtp62.kinghost.net (smtp62.kinghost.net [189.38.82.62])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F4511F7E8
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:20:51 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from smtp-gw-02.kinghost.net (smtp-gw-02 [127.0.0.1])
by smtp62.kinghost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E613927BF0
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:20:49 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from MacBook-Air-de-Juliano.local (unknown [189.38.85.10])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp-gw-02.kinghost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5ABCFAA0D8B4
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:20:49 -0200 (BRST)
Message-ID: <511FB1E1.2010106 at kinghost.com.br>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:20:49 -0200
From: Juliano Primavesi | KingHost <juliano at kinghost.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<BLU170-DS2262A19BAB41506E57DE8CF80E0 at phx.gbl>
<511E88AF.3070109 at vetor.com.br>
<CAHhBgr3ERPO5H=AJo2o8Pet8wr5xm=9m0HC005r61yu_QwOVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHhBgr3ERPO5H=AJo2o8Pet8wr5xm=9m0HC005r61yu_QwOVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:40:18 -0200
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] RES: Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Nova "SALA" de IDC voce quer dizer... Datacenter novo nao tem. Continua
sendo o mesmo predio em Cotia.
Juliano
Em 16/02/13 06:56, Percival Henriques de Souza escreveu:
> A level 3 está com Data Center novo em são Paulo
> Em 15/02/2013 18:48, "manoel Wanderley" <manoel at vetor.com.br> escreveu:
>
>> Este link dos datacenters está muito desatualizado
>>
>>> Da uma olhada no site e agenda uma visita em um dos datacenters da lista.
>>>
>>> http://www.datacenter9.com/**datacenters<http://www.datacenter9.com/datacenters>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Mensagem original-----
>>> De: gter [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.**registro.br<gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>]
>>> Em nome de Juliano
>>> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2013 22:07
>>> Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
>>> Assunto: [GTER] Colocation
>>>
>>> Pessoal, preciso de um colocation (2U) com uns 20Mbps de link.
>>> Alguma recomendação?
>>>
>>> Obrigado
>>>
>>> Att.
>>> Juliano
>>> --
>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem.
>>> Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
>>> Versão: 2013.0.2899 / Banco de dados de vírus: 2639/6105 - Data de
>>> Lançamento: 02/15/13
>>>
>>> --
>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp25236obb;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:40:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.23.1 with SMTP id a1mr3052403anj.1.1361050806856;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a27si13931949yhn.106.2013.02.16.13.40.06;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6DB11F7C8;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:40:03 -0200 (BRST)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com
[209.85.214.180])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F0A311F7B4
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:57:29 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ef5so4680790obb.11
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:57:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=ZeUtXz0GawPAwYk85LKpGeuHd0TDrrV1TVansNPD+gY=;
b=X4fw6ZeOKLeeW7knDHl91bqT8In7Ap9iEqN+909vQj8DHMkUUUxqPakIQ7BwMaHg7D
iEG5pJJgVtzJALTdQkAUMQdXYUlIse/4n902obxM6w7rGrtso6NU1HvO7PQS89cQNt0g
WioeYdPKivDm6/j58wMBW2y/EZkxwSr4S8S922wlp4rt8BzW8h527QKi3Zjv0jXHMUV1
iognucKnOgR5WZtiedh+U653a1uCIANn/yVOIjHjhg0PGy5fv0p4dvmZ6szMy8ACqxkx
foB60/bF6FxatqXgKiQTTdHuVl1O1Wb0pBDtma6n7B9sEh2GDkeb16dgZLa238wQXERA
yRqw=
X-Received: by 10.60.8.134 with SMTP id r6mr4058857oea.53.1361048246465; Sat,
16 Feb 2013 12:57:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.112.130 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 12:57:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAG0G1gtW3VHcG4VuMhqKkCtMb5BMpoizyxu4TMKg1XYPW=hV2g at mail.gmail.com>
References: <3A5A4D3F-25EF-43D5-8E1A-369E31CDB885 at gmail.com>
<CAG0G1gtW3VHcG4VuMhqKkCtMb5BMpoizyxu4TMKg1XYPW=hV2g at mail.gmail.com>
From: Humberto Galiza <humbertogaliza at gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:57:05 -0300
Message-ID: <CAByG9DOruQ5yBrUr+gOyh_+154aJB6j67wrxNi18kdzqwcMzjA at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:40:02 -0200
Subject: Re: [GTER] Wccp + Mara Cache
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Oi,
Não tive tempo de responder antes (e talvez não tenha dado maiores
detalhes sobre o cenário), mas vamos lá:
- No cenário montado foi seguida a orientação do próprio suporte do
Mara (eles tem um passo-a-passo de configuração do mara com cisco
3750). Nesse cenário são criados dois services (80 e 90) que operam em
conjunto com duas acl's (180 e 190 - sentido cliente-> internet, e
internet->cliente respectivamente).
- Na documentação do Mara diz explicitamente para NUNCA utilizar
"redirect out" pois o router irá processar os pacotes em modo software
(mesmo usando L2 com mask para encaminhamento do tráfego); de fato
isso é verdade: se eu habilitar o redirect out nas interfaces (no
service 90) a CPU da caixa é castigada, e começo a perder pacotes.
- Na mesma documentaçào manda ativar ip wccp 80 redirect in / ip wccp
90 redirect in em TODAS as interfaces do router exceto na diretamente
conectada ao mara cache (o que me pareceu bastante estranho, pois no
bluecoat nunca fiz setup assim...mas enfim, foi feito).
- O fato é: quando é feito o setup acima, o tráfego deveria ser
enviado ao mara e processado (há hit counts nas acl's), mas não é
(volto a ressaltar que toda a negociação via WCCP é realizada com
sucesso, e se colocarmos o mara operando em modo router ele faz o
proxy transparente normalmente); tenho trabalhado em conjunto com o
pessoal do suporte deles, mas até agora sem sucesso.
- O setup é todo baseado em encaminhamento L2 usando mask assignment
(suportado pelo Mara)
- Meu IOS é o 15.0(1)S1 na plataforma Cisco 7606 com SUP 720-3CXL.
Alguém já passou por situação semelhante?
Att,
Humberto Galiza
Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 19:53, Alex Montoanelli
<alex.montoanelli at unetvale.net> escreveu:
> Olá Humberto,
>
> Você tem que criar 2 access list, e 2 servicos wccp.
>
> Aplicar um serviço na direção in outro out.
>
> Uma acl pela o sentido in, oque der match vai para o Mara,
> a acl no sentido out é o contrario, oque vem da rua pra dentro.
>
> Lembre-se de ter um interface só para o mara ( pode ser vlan),
> e nela você configura ip wccp exclude redirect-in
>
> Abraço
>
> --
> Alex
>
> 2013/2/13 Humberto Galiza <humbertogaliza at gmail.com>:
>> Prezados,
>>
>> Alguem ai tem wccp v2 rodando com o mara cache?
>>
>> Estou com bastante dificuldade para fazer as duas caixas se entenderem. A negociacao do wccp eh realizada, mas quando habilito o redirect em uma determinada interface do router, o trafego chega ao Mara e se perde (gateway timeout).
>>
>> O mara esta funcional (pois ja funciona em modo tproxy como router). Alguem que tenha o segredo gostaria de compartilhar?
>>
>> Ja configurei diversas vezes com bluecoat, e foi bem menos traumatico...
>>
>> Grato!
>>
>> Enviado via iPhone
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp34088obb;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:26:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.133.44 with SMTP id p32mr12172383yhi.17.1361075195882;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:26:35 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x9si15038660yhl.5.2013.02.16.20.26.35;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:26:35 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7F711F826;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:25:46 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 060DB11F7B7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:48:31 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k11so6162076iea.10
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:48:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=i4MReSgpmbOVlaaozH8WXtU8c9sQjEpdyQNHBN5xjyU=;
b=Epcje5VRngbnSC8442tSzqlT3++lFbPtb73CHRViWxNHCwWyCZsuvRHCdZr6Q/a/VD
qqm5izWmxxtPju2tANdP7COb+Un9uDSWupMV/zRWrDPKrG9kN48NKmYs4UPqg+bQCzll
SbTXL67+bjjM0e1bWeUkzn+gdFMygzz1sFVZmPMkgWvH9TlYNgg79tDHoO2PTFZIgVEm
j5OXDQ9vc2DAdFqcUF+4E9nOrIwOeYVodrJalmFgztqnJnK5Fo6gWzssDYoGFuU04Vbq
cY++rRjBn6JNSBKv3+ge402MQ4MbuKjYdEHY+YRfh5r+i7R1XESYub/iA7N06cL1L0Ee
S/Uw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.194.229 with SMTP id hz5mr4422221igc.111.1361062105317;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:48:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.163.97 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:48:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.163.97 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:48:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
<CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:48:25 -0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Y3zaIr2EdeC-0ykXrZ_H7qa30PI
Message-ID: <CAF60hAzip=HQ_Q1J=Sb7g35dUEE8bCU-asc=ZZ9q8hRmGc+-g at mail.gmail.com>
From: Mauricio Cardoso Dambros <mauricio at mauriciotelecom.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:25:45 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Cabeçalho IP e informações CESoP.
__
Maurício . . .
Sent by my Androidphone...
Em 16/02/2013 04:30, "Rafael Galdino" <sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com>
escreveu:
>
> seria os 32*64 + o que pra dar os 2.5Mbps? canais de sinalização?
>
>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 22:15, Alexandre J. Correa (Onda) <
> alexandre at onda.net.br> escreveu:
>
> > sao exatos 2.6mbit/s com 1000pps !!
> >
> >
> >
> > On 15/02/2013 20:01, Mauricio Cardoso Dambros wrote:
> >
> >> Exatamente, mas devemos lembrar que também há um overhead quando
> >> "encapsulamos" o TDM em IP.
> >> O throughput total pode ser calculado. As variáveis do calculo são o
> >> número
> >> de timeslots, jitter-buffer e packet-delay.
> >> Um E1 unframed com 32 timeslots utiliza aproximadamente 2,5 Mbps,
podendo
> >> variar para mais ou menos.
> >>
> >> Também me coloco a disposição para demais esclarecimentos.
> >>
> >> []´s
> >> Maurício . . .
> >>
> >> Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 09:38, DATACOM - Marcelo.Veriato <
> >> marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br**> escreveu:
> >>
> >> A configuração de timeslots determina quantos timeslots TDM serão
> >>> transmitidos no bundle. No lado do Ethernet essa configuração implica
na
> >>> quantidade de dados transmitidos: cada timeslot representa 64kbits de
> >>> dados
> >>> por bundle. Por exemplo: uma configuração de TDM unframed com 32
> >>> timeslots
> >>> no bundle resulta em uma utilização de banda de 2048kbit/s; dois
bundles
> >>> com essa mesma configuração resultam em uma utilização de banda de
> >>> 4096kbit/s.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Sds.
> >
> > Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
> > Sócio-Administrador
> >
> > Office: +55 34 3351 3077
> >
> > Onda Internet
> > www.onda.net.br
> >
> >
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Att.
>
> Rafael Galdino
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp34074obb;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:25:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.119.9 with SMTP id m9mr11997485yhh.106.1361075159568;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d10si27583476anp.133.2013.02.16.20.25.58;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@onda.net.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB51411F7FE;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:25:24 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from cube.onda.net.br
(2001-12ac-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0005.v6.onda.net.br [IPv6:2001:12ac::5])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D8D911F7B7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:55:44 -0200 (BRST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onda.net.br;
sÞfault;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
bh=vxJkUN6XAlTv+z21GI29+xNDU4DTBkPjx3LFM4KzLL4=;
b¢pK5htvj04mAm7FCRPjN5ljuwQuxvDoB0tcWFxfkI3dbR2JILsWz1abkge9W8/WqPrBp3L1v1t1HvrX92hcej/lPwTJ/KcAa7oQYB4QFaUCDlPpbIytLPz5rs+ZX3Jn;
Received: from static-189-84-15-254.v4.onda.net.br ([189.84.15.254]:49515
helo=[192.168.102.173])
by cube.onda.net.br with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexandre at onda.net.br>)
id 1U6tTg-0004jc-3S
for gter at eng.registro.br; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:55:40 -0200
Message-ID: <512038A3.3050306 at onda.net.br>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:55:47 -0200
From: "Alexandre J. Correa - Onda Internet" <alexandre at onda.net.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <3A5A4D3F-25EF-43D5-8E1A-369E31CDB885 at gmail.com>
<CAG0G1gtW3VHcG4VuMhqKkCtMb5BMpoizyxu4TMKg1XYPW=hV2g at mail.gmail.com>
<CAByG9DOruQ5yBrUr+gOyh_+154aJB6j67wrxNi18kdzqwcMzjA at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAByG9DOruQ5yBrUr+gOyh_+154aJB6j67wrxNi18kdzqwcMzjA at mail.gmail.com>
X-cPanel-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-cPanel-MailScanner-ID: 1U6tTg-0004jc-3S
X-cPanel-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
Provider for details
X-cPanel-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-cPanel-MailScanner-From: alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Spam-Status: No
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cube.onda.net.br
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eng.registro.br
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - onda.net.br
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cube.onda.net.br: authenticated_id:
alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:25:21 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Wccp + Mara Cache
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
usva wccp em 3660 com squid/lusca .. o setup era usando da forma q vc
descreveu...
as interfaces que colocava o redirect in eram as do cliente + uplinks ...
80 clientes e 90 uplinks ou ordem inversa, nao recordo..
o primeiro setup, fiz com tuneis GRE .. depois testei com L2 ..
Em 16/02/2013 18:57, Humberto Galiza escreveu:
> da ativar ip wccp 80 redirect in / ip wccp
> 90 redirect in em TODAS as interfaces do router exceto na diretamente
--
Sds.
Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
Socio-Administrador
Onda Internet
www.onda.net.br
IPV6 Ready !
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp34081obb;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:26:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.146.137 with SMTP id r9mr12014069yhj.98.1361075179175;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u19si6704521ane.152.2013.02.16.20.26.18;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@onda.net.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5F111F808;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:25:35 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from cube.onda.net.br
(2001-12ac-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0005.v6.onda.net.br [IPv6:2001:12ac::5])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0320D11F7B7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:57:24 -0200 (BRST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onda.net.br;
sÞfault;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
bh=UzpCJoNlcQxoSNDof5OJ+Qf2fSZxmAuMRMg27tAuluM=;
b=XRzJCd5SS4mLg0DG9Ueg52oXZNj92WT32XL2BO1Vt704AR/6FeSyWevEcdVho932E6PecURodC35HDKlpKes6HXUtZ5JydAK2dokbVbKx5cSVQi0oWI9BitMSIb2e4Ue;
Received: from static-189-84-15-254.v4.onda.net.br ([189.84.15.254]:49523
helo=[192.168.102.173])
by cube.onda.net.br with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexandre at onda.net.br>)
id 1U6tVI-0004ki-Ph
for gter at eng.registro.br; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:57:20 -0200
Message-ID: <51203908.6050907 at onda.net.br>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:57:28 -0200
From: "Alexandre J. Correa - Onda Internet" <alexandre at onda.net.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
<CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
X-cPanel-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-cPanel-MailScanner-ID: 1U6tVI-0004ki-Ph
X-cPanel-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
Provider for details
X-cPanel-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-cPanel-MailScanner-From: alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Spam-Status: No
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cube.onda.net.br
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eng.registro.br
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - onda.net.br
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cube.onda.net.br: authenticated_id:
alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:25:34 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
e o trafego eh constante, utilizando ou nao.. ele está la !!
Em 15/02/2013 23:47, Rafael Galdino escreveu:
> seria os 32*64 + o que pra dar os 2.5Mbps? canais de sinalização?
>
>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 22:15, Alexandre J. Correa (Onda) <
> alexandre at onda.net.br> escreveu:
>
>> sao exatos 2.6mbit/s com 1000pps !!
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15/02/2013 20:01, Mauricio Cardoso Dambros wrote:
>>
>>> Exatamente, mas devemos lembrar que também há um overhead quando
>>> "encapsulamos" o TDM em IP.
>>> O throughput total pode ser calculado. As variáveis do calculo são o
>>> número
>>> de timeslots, jitter-buffer e packet-delay.
>>> Um E1 unframed com 32 timeslots utiliza aproximadamente 2,5 Mbps, podendo
>>> variar para mais ou menos.
>>>
>>> Também me coloco a disposição para demais esclarecimentos.
>>>
>>> []´s
>>> Maurício . . .
>>>
>>> Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 09:38, DATACOM - Marcelo.Veriato <
>>> marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br**> escreveu:
>>>
>>> A configuração de timeslots determina quantos timeslots TDM serão
>>>> transmitidos no bundle. No lado do Ethernet essa configuração implica na
>>>> quantidade de dados transmitidos: cada timeslot representa 64kbits de
>>>> dados
>>>> por bundle. Por exemplo: uma configuração de TDM unframed com 32
>>>> timeslots
>>>> no bundle resulta em uma utilização de banda de 2048kbit/s; dois bundles
>>>> com essa mesma configuração resultam em uma utilização de banda de
>>>> 4096kbit/s.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Sds.
>>
>> Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
>> Sócio-Administrador
>>
>> Office: +55 34 3351 3077
>>
>> Onda Internet
>> www.onda.net.br
>>
>>
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>
>
>
--
Sds.
Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
Socio-Administrador
Onda Internet
www.onda.net.br
IPV6 Ready !
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp34658obb;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:56:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.84.52 with SMTP id r40mr12172737yhe.94.1361077012754;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d20si2286000ani.134.2013.02.16.20.56.52;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFC311F7C5;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:56:47 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-qe0-f44.google.com (mail-qe0-f44.google.com
[209.85.128.44])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E862F11F7B7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:31:16 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a11so2025072qen.31
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:31:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=xYFzwk7qbzKpBtrc9SNQv0V3ZRkqPNO50mMadi40168=;
b=H8PCRMkZaI8k7yPQT1Zc4RF5HZUCdzYWxNwM+Rz1l4Xy9HBYG9WHp/JGXPgut/zU73
7nC7H4qHf/6VAjbnXOYB67tHrL0zE4gvAeUJrAwRGcmYFJbcms0Z7i69mBRS7k7BJhqM
DFM8UB9yUsGyIs5K9oK3367yNhMJSFK1T+wr1OZyjXHqOzprLSU86ZLxo+0Huk9U6Nto
xCqzC2CedGak0phI9FIY8oyM5e7yzZgkkohU+gu763gcDxSWWo2kc1GDPq6bptv3uTHt
r98JfbiuUozPrFoZ3v0ltItdnSSQ1gxjHiff1zPj6jhWcUUNhiKbl9q4/mesd2cZhVOV
tTdQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.101.74 with SMTP id b10mr3865404qao.0.1361075475086;
Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.78.12 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:31:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51203908.6050907 at onda.net.br>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
<CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
<51203908.6050907 at onda.net.br>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:31:14 -0300
Message-ID: <CACyzUwLZ5Uc+PhQKmHeQaeS1rMX1mZry8fmee5Kd974CSzp_eg at mail.gmail.com>
From: Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar at ispbrasil.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnS11JIGCOQ7ddD64zknk9JOuI6W4nNddFEpCXEbHXEJDNXT4/KhKw1NjQZuc29pVKzG1qy
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:56:46 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
2013/2/16 Alexandre J. Correa - Onda Internet <alexandre at onda.net.br>:
> e o trafego eh constante, utilizando ou nao.. ele está la !!
por isto é viavel converter para voip.
--
------------
Itamar Reis Peixoto
http://www.quebarato.com.br/perfil/itamarjp
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp59582obb;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:28:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.120.206 with SMTP id p54mr16057169yhh.77.1361132891909;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u21si4055940ann.21.2013.02.17.12.28.11;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BA811F87F;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:28:05 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-vb0-f50.google.com (mail-vb0-f50.google.com
[209.85.212.50])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EF1C11F7B6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:53:48 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id ft2so3026863vbb.9
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:53:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=INR18F1pD0llnkCKSZUg4CiqRd1ErJzPnXqpCT/kIuA=;
bã56NR/p5bnJpkduAhHj88cbpwKQ7xKPh2xGZhrVSJZaQrmK/FZeWWKk12ueHH9wzC
+OgFForkOVoj+5VcTO1+7omMAInak8XG90prxToNli5bdn+wKfUqkhVDsZmZJT31yoVt
YcR/Vs38Wdu0wFNeXcDj5zvoA+j1rxK07o/MpHeSbh3KNJv6YiLdfx9qzbQl4toS+s0a
Qa3+lDBFWeJEU4YWkvkbAvpxMC0T1HSMipNGNqhXf6BLtcaGn/mOfl4WIUzUo4wWplGo
2I+A8w7/GTjJ4GMgoQMM5MeQWcBPsyA/X33obcmZJNWJV0VHroKl881A7KZyFNCMy8Gn
Fc5w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.226.70 with SMTP id iv6mr11222018vcb.9.1361102025763;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:53:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.228.4 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:53:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CACyzUwLZ5Uc+PhQKmHeQaeS1rMX1mZry8fmee5Kd974CSzp_eg at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
<CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
<51203908.6050907 at onda.net.br>
<CACyzUwLZ5Uc+PhQKmHeQaeS1rMX1mZry8fmee5Kd974CSzp_eg at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:53:45 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPefbKo9bwXO8xsDwF_4139MzHi+LmzzoPZ+ucFFRjA+MbBHig at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rafael Galdino <sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:28:04 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
nem sempre itamar. pois vc pode querer fracionar digamos uns timeslots pra
voz e outros pra dados....
Em 17 de fevereiro de 2013 01:31, Itamar Reis Peixoto <
itamar at ispbrasil.com.br> escreveu:
> 2013/2/16 Alexandre J. Correa - Onda Internet <alexandre at onda.net.br>:
> > e o trafego eh constante, utilizando ou nao.. ele está la !!
>
> por isto é viavel converter para voip.
>
>
>
> --
> ------------
>
> Itamar Reis Peixoto
> http://www.quebarato.com.br/perfil/itamarjp
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Att.
Rafael Galdino
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp59563obb;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:27:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.149.162 with SMTP id x22mr16157801yhj.37.1361132848847;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:27:28 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a27si17494548yhn.132.2013.02.17.12.27.28;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:27:28 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@onda.net.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0C211F878;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:27:18 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from cube.onda.net.br
(2001-12ac-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0005.v6.onda.net.br [IPv6:2001:12ac::5])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9D5B11F840
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:44:18 -0300 (BRT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onda.net.br;
sÞfault;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
bh=yidEpgvOcpQn3K7Kt2hP1HZsGu02RAa0DtoGKS+rG5A=;
b=ruEWX6npPYlgmGJYOSk1qbIgcwr/9zgADr28CkKd0ChupMcukYbbTSNXM5vr2HCdo8VsySqFlPG+tQynE9msBdUeTXTHafj7tSp5rsxyf9jTYvJnft5KR3qNqUVTVPl6;
Received: from static-189-84-15-254.v4.onda.net.br ([189.84.15.254]:49795
helo=[192.168.102.173])
by cube.onda.net.br with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexandre at onda.net.br>)
id 1U78Hh-0004qf-Cl
for gter at eng.registro.br; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:44:17 -0300
Message-ID: <512116F2.6060901 at onda.net.br>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:44:18 -0300
From: "Alexandre J. Correa - Onda Internet" <alexandre at onda.net.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
<CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
<51203908.6050907 at onda.net.br>
<CACyzUwLZ5Uc+PhQKmHeQaeS1rMX1mZry8fmee5Kd974CSzp_eg at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACyzUwLZ5Uc+PhQKmHeQaeS1rMX1mZry8fmee5Kd974CSzp_eg at mail.gmail.com>
X-cPanel-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-cPanel-MailScanner-ID: 1U78Hh-0004qf-Cl
X-cPanel-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
Provider for details
X-cPanel-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-cPanel-MailScanner-From: alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Spam-Status: No
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cube.onda.net.br
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eng.registro.br
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - onda.net.br
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cube.onda.net.br: authenticated_id:
alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:27:16 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
depende da aplicação itamar !! nem tudo é voip !
Em 17/02/2013 01:31, Itamar Reis Peixoto escreveu:
> 2013/2/16 Alexandre J. Correa - Onda Internet <alexandre at onda.net.br>:
>> e o trafego eh constante, utilizando ou nao.. ele está la !!
> por isto é viavel converter para voip.
>
>
>
--
Sds.
Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
Socio-Administrador
Onda Internet
www.onda.net.br
IPV6 Ready !
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp59576obb;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:27:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.113.180 with SMTP id a40mr16193845yhh.35.1361132871475;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:27:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si17519088yhi.115.2013.02.17.12.27.51;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:27:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB2D11F87D;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:27:35 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (la-in-x022a.1e100.net
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7450311F813
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:31:06 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id fe20so4845818lab.15
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:31:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=ULdxuS64bHTWHSeGS3XcZbasyIFSpIg4IvK+U2H3HhA=;
b=dM45DJM5C6impaxIK4MRFCxyuRXw+4V+YKWKlJCVveSNCRSC6Ebxm6rNa2V/CgyAx0
BDpUwXShJu7pUo7ir8L/Ta1VF7lYJMt4AJozwMSH+yujAdqaihiTZTnVuxb59dD2R+6O
C7G3aAtoLVCGWfbY35bc0husbEqRuXDhkIFWA6XxEUNtjS9itV2r4Xx9NJUqp+D6ayuX
tpjZ0jkGeixZLSpH4QosbNbwb824z3OaM1dLpxOb6um40W8+HMC2sdFgelLb7yUPMnYq
h+S7GEWD+01hrH+/ydqjPZHhh3pGEvtbQpDCO0CyJmjcKNj6Ehua01CMrisLCCOjwSqY
yFAw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.130.131 with SMTP id oe3mr8256970lab.1.1361125863587;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:31:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.65.11 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:31:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:31:03 -0300
Message-ID: <CAGmLXNCBMydpxo4tfWm5LbsYv3CveF_LKHQz3qfYwUn_LmjwkA at mail.gmail.com>
From: Mario Luiz <delins1525 at gmail.com>
To: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:27:33 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: [GTER] Rede HFC
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Olá,
Preciso de uma empresa/pessoa prestar consultoria para implantação de
rede HFC para fornecer tv-internet+telefone. Alguem poderia indicar?
Obrigado,
Mario
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp62058obb;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:11:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.100.238.18 with SMTP id l18mr4777877anh.82.1361139066292;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:11:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r68si18449279yhk.60.2013.02.17.14.11.05;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:11:06 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B420111F84B;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:11:00 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (we-in-x022d.1e100.net
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95DFF11F86E
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:40:55 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r5so4189522wey.32
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:40:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=wKfoJpYNtdE8lOECal/7Dd3i/aF2bCIAU0c9XSqjIwM=;
b=Z481GdNe81plB47nT6QS5c9GQb4XRIEXNiQ8nntKU5ZRzjG6cz5+cXQs1qjDAYnoam
Qc43N3DigoV9+5gWB8T3Ge8dGRWKZfepgW0drGmcBns2dYHqvphqJDhPuZ30CRg47TMU
eZcvNaqUqBfZc8BK2ysSWz0RMJ4gjrV+LqG2Acwi8c7jZhFSsw4WkdaccA5XSTmx9B4Q
fS6/nadXuzkM8m0dPSRBQEUt73AhtoC5BqQgx883HouWwdl0ba1tY6L4WrwOr1zyWyOI
AmVTavUOoHYVCj0MVtE1Azg+M17SNvOrig1cic1ba9YyLDzSOrBlafaiH2IyOBLX5are
IW4Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.235.6 with SMTP id ui6mr15163915wjc.12.1361133653361;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:40:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.3.41 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:40:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGmLXNCBMydpxo4tfWm5LbsYv3CveF_LKHQz3qfYwUn_LmjwkA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGmLXNCBMydpxo4tfWm5LbsYv3CveF_LKHQz3qfYwUn_LmjwkA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:40:53 -0300
Message-ID: <CAA-tYoUDOGa3nBTz+dRTdTL1f_Lj9qCvtiEL31ktibVbsoHa9g at mail.gmail.com>
From: Marc Cabadas <bac at oops.net.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkLV9waYaN2Ma0XolqBNXXuKkHCOHW3j+eFNuZlcdVyuSnM0SzCAsZwqTXqmgNnalMak08X
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:10:59 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Rede HFC
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
em que região você se encontra?
Em 17 de fevereiro de 2013 15:31, Mario Luiz <delins1525 at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Olá,
>
>
> Preciso de uma empresa/pessoa prestar consultoria para implantação de
> rede HFC para fornecer tv-internet+telefone. Alguem poderia indicar?
>
> Obrigado,
>
> Mario
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp62064obb;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:11:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.165.18 with SMTP id s18mr4808308ano.49.1361139084398;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:11:24 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d1si28791541ani.119.2013.02.17.14.11.23;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:11:24 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921A211F872;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:11:01 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (ie-in-x022f.1e100.net
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C382B11F884
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:55:29 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c12so6628783ieb.34
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:55:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=G2MZOOD2EBl1MkGTqya1kycsmyn8RV6ZPytG4wRWbpI=;
b=YvSGSk9GCZA0/i3vDTXRv2zDz8UfgxNwCcRbG+BiHHM+MdtJZE2I8Invqzq4A2d19c
h2SJGd098PNgkYrpBTn8ViDFE0tDv6gk/eoJGeYH4vvCHa/AUcKzC+uoMGecwKgcdXKe
rtC17TGTSyU87uBiS20xkL3BMzeBoRu92NMviB/5CFiKGt7TqtocsjPW6n5vZ3bbU/3p
kEceYrhuXD7BOPYmTTRwRONPAGTmv18Wk05Li02nqIsJ6HJCTJOS9vr4/gnocX006Jn7
uFjSWt62czMaS5oP8BMrhVTqwoX/wQXWnrZk4cGFzz6tkvP87nFluXLbOaZWGzXLRFA5
sLZg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.76.168 with SMTP id l8mr6150564igw.97.1361134526877; Sun,
17 Feb 2013 12:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.157.196 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.157.196 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:55:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511E90BA.5030402 at asbyte.com.br>
References: <CAFxccmx+oYJZHKyFrkt_U85QKdKTTNw75Pd0exsunYB63NWxJw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RT7+kTzDe6=mE-kP+6ZE19MqXBfqBi6i2SHUS=NLQyjgw at mail.gmail.com>
<BLU002-W2268733ABE548B4FF8D7358DC080 at phx.gbl>
<F5981374-F1A3-4E08-9F5B-DC9F8DE596A2 at esds.com.br>
<511E90BA.5030402 at asbyte.com.br>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:55:26 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKEr4RQvtORWTaxoMWSo3_BwXW2SANJUA5N2dGwNtuDPw8yRcQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:10:59 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER]
=?iso-8859-1?q?Problema_com_Auto_Negociação_entre_mikr? =?iso-8859-1?q?otik?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp62075obb;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:11:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.149.74 with SMTP id w50mr16890396yhj.129.1361139103969;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:11:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si17814958yhk.33.2013.02.17.14.11.43;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:11:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7812F11F887;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:11:02 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-yh0-x230.google.com (mail-yh0-x230.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::230])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312BF11F884
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:55:35 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f48.google.com with SMTP id q12so876720yhf.35
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:55:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer
:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding
:mime-version; bh=mDhSc49pPAqpNG/Ie7cwK/1d/V+9OJqGLhad9JgQmBc=;
b=Z2vPavkgxn02tv/gAdqGyKaPBrkPA3BuAJGOgUKdveTGFDxr7Qi7moH9HPufJrejZd
yc3J80RYrJbWxUMmwFCr7eHh4UgR9rb9Cp4skyuMy427H6rFHM6l8Sz1VesWn86zzuio
2azqFM6ffWKUKR9ntTUmh7cmcdvDvWtpUsTa5QwKvQWy5C0un6nSEGD8plbI/eVFXENh
9YNEWLdUGpN1FCbYh61ZMmAXkD1tKA3Ng3b6GPVR8OrwnLl0zrXTbHyg6T3KOS9QHrMk
jfOuDAqnFQm3ToVXo9ooYLMplDuJIqSebNZOOKH+akaMSn75boCvQARNPAe3aWkhu3IO
J+6Q=
X-Received: by 10.236.112.197 with SMTP id y45mr16411336yhg.121.1361134533617;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:55:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([201.49.193.58])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d80sm81898871yhg.4.2013.02.17.12.55.31
(version=TLSv1 cipherìDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits8/128);
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:55:32 -0800 (PST)
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
<CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
<51203908.6050907 at onda.net.br>
<CACyzUwLZ5Uc+PhQKmHeQaeS1rMX1mZry8fmee5Kd974CSzp_eg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKo9bwXO8xsDwF_4139MzHi+LmzzoPZ+ucFFRjA+MbBHig at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wagner Furquim <wagnerfurquim at gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B144)
In-Reply-To: <CAPefbKo9bwXO8xsDwF_4139MzHi+LmzzoPZ+ucFFRjA+MbBHig at mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <AEDB7D7B-B528-421A-9033-B31B1F9CF6B4 at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:55:27 -0300
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:10:59 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?utf-8?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp71157obb;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:23:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.166.226 with SMTP id g62mr17953454yhl.74.1361161416483;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:23:36 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o9si18758756yhm.4.2013.02.17.20.23.35;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:23:36 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017D811F86A;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:23:28 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ve0-f176.google.com (mail-ve0-f176.google.com
[209.85.128.176])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 195B411F84C
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:32:45 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id cz10so4468587veb.35
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:32:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=GesNCvKjax8Qnh1dAQTm1kcHojpY93++xHyIUBe7rKY=;
b=sKuAQpQG5OuhYRHit5Nwlu7gY9V0jA8V9N9dtcYtd4s6tgVdYN3p+s0Huu9CUyy30m
tE8Tex6cegZyd3wqJAkkT2FSHxqfcOLJZHNFyBdAIR80Hmt/6FYWJtJ3CTLF2wEZjbUZ
TxTtIKjQyBrPTpigNWbXnT5Ix291brVGV1zj+tu89jNEvbVxkYfeEKsy5zqprV95k7wY
ZoPOySNrzarrJVUKWAZ3JD3e88FIdWUkHWxx0s3CU4xOXTd1vznvcUqtMmCWCWn3HaYE
2EUybyd/0yl1ftI1FP/CGnHYraHK5arKAsnb6tRGGlE9TF/ptkAsZgWR66CR2zFxUKvT
3S8w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.239.14 with SMTP id ku14mr13427746vcb.57.1361158364879;
Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.80.36 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:32:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALmS6pUh3taJ7Gegghc+pcdqX-fg+5VSE2B03NCfG+ipEfXj5w at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALmS6pUh3taJ7Gegghc+pcdqX-fg+5VSE2B03NCfG+ipEfXj5w at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:32:44 -0300
Message-ID: <CAJmea2G9mFSbmJzV0YTQR4PKiaUPr-Ku5wN+3St67JE9LYmYYQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Antonio Junior <anjunior at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:23:26 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Software para cadastro de Fibras Opticas
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
geogridmaps, mynet(cpqd), fiberdoc...
--
Att,
Antonio Junior
Em 16 de fevereiro de 2013 13:56, Emanuel Martins
<emanuel001 at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Boa tarde,
> Podem me informar um software bom, barato e com versão em portugues de
> preferência que é utilizado para cadastro da rede de fibra optica com
> utilização de mpas e autocad e estoque do material de fibra.
> Agradeço.
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp93975obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:23:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.42.14 with SMTP id u14mr154645anj.38.1361200994770;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c67si20705520yhe.6.2013.02.18.07.23.14;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:23:14 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD7A11F7C8;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:23:10 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com
[209.85.220.47])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9641911F7C1
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:51:04 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id bj3so2826781pad.6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:51:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=vMJMElrWNjD82EgVP32cR9Gfh0oIHd5jEBCdoAR+xOM=;
b=gnEqwCDN/hNe4i3Slx8bH0yWTvXkwgaw++U7Z7sVos4wGrItfwvL4nxvxl2UjjQvWO
QUcjbDtr5WiyiFqA/x8zMUzA1do/OjAZqoGgv3QvWOeaXdWLYGDMNOtNjSvg5S3eQpO5
w2Q1FcHU0w2DfiydCAREo2xe9itt+aWFWj6DBrb9K7ehuxt2uRlfElYlQ0i3g7MtOB9n
zVmiYkmy1gSfM5ZR5Q6wOeGubdxfBnODbY89Ex6GbFOAWKoYwpbr+UEvQzeU7BvV1VZp
qJpT62kMOiK6CTmu2TyiSpWyWQ8JffADiuwiKKyvi7AP6xNwjncLp6sLzkZczOl/p8a/
jH8w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.227.137 with SMTP id sa9mr32884821pac.17.1361195462439;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:51:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.58.35 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:51:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFzheD5=Bz9seUAjjgZFJHSadn0vCTXebm6QDsXsn22Vgk5Ogw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOGL8E91AAMC7_iacBg22vNbfpgYyzCk=vvNzJj3Trh3mjHeJA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2Huof7eMWEqMpEAC-DNVOaVALc4BCnAG0W+DoqrKHnXeg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGxniCXhOPG79QZxD5zqJ0=3i+qVWxhTGtjX906yB3LEWuHxeQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CABR=JGc7Hz59wSQempEjZCQi8Bpt7ArG_Ddrqw4OrgNo1a+3bQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAFAfM5rgdN-1SkOvC6SWZ=Vd=1hQRg+omgkdDJqVoE6=SG4a2g at mail.gmail.com>
<CABR=JGedj=DP2ZbtK7Om=f=W-wX0bz-8bgkn47kgWGEf1eHMeQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAFzheD5=Bz9seUAjjgZFJHSadn0vCTXebm6QDsXsn22Vgk5Ogw at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:51:02 -0300
Message-ID: <CABR=JGfJvJF+GM9U7FDb_tmRCnx5-bcvSXRmg6ssY2YqzWg4eQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Mihran Junior <mihran.kjunior at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:23:08 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Colocation
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
FIlipe,
Não; a referência de Mbps foi citada por outro colega - projetos distintos.
2013/2/15 Filipe Alvarez <filipealvarez at gmail.com>
> Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 15:22, Mihran Junior
> <mihran.kjunior at gmail.com> escreveu:
> > Rafael, tudo bem?
> >
> > Aproximadamente 41m2, hospedando 14-16 racks.
>
> Nossa, tudo isso trafega só 20mbits ?
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Mihran K. Junior
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp93986obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:23:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.127.167 with SMTP id d27mr20981488yhi.39.1361201016464;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:23:36 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a27si20727036yhn.41.2013.02.18.07.23.36;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:23:36 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E0D11F802;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:23:21 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ia0-x232.google.com (ia-in-x0232.1e100.net
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::232])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E71611F7B6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:53:37 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f178.google.com with SMTP id y26so5139224iab.37
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:53:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=/Fj36XKyHXav1V4sgNqzKu7GtmByKEH6/GSmPs3iz3M=;
b=plc3QJtCE2L0PudhNHQQ52VCvKIYF2GfwSP/e2SVcvfTM8ZFKwDH0eUYr0RELKoMKG
rk91MCeupxZzONDfz6x159kbRolhHp0sXsJoKwiQFb+syYkUe7Ty8Bm1wIfzNXTivPqj
bcVFaycPq+oLPkFMWJll/QZzHlIa4TQp6Zdc7BXhU9f9kuTuXFvqlLNdTyVEn8/DZkvP
0hliyIR5SrU7a01N4C3pykt8NoIZjPuz7fLIwVy5y2LZ7ls+sCmHvX3D0xdfq9AbE1P+
pV1NqJWbY//Zoa5v2r2ry8MaoNEdp2HEZPR/POP1DZikGasijgb/qBRaaCPrd2BdIWRQ
eAQw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.213.97 with SMTP id nr1mr7396986igc.36.1361199212468;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:53:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.97.99 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:53:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGmLXNCBMydpxo4tfWm5LbsYv3CveF_LKHQz3qfYwUn_LmjwkA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGmLXNCBMydpxo4tfWm5LbsYv3CveF_LKHQz3qfYwUn_LmjwkA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:53:32 -0300
Message-ID: <CAMkf-ESH-AYERmtQKR+urR+MUHybWNYUWbQWyxW3SxFZijGZUQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rôney_Eduardo?= <roneyeduardosantos at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:23:19 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Rede HFC
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Em 17 de fevereiro de 2013 15:31, Mario Luiz <delins1525 at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Olá,
>
>
> Preciso de uma empresa/pessoa prestar consultoria para implantação de
> rede HFC para fornecer tv-internet+telefone. Alguem poderia indicar?
>
>
www.mcosta.ind.br
--
Rôney Eduardo
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp101077obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:54:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.142.13 with SMTP id u13mr6316993ann.67.1361210063003;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si21400010yhi.141.2013.02.18.09.54.22;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:54:22 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C8D11F815;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:54:11 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from vmsrv02.ps5.com.br (vmsrv02-2.ps5.com.br [189.50.80.104])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FF3011F7E5
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:28:18 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by vmsrv02.ps5.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A26300E12
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:28:18 -0300 (BRT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ps5.com.br
Received: from vmsrv02.ps5.com.br ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (vmsrv02.ps5.com.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id ktJYQbQ1Y2Zq for <gter at eng.registro.br>;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:28:17 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from macair-81-1.ps5.com.br (unknown [189.50.81.1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: marcelo.seabra at ps5.com.br)
by vmsrv02.ps5.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FD23300AE7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:28:17 -0300 (BRT)
Message-ID: <51224891.2080906 at ps5.com.br>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:28:17 -0300
From: Marcelo Seabra <marcelo.seabra at ps5.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gter at eng.registro.br
References: <CALmS6pUh3taJ7Gegghc+pcdqX-fg+5VSE2B03NCfG+ipEfXj5w at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2G9mFSbmJzV0YTQR4PKiaUPr-Ku5wN+3St67JE9LYmYYQ at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJmea2G9mFSbmJzV0YTQR4PKiaUPr-Ku5wN+3St67JE9LYmYYQ at mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:54:10 -0300
Subject: [GTER] cisco 2800 VIC+PLAR (hotline)
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Olá,
Estou com uma demanda, um cliente possui 2 roteadores cisco 2800.
cada um com uma VIC de 4 portas FXS e 1 Telefone analogico ligado em
cada porta 0/0/0 de cada router.
Ele precisa que quando o telefone for tirado do gancho no roteador 1 o
telefone do router 2 toque. (tipo hotline).
Andei estudando nos ultimos dias e vi que a cisco chama esse tipo de
configuracao de PLAR,
mais não consigo achar nenhum exemplo de como fazer essas configurações.
Os exemplos que consegui usam dial-peer, destination-pattern e
sess-target, mais os 2800 não estão aceitando essas configs.
Alguém pode ajudar, com um exemplo basico? Ou indicar uma URL pra ajudar
a fazer isso?
Agradecido desde já!
--
Marcelo
AS 28327
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp101059obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:54:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.157.8 with SMTP id n8mr20152345yhk.76.1361210043253;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a3si30372248ank.143.2013.02.18.09.54.02;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D806911F7F8;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:53:57 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (la-in-x0235.1e100.net
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7020C11F7B9
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:22:38 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fr10so5582949lab.26
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:22:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=ov4v3d5w53np99EBtTyGUWGAhdS9nDCsVrQh3ZFuVzY=;
b=znKWos77ddZ0TR1wYHa7ZVikS1q1U/SGH8NMLqsmQuLY2G1IECuR7ObsXHXkzCBZPV
0Ue/J0GayDhAavCXqCtkFfaQZxoS4jYySspF0ZXJrhDjpRQiQTUuZiNsVqGFEsiWmvuw
RKg7p11fq5j/Jh0EjJ834q0m/KKUJzUZAvfYETGtThnhD0tpfBQKH+SgH6+UpawZBkAD
rX8YZjNUSJ1bz/rXjq8ZCVkul4Kbb7ApzAO9WUJaIkWjAuN+MUm+3DDiuhvHK93fgCRb
wriNKThuH9TgFtFF07N/eYxYUS00c3hG+lMOAsb6bOlLR3ef47gL8bBOLKknSmBGNZi5
v5sA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.105.244 with SMTP id gp20mr10692669lab.34.1361208151352;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:22:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.97.232 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:22:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPb9jwV3GNBwg8xr9bF+ttCsZ4qbq99p3iMS5jAFHQkUzchCkg at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFxccmx7JWq2y5AU0FhF2U3QdiBF1mbpOor5fSLxghYvT6-rEQ at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1302111450340.1719 at carrapato>
<CAPb9jwV3GNBwg8xr9bF+ttCsZ4qbq99p3iMS5jAFHQkUzchCkg at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:22:31 -0300
Message-ID: <CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9=A at mail.gmail.com>
From: Claudio Junior <csjunior at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:53:56 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Servidor dns
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Ola pessoal
Estava olhando estes servidores e eles me pareceram uma boa solução
para um cliente meu.
Eles querem dois servidores para atender o registro.br (master e
slave), e o mesmo servidor atender o dns da rede interna.
Interface com dhcp server em uma rede direta, e mikrotik em redes remotas.
Por ultimo, interface web para administrar estes servidores (criar
novas zonas, etc), pois o pessoal que vai executar estas tarefas é o
usuário.
Alguma das soluções propostas nos emails abaixo (powerdns, maradns)
serviria para isto? Alguém conhece outras opções?
Obrigado pela atenção
--
Claudio da Silva Junior
csjunior at gmail.com
Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 11:50, Giovane Heleno <webgeo at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Tem o http://www.maradns.org/ também.
>
> Giovane Heleno
> www.giovane.pro.br
>
>
> Em 11 de fevereiro de 2013 14:51, Danton Nunes
> <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
>
>> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Robson mendes de souza wrote:
>>
>> Preciso fazer um servidor dns para cache, alguem me indica algum tutorial
>>> ou documentação que posso seguir.
>>>
>>
>> o unbound não requer prática, tampouco habilidade.
>>
>>
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp101041obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:53:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.84.52 with SMTP id r40mr21851535yhe.94.1361210019521;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:53:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n8si21266348ani.175.2013.02.18.09.53.39;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:53:39 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1069911F7DE;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:53:36 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com
[209.85.214.172])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43FB311F7B9
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:50:36 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id tb18so5858420obb.17
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:50:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=R+pHeT7sDwPG4Acb/aAYT0BdmLghcwc3G1paeNiXoJE=;
b=Xh1Tq139uEUqhIq4/BYHhfMuVsPDJr8315QQlBpFHvW/JqTol0vNF5aWWO4Iw0cgzP
rcUFqjKFgPZ26TZoti6L/ZTS1RSsn39z+Xu1jqAstibCDCVqn2CnrEaV2tZXU+Fwh3Fw
mKhY8yJGJggsHHyi+94cYA0Woem1nLybg3nIjAhZsRVm5qYWA7BcLPkTsKQ6SKUzEGfz
quFx2RePkRcq9RkkiWbeX3T1PxypoHFu+RQl5NMfdK4e7+9axFg4XynP5d+M0pNqZz+6
J3H4MhSQ/QDvYbJJdolTqrBajbkXt5roWgLWB6wMv6AJ8wPY0ce9W5FaDazI2Q+6j4ce
iIqQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.2.227 with SMTP id 3mr6284702oex.113.1361209834527; Mon,
18 Feb 2013 09:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:50:34 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:53:34 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
Estou com problemas com minha operadora sobre a mesma.
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp101623obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:06:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.112.197 with SMTP id y45mr22309522yhg.121.1361210811934;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d10si30403357anp.133.2013.02.18.10.06.51;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:06:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2C611F844;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:06:12 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 867E311F7BC
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:56:34 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id l13so4072807wie.2
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:56:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=CYI7XhxjuaSezt78nAbc7HAJs/xAQ+uYUYrMEN/nsgE=;
b=Kzkn/oyEbd6pITm3afHNdW7NE3LD6f3yv3hKxSWc2syLQCebsF0u7Y8Gjlr2/2Xgml
h5JGvyomwDDfgqkhwGMathxN8wDy71aCUYVkHVvlHg/RMKFP7xNNwSwqT6yxe0romMaY
0VHZFTwtzME1o90X6BbrpWNWXOn7/lnEIO3vYhCywWnpid/adyz0VxB2mSGD/6kjqfS6
dpFNc121UCWjineFqKyF/aT8zF4nmVRSvEres/eoyFwTPRuYh8cigmPGtsTI4MGrvlNR
mriJZCLec/PxwMZ7ONKLmvZp+to4rlGQogOC8773T60MI4YFJCt4sNuRXZWtBE9B7uhA
VfUw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.239.202 with SMTP id vu10mr10268919wjc.49.1361210181533;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:56:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.88.196 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:56:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9=A at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFxccmx7JWq2y5AU0FhF2U3QdiBF1mbpOor5fSLxghYvT6-rEQ at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1302111450340.1719 at carrapato>
<CAPb9jwV3GNBwg8xr9bF+ttCsZ4qbq99p3iMS5jAFHQkUzchCkg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9=A at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:56:21 -0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0-fgtDXmteLnV2JWIMxlXspEmI0
Message-ID: <CAGiBWQCqGibt4Oi-b_WDZiZifjTOBmz0DkhB5q2b9+d4sdSF2w at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_Gutierres_-_Operação_de_Redes? <leonardo at vibeti.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:06:10 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Servidor dns
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Boa tarde
Sim PowerDNS, estou usando sem problemas, Master e Slave. recomendo
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 14:22, Claudio Junior <csjunior at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Ola pessoal
>
> Estava olhando estes servidores e eles me pareceram uma boa solução
> para um cliente meu.
>
> Eles querem dois servidores para atender o registro.br (master e
> slave), e o mesmo servidor atender o dns da rede interna.
> Interface com dhcp server em uma rede direta, e mikrotik em redes remotas.
> Por ultimo, interface web para administrar estes servidores (criar
> novas zonas, etc), pois o pessoal que vai executar estas tarefas é o
> usuário.
>
> Alguma das soluções propostas nos emails abaixo (powerdns, maradns)
> serviria para isto? Alguém conhece outras opções?
>
> Obrigado pela atenção
>
> --
> Claudio da Silva Junior
> csjunior at gmail.com
>
>
> Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 11:50, Giovane Heleno <webgeo at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
> > Tem o http://www.maradns.org/ também.
> >
> > Giovane Heleno
> > www.giovane.pro.br
> >
> >
> > Em 11 de fevereiro de 2013 14:51, Danton Nunes
> > <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> >
> >> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Robson mendes de souza wrote:
> >>
> >> Preciso fazer um servidor dns para cache, alguem me indica algum
> tutorial
> >>> ou documentação que posso seguir.
> >>>
> >>
> >> o unbound não requer prática, tampouco habilidade.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> >>
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp101603obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:06:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.139.113 with SMTP id b77mr22267257yhj.130.1361210794612;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o9si21445006yhm.17.2013.02.18.10.06.34;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7140711F829;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:06:04 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from inexo.com.br (newquantum.inexo.com.br [187.17.38.36])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1146211F7C6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:00:46 -0300 (BRT)
Received: (qmail 948 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2013 18:00:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zaphod.inexo.com.br)
(2001:12c4:f0da:005e:0223:7dff:fe43:e7fb)
by 2001:12c4:f0da:005e:0000:0000:b010:c0c0 with SMTP;
18 Feb 2013 18:00:45 -0000
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:00:44 -0300 (BRT)
From: Danton Nunes <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>
X-X-Sender: danton at zaphod.inexo.com.br
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:06:03 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo ADSL.
Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas regras e
se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp101584obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:06:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.165.135 with SMTP id e7mr21916572yhl.99.1361210773374;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o9si21443409yhm.95.2013.02.18.10.06.13;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3CB11F821;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:05:54 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-yh0-x233.google.com (mail-yh0-x233.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::233])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B1A511F7B8
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:01:56 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id q1so1034307yhf.10
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:01:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
bh=SJN0J4vUdV1mnT6QRfY+3vYWN8NcnMS2UPm1umQ3pcs=;
b=A+SDAJX+y8Vb0z5BMo8LgZkDMHW+0yk0LS4l67+sNMuxfOVZHL6r4tHbIPV4T0ztxZ
3+3f2PN55ISghK2aDyfpbA1971Rq3E6DKERxH5+mLij5gTLc5ypkVOjpfj8JqNKcowEg
7ext3zeJKd39PAo5Wj4+XM7gnbITrGvgIhMwWjZn5r0Uy8z1YzNLcpCL2GK34APjO/Ol
msg3To3uGGfZLw5qqwxhsn3J1mjUmx1CPVWv/m3MfSNza6jiexOQM8G7jX/BdqwUiIq4
+5VyGgfRKA5kC98k81ah14Vd6YQXYwr2G0AQ+VQyviVKBtnBwInx8C3bWQp2dI6suxpU
6tXA=
X-Received: by 10.101.87.8 with SMTP id p8mr6424631anl.60.1361210514378;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:01:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.200] ([201.53.29.47])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d80sm89569958yhg.4.2013.02.18.10.01.52
(version=TLSv1 cipherìDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits8/128);
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:01:53 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Rafael Cresci <cresci at gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9=A at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:01:50 -0300
Message-Id: <23D4DB2D-1A1B-4AD7-8E09-A4B080CBD9F3 at gmail.com>
References: <CAFxccmx7JWq2y5AU0FhF2U3QdiBF1mbpOor5fSLxghYvT6-rEQ at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1302111450340.1719 at carrapato>
<CAPb9jwV3GNBwg8xr9bF+ttCsZ4qbq99p3iMS5jAFHQkUzchCkg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9=A at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:05:53 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Servidor dns
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Existem algumas interfaces web para o PowerDNS.
On 18/02/2013, at 14:22, Claudio Junior <csjunior at gmail.com> wrote:
> Alguma das soluções propostas nos emails abaixo (powerdns, maradns)
> serviria para isto? Alguém conhece outras opções?
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp101565obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:05:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.142.13 with SMTP id u13mr6340345ann.67.1361210752185;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q15si9189881ank.150.2013.02.18.10.05.51;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@onda.net.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75AF11F7E8;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:05:48 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from cube.onda.net.br
(2001-12ac-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0005.v6.onda.net.br [IPv6:2001:12ac::5])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE3B11F7C6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:03:33 -0300 (BRT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onda.net.br;
sÞfault;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
bh=xqIaDdgd2pGoa21G0oMNdYlcP2BrybQ4L6sCM+8BXSk=;
b=jQkrrp+Guh9c7jYJQ7wmml2Q9DB5rvy6f+yu668KosQ5MGlddkHnT/yep80Wk/Ypef0D9TKNbfP1xQm/Vl+ds1E4/8LdY1HyasFOoU/ZbSGbQZ7kIn2OK4zOtefG9OXe;
Received: from static-189-84-12-3.v4.onda.net.br ([189.84.12.3]:60589
helo=[192.168.2.250])
by cube.onda.net.br with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexandre at onda.net.br>)
id 1U7V3k-0002tv-5h
for gter at eng.registro.br; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:03:24 -0300
Message-ID: <51226CDD.5010004 at onda.net.br>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:03:09 -0300
From: "Alexandre J. Correa (Onda)" <alexandre at onda.net.br>
Organization: Onda Internet Ltda.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
X-cPanel-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-cPanel-MailScanner-ID: 1U7V3k-0002tv-5h
X-cPanel-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
Provider for details
X-cPanel-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-cPanel-MailScanner-From: alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Spam-Status: No
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cube.onda.net.br
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eng.registro.br
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - onda.net.br
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cube.onda.net.br: authenticated_id:
alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:05:46 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Em links dedicados, acredito que eles nao fazem o bloqueio (e nao podem)
mas nos acessos compartilhados (3g, wi-fi, adsl, etc) ja estao
praticando ha algum tempo !!
On 18/02/2013 14:50, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
> Estou com problemas com minha operadora sobre a mesma.
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Sds.
Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
Sócio-Administrador
Office: +55 34 3351 3077
Onda Internet
www.onda.net.br
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp102054obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:16:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.169.104 with SMTP id m68mr22116453yhl.27.1361211396083;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:16:36 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k65si21416511yhj.101.2013.02.18.10.16.35;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:16:36 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1919C11F80B;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:16:32 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com (mail-oa0-f47.google.com
[209.85.219.47])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EAF111F7C6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:07:54 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id o17so6033160oag.20
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:07:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=JibbpTcW9cfIgP/IZ+vx9gnCQHPpRU4bPUXJgRINK7E=;
b=cLnJqlG1lniuGw0wOs87ybh+kDDP0NhIa16KUlJK44WmfD1AeBH6DcjaIogJpQfpoF
oMp0+Rj1gmRi7WbjAc5tVG4PcfdYPIJk8g1Ry/9Rj/UT91smDtj0MZU7EfIzYq5wDhZC
LWjz335+z9ceyeqDP+MLXPdvkA+F1weJT+kgjFpyIFwMjE3d+SBNcCYkwFbK2bRprGVr
6/B9mUaZjl+1h7FMo6wDegyWkMhK4UnZJLbFxojVSoef2dt2GyixHeTc1itsJ7PBUAWY
DPA/LD0TEAwfO5DY9KiOJ4GibNjADEz4qbYS7QUrJwuEjheWt6YQ6LCMoEwCj/jxP7kB
T6Lw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.2.227 with SMTP id 3mr6307168oex.113.1361210872870; Mon,
18 Feb 2013 10:07:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:07:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:07:52 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:16:30 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes
<danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
>
> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
>>
>
> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo ADSL.
>
> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas regras e
> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp102086obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:17:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.71.228 with SMTP id r64mr22046959yhd.56.1361211442271;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:17:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x69si22128953yhd.120.2013.02.18.10.17.22;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:17:22 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F3111F86E;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:16:48 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAAC911F7C6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:08:22 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id t44so4888255wey.12
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:08:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=ng+fi1jzl+e7X+B8nEaWXu2dZBOA9D4WNuKwgllqAMk=;
b=wKTv94zH62tLrx2XeQndOd36mG9SGsAY7/IxEDPLj6VbVIZ3gbMc/5420pm1OtMHXA
ee9f/kww3Vu5n+x/8BtM9zykWiFc2FZkEyE1V45CpqPmY4E1nRXlImrKJXJXCGUsCXKO
rKGa1e4Z02ilIkle0/jC8gkS5bm6xBXCzwkG+moOhprv7KbqXj/lSQXRtZVRXaBd4hV6
2jyF3ZVBNSBfgvxF9pM6JIhMzboHNzR8qD92xXEJ9EKwwoK1udpQ0PDLJOAvQ8TAMZJN
Ia8EC1NsBseQqKz2Y6o3TzU07IpH/sNQsSZwmm57KB0oRyjevQIRMNJbdtdYGjV4+oHI
AAvg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.103.65 with SMTP id fu1mr2852926wib.4.1361210889983;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.88.196 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:08:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <23D4DB2D-1A1B-4AD7-8E09-A4B080CBD9F3 at gmail.com>
References: <CAFxccmx7JWq2y5AU0FhF2U3QdiBF1mbpOor5fSLxghYvT6-rEQ at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1302111450340.1719 at carrapato>
<CAPb9jwV3GNBwg8xr9bF+ttCsZ4qbq99p3iMS5jAFHQkUzchCkg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9=A at mail.gmail.com>
<23D4DB2D-1A1B-4AD7-8E09-A4B080CBD9F3 at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:08:09 -0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ELfxd0HQLfZM84-jzAxyjfzpy9c
Message-ID: <CAGiBWQAg55GpVNxcOBCNuJ=esH5XUCFLxOiYUJKLbfqg3_uJ+A at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Leonardo_Gutierres_-_Operação_de_Redes? <leonardo at vibeti.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:16:45 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Servidor dns
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sim uso POWERADMIN, bem completa.
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:01, Rafael Cresci <cresci at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Existem algumas interfaces web para o PowerDNS.
>
> On 18/02/2013, at 14:22, Claudio Junior <csjunior at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Alguma das soluções propostas nos emails abaixo (powerdns, maradns)
> > serviria para isto? Alguém conhece outras opções?
>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp102074obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:17:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.123.208 with SMTP id v56mr22494198yhh.52.1361211424398;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si21504099yhk.85.2013.02.18.10.17.04;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2CE11F850;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:16:40 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com (mail-oa0-f51.google.com
[209.85.219.51])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C50E11F7DE
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:09:33 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id h2so6094518oag.38
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:09:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=KQkvm3/xE2zXzTdRz8x1ESIh66Y+eCoGnot5CIh2JMg=;
b=g9UgGKEy7juX7OoQAUDfUGROkpBVzzrPAlmS3LrlfuYV6UhrfQM+lPf7ChaJs8NKBG
+E4LojCbBMwFnCmR3bWb/k10TjgSUsT1AGKgbUYsXG3cYeuqqfhfFUGTff24JRvJQszG
iTDy+2M8ew3VC/Wi19kFYfMxNjPlnVajePFF0Ri7NxwWmF6OnHh7hJSSfQPGE7ihMpTM
GV+k4IAw7Zuco3FofZWxQ4E9z8PlqTO9Xm8doMMe6pDsP4HHU69uBImWW5Bu5FsC9XRA
FiQFqo6kSrr0G3S3oBIaVG/yPj74vr6AVJs+K2xZw1KKGbLX4/1bXzSvxq9vP7PkIKaM
sskA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.144.42 with SMTP id sj10mr6481833obb.66.1361210972039;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:09:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:09:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:09:31 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:16:38 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta 25 é
bloqueada, o que fazer?
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
<abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
>
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
>>
>> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
>>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
>>>
>>
>> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo ADSL.
>>
>> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas regras e
>> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
>>
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>
>
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp106593obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:06:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.138.79 with SMTP id z55mr22638961yhi.89.1361217977966;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w6si6811898anf.8.2013.02.18.12.06.17;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0C111F829;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:30 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from inexo.com.br (newquantum.inexo.com.br [187.17.38.36])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6716911F7C8
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:30:32 -0300 (BRT)
Received: (qmail 14396 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2013 18:30:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zaphod.inexo.com.br)
(2001:12c4:f0da:005e:0223:7dff:fe43:e7fb)
by 2001:12c4:f0da:005e:0000:0000:b010:c0c0 with SMTP;
18 Feb 2013 18:30:31 -0000
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:30:31 -0300 (BRT)
From: Danton Nunes <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>
X-X-Sender: danton at zaphod.inexo.com.br
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181527190.26092 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:28 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
só se você estiver usando um acesso destinado a usuário final, tipo ADSL,
mas como você falou em AS no começo, não deve ser este o caso.
se houve bloqueio, o roteador que bloqueou te manda de volta um pacote
ICMP dizendo que foi filtrado. Pelo endereço IP de origem desse pacote
você sabe quem bloqueou. um nmap mais tcpdump/wireshark básicos resolvem.
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp106605obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:06:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.155.7 with SMTP id i7mr12868451yhk.16.1361218001229;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:06:41 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q15si30634001ann.93.2013.02.18.12.06.41;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:06:41 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B652511F839;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:39 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from inexo.com.br (newquantum.inexo.com.br [187.17.38.36])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AADD11F7BD
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:36:10 -0300 (BRT)
Received: (qmail 18606 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2013 18:36:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zaphod.inexo.com.br)
(2001:12c4:f0da:005e:0223:7dff:fe43:e7fb)
by 2001:12c4:f0da:005e:0000:0000:b010:c0c0 with SMTP;
18 Feb 2013 18:36:03 -0000
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:36:06 -0300 (BRT)
From: Danton Nunes <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>
X-X-Sender: danton at zaphod.inexo.com.br
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181530450.26092 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:38 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta 25 é
> bloqueada, o que fazer?
você usa os endereços IP do teu 'upstream'? se sim, tem que se submeter às
regras dele. mas não faz sentido usar os endereços de terceiro se você tem
os seus próprios e os anuncia via BGP-4, não?
verifique se efetivamente a porta está bloqueada com as ferramentas que
indiquei na outra mensagem: nmap (famoso, apareceu até no filme Matrix) e
tcpdump ou wireshark.
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp106642obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:07:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.49.130.167 with SMTP id of7mr5852180qeb.22.1361218041750;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r30si27223032ann.139.2013.02.18.12.07.21;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A4711F853;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:58 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 828C211F77A
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:38:17 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 9so7588105iec.18
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:38:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh=PWmK/4xSlOxxGz+hOJMbFLujLmnMw93BdFJCzd+hy5Y=;
b=XDNN5Oe6Acgwvr4pbe0usszYoBDTXSzfOAz48rT03+4sIqV3Qj/eURGJPmBsagMrCN
oUfuPOx3j9mpGv1HpFzyC++smOMYVL4BjiruPMoGE9v/JPY9jp3dqjxzKob5w9AUIiRA
MxX+DcFItvUi59SUWRvTrEMfNXydQ6pnigLYwiiGgoblApkd301k42bZL4Q/cHNYfmYz
dSSH/bb5lf2Q3JXYaEVo1qMSwpVSnpN6gFwtNmfUmp4Ss9ajxkn4BJtN9HCKJOJ3A2cg
4sHFMthmZcVcJfJmqigVESnISpgpex7XjELybxazRivjIJkiIDLfK7K4RIeXDfj4QKjT
rjVw=
X-Received: by 10.50.153.198 with SMTP id vi6mr7966135igb.112.1361212695562;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:38:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.157.196 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:37:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:37:55 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:56 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Se você usa um bloco de IPs de sua operadora que foi delegado à você, você
deve especificar à operadora quais IPs deverão ter trafego na port0 25
liberado(presumindo-se mail-servers).
Se você(seus clientes) usa seu próprio bloco de IPs, o bloqueio da porta 25
não se aplica.
Em primeira instânica, entre em acordo com a equipe da operadora em questão
...
(De preferênica que seja tudo pro e-mmail)
Caso não haja boa vontade por parte deles, acione a anatel.
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
<abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta 25 é
> bloqueada, o que fazer?
>
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
> <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
> > Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
> >
> >
> > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <
> danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> >>
> >> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
> >>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo ADSL.
> >>
> >> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas regras e
> >> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
> >>
> >> --
> >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> >>
> >
> >
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Douglas Fernando Fischer
Engº de Controle e Automação
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp106561obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:05:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.224.101.74 with SMTP id b10mr6083624qao.0.1361217931917;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:05:31 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c4si2926466qap.11.2013.02.18.12.05.31;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:05:31 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@onda.net.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9DE11F80C;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:12 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from cube.onda.net.br
(2001-12ac-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0005.v6.onda.net.br [IPv6:2001:12ac::5])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E90DE11F791
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:43:46 -0300 (BRT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onda.net.br;
sÞfault;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
bh=bkPjpCLAr7wQVbAZVhuotrFeS5RQ5reozptRvZZOIZY=;
b=cgBkuMI7kk3uQpMQ1kdWJ/HCYjFf9n9VTcIuE+68aPdXj/sY6lRvaBzVPt6xQBH3AuhL83WYXRiY+Ai/yXPNdu32yLh7dOVRCGseUvSGugDjq0lMr1spIYdhyUDwMkMt;
Received: from static-189-84-12-3.v4.onda.net.br ([189.84.12.3]:60698
helo=[192.168.2.250])
by cube.onda.net.br with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexandre at onda.net.br>)
id 1U7Vgo-0005KH-1k
for gter at eng.registro.br; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:43:46 -0300
Message-ID: <51227653.7040006 at onda.net.br>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:43:31 -0300
From: "Alexandre J. Correa (Onda)" <alexandre at onda.net.br>
Organization: Onda Internet Ltda.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
X-cPanel-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-cPanel-MailScanner-ID: 1U7Vgo-0005KH-1k
X-cPanel-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
Provider for details
X-cPanel-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-cPanel-MailScanner-From: alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Spam-Status: No
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cube.onda.net.br
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eng.registro.br
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - onda.net.br
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cube.onda.net.br: authenticated_id:
alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:10 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
desbloqueio ! se nao desbloquear.. 1331 e chama os 'homi' !
On 18/02/2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta 25 é
> bloqueada, o que fazer?
>
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
> <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
>> Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
>>
>>
>> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
>>
>> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
>>> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
>>>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
>>>>
>>> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo ADSL.
>>>
>>> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas regras e
>>> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
>>>
>>> --
>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>>
>>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Sds.
Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
Sócio-Administrador
Office: +55 34 3351 3077
Onda Internet
www.onda.net.br
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp106579obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:05:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.119.9 with SMTP id m9mr22579627yhh.106.1361217955670;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:05:55 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m23si21884605yhl.116.2013.02.18.12.05.55;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:05:55 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0760D11F821;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:20 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail.sm01.inetweb.com.br (mail.sm04.inetweb.com.br
[201.70.96.222])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC7D11F797
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:47:18 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from mail.a.primehost.com.br [177.11.80.252] by
mail.sm01.inetweb.com.br with SMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:47:08 -0300
Received: from CLEBERSAADPC (bb6888d6.virtua.com.br [187.104.136.214]) by
mail.a.primehost.com.br with SMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:47:03 -0300
From: "Cleber @ Inetweb" <cleber-listas at inetweb.com.br>
To: "'Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes'"
<gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:47:03 -0300
Message-ID: <000401ce0e08$57ce05d0$076a1170$@inetweb.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
thread-index: AQCN8975FpWCqsiTJT0XZ84bpSxSNgGI+kYiAhr61lsCpOk6HZrN4bLQ
Content-Language: pt-br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:18 -0300
Subject: [GTER] RES: Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Se você realmente é um ISP e tem AS proprio o seu fornecedor de link teve um
entendimento errôneo do bloqueio!
Tem que bater o pé.
-----Mensagem original-----
De: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br [mailto:gter-bounces at eng.registro.br] Em
nome de Wildemberg Lopes
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:10
Para: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
Assunto: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta 25 é
bloqueada, o que fazer?
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
<abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
>
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes
<danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
>>
>> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
>>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
>>>
>>
>> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo ADSL.
>>
>> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas
>> regras e se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
>>
>> --
>> gter list
https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mail
man/listinfo/gter>
>>
>
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp106622obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:07:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.119.69 with SMTP id m45mr22567947yhh.128.1361218022903;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e69si21929172yhm.52.2013.02.18.12.07.02;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D3811F84B;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:46 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com (mail-oa0-f52.google.com
[209.85.219.52])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9633511F797
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:48:28 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k14so6228528oag.11
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:48:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh¿ieJrYZct0jhFjnsDejBJx50iu8ru+KIfG/yzDamMU=;
b=resJVxN0eTvKvTUwGF0XPLjPjOL8bKLw1ILX8Tz35lG5RUZAGNTJzTQt5PYMPjWh0f
iEUT4AHdic+mc4Bi0hIrJk5luUGtKyluMSWDZIHZeBnf9/wazVIOrGhtPx7pN7vBPRBw
iRI1VdxhIZHLzIBU3IXrmeH7/ApnIrN1WraIocbvFGG6pNmd3S8iwj/f5Z7+rh5QtJn0
5BQvXAWn3mc/ZhR6HHpgfDRhihb3bAsmN4uaz31ihBuPUkUOWfZXAcHZY18qRLkWcqYV
TEGPo7AfjJJgzDKbSdmkh95LjT/60UKqr32XSwMkwXLRvmxdJihsfHH1+8JbMiP7SJ+y
QIBg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.114.97 with SMTP id jf1mr1979965obb.31.1361213306785;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:48:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.91.168 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:48:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:48:26 -0300
Message-ID: <CAFzheD63aRXKiYLmpog7kOoAHLQuNQQhMRa-LOApHdNcAAgk1g at mail.gmail.com>
From: Filipe Alvarez <filipealvarez at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:45 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
<abusesingle at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta 25 é
> bloqueada, o que fazer?
Por curiosidade, qual é o fornecedor?
Só pra eu me recordar na hora de não-contratar um link :)
[]s
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp106538obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:05:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.4.21 with SMTP id g21mr6622420ani.11.1361217915189;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m23si21881251yhl.64.2013.02.18.12.05.09;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5635911F7F9;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:05 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-qa0-f41.google.com (mail-qa0-f41.google.com
[209.85.216.41])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28A2A11F7A6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:05:13 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id hy16so1452355qab.0
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:05:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=ZZSOrM3mCYehMnNWXcC1Sf098FjdJZUzObRdrttllQ4=;
b=IrEhGBWQnNgWSzdTNLcH7U+Tsr0ZC/kprlcAh+kiK6MOdzEaplX0gFARP5Zy4Mmh5F
iK14zxnLl56uIXMyjQ6m/MBeaobkcI+5AjhtlQ413BJ+nbbSvpdheuK2BN/Lz252h/oM
LsBISIQUGO7pgyHRLNVtcF+mHpftKJTQQZoibH0IcutsMo57P0PrXn9EOiwfJD8SXgSs
fKNgRl2vev0KplroNc4a7Cs5AdeKgxU8n4cTgTOaYDHAyn0gRRYR5VBnuzxCsoxsFq0o
afbSCdhqIIdsPJUifAjGlRJdHgeXVCriVqYe8zHmUtQBLd3nfDXINrwlchvSBAJR8Pqs
pzQA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.96.33 with SMTP id dp1mr5720539qeb.60.1361214311956; Mon,
18 Feb 2013 11:05:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.49.74 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:05:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [201.23.177.165]
Received: by 10.49.49.74 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:05:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51224891.2080906 at ps5.com.br>
References: <CALmS6pUh3taJ7Gegghc+pcdqX-fg+5VSE2B03NCfG+ipEfXj5w at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2G9mFSbmJzV0YTQR4PKiaUPr-Ku5wN+3St67JE9LYmYYQ at mail.gmail.com>
<51224891.2080906 at ps5.com.br>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:05:11 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO6a2WOMKtRVTiwwrpL_U4nMe2xzzMVLv=tg2GgP7+u-aqdy9Q at mail.gmail.com>
From: Victor Circelli <victor at circelli.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkM0STlwr2h4iRL/qVbmVC3NnAvcpComdZiCG9D0uTgJbA1HrYvejqlcO3VqdgfgACudz0o
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:05:03 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] cisco 2800 VIC+PLAR (hotline)
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Marcelo,
De cabeça não sei como fazer isso, mas porque não aceita a configuração de
dial-peer no seu roteador?
Temos aqui um 2800 (2811 se não me engano) de lab e usamos exclusivamente
para voz, com diversos dial-peer pots e voip criados.
Abs
Em 18/02/2013 14:54, "Marcelo Seabra" <marcelo.seabra at ps5.com.br> escreveu:
> Olá,
>
> Estou com uma demanda, um cliente possui 2 roteadores cisco 2800.
> cada um com uma VIC de 4 portas FXS e 1 Telefone analogico ligado em cada
> porta 0/0/0 de cada router.
> Ele precisa que quando o telefone for tirado do gancho no roteador 1 o
> telefone do router 2 toque. (tipo hotline).
> Andei estudando nos ultimos dias e vi que a cisco chama esse tipo de
> configuracao de PLAR,
> mais não consigo achar nenhum exemplo de como fazer essas configurações.
> Os exemplos que consegui usam dial-peer, destination-pattern e
> sess-target, mais os 2800 não estão aceitando essas configs.
> Alguém pode ajudar, com um exemplo basico? Ou indicar uma URL pra ajudar a
> fazer isso?
>
>
> Agradecido desde já!
>
> --
> Marcelo
> AS 28327
>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp108680obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:04:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.224.178.77 with SMTP id bl13mr6192734qab.13.1361221475515;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q15si30728881ann.199.2013.02.18.13.04.35;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1077811F80B;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:04:31 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com
[209.85.214.180])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF53911F831
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:16:36 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ef5so6041723obb.11
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:16:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=bs0BHEJ2PlLDtDR1lPq81ADAAcYeZDvO78YiD2nSEQA=;
b=VklJS3c2fb0UhwaWkxkjzgE5sPNWtExVZnbDLWST3bIb3bzeA1NgW+S25nVB2ymXCF
lFvYFGEcfNeILg7qmEfN6sUKe2TECMTXwX07jFQNeXjTUvSyGmWGuI/JECHM3yMFklBD
BGxLT5uim4FhpTEmaSevm0CeKCBy92C2aAyVZ1OJ9+iLEfBIA5vqARuLsUnMlznvt6Ay
6ir9UqGW5NPSjfBKVQvqGe8VTU0sKcdN8QuMN/Jg3iOQHhlVOG55pX4a6qBBMDpD1nMk
XvFDpcNWATTIV8Mw2EM1dJv9aUlhGseAzyrkEW21LISonjQAa2m3AL2Hwa1P9uLAnaGq
0MJA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.172.84 with SMTP id ba20mr6516078oec.10.1361218595641;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:16:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:16:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:16:35 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:04:29 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Pois o mesmo, só disse que iria liberar as portas mediante uma declaração
que eu mandasse, porem é um provedor que me vende o link, não pego direto
de operadoras e isso está me dando bastante dor de cabeça!
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:37, Douglas Fischer
<fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Se você usa um bloco de IPs de sua operadora que foi delegado à você, você
> deve especificar à operadora quais IPs deverão ter trafego na port0 25
> liberado(presumindo-se mail-servers).
>
> Se você(seus clientes) usa seu próprio bloco de IPs, o bloqueio da porta 25
> não se aplica.
>
> Em primeira instânica, entre em acordo com a equipe da operadora em questão
> ...
> (De preferênica que seja tudo pro e-mmail)
> Caso não haja boa vontade por parte deles, acione a anatel.
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
> <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
> > Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta 25 é
> > bloqueada, o que fazer?
> >
> >
> > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
> > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> >
> > > Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
> > >
> > >
> > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <
> > danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
> > >>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo
> ADSL.
> > >>
> > >> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas
> regras e
> > >> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Douglas Fernando Fischer
> Engº de Controle e Automação
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp108688obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:04:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.79.9 with SMTP id h9mr23544562yhe.83.1361221498068;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:04:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o9si22209258yhm.4.2013.02.18.13.04.57;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:04:58 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D520A11F828;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:04:40 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ia0-x234.google.com (mail-ia0-x234.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::234])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3DC811F7A6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:24:58 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f27so5391947iae.25
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:24:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh=k2lHmkLbM6bKSFKB6WfRIlGWwlx4I60Ag4qc6EkFv1Y=;
b=fmHO7ro1uK4dgQ5EtknjcOFd0NKWEvAUXcVbdCKDY5n0/9k3oPneOBY4z32uRn4WxF
VM+XZy4QyM+9Rc4jQguus5dqAinXH+Gg32qNYshhRVTKu/OOyOEkCn3KB92+W6U2qWM9
SjJ8xtMB1/Elb1mbfJurhiBJW6FwObOBkSz/Jh1AmzEJX6TjPU0XMU6k8eH4Gf+QWegF
imN16mq/Y0YGKCJRrG5ytvH/xqanlmAoCBS4HlS0JF5GsJEg4i5qRTVHkNU0phSXp8Uf
ikbH5NHvelKKxDl+ZtWx1t+hgHlacqbizzHyuX2NBfjwGT0sybir13uQw55Lwge6pKfv
K49g=
X-Received: by 10.50.181.136 with SMTP id dw8mr8089682igc.39.1361219097219;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:24:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.157.196 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:24:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51224891.2080906 at ps5.com.br>
References: <CALmS6pUh3taJ7Gegghc+pcdqX-fg+5VSE2B03NCfG+ipEfXj5w at mail.gmail.com>
<CAJmea2G9mFSbmJzV0YTQR4PKiaUPr-Ku5wN+3St67JE9LYmYYQ at mail.gmail.com>
<51224891.2080906 at ps5.com.br>
From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:24:37 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKEr4RS4bxht8ebdwpR7TagiZqEPGD+fgH-Wzi4ONN10YwYxwg at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:04:38 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] cisco 2800 VIC+PLAR (hotline)
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Em cara router você vai ter que ter 2(pelo menos) dial peers:
- um POTS apontando para a porta que esta o telefone analógico
- o outro VOIP que manda para o outro router
Além disso vai ter que colocar o PLAR na FXS discando para o mesmo destino d
o dial-peer VOIP.
Manda as configs que você tá querendo aplicar, de prefernecia com as msgs
de erro que ele apresnta na hora de colar o script.
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 12:28, Marcelo Seabra
<marcelo.seabra at ps5.com.br>escreveu:
> Olá,
>
> Estou com uma demanda, um cliente possui 2 roteadores cisco 2800.
> cada um com uma VIC de 4 portas FXS e 1 Telefone analogico ligado em cada
> porta 0/0/0 de cada router.
> Ele precisa que quando o telefone for tirado do gancho no roteador 1 o
> telefone do router 2 toque. (tipo hotline).
> Andei estudando nos ultimos dias e vi que a cisco chama esse tipo de
> configuracao de PLAR,
> mais não consigo achar nenhum exemplo de como fazer essas configurações.
> Os exemplos que consegui usam dial-peer, destination-pattern e
> sess-target, mais os 2800 não estão aceitando essas configs.
> Alguém pode ajudar, com um exemplo basico? Ou indicar uma URL pra ajudar a
> fazer isso?
>
>
> Agradecido desde já!
>
> --
> Marcelo
> AS 28327
>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>
--
Douglas Fernando Fischer
Engº de Controle e Automação
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp108704obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:05:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.117.169 with SMTP id j29mr23571332yhh.43.1361221518832;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:05:18 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u33si8513169ann.186.2013.02.18.13.05.18;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:05:18 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCC911F841;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:04:51 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from smtp.asbyte.com.br (smtp.asbyte.com.br [187.94.224.228])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E7711F7A6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:25:29 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from smtp.asbyte.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.asbyte.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D040E56F91E
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:25:28 -0300 (BRT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at asbyte.com.br
Received: from smtp.asbyte.com.br ([127.0.0.1])
by smtp.asbyte.com.br (smtp.asbyte.com.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024) with ESMTP id PeVAXJmcuo82 for <gter at eng.registro.br>;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:25:27 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from natalie.asbyte.com.br (unknown [192.168.0.111])
(Authenticated sender: victorio at asbyte.com.br)
by smtp.asbyte.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 878AC56F891
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:25:26 -0300 (BRT)
Message-ID: <51228E36.3040703 at asbyte.com.br>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:25:26 -0300
From: =?UTF-8?B?VmljdMOzcmlv?= <victorio at asbyte.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAFxccmx+oYJZHKyFrkt_U85QKdKTTNw75Pd0exsunYB63NWxJw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RT7+kTzDe6=mE-kP+6ZE19MqXBfqBi6i2SHUS=NLQyjgw at mail.gmail.com>
<BLU002-W2268733ABE548B4FF8D7358DC080 at phx.gbl>
<F5981374-F1A3-4E08-9F5B-DC9F8DE596A2 at esds.com.br>
<511E90BA.5030402 at asbyte.com.br>
<CAKEr4RQvtORWTaxoMWSo3_BwXW2SANJUA5N2dGwNtuDPw8yRcQ at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKEr4RQvtORWTaxoMWSo3_BwXW2SANJUA5N2dGwNtuDPw8yRcQ at mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:04:49 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER]
=?utf-8?q?Problema_com_Auto_Negociação_entre_mik? =?utf-8?q?rotik?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp108720obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:05:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.138.42 with SMTP id z30mr23480744yhi.101.1361221542149;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:05:42 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l41si22058268yho.14.2013.02.18.13.05.41;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:05:42 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F1D11F86E;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:04:58 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com (mail-ee0-f51.google.com [74.125.83.51])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DE3911F802
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:29:16 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id d17so2967294eek.24
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:29:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh=MfNBHQxnvieWH8H3qZbXhdQZyJBuOk0/Fg4zWo2GovE=;
b=VVfDxGyvGCMcP7RlZ9lDfMZZ4raJ5+enuRSlhghMH1luoJ/Thil71kpakI34sBzfqv
tDQ88Y8ovR6Zvs4aBXKC19KgbRcGrRcUA6Hl5RaKXiHBCofrgaTBcSdg1W3j911MKaxF
jqmEBRA9+kzrJBHaDwc1V6OAsXNpAH4+Vw/eDFpV0uPsL5urNR9Igm/mN+22KUQfACS5
/WdoQ7EuQkKg04QyNtJk25Ap7HsuAjjT/AkSG5vyjFJZsxDsFuhLxdq+RZ7t6gNfEQkK
dy7NPdeHh1gGxEP6XnKPLmEfTVr3pzUW0rNKwsg4lKh/PjZ2M9iZV9AaGLBaIsUJRi+J
dB7g=
X-Received: by 10.14.209.131 with SMTP id s3mr48235488eeo.26.1361219354579;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:29:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.209.200 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:28:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9=A at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFxccmx7JWq2y5AU0FhF2U3QdiBF1mbpOor5fSLxghYvT6-rEQ at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1302111450340.1719 at carrapato>
<CAPb9jwV3GNBwg8xr9bF+ttCsZ4qbq99p3iMS5jAFHQkUzchCkg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9=A at mail.gmail.com>
From: Giovane Heleno <webgeo at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:28:54 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPb9jwXmxCBNc6a8tZt3paWuuLUKsy2DVAVVhPNnJobLv3g8zQ at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:04:57 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Servidor dns
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
O Mara DNS é só recursivo.
Não faz autoritativo.
Giovane Heleno
www.giovane.pro.br
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 14:22, Claudio Junior <csjunior at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Ola pessoal
>
> Estava olhando estes servidores e eles me pareceram uma boa solução
> para um cliente meu.
>
> Eles querem dois servidores para atender o registro.br (master e
> slave), e o mesmo servidor atender o dns da rede interna.
> Interface com dhcp server em uma rede direta, e mikrotik em redes remotas.
> Por ultimo, interface web para administrar estes servidores (criar
> novas zonas, etc), pois o pessoal que vai executar estas tarefas é o
> usuário.
>
> Alguma das soluções propostas nos emails abaixo (powerdns, maradns)
> serviria para isto? Alguém conhece outras opções?
>
> Obrigado pela atenção
>
> --
> Claudio da Silva Junior
> csjunior at gmail.com
>
>
> Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 11:50, Giovane Heleno <webgeo at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
> > Tem o http://www.maradns.org/ também.
> >
> > Giovane Heleno
> > www.giovane.pro.br
> >
> >
> > Em 11 de fevereiro de 2013 14:51, Danton Nunes
> > <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> >
> >> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Robson mendes de souza wrote:
> >>
> >> Preciso fazer um servidor dns para cache, alguem me indica algum
> tutorial
> >>> ou documentação que posso seguir.
> >>>
> >>
> >> o unbound não requer prática, tampouco habilidade.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> >>
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp113595obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:38:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.81.7 with SMTP id l7mr24443068yhe.112.1361230707152;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:38:27 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i16si31015225anl.12.2013.02.18.15.38.26;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:38:27 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id A967011F7F1;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:38:11 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ia0-x235.google.com (mail-ia0-x235.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::235])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72CC11F79E
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:10:12 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e16so5150852iaa.26
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:10:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh=YnJB3ZgTQIfVuV4HdOzCm8An9FHOL+m/J7qiPyguq1Y=;
b=QIpH31to3seYlho5FBMm+yG91XXcy11rpJKW72heXebJgAuZpIIdU06tIBH5KXYJkb
CjOrOdHAIrTGNgBLA1rOvBBrR6mWDIuS89svbW5Nfb6xnE1cA7Rxik+lp4IE3GD0R5l8
yfykCUwa6ZEZWzPEcDGzvbE7CCt4ZS8m4E7I6UAy1rcOs9qfkc5DMB7JvAi+tkfdHvLZ
VZtG5uuRYCeqZn8hDMU88FwGg8fKVH1L+tX7NgHos49v0ZAE5uxyl3iaC+w9usAbuTYT
1miN/UwoqM+Y99p8SIcM7CD3CDHKnuh2kuw5+CjWRY+Lwm1gNuF9JPjY86kDFCB3kpjQ
fwGw=
X-Received: by 10.50.153.198 with SMTP id vi6mr8159105igb.112.1361221810832;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:10:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.157.196 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:09:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:09:50 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:38:10 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
1º
"Pois o mesmo, só disse que..." -> Disse-falado ou disse-escrito?
2º
Esclareça algo. Os IPs que estão bloqueados são do seu bloco de IPs, ou do
bloco dele e delegados a você?
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 17:16, Wildemberg Lopes
<abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Pois o mesmo, só disse que iria liberar as portas mediante uma declaração
> que eu mandasse, porem é um provedor que me vende o link, não pego direto
> de operadoras e isso está me dando bastante dor de cabeça!
>
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:37, Douglas Fischer
> <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
> > Se você usa um bloco de IPs de sua operadora que foi delegado à você,
> você
> > deve especificar à operadora quais IPs deverão ter trafego na port0 25
> > liberado(presumindo-se mail-servers).
> >
> > Se você(seus clientes) usa seu próprio bloco de IPs, o bloqueio da porta
> 25
> > não se aplica.
> >
> > Em primeira instânica, entre em acordo com a equipe da operadora em
> questão
> > ...
> > (De preferênica que seja tudo pro e-mmail)
> > Caso não haja boa vontade por parte deles, acione a anatel.
> >
> > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
> > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> >
> > > Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta 25
> é
> > > bloqueada, o que fazer?
> > >
> > >
> > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <
> > > danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
> > > >>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo
> > ADSL.
> > > >>
> > > >> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas
> > regras e
> > > >> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> > > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Douglas Fernando Fischer
> > Engº de Controle e Automação
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Douglas Fernando Fischer
Engº de Controle e Automação
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp113576obb;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:38:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.122.7 with SMTP id s7mr24624596yhh.70.1361230685459;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x69si23453766yhd.120.2013.02.18.15.38.04;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gerencianet.com.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD3F11F7BD;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:38:00 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D3111F79B
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:25:52 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c41so3252914eek.41
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:25:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gerencianet.com.br; s=google;
h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=DIDWnQgocILzSC5CgOlytIv90dVhIst0uvES6S2Rdb4=;
b=bGTWNfs/3G0tO767nD74gqMPQIxLgYXPgzv7+IBF9mEgUpevrVBR6Ag33CWEWd0LSk
Mi+5yvDS36ww2vcy92xDy1Kgi5S/1Wnt07r+K9PIC8RXbVesyWVva1dhK29IjTlD5zYs
Z5pV1r7OHZ8OCktXHeBbJz+xm6cOacG3Ju01UX-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=DIDWnQgocILzSC5CgOlytIv90dVhIst0uvES6S2Rdb4=;
b=ZQOriRkfN1unkAtt1w50qeTrnQ13de7FJ+Jm5SrShquulvW7GJhiXLBXdj65uWDOPQ
XwKMAGUFwK083FhFnqHYZDh3TCwd0ppIDdTfL17ge6iZ3SOfLYP90DoQdj9nnrKM84LI
usVG6edgM82duLpGTgY+eO8pHnmMowbiP1mFlFp8WHB84466x0THPu4oxgpvhK6GXXKU
gVYyDyN868S0JO572NKMNoOLTRk9r6IDdOQnb5EqgrfWaeVyqD0VXGaWVEISkpN//uEu
mbGhsYylfzyog+WSHwuSoApvacBcTVflVIGXD0SXHQQuS/X7CNFjhddElJp5YyYrJVuZ
WXJA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.200.137 with SMTP id z9mr49190157een.20.1361226350068;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:25:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.72.155 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:25:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [189.83.46.146]
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:25:49 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPAG64mLhCxjrWAj5c3V4H_mK9MCt+QPFLsWM+aHvi3UB1TLdQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Eduardo Fontinelle <eduardo at gerencianet.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlVT9DTEkIOztB0moNM9wTY8Z6jmtEwBfpBKoZf7zWkDIMf+GTD+bU2a61Dp397Oqt3rMh1
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:37:58 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Ameaças eventualmente resolvem!
Se o bloco é seu, quem tem que fazer bloqueios é você, e não o seu ISP.
*Eduardo Fontinelle*
Analista de Sistemas
+55 (31) 3603-0800
+55 (31) 3603-0829 - Ramal: 309
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 17:16, Wildemberg Lopes
<abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Pois o mesmo, só disse que iria liberar as portas mediante uma declaração
> que eu mandasse, porem é um provedor que me vende o link, não pego direto
> de operadoras e isso está me dando bastante dor de cabeça!
>
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:37, Douglas Fischer
> <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
> > Se você usa um bloco de IPs de sua operadora que foi delegado à você,
> você
> > deve especificar à operadora quais IPs deverão ter trafego na port0 25
> > liberado(presumindo-se mail-servers).
> >
> > Se você(seus clientes) usa seu próprio bloco de IPs, o bloqueio da porta
> 25
> > não se aplica.
> >
> > Em primeira instânica, entre em acordo com a equipe da operadora em
> questão
> > ...
> > (De preferênica que seja tudo pro e-mmail)
> > Caso não haja boa vontade por parte deles, acione a anatel.
> >
> > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
> > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> >
> > > Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta 25
> é
> > > bloqueada, o que fazer?
> > >
> > >
> > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <
> > > danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
> > > >>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo
> > ADSL.
> > > >>
> > > >> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas
> > regras e
> > > >> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> > > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Douglas Fernando Fischer
> > Engº de Controle e Automação
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp142272obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:18:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.54.13 with SMTP id g13mr8389539ank.39.1361283520621;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x13si32333725ani.71.2013.02.19.06.18.40;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045BE11F89F;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:17:46 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com
[209.85.214.180])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4763311F7B1
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:57:04 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ef5so5958117obb.25
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:57:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=gmKcWKnYDFyCldmYUs31J3u/3gWxWmXu42H/+OWZEiQ=;
b=pr1V8Wnk1MpFIElpQzq32ZYIYi0QlITIXIWV13oiNb6HU8XvVKKPp6G1kBeGExVeLB
1Z/Ligytm6zL4wPTAU0xIsKfgAucEoCQHyDIxbSdVEmkwGdv3s2+WkcsQB/yPw+D/2HQ
gMIVL5iIasBopZ5vgn7RJCrn+M3LDVlZyifitA05KKmTWUcxxs75BvdD7HFgNhU0KRxt
TWqbZQrox21NpqSgeEN7MqxrvqMiOqA0CpB+3tPq7QbZI1oGbbOzOLA9ewiPtKN93XKN
atLGgJHBwLJAUP5ZsIoESKheCVnfr8jZQZfHvpWtmetIzGCuFDQmg0+1J81rR5E6tas1
fEdw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.2.227 with SMTP id 3mr6685734oex.113.1361231822773; Mon,
18 Feb 2013 15:57:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:57:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:57:02 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>,
fischerdouglas at gmail.com
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:17:43 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
1) Disse por e-mail sim
2) o meu bloco Meu ASN 52919 e meu BLoco é 177.10.132.0/22 e eles estão
bloqueados pelo ISP e não por mim,
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 18:09, Douglas Fischer
<fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
> 1º
> "Pois o mesmo, só disse que..." -> Disse-falado ou disse-escrito?
>
>
> 2º
> Esclareça algo. Os IPs que estão bloqueados são do seu bloco de IPs, ou do
> bloco dele e delegados a você?
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 17:16, Wildemberg Lopes
> <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
> > Pois o mesmo, só disse que iria liberar as portas mediante uma declaração
> > que eu mandasse, porem é um provedor que me vende o link, não pego direto
> > de operadoras e isso está me dando bastante dor de cabeça!
> >
> >
> > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:37, Douglas Fischer
> > <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
> >
> > > Se você usa um bloco de IPs de sua operadora que foi delegado à você,
> > você
> > > deve especificar à operadora quais IPs deverão ter trafego na port0 25
> > > liberado(presumindo-se mail-servers).
> > >
> > > Se você(seus clientes) usa seu próprio bloco de IPs, o bloqueio da
> porta
> > 25
> > > não se aplica.
> > >
> > > Em primeira instânica, entre em acordo com a equipe da operadora em
> > questão
> > > ...
> > > (De preferênica que seja tudo pro e-mmail)
> > > Caso não haja boa vontade por parte deles, acione a anatel.
> > >
> > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta
> 25
> > é
> > > > bloqueada, o que fazer?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <
> > > > danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é
> verídico o
> > > > >>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo
> > > ADSL.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas
> > > regras e
> > > > >> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> > > > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Douglas Fernando Fischer
> > > Engº de Controle e Automação
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > >
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Douglas Fernando Fischer
> Engº de Controle e Automação
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp142424obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:21:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.120.101 with SMTP id o65mr28647700yhh.57.1361283683463;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f5si32345813ank.144.2013.02.19.06.21.22;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEC411F8BE;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:20:54 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-bk0-f42.google.com (mail-bk0-f42.google.com
[209.85.214.42])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F94D11F7A6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:27:12 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id jk7so2844724bkc.1
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:27:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=v+5AdVKkd+G4/ObphfCM712cWq+dJKh4g9olDs7Wmsw=;
bÞNxiHC5+qscaNYqC9YhdG2TQdmVSIvPLnzkDXV+OdiQsUt0DMcxSvzWkYWa3zVaPB
H9EtIpz1Vyr6N8o249Yhh2sXQ0Vp8Brnnt2bmJT1c5D7SpToJ76g4M9CJAMr2rZ4fNUE
yYNDUTcjnFur4EPbr8D4KWpVLFbZGgIlYw2mkUZ0MAbLQXoJG885OxuXGZ3iZR4htPLC
WPo+aVVzn/au525JvmnU93HWgvo5OzhTZn/VJcNHXjauZY7LfW683H/6LAXU/gn9MhK5
VagmRuJT6KhWsw2EsDHXc97b4wqVmQbZk/bWBwZlTOoHzXqbrZKMA/DMarxRNL1VSWbh
doFw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.204.147.130 with SMTP id l2mr5392263bkv.127.1361233630288;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.26.150 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.26.150 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:27:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:27:10 -0300
X-Google-Sender-Auth: d1aVwWZ4LSDJH-M5qWc249s-c3o
Message-ID: <CACkLYe4FUXfiP8hkhF5FbZ0ftDez_qS3Z7UzSYmaPcjHBtEsBA at mail.gmail.com>
From: Francisco V Brasileiro <francisco at brasileiro.adm.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:20:52 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Isso nada mais é do que ignorancia sobre o que é efetivamente o bloqueio da
porta 25, aliado a confusão que ele deve fazer sobre o que é trâsito do que
é acesso.
Em 18/02/2013 18:04, "Wildemberg Lopes" <abusesingle at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Pois o mesmo, só disse que iria liberar as portas mediante uma declaração
> que eu mandasse, porem é um provedor que me vende o link, não pego direto
> de operadoras e isso está me dando bastante dor de cabeça!
>
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:37, Douglas Fischer
> <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
> > Se você usa um bloco de IPs de sua operadora que foi delegado à você,
> você
> > deve especificar à operadora quais IPs deverão ter trafego na port0 25
> > liberado(presumindo-se mail-servers).
> >
> > Se você(seus clientes) usa seu próprio bloco de IPs, o bloqueio da porta
> 25
> > não se aplica.
> >
> > Em primeira instânica, entre em acordo com a equipe da operadora em
> questão
> > ...
> > (De preferênica que seja tudo pro e-mmail)
> > Caso não haja boa vontade por parte deles, acione a anatel.
> >
> > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
> > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> >
> > > Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta 25
> é
> > > bloqueada, o que fazer?
> > >
> > >
> > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <
> > > danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é verídico o
> > > >>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final, tipo
> > ADSL.
> > > >>
> > > >> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas
> > regras e
> > > >> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> > > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Douglas Fernando Fischer
> > Engº de Controle e Automação
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp142466obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:21:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.149.162 with SMTP id x22mr28714428yhj.37.1361283717027;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:21:57 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c67si25846433yhe.6.2013.02.19.06.21.56;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:21:57 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BDB11F8C4;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:21:10 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com (mail-ob0-f170.google.com
[209.85.214.170])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81A0611F7B8
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:52:42 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wc20so6175798obb.1
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:52:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=8xT5gD0YwHdgAj6ABu0Qs82wgN43i90cjyUVNYXxorg=;
b=Rssl/yYWNRqSQ+lYbLodSzilBlULNWShIh8xVXITh1vTRNcXtfUh38zrllJ0wS/wbR
fVhvdxt5UTL4ExpAr5v9Tc1mHHXMQ8Qvhui4oBEyZtzMydOs62Pr7nB6QI+eSpyz3/Th
Y7zczhjiEbDwSt7++tL4G+ldv78fReBkNT37FA3YVmGpsZpKFhAMDx6avtGu/gRHxrTM
Swvh3zvFisIRqVrj0N2jY9oEkZqfrClRpuDNaaKguYTRQoDBFw7FUWqhYJ02vBjFxmLw
KKhbtk+Bv9qZelDIaeYizauYEdXUzuy0EAlynqPwSYFprmWECeIt5oJ7rW6jwmC3ipPt
ckZw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.27.228 with SMTP id w4mr6702784oeg.104.1361235160447;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:52:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.82.164 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:52:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPb9jwXmxCBNc6a8tZt3paWuuLUKsy2DVAVVhPNnJobLv3g8zQ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFxccmx7JWq2y5AU0FhF2U3QdiBF1mbpOor5fSLxghYvT6-rEQ at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1302111450340.1719 at carrapato>
<CAPb9jwV3GNBwg8xr9bF+ttCsZ4qbq99p3iMS5jAFHQkUzchCkg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9=A at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPb9jwXmxCBNc6a8tZt3paWuuLUKsy2DVAVVhPNnJobLv3g8zQ at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:52:40 -0300
Message-ID: <CAE8fkNw=mD6qgrCisDMhH51XozjkpMc+yz2b7R72++WKpUEPAw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Hermann Wecke <hermann at wecke.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmxejFz2mPm+4HpJ/FOlMtgojEFqSpsCUPqXddSjtmGcuw0Tz1lDzW0kKbkuaIum85izYuk
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:21:08 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Servidor dns
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
2013/2/18 Giovane Heleno <webgeo at gmail.com>:
> O Mara DNS é só recursivo.
> Não faz autoritativo.
Talvez em uma versão mais antiga - a mais recente já faz
Using MaraDNS as an authoritative DNS server
http://www.maradns.org/tutorial/authoritative.html
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp142391obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.114.13 with SMTP id b13mr29561847yhh.11.1361283649427;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:20:49 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x9si25879637yhl.18.2013.02.19.06.20.48;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:20:49 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF4511F8B1;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:20:43 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3628A11F7B8
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:06:01 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x10so5341376wey.17
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:05:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:x-originating-ip:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=tTsoPNEZYAaxZXIdH05rcBioQtY5qjntDjbCDu/9iqg=;
b=bPodCg87NwhAOb9uO+tCfFUcHCzp9oZHw746fHdaOBW9wzYs+0uiXbApPUIISLYaUX
VcdarvRnjXlj1Qp6vCr2nns5M8zTTc9p3DKgMQ0Oharur0NGjsua5BR5IAkXSvRuLeK3
WwENQnah/e/P8WfaLnx/4ZsyvmsgEeN54D2Fp/KQUgsiNWpFHVUdspfswxXNcEcg6/e1
ZUiOESBs1VVryDCVf+sIccfCOXQREe4I6UEWl3prihaQPo9jV0K0h2ze4rM++sFHbNDd
Zq45fWl+gE9MmpT4Oy/797ygtrEqSTW+GouQmq9vjIhRGc3sp7/tNS3NLO9KS9X+gKFR
f8kg=
X-Received: by 10.194.235.6 with SMTP id ui6mr23064009wjc.12.1361239556842;
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:05:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.217.69.67 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:05:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [187.121.4.116]
From: Felipe Trevisan <felipe at reabra.com.br>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:05:36 -0300
Message-ID: <CACA_9Q_ZyU6k-gRV1KjbkRUn1V3aAc4ZTzHbrtJJ-S3b64Dbzg at mail.gmail.com>
To: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkl71MdAdBOy9udBGZll16cflGsvbMP6IIE+NnPPTXAcN0UZFdPcJtT/Wecjo9YJIYtHcYU
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:20:41 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: [GTER] Rede HFC
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sobre consultoria em redes HFC, fale com o Antonio Salles da QAM TV
http://qamtv.com.br/#
abs,
2013/2/18 <gter-request at eng.registro.br>
> Send gter mailing list submissions to
> gter at eng.registro.br
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> gter-request at eng.registro.br
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> gter-owner at eng.registro.br
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of gter digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Colocation (Mihran Junior)
> 2. Re: Rede HFC (R?ney Eduardo)
> 3. Bloquei de porta 25 (Wildemberg Lopes)
> 4. Re: Servidor dns (Claudio Junior)
> 5. cisco 2800 VIC+PLAR (hotline) (Marcelo Seabra)
> 6. Re: Bloquei de porta 25 (Alexandre J. Correa (Onda))
> 7. Re: Servidor dns (Rafael Cresci)
> 8. Re: Bloquei de porta 25 (Danton Nunes)
> 9. Re: Servidor dns (Leonardo Gutierres - Opera??o de Redes)
> 10. Re: Bloquei de porta 25 (Wildemberg Lopes)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:51:02 -0300
> From: Mihran Junior <mihran.kjunior at gmail.com>
> To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> <gter at eng.registro.br>
> Subject: Re: [GTER] Colocation
> Message-ID:
> <CABR> JGfJvJF+GM9U7FDb_tmRCnx5-bcvSXRmg6ssY2YqzWg4eQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> FIlipe,
>
> N?o; a refer?ncia de Mbps foi citada por outro colega - projetos distintos.
>
>
> 2013/2/15 Filipe Alvarez <filipealvarez at gmail.com>
>
> > Em 15 de fevereiro de 2013 15:22, Mihran Junior
> > <mihran.kjunior at gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > Rafael, tudo bem?
> > >
> > > Aproximadamente 41m2, hospedando 14-16 racks.
> >
> > Nossa, tudo isso trafega s? 20mbits ?
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Mihran K. Junior
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:53:32 -0300
> From: R?ney Eduardo <roneyeduardosantos at gmail.com>
> To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> <gter at eng.registro.br>
> Subject: Re: [GTER] Rede HFC
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAMkf-ESH-AYERmtQKR+urR+MUHybWNYUWbQWyxW3SxFZijGZUQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Em 17 de fevereiro de 2013 15:31, Mario Luiz <delins1525 at gmail.com
> >escreveu:
>
> > Ol?,
> >
> >
> > Preciso de uma empresa/pessoa prestar consultoria para implanta??o de
> > rede HFC para fornecer tv-internet+telefone. Alguem poderia indicar?
> >
> >
> www.mcosta.ind.br
>
> --
> R?ney Eduardo
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:50:34 -0300
> From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
> To: gter at eng.registro.br
> Subject: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para n?s provedores ? ver?dico o
> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para n?s AS.
> Estou com problemas com minha operadora sobre a mesma.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:22:31 -0300
> From: Claudio Junior <csjunior at gmail.com>
> To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> <gter at eng.registro.br>
> Subject: Re: [GTER] Servidor dns
> Message-ID:
> <CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9> A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Ola pessoal
>
> Estava olhando estes servidores e eles me pareceram uma boa solu??o
> para um cliente meu.
>
> Eles querem dois servidores para atender o registro.br (master e
> slave), e o mesmo servidor atender o dns da rede interna.
> Interface com dhcp server em uma rede direta, e mikrotik em redes remotas.
> Por ultimo, interface web para administrar estes servidores (criar
> novas zonas, etc), pois o pessoal que vai executar estas tarefas ? o
> usu?rio.
>
> Alguma das solu??es propostas nos emails abaixo (powerdns, maradns)
> serviria para isto? Algu?m conhece outras op??es?
>
> Obrigado pela aten??o
>
> --
> Claudio da Silva Junior
> csjunior at gmail.com
>
>
> Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 11:50, Giovane Heleno <webgeo at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
> > Tem o http://www.maradns.org/ tamb?m.
> >
> > Giovane Heleno
> > www.giovane.pro.br
> >
> >
> > Em 11 de fevereiro de 2013 14:51, Danton Nunes
> > <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> >
> >> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Robson mendes de souza wrote:
> >>
> >> Preciso fazer um servidor dns para cache, alguem me indica algum
> tutorial
> >>> ou documenta??o que posso seguir.
> >>>
> >>
> >> o unbound n?o requer pr?tica, tampouco habilidade.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> >>
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:28:17 -0300
> From: Marcelo Seabra <marcelo.seabra at ps5.com.br>
> To: gter at eng.registro.br
> Subject: [GTER] cisco 2800 VIC+PLAR (hotline)
> Message-ID: <51224891.2080906 at ps5.com.br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Ol?,
>
> Estou com uma demanda, um cliente possui 2 roteadores cisco 2800.
> cada um com uma VIC de 4 portas FXS e 1 Telefone analogico ligado em
> cada porta 0/0/0 de cada router.
> Ele precisa que quando o telefone for tirado do gancho no roteador 1 o
> telefone do router 2 toque. (tipo hotline).
> Andei estudando nos ultimos dias e vi que a cisco chama esse tipo de
> configuracao de PLAR,
> mais n?o consigo achar nenhum exemplo de como fazer essas configura??es.
> Os exemplos que consegui usam dial-peer, destination-pattern e
> sess-target, mais os 2800 n?o est?o aceitando essas configs.
> Algu?m pode ajudar, com um exemplo basico? Ou indicar uma URL pra ajudar
> a fazer isso?
>
>
> Agradecido desde j?!
>
> --
> Marcelo
> AS 28327
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:03:09 -0300
> From: "Alexandre J. Correa (Onda)" <alexandre at onda.net.br>
> To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> <gter at eng.registro.br>
> Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
> Message-ID: <51226CDD.5010004 at onda.net.br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Em links dedicados, acredito que eles nao fazem o bloqueio (e nao podem)
>
> mas nos acessos compartilhados (3g, wi-fi, adsl, etc) ja estao
> praticando ha algum tempo !!
>
>
> On 18/02/2013 14:50, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> > Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para n?s provedores ? ver?dico o
> > bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para n?s AS.
> > Estou com problemas com minha operadora sobre a mesma.
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
>
> --
> Sds.
>
> Alexandre Jeronimo Correa
> S?cio-Administrador
>
> Office: +55 34 3351 3077
>
> Onda Internet
> www.onda.net.br
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:01:50 -0300
> From: Rafael Cresci <cresci at gmail.com>
> To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> <gter at eng.registro.br>
> Subject: Re: [GTER] Servidor dns
> Message-ID: <23D4DB2D-1A1B-4AD7-8E09-A4B080CBD9F3 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Existem algumas interfaces web para o PowerDNS.
>
> On 18/02/2013, at 14:22, Claudio Junior <csjunior at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Alguma das solu??es propostas nos emails abaixo (powerdns, maradns)
> > serviria para isto? Algu?m conhece outras op??es?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:00:44 -0300 (BRT)
> From: Danton Nunes <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>
> To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> <gter at eng.registro.br>
> Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
> Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
>
> > Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para n?s provedores ? ver?dico o
> > bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para n?s AS.
>
> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 ? s? em redes de acesso final, tipo ADSL.
>
> Se voc? tem endere?os IP pr?prios e um AS, voc? estabelece suas regras e
> se responsabiliza por elas. Tr?nsito n?o ? filtrado.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:56:21 -0300
> From: Leonardo Gutierres - Opera??o de Redes <leonardo at vibeti.com.br>
> To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> <gter at eng.registro.br>
> Subject: Re: [GTER] Servidor dns
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAGiBWQCqGibt4Oi-b_WDZiZifjTOBmz0DkhB5q2b9+d4sdSF2w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Boa tarde
>
> Sim PowerDNS, estou usando sem problemas, Master e Slave. recomendo
>
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 14:22, Claudio Junior <csjunior at gmail.com
> >escreveu:
>
> > Ola pessoal
> >
> > Estava olhando estes servidores e eles me pareceram uma boa solu??o
> > para um cliente meu.
> >
> > Eles querem dois servidores para atender o registro.br (master e
> > slave), e o mesmo servidor atender o dns da rede interna.
> > Interface com dhcp server em uma rede direta, e mikrotik em redes
> remotas.
> > Por ultimo, interface web para administrar estes servidores (criar
> > novas zonas, etc), pois o pessoal que vai executar estas tarefas ? o
> > usu?rio.
> >
> > Alguma das solu??es propostas nos emails abaixo (powerdns, maradns)
> > serviria para isto? Algu?m conhece outras op??es?
> >
> > Obrigado pela aten??o
> >
> > --
> > Claudio da Silva Junior
> > csjunior at gmail.com
> >
> >
> > Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 11:50, Giovane Heleno <webgeo at gmail.com>
> > escreveu:
> > > Tem o http://www.maradns.org/ tamb?m.
> > >
> > > Giovane Heleno
> > > www.giovane.pro.br
> > >
> > >
> > > Em 11 de fevereiro de 2013 14:51, Danton Nunes
> > > <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> > >
> > >> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Robson mendes de souza wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Preciso fazer um servidor dns para cache, alguem me indica algum
> > tutorial
> > >>> ou documenta??o que posso seguir.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> o unbound n?o requer pr?tica, tampouco habilidade.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> > >>
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:07:52 -0300
> From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
> To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
> <gter at eng.registro.br>
> Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
> Message-ID:
> <CAPn11ODuvsH> ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
>
>
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes
> <danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
>
> > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> >
> > Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para n?s provedores ? ver?dico o
> >> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para n?s AS.
> >>
> >
> > Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 ? s? em redes de acesso final, tipo ADSL.
> >
> > Se voc? tem endere?os IP pr?prios e um AS, voc? estabelece suas regras e
> > se responsabiliza por elas. Tr?nsito n?o ? filtrado.
> >
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> gter digest list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
> End of gter Digest, Vol 119, Issue 35
> *************************************
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp142292obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:19:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.229.177.224 with SMTP id bj32mr1464923qcb.102.1361283543926;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:19:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r17si14883857qct.147.2013.02.19.06.19.03;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:19:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@onda.net.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id D409E11F8A9;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:18:06 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from cube.onda.net.br
(2001-12ac-0000-0000-0000-0000-0000-0005.v6.onda.net.br [IPv6:2001:12ac::5])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0839711F7B8
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:17:19 -0300 (BRT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onda.net.br;
sÞfault;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
bh=ZmJTruemZHnPfTnyL68Fa3+Qc5+c6AyMFUgSFVhGC0g=;
b=KJP3Fj5urgjLr9zv4y/JkojV0V84jsir6iSyikoK06dN5+kyj8E+ZEHZb8c6a0Gp0RBnoYvJpPB1ECdXLRgZx85wLOhvxvIZ2nywVYH3gIo53tb/8meTac/E8rp/myHy;
Received: from static-189-84-15-254.v4.onda.net.br ([189.84.15.254]:52658
helo=[192.168.102.173])
by cube.onda.net.br with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <alexandre at onda.net.br>)
id 1U7dhm-0004wj-8w
for gter at eng.registro.br; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:17:18 -0300
Message-ID: <5122EE9F.3030803 at onda.net.br>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:16:47 -0300
From: "Alexandre J. Correa - Onda Internet" <alexandre at onda.net.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
<CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
<51203908.6050907 at onda.net.br>
<CACyzUwLZ5Uc+PhQKmHeQaeS1rMX1mZry8fmee5Kd974CSzp_eg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKo9bwXO8xsDwF_4139MzHi+LmzzoPZ+ucFFRjA+MbBHig at mail.gmail.com>
<AEDB7D7B-B528-421A-9033-B31B1F9CF6B4 at gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AEDB7D7B-B528-421A-9033-B31B1F9CF6B4 at gmail.com>
X-cPanel-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-cPanel-MailScanner-ID: 1U7dhm-0004wj-8w
X-cPanel-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
Provider for details
X-cPanel-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-cPanel-MailScanner-From: alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Spam-Status: No
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cube.onda.net.br
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - eng.registro.br
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - onda.net.br
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cube.onda.net.br: authenticated_id:
alexandre at onda.net.br
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:18:05 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?utf-8?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
ICBJbmNvbWluZyByYXRlczogICAgMjYyNC4wIGtiaXRzL3NlYyDilIIK4pSCICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAxMDAwLjAgcGFja2V0cy9zZWMg4pSCCuKUgiBPdXRnb2luZyByYXRlczogICAgMjYy
NC4wIGtiaXRzL3NlYyDilIIK4pSCICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAxMDAwLjAgcGFja2V0cy9z
ZWMKCm5lbSBtZXhlCgpFbSAxNy8wMi8yMDEzIDE3OjU1LCBXYWduZXIgRnVycXVpbSBlc2NyZXZl
dToKPiBzaW0sIG5vIG1ldSBjYXNvIG7Do28gZGEgcHJhIHRyYW5zcG9ydGFyIGVtIFNJUCwgSXRh
bWFyIHRhIGZhbGFuZG8gYmVzdGVpcmEsIGRlIGNlcnRvIG7Do28gbGV1IG9zIGUtbWFpbHMuIE9i
cmlnYWRvLAo+Cj4gRW52aWFkbyB2aWEgaVBob25lCj4KPiBFbSAxNy8wMi8yMDEzLCDDoHMgMDg6
NTMsIFJhZmFlbCBHYWxkaW5vIDxzdXAucmFmYWVsZ2FsZGlub0BnbWFpbC5jb20+IGVzY3JldmV1
Ogo+Cj4+IG5lbSBzZW1wcmUgaXRhbWFyLiBwb2lzIHZjIHBvZGUgcXVlcmVyIGZyYWNpb25hciBk
aWdhbW9zIHVucyB0aW1lc2xvdHMgcHJhCj4+IHZveiBlIG91dHJvcyBwcmEgZGFkb3MuLi4uCj4+
Cj4+IEVtIDE3IGRlIGZldmVyZWlybyBkZSAyMDEzIDAxOjMxLCBJdGFtYXIgUmVpcyBQZWl4b3Rv
IDwKPj4gaXRhbWFyQGlzcGJyYXNpbC5jb20uYnI+IGVzY3JldmV1Ogo+Pgo+Pj4gMjAxMy8yLzE2
IEFsZXhhbmRyZSBKLiBDb3JyZWEgLSBPbmRhIEludGVybmV0IDxhbGV4YW5kcmVAb25kYS5uZXQu
YnI+Ogo+Pj4+IGUgbyB0cmFmZWdvIGVoIGNvbnN0YW50ZSwgdXRpbGl6YW5kbyBvdSBuYW8uLiBl
bGUgZXN0w6EgbGEgISEKPj4+IHBvciBpc3RvIMOpIHZpYXZlbCBjb252ZXJ0ZXIgcGFyYSB2b2lw
Lgo+Pj4KPj4+Cj4+Pgo+Pj4gLS0KPj4+IC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQo+Pj4KPj4+IEl0YW1hciBSZWlz
IFBlaXhvdG8KPj4+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucXVlYmFyYXRvLmNvbS5ici9wZXJmaWwvaXRhbWFyanAK
Pj4+IC0tCj4+PiBndGVyIGxpc3QgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly9lbmcucmVnaXN0cm8uYnIvbWFpbG1hbi9s
aXN0aW5mby9ndGVyCj4+Cj4+Cj4+IC0tIAo+PiBBdHQuCj4+Cj4+IFJhZmFlbCBHYWxkaW5vCj4+
IC0tCj4+IGd0ZXIgbGlzdCAgICBodHRwczovL2VuZy5yZWdpc3Ryby5ici9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3Rp
bmZvL2d0ZXIKPiAtLQo+IGd0ZXIgbGlzdCAgICBodHRwczovL2VuZy5yZWdpc3Ryby5ici9tYWls
bWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2d0ZXIKCgotLSAKU2RzLgoKQWxleGFuZHJlIEplcm9uaW1vIENvcnJlYQpT
b2Npby1BZG1pbmlzdHJhZG9yCgpPbmRhIEludGVybmV0Cnd3dy5vbmRhLm5ldC5icgoKSVBWNiBS
ZWFkeSAhCgotLQpndGVyIGxpc3QgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly9lbmcucmVnaXN0cm8uYnIvbWFpbG1hbi9s
aXN0aW5mby9ndGVy
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp142168obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:17:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.49.73.105 with SMTP id k9mr7066365qev.6.1361283423967;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d3si5524474anp.135.2013.02.19.06.17.03;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D02111F851;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:16:58 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ia0-x22f.google.com (mail-ia0-x22f.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22f])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DD9811F79E
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:39:26 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r4so5905086iaj.6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:39:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=E+sBo4TSZLVReKwatIfQs6TiFBfXeueSs4fVxgAFmw0=;
b=ieuZ7vGifAc1wzkAXMQU8F52uxMjFR4sEdc4QPkW3b8Ng4kmpIVPxjf/SBJqDO/9gz
HinB62VWBtafKLJMXW5357mWO04VQu2ShnYosGJFeIGsVVNlWe3NG0F8rJk2fVF7rm8x
z4Y+h3bmiCoFG7lfl8PgJegTYgfpPdxNpC/LT0RFe1n+535LMnhYhbov3F6KvYpt1B9y
osc7Su08ByYrfNVHyT5I8U3KoEOv8V/ELMPBiV9Yp6qqqorer/wOhyC0FaamXK0UjHu0
0aZhgAgBy+1YV+AX41P65QBoB1nsc32JGcdX6AGlyOlJF7ZXOM+6doTM34nac7aP5pC+
JQpA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.159.194 with SMTP id m2mr7351893icx.13.1361273964524;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.2.196 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:39:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51228E36.3040703 at asbyte.com.br>
References: <CAFxccmx+oYJZHKyFrkt_U85QKdKTTNw75Pd0exsunYB63NWxJw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RT7+kTzDe6=mE-kP+6ZE19MqXBfqBi6i2SHUS=NLQyjgw at mail.gmail.com>
<BLU002-W2268733ABE548B4FF8D7358DC080 at phx.gbl>
<F5981374-F1A3-4E08-9F5B-DC9F8DE596A2 at esds.com.br>
<511E90BA.5030402 at asbyte.com.br>
<CAKEr4RQvtORWTaxoMWSo3_BwXW2SANJUA5N2dGwNtuDPw8yRcQ at mail.gmail.com>
<51228E36.3040703 at asbyte.com.br>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:39:24 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPeqj48M9+ZdKBiv-xFM_XodYTKeWWX1tM-VpFCAS74w8=Wdzw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Tarcisio azevedo <tarcisioazevedo1 at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:16:57 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER]
=?iso-8859-1?q?Problema_com_Auto_Negociação_entre_mikr? =?iso-8859-1?q?otik?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp142206obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:17:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.224.223.80 with SMTP id ij16mr7000146qab.8.1361283457572;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:17:37 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u15si10500370qct.59.2013.02.19.06.17.37;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:17:37 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9DD11F879;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:17:31 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com
[209.85.219.54])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C72E11F7A3
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:22:17 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n12so6842196oag.27
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:22:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh=Ruho5x9/l89oK6JUXcZqXiPDKzgCsbHJswT9x0aQqww=;
b=ZLr3GfGd867wdxgS6h/zlxK2LpItVMduliL4euLXxwmZhOInq8Hd+V8Be9Kso0iv8T
/8n7m2OJxg7FNP5nff4gDk6HoIAj1SBx4fuAladaKmuJdzSyJZUCKSabvgKU6S1yZfPw
njdmdBxi8gIT2yUTO5xphfaThnunds1FTegpMhFyPvU1D7FSLabXDVdSrwCkapUkg/WS
pxvFQRNf4wG0+mf9W81727A9gTVT/UGXMw7vf2F/OWRRxFuDBD3nM3EiqtkyeeLuzXdM
e7rJ/9tr9p2ybBCpRgFrlACPouxB5ZTiBbBoU+MFQVcb6NnyM3siyrKQMyJctue858uu
Zksg=
X-Received: by 10.182.177.72 with SMTP id co8mr7661634obc.53.1361280135892;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:22:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.241.168 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:21:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Dias <lucasmcz at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:21:34 -0300
Message-ID: <CAHDm2GT9=cgkUg+_LM8qkhg8AN5MWhLx1tadKE3vTeOvXR3PZw at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:17:29 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Links para consulta
http://antispam.br/porta25/
http://www.antispam.br/admin/porta25/
O Bloqueio da porta 25 foi determinado junto ao CGI.br ANATEL e outros
orgãos, porém somente para uso em links considerados residências. Ou seja,
o cliente final, que tentar originar conexões para a Porta 25 não
conseguirá. A porta adotada para o SMTPS, é a 587 ou ainda a 465.
Essa ação é para minimizar a quantidade de Spammers que o Brasil produzia.
O bloqueio não é para ocorrer entre Operadoras e Pessoas Jurídicas por
exemplo. Uma empresa pode ter um link dedicado e possuir seu próprio
serviço de email. Contudo, ela terá que configurar o SMTP para seus
funcíonários, por que qualquer conexão 3G, por default bloqueará acesso a
porta 25.
Logo, seu fornecedor de Link está equivocado. Ou ainda pode estar ocorrendo
um problema no seu contrato com ele.
Use os links acima para justificar o desbloqueio, lembrando que você como
ISP, deverá, para clientes residências, efetuar o bloqueio, mas para
clientes PJ não é necessário.
Caso ele não libere amigo, tenta outras opções de fornecedor. Sei que isso
no nosso país é tenso e dramático, mas tente.
--
.:: Lucas Dias
.:: OS3 Soluções em TI
.:: (82) 8813-1494 / 8111-2288
.:: Antes de imprimir, veja se realmente é necessário!!!
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp147861obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:13:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.145.33 with SMTP id o21mr29337044yhj.55.1361290430035;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:13:50 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c67si26302736yhe.84.2013.02.19.08.13.49;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:13:49 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@cenadigital.com.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F8811F85F;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:12:45 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ve0-f173.google.com (mail-ve0-f173.google.com
[209.85.128.173])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F6611F77F
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:25:21 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f173.google.com with SMTP id oz10so5877722veb.18
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:25:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
dÎnadigital.com.br; s=mail;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=q9rmSD2NV1d7FgYqJsDms0ECsm8u6eqH667wsdjlqtw=;
b=ZP8K0H1D2h+lNH7FtOWweZjqenfVIGAUIENsqUgE7Haai7prBArZsf/pvJS8vIRAUV
IFtuRkqiOcV+rrki6fPRiHPFlrR2pMvLiyVlCcxGTwuxDiZ7W22uhPsyI5KjtNwQSjhr
ORjDAwbr42nQVUHqqz5hR5kbepeRJHIEwMKlYX-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=q9rmSD2NV1d7FgYqJsDms0ECsm8u6eqH667wsdjlqtw=;
b=Sv0+F3WA/gLsFI9GzfUrVkZlBX1XOClUNXkusYyaxxgEkOMsc3XOm9r/2z1UBkRfao
VTxUOa3Hkd/IuvLxqxhaytBn4Nuzr11KZ6GUGIeK+POHXF8eZbgsvM+pDTJoUOTrkAPD
8u5LTQZ/eRIk5BRYNsFECmOLgY+4zJDWZ2wYzP7ACEqGusM71Q/mlWv0E3X4kZbtB6jc
NfhLgDRPyPWPRh0VFChWyjpNTXfP2NnZhCv9kEhQ4YR1bcLDYBN52MY3wS1Z48L6Rdo1
U2e+o80iMn4mgEUTIXaHvKjhhSdGu4sFnHrTk9l8QJQ89yX+sEOG08mu1cdGA0OsV6H8
Dz3g=
X-Received: by 10.58.50.7 with SMTP id y7mr21404365ven.24.1361283895550; Tue,
19 Feb 2013 06:24:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.6.167 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:24:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rafael Henrique Faria <rafaelhfaria at cenadigital.com.br>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:24:15 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkemD/nzquAbsxEHYyY59hb4fCJFKR1Rkkh4waDg0zFKRUwN0E2SM4jEy9yaZFwhKdbzSJG
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:12:44 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Bom dia Wildermberg.
2013/2/18 Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
> 2) o meu bloco Meu ASN 52919 e meu BLoco é 177.10.132.0/22 e eles estão
> bloqueados pelo ISP e não por mim,
>
>
A dúvida do Douglas Fischer, e de muitos aqui para te ajudar, é se esse
bloco (177.10.132.0/22) é realmente seu, você pagou por ele direto com o
NIC BR. Ou você alugou esse bloco do seu provedor? O seu provedor pagou por
um bloco maior com o Registro.BR, e está alugando esse /22 para você? Com
isso o provedor se torna o proprietário legítimo do bloco, você é um
cliente dele.
Mas se você contratou o bloco direto com o NIC BR, você que paga
diretamente por ele, aí você é o proprietário, e você que dita as regras do
mesmo.
> Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 18:09, Douglas Fischer
> <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
> > 1º
> > "Pois o mesmo, só disse que..." -> Disse-falado ou disse-escrito?
> >
> >
> > 2º
> > Esclareça algo. Os IPs que estão bloqueados são do seu bloco de IPs, ou
> do
> > bloco dele e delegados a você?
> >
> > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 17:16, Wildemberg Lopes
> > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> >
> > > Pois o mesmo, só disse que iria liberar as portas mediante uma
> declaração
> > > que eu mandasse, porem é um provedor que me vende o link, não pego
> direto
> > > de operadoras e isso está me dando bastante dor de cabeça!
> > >
> > >
> > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:37, Douglas Fischer
> > > <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Se você usa um bloco de IPs de sua operadora que foi delegado à você,
> > > você
> > > > deve especificar à operadora quais IPs deverão ter trafego na port0
> 25
> > > > liberado(presumindo-se mail-servers).
> > > >
> > > > Se você(seus clientes) usa seu próprio bloco de IPs, o bloqueio da
> > porta
> > > 25
> > > > não se aplica.
> > > >
> > > > Em primeira instânica, entre em acordo com a equipe da operadora em
> > > questão
> > > > ...
> > > > (De preferênica que seja tudo pro e-mmail)
> > > > Caso não haja boa vontade por parte deles, acione a anatel.
> > > >
> > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a porta
> > 25
> > > é
> > > > > bloqueada, o que fazer?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <
> > > > > danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é
> > verídico o
> > > > > >>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final,
> tipo
> > > > ADSL.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece suas
> > > > regras e
> > > > > >> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> > > > > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Douglas Fernando Fischer
> > > > Engº de Controle e Automação
> > > > --
> > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > > >
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Douglas Fernando Fischer
> > Engº de Controle e Automação
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp147813obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:13:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.224.42.4 with SMTP id q4mr1554422qae.49.1361290381049;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u20si14990663qct.203.2013.02.19.08.13.00;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC32311F84D;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:12:16 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-qa0-f45.google.com (mail-qa0-f45.google.com
[209.85.216.45])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF86B11F8B6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:32:16 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id g10so1857175qah.11
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:32:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=nrrn9xgyLufAXhYLJSOSMloTeATP5wZju4OUST4rqtI=;
b=YB+fRyzJ76cTsPv5nRyFvYHljbNss6aL3c5ifnogKoCQ2Qme1f03LiMZfwXbY6ob29
q6ZntT1pul9LtxCBDDL3ZRYElDQDINEhPBeqR9Nn0uDT8AVBEvSxoe/xq1eUNkvt1DjW
bVBAq8nSy7oR0wiCSmMC5y0XA5iyWnsNHleXDlQX/k/vVjtWl9ZQ84yy77BN5JlQ3JQK
tXmoIL00FSygPJ9R/lMbdzfE5lDzf4OtS6T98mB6dSfOaLjYhbNAO18jt62AzZDLagv3
8MPMQPr0sg1urUNDZFEZVkz1zyfRFXlbcNjJWUVrA0CSsr54gpDg+VactB2LmPMxu/71
ykgg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.37.211 with SMTP id y19mr1462235qcd.77.1361284335660;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:32:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.109.98 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:32:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:32:15 -0300
Message-ID: <CAJ=jT++84m6TxVyfrzFuH4i9uR66NrtRWnNaGG=DxOrcUZbyaA at mail.gmail.com>
From: Jorge Augusto <jgutors at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:12:14 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Marcelo,
O produto já está pronto (Parte TDMOverIP)?
Lembro que existia algumas situações bizarras no EDD (Na Versao testada)
-Se você vai transportar e1s de diferentes origens vai ter problemas,
existe um grande problema na construção fisica (Relógio) do mesmo que causa
problemas de escorregamento por erros no clock (Retorno).
-Falta de documentação (valores de Packet Delay, Jitter Buffer e etc)
-Não existia uma forma direta de testar um enlace entre EDDs, se você
executar um teste de "ping" direcionado a um EDD para medir latência,
jitter e perda de pacotes o EDD vai gerar um falso valor de resposta já que
a CPU do EDD (INPUT) não possui grande processamento e ai fica
contraditório, como vou testar o segmento (Até o EDD) se ele nem me
responde a "altura" :). A solução para testar o segmento era colocar um
equipamento depois do EDD :).
-O velho problema da construção do "chicote" de e1s que foram montados em
"pares" e mesmo eu usando apenas um e1 (Tributário) o outro (e1) ficava lá
aberto (fisicamente), ai pra não gerar problemas de "ruidos e
interferências de meios externos" e outras coisas era preciso fazer um loop
fisico no e1 que não estava em uso. (Não podia deixar aberto).
Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 09:38, DATACOM - Marcelo.Veriato <
marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br> escreveu:
> Basicamente o EDD da Datacom utiliza 3 elementos (interfaces), TDM, Bundle
> e Pseudo-Wire.
>
> Na interface TDM do EDD, configura-se o PCM que corresponda ao tipo de
> quadro (com/sem sincronismo) e número de timeslots, além da sinalização por
> canal associado caso necessário.
>
> O bundle se refere à rede Ethernet, onde a finalidade dele é a transmissão
> dos dados sobre a rede IP/Ethernet. O bundle representa um mapeamento de
> uma interface TDM que será transmitido entre dois equipamentos conectados
> por Pseudo-Wire.
>
> A Pseudo-Wire (PW) permite que serviços como o TDM sejam transportados por
> uma conexão virtual ponto a ponto através de um mesmo circuito em redes
> IP/Ethernet até seu destino. A ideia básica é a utilização de uma terceira
> camada na rede sobre a qual uma operadora necessita transportar serviços
> legados incluindo também a camada 2 de serviços da rede.
>
> A configuração de timeslots determina quantos timeslots TDM serão
> transmitidos no bundle. No lado do Ethernet essa configuração implica na
> quantidade de dados transmitidos: cada timeslot representa 64kbits de dados
> por bundle. Por exemplo: uma configuração de TDM unframed com 32 timeslots
> no bundle resulta em uma utilização de banda de 2048kbit/s; dois bundles
> com essa mesma configuração resultam em uma utilização de banda de
> 4096kbit/s.
>
> Dependendo do modelo do EDD, podem ter até 8 bundles simultâneos, ou seja,
> 8 E1 de 32 timeslots.
>
> Caso queira discutir mais a fundo esta questão podemos conversar em pvt.
>
> Marcelo Veriato Lima
> DATACOM
> Analista de Infraestrutura
> Av. França, 735. Porto Alegre, RS - 90230-220
> Fone: 51 3933-3000 Ramal: 3359
> marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br
> www.datacom.ind.br
>
>
> On 02/10/2013 01:08 PM, Rafael Galdino wrote:
>
>> mas como funcionaria o transporte do E1 dentro de IP? digo por conta dos
>> timeslots, da sinalização.....
>>
>> fiquei curioso
>>
>> Em 8 de fevereiro de 2013 21:21, MrGuga <mrguga at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>> Usamos o EDD da Datacom, funcionou direitinho.
>>>
>>>
>>> Em 8 de fevereiro de 2013 20:36, Douglas Fischer
>>> <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>**escreveu:
>>>
>>> Dependendo do serviço que você vai oferecer, se for VOZ, você pode
>>>>
>>> colocar
>>>
>>>> os
>>>> canais B sob ação dos codecs(ou fax detection) e transportar o canal D
>>>> limpo..
>>>>
>>>> Fiz isso uma vez com um par de Cisco para interligar uns PABX legados.
>>>>
>>>> Não me lembro da config, mas era bem trivial. E funciona bem.
>>>>
>>>> Em 8 de fevereiro de 2013 19:50, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>> escreveu:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Estou precisando transportar E1 via IP, porem, será utilizado para
>>>>>> interconexão, assim tenho que carregar a sinalização original, qual
>>>>>> equipamento seria recomendado ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Se é preciso manter a sinalização original, você precisa encarar isso
>>>>> como serial TDM/G.703 e transportar, em algo citado como TDMoIP ou
>>>>> CEoIP. Mas sincronizar esse G.703 entre a central E1 remota e a da
>>>>> tele vai ser uma tarefa ingrata, feita com "adaptive clock recover"...
>>>>> não tem mesmo como trocar o meio de caminho para algo com links E1 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Um dos equipamentos que faz isso é o módulo NM-CEM-4TE1 para
>>>>> roteadores Cisco. RAD, Overture, Juniper(linha CTP) e Telco Systems
>>>>> também tem produtos nesse segmento.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rubens
>>>>> --
>>>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Douglas Fernando Fischer
>>>> Engº de Controle e Automação
>>>> --
>>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp147795obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:12:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.1.10 with SMTP id d10mr8637498ani.55.1361290351077;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:12:31 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k6si6326033anh.157.2013.02.19.08.12.30;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:12:31 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C1D11F839;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:11:58 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A7DF11F8B6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:33:30 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k14so8521928iea.27
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:33:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh=G3Uuo9iLGw4x1EYtdqoH9j8+3b4M2jpMK6+xPESaRo4=;
b=akuQCdKK+TlxuJe9rtg4VHbNK4Z7lGCKIBaJKsAM+eqfBRLDTTdlLfU0Bq9wBTTox/
q2/5XxjnoyoPKwKo284J/IdKlKdh5+TTRDo4z29tmV9Zd1TjswGOgNSlJXCaOPWD/ADl
Qr9wyYc4OfoJyT8aRYzZlAzX8rOj6B5xwsbvYSjz7szXo7ta6HOZz6CBety3/MI/Iyb0
ZNRyahZ0fxc/rLBgkaxSn8umxlv+CHgqJ2kDWAo9dv45meiFX+xb4q7U07wYGohXjB+N
PLGYXJ+sLj6g/zxgO1dpvP2jZwqCjGKyKNG5bjMPp0hqe7Q4gQe2pdAdMenQjrFRZZcK
RQWA=
X-Received: by 10.50.181.136 with SMTP id dw8mr9411756igc.39.1361284396881;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:33:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.157.196 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:32:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5122EE9F.3030803 at onda.net.br>
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAF60hAyjc8VXcx=k9nWX2cZk3kXYrYmTJkTak8vghpyVKpHVoQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511EDDC5.4060204 at onda.net.br>
<CAPefbKpvn12WhR0A-dA74jCgcydub2n5E+XAF=Lff0DDQN_Bsw at mail.gmail.com>
<51203908.6050907 at onda.net.br>
<CACyzUwLZ5Uc+PhQKmHeQaeS1rMX1mZry8fmee5Kd974CSzp_eg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKo9bwXO8xsDwF_4139MzHi+LmzzoPZ+ucFFRjA+MbBHig at mail.gmail.com>
<AEDB7D7B-B528-421A-9033-B31B1F9CF6B4 at gmail.com>
<5122EE9F.3030803 at onda.net.br>
From: Douglas Fischer <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:32:56 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKEr4RS1Q-M364SxQnUdy+XSNce3Ejs4n8U8O+b6s1Zk=mTEhg at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:11:56 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp147834obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:13:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.148.164 with SMTP id v24mr29251071yhj.116.1361290405442;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:13:25 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e69si26305880yhm.39.2013.02.19.08.13.25;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:13:25 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B2B11F856;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:12:26 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com (mail-vc0-f173.google.com
[209.85.220.173])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91A9211F8B6
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:35:05 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id fy27so1356421vcb.18
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:35:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=tE+kKeF+JhUZU4OU3/RjaY0RZAMj+x1wUX9EfYIFaP0=;
b¾2PEJWAGnOH2PqgRGkBEr48CDpwxYYc647MdnUCYxIsUGKQTMvRE01VHPtMCIVUSc
ySkGYKko5m8bacicckBeClinetoJPqSbDxgbd1EAsLtBdkJXVNuK+0k0Ak6Y+Ct6CtCJ
pJzzdbBl0fTUJm/sNWMr7uo3V9XosvARRLJOEr1LM0vwqe8hGCK2ZJmHYiD1ya4R7htT
iS8n6d4DjfBuyPRUkpkQ2AcxfydO0FcsZhaFDXaZmN1HG6RpFOA2hloRwj6ZTElT+PEL
SFx4g0EXds1ZUmyZHJFbAqJaQvbZd7EcPFzZmjdu2fwdUTwpO9n/FRIxu7o9jfS5e0eU
KryQ=
X-Received: by 10.52.89.52 with SMTP id bl20mr18072245vdb.85.1361284503773;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:35:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.22.203 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:34:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+zzT8_Bnyigb76wMadeQikQF38LAmhEBNx2Ya++LmXiÄZUA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP2YjMENsBkCENGaBPjxob=qwnCsh4FZ8mkTgfFf4-FpqZ2Kgg at mail.gmail.com>
<17034976.1486.1358201650804.JavaMail.felipe at titan.local>
<CAD_GhtYZy1W8DyAqa0c1Z0oe+y6E+w+yRiAXX+fOvz27OowORg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAHDm2GSPDBx=UBomQX+-1F78BYMHTE2s_UXZ-sDgqQsMj+CULA at mail.gmail.com>
<CA+zzT8_Bnyigb76wMadeQikQF38LAmhEBNx2Ya++LmXiÄZUA at mail.gmail.com>
From: "Jonatas M. Victor" <jonatasmv at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:34:43 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOXXN-K_fOgj9qKm3jNK8xkaqkmc70yn6qyj2isqtaODMg9Xrw at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:12:25 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Modelos de switchs com custo/benefico
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Eu testei modelos da Alcatel que tem custo bem baixo mas a
performace parece ótima. Via CLI é bom
de operar mas via interfaceweb tah muito trabalho.
2013/1/15 Rafael Petter <rafapetter at gmail.com>:
> Dell Force10 S25 / S50 são ótimas opções.
> Em 15/01/2013 23:46, "Lucas Dias" <lucasmcz at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Em 15 de janeiro de 2013 14:12, Paulo Henrique <paulo.rddck at bsd.com.br
>> >escreveu:
>>
>> > Em 14 de janeiro de 2013 20:00, Felipe Rossi <felipe at rsantos.eti.br
>> > >escreveu:
>> >
>> > HP Procurve 2910AL ( 2 anos de operação sem qualquer problemas )
>> > Juniper EX4200-24PX ( estou testanto este aqui ainda, 1 semana de
>> produção
>> > e gostanto dos resultados ).
>> > 3Com Superstack 3 SFP. ( embora seja fast-ethernets o desempenho deles
>> com
>> > as 24 portas trafegando é impressionantes. )
>> >
>> > Att.
>> >
>>
>> Claudio,
>>
>> As indicações do amigo Paulo Henrique são muito boas.
>> Como não faço ideia da carga que será na sua rede, eu ainda indico a série
>> HP 1910 e 1905 de Swtches.
>> Preços muito bons e com ótimo MTBF.
>>
>> Escolha switches que pelo menos lhe entregue gestão de camada 2, alto
>> acessível e muito usado em empresas de qualquer tamanho.
>>
>> --
>> .:: Lucas Dias
>> .:: OS3 Soluções em TI
>> .:: (82) 8813-1494 / 8111-2288
>> .:: Antes de imprimir, veja se realmente é necessário!!!
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
--
.:Abraços:.
<<< Jonatas M. Victor >>>
jonatas at jmv.eti.br / jonatasmv at gmail.com
UIN: 138431258 / MSN: jonatasmv at msn.com
BSD User: BSD051240 / Linux User: #278922
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp155566obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:05:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.165.135 with SMTP id e7mr30326339yhl.99.1361300738715;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s9si26684714ano.121.2013.02.19.11.05.38;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1100611F8AF;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:05:34 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from snt0-omc1-s7.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc1-s7.snt0.hotmail.com
[65.55.90.18]) by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A5211F80A
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:20:26 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from SNT002-W90 ([65.55.90.9]) by snt0-omc1-s7.snt0.hotmail.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:20:25 -0800
X-EIP: [gaph9YGU0QTxqVxoFA/11C17V5OBvFmeCm/K3aHaiAM=]
X-Originating-Email: [bruno at openline.com.br]
Message-ID: <SNT002-W90C5E3941720384A2EC58DF5F50 at phx.gbl>
From: Bruno Cabral <bruno at openline.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:20:24 +0300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>,
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>,
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>,
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>,
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>,
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>,
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>,
<CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>,
<CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2013 16:20:25.0623 (UTC)
FILETIME=[06377A70:01CE0EBD]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:05:32 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
$ whois -h www.registro.br 177.10.132/22(...)inetnum: 177.10.132/22aut-num: AS52919abuse-c: SRSHOowner: SINGLE HOST DATACENTER LTDAownerid: 006.105.483/0001-75responsible: Gerencia de Redes Single Hostcountry: BRowner-c: WMM72tech-c: SRSHO
se esse "provedor" que te vende link esta bloqueando, voce deve aciona-lo para nao bloquear. é simples desse jeito
!3runo Cabral
--
Cursos e Consultoria BGP
> > 2) o meu bloco Meu ASN 52919 e meu BLoco é 177.10.132.0/22 e eles estão
> > bloqueados pelo ISP e não por mim,
>
> A dúvida do Douglas Fischer, e de muitos aqui para te ajudar, é se esse
> bloco (177.10.132.0/22) é realmente seu, você pagou por ele direto com o
> NIC BR. Ou você alugou esse bloco do seu provedor? O seu provedor pagou por
> um bloco maior com o Registro.BR, e está alugando esse /22 para você? Com
> isso o provedor se torna o proprietário legítimo do bloco, você é um
> cliente dele.
>
> Mas se você contratou o bloco direto com o NIC BR, você que paga
> diretamente por ele, aí você é o proprietário, e você que dita as regras do
> mesmo.
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp155588obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:06:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.125.201 with SMTP id z49mr30939311yhh.93.1361300764711;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:06:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u11si19878726ann.73.2013.02.19.11.06.04;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:06:04 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7C411F8C2;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:05:43 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com
[209.85.214.175])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C8511F801
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:21:48 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id uz6so6695680obc.20
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:21:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=LU+11Bkm2g5y8+F+5pc+CCn4wlSfgFMjzBccLwDne4Q=;
bÁGbXKH6XE0k4EQ6dmvUQVPf0vdK9RK/rGHj06FfU5KOhPWlzw5XjwfSsfQ2N68RZe
U8rmwUjyRQiCQRtklwSuglSLqq8srbbEyYd2iHQdZZMhEmaE1vWzbQoRTy+gQbef3k2t
8HV7fNUO0cEppi1/35SOyYQoc1Gm3UqmF+iGgg0vqS3Og1qtOfGDuDJ15OsrrjBD0Kc7
FmDVuU86ui/68FrELJkiau4hcMgO76rX9w54YQVgF39lPNRIkZnHVfqx4k6olDI1njvQ
GGw8FKePxka23DVpdrrSsA9yKb0LXEaaclbv9iYbOUJDNDRs6KAMvHvpiT2JbVCycGkY
3E2Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.27.136 with SMTP id t8mr7729072oeg.92.1361290907180; Tue,
19 Feb 2013 08:21:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:21:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:21:47 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11OBs7w2Kz9YtHs0To30+nK5QrkOxUZMJ4wRpcULnPXru+Q at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:05:42 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Respondendo aos amigos, sim, o BLOCO é meu, comprei a Registro.br ASN52919
e Bloco 177.10.132.0/22, porem parece não ter domínio do que é meu, hhehe
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 11:24, Rafael Henrique Faria <
rafaelhfaria at cenadigital.com.br> escreveu:
> Bom dia Wildermberg.
>
> 2013/2/18 Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
>
> > 2) o meu bloco Meu ASN 52919 e meu BLoco é 177.10.132.0/22 e eles estão
> > bloqueados pelo ISP e não por mim,
> >
> >
> A dúvida do Douglas Fischer, e de muitos aqui para te ajudar, é se esse
> bloco (177.10.132.0/22) é realmente seu, você pagou por ele direto com o
> NIC BR. Ou você alugou esse bloco do seu provedor? O seu provedor pagou por
> um bloco maior com o Registro.BR, e está alugando esse /22 para você? Com
> isso o provedor se torna o proprietário legítimo do bloco, você é um
> cliente dele.
>
> Mas se você contratou o bloco direto com o NIC BR, você que paga
> diretamente por ele, aí você é o proprietário, e você que dita as regras do
> mesmo.
>
>
> > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 18:09, Douglas Fischer
> > <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
> >
> > > 1º
> > > "Pois o mesmo, só disse que..." -> Disse-falado ou disse-escrito?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2º
> > > Esclareça algo. Os IPs que estão bloqueados são do seu bloco de IPs, ou
> > do
> > > bloco dele e delegados a você?
> > >
> > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 17:16, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Pois o mesmo, só disse que iria liberar as portas mediante uma
> > declaração
> > > > que eu mandasse, porem é um provedor que me vende o link, não pego
> > direto
> > > > de operadoras e isso está me dando bastante dor de cabeça!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:37, Douglas Fischer
> > > > <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > Se você usa um bloco de IPs de sua operadora que foi delegado à
> você,
> > > > você
> > > > > deve especificar à operadora quais IPs deverão ter trafego na port0
> > 25
> > > > > liberado(presumindo-se mail-servers).
> > > > >
> > > > > Se você(seus clientes) usa seu próprio bloco de IPs, o bloqueio da
> > > porta
> > > > 25
> > > > > não se aplica.
> > > > >
> > > > > Em primeira instânica, entre em acordo com a equipe da operadora em
> > > > questão
> > > > > ...
> > > > > (De preferênica que seja tudo pro e-mmail)
> > > > > Caso não haja boa vontade por parte deles, acione a anatel.
> > > > >
> > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a
> porta
> > > 25
> > > > é
> > > > > > bloqueada, o que fazer?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > > > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <
> > > > > > danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é
> > > verídico o
> > > > > > >>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final,
> > tipo
> > > > > ADSL.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece
> suas
> > > > > regras e
> > > > > > >> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> > > > > > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Douglas Fernando Fischer
> > > > > Engº de Controle e Automação
> > > > > --
> > > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Douglas Fernando Fischer
> > > Engº de Controle e Automação
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > >
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp70352obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:58:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.123.208 with SMTP id v56mr31328196yhh.52.1361303931707;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m23si27256829yhl.25.2013.02.19.11.58.51;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A2B11F8B9;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:58:13 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com (mail-oa0-f45.google.com
[209.85.219.45])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56CA711F801
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:35:18 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id o6so7190209oag.32
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:35:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bhû2UwJ4aQti875yLFe+DNoU1yAqtkPXD+1BQeVLGmSI=;
b=Y9+Ak9dqrgIzQ8drY9hRkEj3WyHantaTssjnQCLkjsTk9bUGKF7uQQpC52etISYZhZ
Glcyhi0SzEgAAAitWtV/duRz29b3XpcBWkAmLXf1FDBAra+hmy3FPukFVuIdfvL6ZsAM
aPgjrFP75jK490QNKMwvX4KqtPBxiDLcMJWJbBKyCGaoLRuLAhN74uKQGi7XTmYIBSis
p7isk2UfULCP6A0EzeucaOoILPu9ABRzOJXqejaC/TI6M+AdCuEaEHsH+R+N6kjgVobo
093H3WhnWVLyrNiXANOpFFak/zqKhf5MJF10gldYcNvugD+EpcFtZnNjjwez5CysWGW0
4cQw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.29.129 with SMTP id k1mr1351459oeh.8.1361291716319; Tue,
19 Feb 2013 08:35:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:35:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:35:16 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11OByeAhonYNU+6YfLC--3Hu28-W7tNBjBcSh4PWwW9whhg at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:58:11 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: [GTER] Bloqueio de AS/IPS indevido!
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Primeiramente gostaria de cumprimentar aos amigos desta lista, caros, essa
manhã tive um problema com minha operadora de transito, pois o que
aconteceu foi:
Compro o link a eles, eles fazem o anuncio do meu ASN52919, tenho um
pequeno data center no PE, como vendemos a todo mundo, clouds, servidores
dedicados, enfim, pode nos acontecer de algum engraçado por virus, paginas
falsas, enfim, essas coisas, só que essa manhã acontece isso, um arquivo
PAC, me foi enviado do setor de incidentes da Santander Brasil, o fato,
quando tomei conhecimentos, o mesmo provedor também deve ter recebido o
e-mail, então os caras simplesmente bloquearam meu circuito "TENHO
AS PRÓPRIO" então pergunto a vocês, se o IPS não são deles, AS também,
então que politicas usaram para tal FATO? claro, na mesma hora que
liberaram o LINK, eu removi o arquivo.
Cordialmente,
Wildemberg Lopes
CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
(83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
http://as52919.peeringdb.com
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp70367obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:59:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.123.98 with SMTP id u62mr30703694yhh.124.1361303960163;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:59:20 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v3si19006785ani.181.2013.02.19.11.59.19;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:59:20 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF6F11F8D1;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:58:20 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com (mail-ob0-f174.google.com
[209.85.214.174])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0893611F7B9
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:41:46 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 16so6778231obc.5
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:41:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=RIDKTwxgxDBMp8NqxNARbesaXu1ILNNF0JEOb9Mny9o=;
b=oimyjhYpcbax4bHsaWUgW+Z14kwwEff8cckSN9kYLMDS1VIdNPklkyS/Gi22sOFqnq
/0GWU0ZKmmzfwyr8znAc3uuUISsfubJGNHDwyfoNAeke1xqMkTJxFnD/DUtLj3G54a8A
UM18x4xZZbUHIVyOwdpg/tXk7CtqZ1J5qGlVSqv96L0M7/ES/+pd97AuMnSKXdvAgebS
9oucoy0W5nzLZVDqJgjdIpgG1WdL0qRNuvYMsq1xKOA0juMRWvuwfwfsQk9ZArltpqYi
URGwZR6MAihOPW1p+T2TSBhjVCrYuBELly4A2cNUBP6GjzTPS3wRyjcIhPTH4jHxHgw8
xgcA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.115.34 with SMTP id jl2mr8006965obb.9.1361292105094;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:41:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OBs7w2Kz9YtHs0To30+nK5QrkOxUZMJ4wRpcULnPXru+Q at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OBs7w2Kz9YtHs0To30+nK5QrkOxUZMJ4wRpcULnPXru+Q at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:41:44 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11OBheOg_Dd7pYRxKVktRcjjkmmw1qAZoTu=eKXtE9L6R1w at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:58:18 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
O provedor, me exigiu uma declaração para uso da porta 25 com
reconhecimento de firma....
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 13:21, Wildemberg Lopes
<abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Respondendo aos amigos, sim, o BLOCO é meu, comprei a Registro.br ASN52919
> e Bloco 177.10.132.0/22, porem parece não ter domínio do que é meu, hhehe
>
>
>
> Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 11:24, Rafael Henrique Faria <
> rafaelhfaria at cenadigital.com.br> escreveu:
>
> Bom dia Wildermberg.
>>
>> 2013/2/18 Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
>>
>> > 2) o meu bloco Meu ASN 52919 e meu BLoco é 177.10.132.0/22 e eles estão
>> > bloqueados pelo ISP e não por mim,
>> >
>> >
>> A dúvida do Douglas Fischer, e de muitos aqui para te ajudar, é se esse
>> bloco (177.10.132.0/22) é realmente seu, você pagou por ele direto com o
>> NIC BR. Ou você alugou esse bloco do seu provedor? O seu provedor pagou
>> por
>> um bloco maior com o Registro.BR, e está alugando esse /22 para você? Com
>> isso o provedor se torna o proprietário legítimo do bloco, você é um
>> cliente dele.
>>
>> Mas se você contratou o bloco direto com o NIC BR, você que paga
>> diretamente por ele, aí você é o proprietário, e você que dita as regras
>> do
>> mesmo.
>>
>>
>> > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 18:09, Douglas Fischer
>> > <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
>> >
>> > > 1º
>> > > "Pois o mesmo, só disse que..." -> Disse-falado ou disse-escrito?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2º
>> > > Esclareça algo. Os IPs que estão bloqueados são do seu bloco de IPs,
>> ou
>> > do
>> > > bloco dele e delegados a você?
>> > >
>> > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 17:16, Wildemberg Lopes
>> > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
>> > >
>> > > > Pois o mesmo, só disse que iria liberar as portas mediante uma
>> > declaração
>> > > > que eu mandasse, porem é um provedor que me vende o link, não pego
>> > direto
>> > > > de operadoras e isso está me dando bastante dor de cabeça!
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:37, Douglas Fischer
>> > > > <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Se você usa um bloco de IPs de sua operadora que foi delegado à
>> você,
>> > > > você
>> > > > > deve especificar à operadora quais IPs deverão ter trafego na
>> port0
>> > 25
>> > > > > liberado(presumindo-se mail-servers).
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Se você(seus clientes) usa seu próprio bloco de IPs, o bloqueio da
>> > > porta
>> > > > 25
>> > > > > não se aplica.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Em primeira instânica, entre em acordo com a equipe da operadora
>> em
>> > > > questão
>> > > > > ...
>> > > > > (De preferênica que seja tudo pro e-mmail)
>> > > > > Caso não haja boa vontade por parte deles, acione a anatel.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
>> > > > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a
>> porta
>> > > 25
>> > > > é
>> > > > > > bloqueada, o que fazer?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
>> > > > > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <
>> > > > > > danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é
>> > > verídico o
>> > > > > > >>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
>> > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final,
>> > tipo
>> > > > > ADSL.
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece
>> suas
>> > > > > regras e
>> > > > > > >> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter
>> <
>> > > > > > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Douglas Fernando Fischer
>> > > > > Engº de Controle e Automação
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> > > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Douglas Fernando Fischer
>> > > Engº de Controle e Automação
>> > > --
>> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> > >
>> > --
>> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>
>
>
--
Cordialmente,
Wildemberg Lopes
CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
(83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
http://as52919.peeringdb.com
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.112.138 with SMTP id iq10csp152207obb;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:47:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.113.180 with SMTP id a40mr30065707yhh.35.1361296041344;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x9si26746681yhl.96.2013.02.19.09.47.20;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:47:21 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EED111F7D1;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:47:12 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail.datacom.ind.br (mail2.datacom.ind.br [201.90.171.130])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4092611F781
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:20:34 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by mail.datacom.ind.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7401850095
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:20:33 -0300 (BRT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at datacom.ind.br
Received: from mail.datacom.ind.br ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.datacom.ind.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id pdVtveCBfSRH for <gter at eng.registro.br>;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:20:33 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from [10.0.15.101] (unknown [10.0.15.101])
by mail.datacom.ind.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 388EC1850077
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:20:33 -0300 (BRT)
Message-ID: <5123B531.3050809 at datacom.ind.br>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:24:01 -0300
From: "DATACOM - Marcelo.Veriato" <marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gter at eng.registro.br
References: <CAFty_mfrf+cdQ-9FYkBTfSAmr1k=Zb_qOrLZ1EaLb+TL5K-4qg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAGFn2k0L5A574W+zZcv5xºdwwXe=gqOM-igAhXrUCLt+uoiQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RTUwbpqaFRXPC1ibur6b654yFourG=SPDR6KPThX839kQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAEvWu_p9M6f8fknuYZVkKseAadMd3j8TknrDKN3A2ZpgcHXg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKou7OWziUK07Gp54jZiDd4iN1bLZT5ZNVMmc+HbRZQ at mail.gmail.com>
<511B7B1F.60902 at datacom.ind.br>
<CAJ=jT++84m6TxVyfrzFuH4i9uR66NrtRWnNaGG=DxOrcUZbyaA at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ=jT++84m6TxVyfrzFuH4i9uR66NrtRWnNaGG=DxOrcUZbyaA at mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:47:11 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?transporte_E1_via_IP_p/_interconexão?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
respostas in-line
Marcelo Veriato Lima
DATACOM
Analista de Infraestrutura
Av. França, 735. Porto Alegre, RS - 90230-220
Fone: 51 3933-3000 Ramal: 3359
marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br
www.datacom.ind.br
On 02/19/2013 11:32 AM, Jorge Augusto wrote:
> Marcelo,
>
> O produto já está pronto (Parte TDMOverIP)?
Sim
>
> Lembro que existia algumas situações bizarras no EDD (Na Versao testada)
>
> -Se você vai transportar e1s de diferentes origens vai ter problemas,
> existe um grande problema na construção fisica (Relógio) do mesmo que causa
> problemas de escorregamento por erros no clock (Retorno).
Este problema ocorre quando se deseja transportar o tráfego de dois E1
que possuem referencias diferentes de clock. O EDD irá transmitir para o
E1 a partir de uma única referencia, o que é normal. Está em roadmap a
capacidade de transportar E1s com frequências diferentes.
>
> -Falta de documentação (valores de Packet Delay, Jitter Buffer e etc)
Existe um documento interno que é distribuido a clientes que utilizam o
EDD com todas estas informações.
>
> -Não existia uma forma direta de testar um enlace entre EDDs, se você
> executar um teste de "ping" direcionado a um EDD para medir latência,
> jitter e perda de pacotes o EDD vai gerar um falso valor de resposta já que
> a CPU do EDD (INPUT) não possui grande processamento e ai fica
> contraditório, como vou testar o segmento (Até o EDD) se ele nem me
> responde a "altura" :). A solução para testar o segmento era colocar um
> equipamento depois do EDD :).
O EDD suporta o CFM que é um protocolo específico para monitoramento de
circuitos L2. Com ele é possível realizar medições de delay e jitter,
além de poder realizar ping e traceroute somente com mac-address. É
sabido que utilizar ping para medir latência, em qualquer vendor, não
possui precisão pois vai direto a CPU, CPU esta que também é responsável
por processar outros assuntos que não são tratados diretamente no
hardware, neste caso uma concorrência pode aumentar significativamente a
latência do ping.
>
> -O velho problema da construção do "chicote" de e1s que foram montados em
> "pares" e mesmo eu usando apenas um e1 (Tributário) o outro (e1) ficava lá
> aberto (fisicamente), ai pra não gerar problemas de "ruidos e
> interferências de meios externos" e outras coisas era preciso fazer um loop
> fisico no e1 que não estava em uso. (Não podia deixar aberto).
Isso realmente ocorreu mas foi corrigido em novas versões do cabo.
Att.
Marcelo
>
>
>
>
> Em 13 de fevereiro de 2013 09:38, DATACOM - Marcelo.Veriato <
> marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br> escreveu:
>
>> Basicamente o EDD da Datacom utiliza 3 elementos (interfaces), TDM, Bundle
>> e Pseudo-Wire.
>>
>> Na interface TDM do EDD, configura-se o PCM que corresponda ao tipo de
>> quadro (com/sem sincronismo) e número de timeslots, além da sinalização por
>> canal associado caso necessário.
>>
>> O bundle se refere à rede Ethernet, onde a finalidade dele é a transmissão
>> dos dados sobre a rede IP/Ethernet. O bundle representa um mapeamento de
>> uma interface TDM que será transmitido entre dois equipamentos conectados
>> por Pseudo-Wire.
>>
>> A Pseudo-Wire (PW) permite que serviços como o TDM sejam transportados por
>> uma conexão virtual ponto a ponto através de um mesmo circuito em redes
>> IP/Ethernet até seu destino. A ideia básica é a utilização de uma terceira
>> camada na rede sobre a qual uma operadora necessita transportar serviços
>> legados incluindo também a camada 2 de serviços da rede.
>>
>> A configuração de timeslots determina quantos timeslots TDM serão
>> transmitidos no bundle. No lado do Ethernet essa configuração implica na
>> quantidade de dados transmitidos: cada timeslot representa 64kbits de dados
>> por bundle. Por exemplo: uma configuração de TDM unframed com 32 timeslots
>> no bundle resulta em uma utilização de banda de 2048kbit/s; dois bundles
>> com essa mesma configuração resultam em uma utilização de banda de
>> 4096kbit/s.
>>
>> Dependendo do modelo do EDD, podem ter até 8 bundles simultâneos, ou seja,
>> 8 E1 de 32 timeslots.
>>
>> Caso queira discutir mais a fundo esta questão podemos conversar em pvt.
>>
>> Marcelo Veriato Lima
>> DATACOM
>> Analista de Infraestrutura
>> Av. França, 735. Porto Alegre, RS - 90230-220
>> Fone: 51 3933-3000 Ramal: 3359
>> marcelo.veriato at datacom.ind.br
>> www.datacom.ind.br
>>
>>
>> On 02/10/2013 01:08 PM, Rafael Galdino wrote:
>>
>>> mas como funcionaria o transporte do E1 dentro de IP? digo por conta dos
>>> timeslots, da sinalização.....
>>>
>>> fiquei curioso
>>>
>>> Em 8 de fevereiro de 2013 21:21, MrGuga <mrguga at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>> Usamos o EDD da Datacom, funcionou direitinho.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Em 8 de fevereiro de 2013 20:36, Douglas Fischer
>>>> <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>**escreveu:
>>>>
>>>> Dependendo do serviço que você vai oferecer, se for VOZ, você pode
>>>>>
>>>> colocar
>>>>
>>>>> os
>>>>> canais B sob ação dos codecs(ou fax detection) e transportar o canal D
>>>>> limpo..
>>>>>
>>>>> Fiz isso uma vez com um par de Cisco para interligar uns PABX legados.
>>>>>
>>>>> Não me lembro da config, mas era bem trivial. E funciona bem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Em 8 de fevereiro de 2013 19:50, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>> escreveu:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Estou precisando transportar E1 via IP, porem, será utilizado para
>>>>>>> interconexão, assim tenho que carregar a sinalização original, qual
>>>>>>> equipamento seria recomendado ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Se é preciso manter a sinalização original, você precisa encarar isso
>>>>>> como serial TDM/G.703 e transportar, em algo citado como TDMoIP ou
>>>>>> CEoIP. Mas sincronizar esse G.703 entre a central E1 remota e a da
>>>>>> tele vai ser uma tarefa ingrata, feita com "adaptive clock recover"...
>>>>>> não tem mesmo como trocar o meio de caminho para algo com links E1 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Um dos equipamentos que faz isso é o módulo NM-CEM-4TE1 para
>>>>>> roteadores Cisco. RAD, Overture, Juniper(linha CTP) e Telco Systems
>>>>>> também tem produtos nesse segmento.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rubens
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Douglas Fernando Fischer
>>>>> Engº de Controle e Automação
>>>>> --
>>>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
>>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp70315obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:57:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.105.28 with SMTP id h28mr9080668anm.47.1361303859682;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x9si27323836yhl.5.2013.02.19.11.57.39;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340B611F803;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:57:34 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com (mail-qa0-f46.google.com
[209.85.216.46])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A03411F7C9
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:24:29 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id o13so2022649qaj.19
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:24:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=vF+Kcc3W07wsuraHXvNZP3a9/NIbHMrY/ZN0Mw1FltI=;
b=bvA1lNJap15g1z55OC/r1rlVGpacexa/e0nCy8eaKxSuLrhisoAhQO8AmAv2i8f3nY
GpEjapLEzONpCiTbVEwul6/1gFE9l+Z/0BMCOv39Oyv64o5b4UrxtybQZivqfnKY4Ndh
mEy8a5M+L6Uw83gL0F8wAkCadpsP8UefZ//HCiEAJM9hqT2M/ND1huy03PTU/HHOlt9h
nxfdKDVIlXdTbbsgg+HrP/U0ETLeLxRdTMTUHNhLHdGf98b5f+R33cKXcGlO7EH4gc+P
T30OnhVxRmOkkvBXLL1Rd849s/BXCFEBKD5Kgwf8OnwBaK797uQgv0M8OIcUlmv/l3FB
PSfw=
X-Received: by 10.224.174.80 with SMTP id s16mr6103362qaz.85.1361301867134;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:24:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.254.10] ([201.15.235.24])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hn9sm28541913qab.8.2013.02.19.11.24.25
(version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits8/128);
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5123D167.3030904 at emtectelecom.com.br>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:24:23 -0400
From: "Diego M. Morandini" <diego at emtectelecom.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <CAFxccmx+oYJZHKyFrkt_U85QKdKTTNw75Pd0exsunYB63NWxJw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RT7+kTzDe6=mE-kP+6ZE19MqXBfqBi6i2SHUS=NLQyjgw at mail.gmail.com>
<BLU002-W2268733ABE548B4FF8D7358DC080 at phx.gbl>
<F5981374-F1A3-4E08-9F5B-DC9F8DE596A2 at esds.com.br>
<511E90BA.5030402 at asbyte.com.br>
<CAKEr4RQvtORWTaxoMWSo3_BwXW2SANJUA5N2dGwNtuDPw8yRcQ at mail.gmail.com>
<51228E36.3040703 at asbyte.com.br>
<CAPeqj48M9+ZdKBiv-xFM_XodYTKeWWX1tM-VpFCAS74w8=Wdzw at mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPeqj48M9+ZdKBiv-xFM_XodYTKeWWX1tM-VpFCAS74w8=Wdzw at mail.gmail.com>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmrF70AEWPIagoKPciCS7c9JBW6PjWnHBEWiXfawLFk4J2c3DiJIP24pvFwSDMwYHSYGnrJ
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:57:32 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER]
=?utf-8?q?Problema_com_Auto_Negociação_entre_mik? =?utf-8?q?rotik?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp70382obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:59:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.59.97 with SMTP id r61mr30743645yhc.103.1361303979775;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:59:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r68si27981459yhk.151.2013.02.19.11.59.39;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:59:39 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901D711F8D9;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:58:28 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com
[209.85.214.178])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2125411F7D7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:28:50 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id wd20so6941467obb.37
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:28:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh½8/Ug4I7qU+4f+sQYTh+5iDs99V6uRhWmCoG5uXYMw=;
b=TQhv2wO45Ms0RrFKKHJO+0c7z84SPnv1DgWEpOor93U9AMppdpxzq1rFn2eiigiaE4
oZbmTXMhjPkQPY71z9ZYl3a6S+0PfpJx1nu04m4kcHKnjcQwOGx6yO60pA8b6w3XnJ8c
1Dw5B7hC0lU15wJPg7x+4lZpseVc+9QAW8bP5XMYmI5xEtNK+MfFFU8SmNvSTuKuK1VB
r5ZvbBlJrEjVaS3YPHuXD8xv84VcoXR2Lq7xxqGPRraO962m3t7nv/NXoGQnrjgghBlj
NYnL3kqWUCLSZVxCuKqwSisPRyHZ4BwbOBGbif47inlMTIyEp/mLzZ2aPh8G2AhR+wZS
d+Eg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.29.129 with SMTP id k1mr1601313oeh.8.1361302129156; Tue,
19 Feb 2013 11:28:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:28:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <SNT002-W90C5E3941720384A2EC58DF5F50 at phx.gbl>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
<SNT002-W90C5E3941720384A2EC58DF5F50 at phx.gbl>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:28:49 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11OB7yqPS34qw9H47qaQWHT35mSBgW3WmB24gd193Cv-AjQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:58:26 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Bem de toda forma, apesar de achar um abuso, enviei a empresa a Declaração
para o debloqueio do mesmo!
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 13:20, Bruno Cabral <bruno at openline.com.br>escreveu:
> $ whois -h www.registro.br 177.10.132/22(...)inetnum:
> 177.10.132/22aut-num: AS52919abuse-c: SRSHOowner: SINGLE HOST
> DATACENTER LTDAownerid: 006.105.483/0001-75responsible: Gerencia de
> Redes Single Hostcountry: BRowner-c: WMM72tech-c: SRSHO
> se esse "provedor" que te vende link esta bloqueando, voce deve aciona-lo
> para nao bloquear. é simples desse jeito
> !3runo Cabral
> --
> Cursos e Consultoria BGP
> > > 2) o meu bloco Meu ASN 52919 e meu BLoco é 177.10.132.0/22 e eles
> estão
> > > bloqueados pelo ISP e não por mim,
> >
> > A dúvida do Douglas Fischer, e de muitos aqui para te ajudar, é se esse
> > bloco (177.10.132.0/22) é realmente seu, você pagou por ele direto com o
> > NIC BR. Ou você alugou esse bloco do seu provedor? O seu provedor pagou
> por
> > um bloco maior com o Registro.BR, e está alugando esse /22 para você? Com
> > isso o provedor se torna o proprietário legítimo do bloco, você é um
> > cliente dele.
> >
> > Mas se você contratou o bloco direto com o NIC BR, você que paga
> > diretamente por ele, aí você é o proprietário, e você que dita as regras
> do
> > mesmo.
>
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Cordialmente,
Wildemberg Lopes
CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
(83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
http://as52919.peeringdb.com
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp70346obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:58:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.5.17 with SMTP id h17mr9061613ani.53.1361303907584;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:58:27 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n14si32982647anl.102.2013.02.19.11.58.27;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:58:27 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BB411F879;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:57:50 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ea0-f174.google.com (mail-ea0-f174.google.com
[209.85.215.174])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C90211F7CE
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:46:58 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 1so3062186eaa.5
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:46:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bhÎyiwq5AKwzDuZTtqZ8RM/EARn0VK8EaxgE/IXClIrs=;
b=upvgzWI5CIsh176EXfsg2AGrbvC9dP8o8QEM0y+ABDUtqnyHDFT0m1mfvDRf25svH4
7mMeeR7p/AhW2mo6vbqmp3xEV/TM2SoDnwdXqnwIKuo6C40ariOyYWcKqglDM+9NLaDq
CZJv8pCV99u5ePsF437Nx8Rq5Ugl064kWriI1j0N0X/0gYb05PaAttggSAhkvBVHllXG
LctAdVIh1WBmE3tkbA5GSpUl6ZIdA5W5KWV7udvZPbm3yhgas7oMVz6a6lUc75obCg8s
eNy2mq4WN6I1YUznjbyVsDWfNu3bzj7+LPL1ZYs7qyEJWOF69qlXKc/tCgrO8N/If7Ol
+7Ag=
X-Received: by 10.14.193.134 with SMTP id k6mr60293632een.37.1361303215140;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:46:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.209.200 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:46:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAE8fkNw=mD6qgrCisDMhH51XozjkpMc+yz2b7R72++WKpUEPAw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFxccmx7JWq2y5AU0FhF2U3QdiBF1mbpOor5fSLxghYvT6-rEQ at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1302111450340.1719 at carrapato>
<CAPb9jwV3GNBwg8xr9bF+ttCsZ4qbq99p3iMS5jAFHQkUzchCkg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAP2YjMFhFYU=HHbq0fztR6sWGmkhRRdOotdqM+OCJiS50sN9=A at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPb9jwXmxCBNc6a8tZt3paWuuLUKsy2DVAVVhPNnJobLv3g8zQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAE8fkNw=mD6qgrCisDMhH51XozjkpMc+yz2b7R72++WKpUEPAw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Giovane Heleno <webgeo at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:46:35 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPb9jwXucMvh_CVnt3JA8vrAhnzT2HGfsC9w24L-UEgezK7=2g at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:57:49 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Servidor dns
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Verdade... não cheguei a implementar.
Vou testar. Obrigado!
Giovane Heleno
www.giovane.pro.br
Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 21:52, Hermann Wecke <hermann at wecke.com>escreveu:
> 2013/2/18 Giovane Heleno <webgeo at gmail.com>:
> > O Mara DNS é só recursivo.
> > Não faz autoritativo.
>
> Talvez em uma versão mais antiga - a mais recente já faz
>
> Using MaraDNS as an authoritative DNS server
> http://www.maradns.org/tutorial/authoritative.html
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp70327obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:58:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.101.175.17 with SMTP id c17mr9082910anp.52.1361303884206;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x9si27325852yhl.96.2013.02.19.11.58.03;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DC011F84F;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:57:44 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com (mail-ee0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100EF11F7D7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:49:49 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id t10so3855256eei.35
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:49:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh=QjlGt+rHISWlWUiuC66DCyvD4S5cuc3V8Fzc5mZCTxQ=;
b=RAjz4NCG/byiK6kGo61/ZbvxInr0T5AnNe1vhuZOh4S6o9ir4iyq85NovULY9Yaqgo
JmdrjFRDUOMaAWXZ1ABNt5Fcnt/gBRGh5o0B4cZpr/4bFuvnDnsL4XBhKLwHJz4kJQ7Y
JWfTgO9oembTUOu2WlGnbz5F73hj1YHjV+20aZopPnsp/GF/D07UYYBDboP6bry4gt2W
CVdgcaxuLatHTET7TTJrO3JzOViHAXFaKk6chPpe79U3kR2vgbaL16YeJ08mZt5OQtZr
QYAPhP1RlGkAamx2s4J6oYT/kSQIG67sAWkl3H6LScIYHqH+xzJ4hh0zo3MkH1EfVUBZ
SOpw=
X-Received: by 10.14.194.198 with SMTP id m46mr60052603een.8.1361303387168;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:49:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.209.200 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:49:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
From: Giovane Heleno <webgeo at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:49:27 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPb9jwWAZvWUQF0WpT8AhrfFA958X_6e5HTu6_goQ7OJke=ZaA at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:57:42 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Tudo dele... :-)
http://registro.br/cgi-bin/whois/?qr=AS52919
Giovane Heleno
www.giovane.pro.br
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 11:24, Rafael Henrique Faria <
rafaelhfaria at cenadigital.com.br> escreveu:
> Bom dia Wildermberg.
>
> 2013/2/18 Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
>
> > 2) o meu bloco Meu ASN 52919 e meu BLoco é 177.10.132.0/22 e eles estão
> > bloqueados pelo ISP e não por mim,
> >
> >
> A dúvida do Douglas Fischer, e de muitos aqui para te ajudar, é se esse
> bloco (177.10.132.0/22) é realmente seu, você pagou por ele direto com o
> NIC BR. Ou você alugou esse bloco do seu provedor? O seu provedor pagou por
> um bloco maior com o Registro.BR, e está alugando esse /22 para você? Com
> isso o provedor se torna o proprietário legítimo do bloco, você é um
> cliente dele.
>
> Mas se você contratou o bloco direto com o NIC BR, você que paga
> diretamente por ele, aí você é o proprietário, e você que dita as regras do
> mesmo.
>
>
> > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 18:09, Douglas Fischer
> > <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
> >
> > > 1º
> > > "Pois o mesmo, só disse que..." -> Disse-falado ou disse-escrito?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2º
> > > Esclareça algo. Os IPs que estão bloqueados são do seu bloco de IPs, ou
> > do
> > > bloco dele e delegados a você?
> > >
> > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 17:16, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Pois o mesmo, só disse que iria liberar as portas mediante uma
> > declaração
> > > > que eu mandasse, porem é um provedor que me vende o link, não pego
> > direto
> > > > de operadoras e isso está me dando bastante dor de cabeça!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:37, Douglas Fischer
> > > > <fischerdouglas at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > Se você usa um bloco de IPs de sua operadora que foi delegado à
> você,
> > > > você
> > > > > deve especificar à operadora quais IPs deverão ter trafego na port0
> > 25
> > > > > liberado(presumindo-se mail-servers).
> > > > >
> > > > > Se você(seus clientes) usa seu próprio bloco de IPs, o bloqueio da
> > > porta
> > > > 25
> > > > > não se aplica.
> > > > >
> > > > > Em primeira instânica, entre em acordo com a equipe da operadora em
> > > > questão
> > > > > ...
> > > > > (De preferênica que seja tudo pro e-mmail)
> > > > > Caso não haja boa vontade por parte deles, acione a anatel.
> > > > >
> > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:09, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Sou um ISP AS52919 porem, o meu fornecedor do link, diz que a
> porta
> > > 25
> > > > é
> > > > > > bloqueada, o que fazer?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:07, Wildemberg Lopes
> > > > > > <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Se no caso, o provedor estiver me bloqueando esse acesso?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Em 18 de fevereiro de 2013 15:00, Danton Nunes <
> > > > > > danton.nunes at inexo.com.br>escreveu:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Wildemberg Lopes wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Gostaria de saber com os amigos se para nós provedores é
> > > verídico o
> > > > > > >>> bloqueio da porta pelas operadoras para nós AS.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Negativo. Bloqueio de porta 25 é só em redes de acesso final,
> > tipo
> > > > > ADSL.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Se você tem endereços IP próprios e um AS, você estabelece
> suas
> > > > > regras e
> > > > > > >> se responsabiliza por elas. Trânsito não é filtrado.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> gter list https://eng.registro.br/**mailman/listinfo/gter<
> > > > > > https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Douglas Fernando Fischer
> > > > > Engº de Controle e Automação
> > > > > --
> > > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Douglas Fernando Fischer
> > > Engº de Controle e Automação
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > >
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp75245obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:08:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.180.42 with SMTP id i30mr31406587yhm.68.1361311728371;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:08:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d67si27890335yhn.113.2013.02.19.14.08.47;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:08:48 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F08C11F8DE;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:08:31 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-qa0-f52.google.com (mail-qa0-f52.google.com
[209.85.216.52])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E7FB11F82A
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:09:34 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id bs12so2045293qab.4
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:09:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
bh=doMFkWrv9b0MZvFpR609xowozJJIAZYXP2aTYySX+6w=;
b=XDNR2u2GxaKcLet2xxNH5/FTkjLR/Z1SyDtq1auMN9+Tdl9XmRjL6p/nCAyxmTMBxk
pPZra6C3OCi0zjIXcvzcpejZq7l20RIfFHz35/39VsmG3bIN8xlwz0f1mZMCWFcraaEu
7rmZYuDA1z/wGtl+EuKUwWx35fFiWsYyUSacJj+MO3y9w1LbE2NaSyxNQuRLB+rF4LGS
bYaiL07eS2pACtr0D6CulHskcGW0PK+hwbEuxEJks9bOCvGlCQFATFqzKhc8TnY/9Q5n
wUPmIQUbeqMMD3Uma+kjdSL/pEUzzp7OgN7mLf3UTfEjmpah1FnYaYP/Kqy1Zq4jdhAS
XcKg=
X-Received: by 10.224.222.14 with SMTP id ie14mr7802688qab.61.1361304573039;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:09:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.200] ([201.53.29.47])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z5sm28084774qer.8.2013.02.19.12.09.31
(version=TLSv1 cipherìDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits8/128);
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:09:32 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Rafael Cresci <cresci at gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OBheOg_Dd7pYRxKVktRcjjkmmw1qAZoTu=eKXtE9L6R1w at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:09:28 -0300
Message-Id: <EFD2CA1E-84D1-49A6-9F95-964EF72AA1D1 at gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OBs7w2Kz9YtHs0To30+nK5QrkOxUZMJ4wRpcULnPXru+Q at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OBheOg_Dd7pYRxKVktRcjjkmmw1qAZoTu=eKXtE9L6R1w at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:08:29 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
É justo.
Pode não ser o seu caso, mas tem muita gente por aí que pega alocações (ninguém compra nenhum IP porque IPs são alocados/licenciados e são patrimônio público, ninguém é dono) destas só pra disparar spam.
On 19/02/2013, at 13:41, Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com> wrote:
> O provedor, me exigiu uma declaração para uso da porta 25 com
> reconhecimento de firma....
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp75258obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:09:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.144.36 with SMTP id m24mr31466567yhj.104.1361311748080;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t12si33238396anh.137.2013.02.19.14.09.07;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:09:08 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A9211F8D7;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:08:54 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ve0-f171.google.com (mail-ve0-f171.google.com
[209.85.128.171])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C42B11F8D7
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:17:41 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id b10so6235732vea.2
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:17:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
bh=kdyvA4+TYo684/q2QEH4Q5Nw3I5yj0wS/6GiCPhyLCA=;
b´4rF9PB1eCWW5mEIffZOWgUXbcbRypfGeknAokBf7blTDQPHExu+M1LMqmC+jDCds
ZJsehn6RpbZNoNPAWZsNJkAC00STDrnPurjbYXC9mQZnal/9V6gjQH75cploHLauR22b
Fl0kGx96quWIfo1XMm/5D++pbEdOoh3xeJfODpoNW4y0dYolZOnpFl02GsjUrziKQkTX
FmK/gF2ts63htCIcwB4KjfepkHtYIXmmOo4vVc+CK4muYZtliBjVpEACYWAfLmUD5mX9
4Qa26r9gf/G58owmCXclKJa+OlAHh8FzGPh+Qt9E+n6G9EiEycOC69H9fSeuZaO1oZph
GFSw=
X-Received: by 10.220.222.8 with SMTP id ie8mr15814664vcb.27.1361305060878;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:17:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.200] ([201.53.29.47])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x9sm103201870vel.4.2013.02.19.12.17.39
(version=TLSv1 cipherìDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits8/128);
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:17:40 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Rafael Cresci <cresci at gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OByeAhonYNU+6YfLC--3Hu28-W7tNBjBcSh4PWwW9whhg at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:17:36 -0300
Message-Id: <7DBF3F97-BBE1-4029-9C1C-B01FD61913B0 at gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OByeAhonYNU+6YfLC--3Hu28-W7tNBjBcSh4PWwW9whhg at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:08:52 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloqueio de AS/IPS indevido!
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
On 19/02/2013, at 13:35, Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com> wrote:
> Compro o link a eles, eles fazem o anuncio do meu ASN52919, tenho um
> pequeno data center no PE, como vendemos a todo mundo, clouds, servidores
> dedicados, enfim, pode nos acontecer de algum engraçado por virus, paginas
> falsas, enfim, essas coisas, só que essa manhã acontece isso, um arquivo
> PAC, me foi enviado do setor de incidentes da Santander Brasil, o fato,
> quando tomei conhecimentos, o mesmo provedor também deve ter recebido o
> e-mail, então os caras simplesmente bloquearam meu circuito "TENHO
> AS PRÓPRIO" então pergunto a vocês, se o IPS não são deles, AS também,
> então que politicas usaram para tal FATO? claro, na mesma hora que
> liberaram o LINK, eu removi o arquivo.
Em geral é melhor prevenir do que remediar. Se seu uplink em geral não lida com provedores de conteúdo, e sim somente com clientes de acesso, o bloqueio é a maneira mais natural de agirem, pois corta o problema pela raiz. Nullroute na borda. E você tem de estar acessível e tomar uma atitude imediatamente, deixar telefones onde você seja alcançável e responder ao abuse@ do seu domínio de imediato. "Não estar alcançável" ou com celular fora de área ou "este numero não existe" só piora a situação.
Como falei na outra resposta, acontece toda hora nos EUA e Europa de nego abrir empresa fantasma e pedir alocação de IPs só pra sujar os mesmos por Spam. Podem ter te categorizado como uma destas, visto não ter ainda histórico consumado e reputação no mercado...
> Cordialmente,
> Wildemberg Lopes
> CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
> (83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
> http://as52919.peeringdb.com
Suas informações no PeeringDB estão erradas.
Você não anuncia 18881 prefixos. E seu IP de gateway no PTTMetro não pode ser um /22 nem um /32...
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp75274obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:09:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.138.162 with SMTP id a22mr32324017yhj.80.1361311768963;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:09:28 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h37si33235318anm.161.2013.02.19.14.09.28;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:09:28 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CA211F8E5;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:09:22 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ve0-f171.google.com (mail-ve0-f171.google.com
[209.85.128.171])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3623311F869
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:24:28 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id b10so6338935vea.30
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:24:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=CXUDxsYPDCbk6ZnWIAnEe7vTmW9ZWsrRCfzdjSmWhxc=;
b=KnvziFJnGnjTCOszgPJAILynnDsyQ6d05PPNbefQ6JfWBBbvp1wBnyTN9vB+3Na0eX
PiX59SGN++v2QkIMaHjeRQ40Mi6a0Rxx7BROegZqPY3kPbjKC+P8p0+r3QNQxb90CODS
Zi/BouChrSG9T1MOvUyWETseAKTAougE2GtLwFJWC+4oCM1N6bOHQLqw6fWwdHk+zouO
GXXGj2iCIkPKewCDBeOlyomp7hia0RIewkoxwUvD+v0cnRovJ4rniDKwP6c6IASFXOAh
9p/e4CIEMNo8OKQHjNeAUcdEC9mCj3gp5lO0odIlZeofVptrn9U0sfp4Mtq14pHBt0pX
ZClg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.21.175 with SMTP id w15mr19489014vde.100.1361305466931;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.219.5 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:24:26 -0300
Message-ID: <CAFdmQspRS+1HV=nFczhRfN_uGiQ-rcF4Niy2-d-TJQY_wwkMmw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Kivio Braga <kiviobraga at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:09:20 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: [GTER] Substituir - Cisco 7206 VXR Borda
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Prezados,
Estamos analisando a troca do nosso router de borda devido
demanda ter aumentado muito no ultimo ano, com isso o processamento fica
maior parte do tempo acima de 85%, preciso da opinião dos experientes para
qual modelo poderia estar migrando.
Segue abaixo o que o nosso Cisco-7206 tem segurado na rede:
Modelo: Cisco 7206 / NPE-G2
Processamento: 85% Média (Horario de pico chega 92%)
Serviços Rodando: BGP4 (IPv4,IPv6) / OSPF / MPLS / TUNNEL GRE
FORWARD NPE-G2 ->
Ethernet-0/1 -> 400Mbits ( Média utilização )
Ethernet-0/2 -> 600Mbits ( Média utilização )
Ethernet-0/3 -> 200Mbits ( Média utilização )
- BGP_OPERADORA_A -> 500Mbits (Full Routing) 75% média consumo
- BGP_OPERADORA_B -> 300Mbits (Full Routing) 70% média consumo
- BGP_PTT/SP -> 200Mbits ( 9091 Prefixos ) 90% média consumo
- BGP_PTT/MG -> 50Mbits ( 5037 Prefixos ) 9% média consumo
- iBGP/OSPF - > 25 Neighbor ( Rota Default GW / Rotas Internas AS )
- EBGP_DOWNSTREAM -> 4 Neighbor (Full Routing)
- MPLS -> 6 Interface (Vlan)
- GRE -> 1 Tunnel
Alguma sugestão para qual modelo de caixa eu posso migrar e ter mais alguns
anos de tranquilidade ?
--
Kívio Fernandes Braga
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp75234obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:08:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.165.135 with SMTP id e7mr31441393yhl.99.1361311704828;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:08:24 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g20si33254321anp.19.2013.02.19.14.08.24;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:08:24 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7669911F8CE;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:08:20 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from snt0-omc1-s3.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc1-s3.snt0.hotmail.com
[65.55.90.14]) by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B425311F7E2
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:27:51 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from SNT002-W99 ([65.55.90.8]) by snt0-omc1-s3.snt0.hotmail.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:27:48 -0800
X-EIP: [Bd5mihmjnifyvcwwGCdSYQnkUnDuIb8/uMfXOOuA2Pc=]
X-Originating-Email: [bruno at openline.com.br]
Message-ID: <SNT002-W99EF98C3AFAFF495E4E84BF5F50 at phx.gbl>
From: Bruno Cabral <bruno at openline.com.br>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:27:48 +0300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <5123D167.3030904 at emtectelecom.com.br>
References: <CAFxccmx+oYJZHKyFrkt_U85QKdKTTNw75Pd0exsunYB63NWxJw at mail.gmail.com>,
<CAKEr4RT7+kTzDe6=mE-kP+6ZE19MqXBfqBi6i2SHUS=NLQyjgw at mail.gmail.com>,
<BLU002-W2268733ABE548B4FF8D7358DC080 at phx.gbl>,
<F5981374-F1A3-4E08-9F5B-DC9F8DE596A2 at esds.com.br>,
<511E90BA.5030402 at asbyte.com.br>,
<CAKEr4RQvtORWTaxoMWSo3_BwXW2SANJUA5N2dGwNtuDPw8yRcQ at mail.gmail.com>,
<51228E36.3040703 at asbyte.com.br>,
<CAPeqj48M9+ZdKBiv-xFM_XodYTKeWWX1tM-VpFCAS74w8=Wdzw at mail.gmail.com>,
<5123D167.3030904 at emtectelecom.com.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2013 20:27:48.0727 (UTC)
FILETIME=[95656870:01CE0EDF]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:08:18 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER]
=?iso-8859-1?q?Problema_com_Auto_Negociação_entre_mikr? =?iso-8859-1?q?otik?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Ja vi problema semelhante entre a porta giga de um radio licenciado e a porta giga de uma Rb1100AH. Com uma Rb1000, por outro lado, funcionava.
!3runo Cabral
--Cursos e Consultoria BGP
> Idem aqui. Problemas de negociação entre um Cisco 1905 e uma RB100AHX2,
> ambos com portas gigabit.
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp75289obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:09:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.180.42 with SMTP id i30mr31412783yhm.68.1361311791164;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t5si11020551ann.11.2013.02.19.14.09.50;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B26111F8EE;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:09:35 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com (mail-ob0-f170.google.com
[209.85.214.170])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E214F11F809
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:00:13 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wc20so7155723obb.29
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:00:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=J5ZBLSjXm9wv7yQXAJsmkdDXu+ghX1zHIazNDdMLbCI=;
b=ShF/6IQ+GrsI+HhWyqgUvlYzznsJUfWDc/QNhIAL+bdXoPsKBbRbVER7E1pCzEt5/V
vdaqhe8VNBPPCvOx8xkTAvWqIV0c6ztoCQHUVO2cLQdkBBSO4xRMPXipJ51TcyMyzM7Z
87ZF9CsiRAkk2zLx6BlOks5HyPtW6TOGqUqj5kgMO1TKniTxxjgIDxpxa1O/A+tWLEye
X83V8eo4iZy7xgxNh9YpQPhSAOjPffEtZkcUFUYB5L95pcNaq5yQa6x+l7cjad5U2FJY
Be9KWh2nys/aIQHJTXyRd1Yf9yd919nOS2HveN7759TlgvlsvAq/QhbjyqzKiPQG2H5h
Tyew=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.22.34 with SMTP id a2mr4220013oef.97.1361307612251; Tue,
19 Feb 2013 13:00:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.135.166 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:00:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OB7yqPS34qw9H47qaQWHT35mSBgW3WmB24gd193Cv-AjQ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
<SNT002-W90C5E3941720384A2EC58DF5F50 at phx.gbl>
<CAPn11OB7yqPS34qw9H47qaQWHT35mSBgW3WmB24gd193Cv-AjQ at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:00:11 -0300
Message-ID: <CAHSR2pQmjfpecZCt0cKcCfWPBq0b-+KB7Ezv-zGJ5s62iC9kfw at mail.gmail.com>
From: "V. Feitoza" <vfeitoza at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:09:33 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Wildemberg ,
Já possui link com a SitecNET, mas na época não tinhamos este problema.
Como também tinhas ASN, tudo estava perfeitamente liberado, ate que
tinhamos em nossa rede diversos servidores de e-amil's de clientes aqui em
Campina Grande - PB.
Virtual Word - O mundo ao seu alcance.
Victor Feitoza
Gerente de TI
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 16:28, Wildemberg Lopes
<abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Bem de toda forma, apesar de achar um abuso, enviei a empresa a Declaração
> para o debloqueio do mesmo!
>
>
> Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 13:20, Bruno Cabral <bruno at openline.com.br
> >escreveu:
>
> > $ whois -h www.registro.br 177.10.132/22(...)inetnum:
> > 177.10.132/22aut-num: AS52919abuse-c: SRSHOowner: SINGLE
> HOST
> > DATACENTER LTDAownerid: 006.105.483/0001-75responsible: Gerencia de
> > Redes Single Hostcountry: BRowner-c: WMM72tech-c: SRSHO
> > se esse "provedor" que te vende link esta bloqueando, voce deve aciona-lo
> > para nao bloquear. é simples desse jeito
> > !3runo Cabral
> > --
> > Cursos e Consultoria BGP
> > > > 2) o meu bloco Meu ASN 52919 e meu BLoco é 177.10.132.0/22 e eles
> > estão
> > > > bloqueados pelo ISP e não por mim,
> > >
> > > A dúvida do Douglas Fischer, e de muitos aqui para te ajudar, é se esse
> > > bloco (177.10.132.0/22) é realmente seu, você pagou por ele direto
> com o
> > > NIC BR. Ou você alugou esse bloco do seu provedor? O seu provedor pagou
> > por
> > > um bloco maior com o Registro.BR, e está alugando esse /22 para você?
> Com
> > > isso o provedor se torna o proprietário legítimo do bloco, você é um
> > > cliente dele.
> > >
> > > Mas se você contratou o bloco direto com o NIC BR, você que paga
> > > diretamente por ele, aí você é o proprietário, e você que dita as
> regras
> > do
> > > mesmo.
> >
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialmente,
> Wildemberg Lopes
> CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
> (83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
> http://as52919.peeringdb.com
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp77503obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:13:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.180.232 with SMTP id j68mr32809075yhm.30.1361315623958;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:13:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si28168554yhi.154.2013.02.19.15.13.43;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:13:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F13711F91D;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:12:22 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com (mail-vc0-f173.google.com
[209.85.220.173])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF19011F869
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:12:48 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id fy27so1668387vcb.18
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:12:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh›8UDHxKcOCrqSEHGVDNVvqeec7t5nCTdCIPoVJYuqo=;
b=UPTqjkI42lQih1RsEzNZw7n17T3pB2FRq+4SsXzPDcOcoMa4EGyWb19opjkRrtdfrV
tfF/nnwKRz4bbrVCK419pI53uSNSdlK7C4YEp62es6RQ9T28JZrv4fQTJftWNjaF0XLX
5rg6Q1Uj9H0rsq2g7E5d6OYSlqL5VMKEyPFh89J3cqQsZV5PHfkWamGn/C9i/fVZnJ4J
JiYUWey/cmeGMQAjJK3kcTtvONPw1H1TiCnCAmti29icmxFkI3hMEPdNhU/fZJv8FCnJ
UWKGzyzH40ChwMmVxhGdVWcf8hKzYLMDXmtl/0NU9rqfkhg6xLgFYlw0GvoiKjDg/gGF
Sonw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.24.98 with SMTP id t2mr19930488vdf.69.1361311967499; Tue,
19 Feb 2013 14:12:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.228.4 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:12:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPn11OByeAhonYNU+6YfLC--3Hu28-W7tNBjBcSh4PWwW9whhg at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OByeAhonYNU+6YfLC--3Hu28-W7tNBjBcSh4PWwW9whhg at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:12:47 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPefbKrdZwDpt=QaTMUAdu8XPpOgyWd0TnrByCo=U8ZG0WN8+Q at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rafael Galdino <sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:12:20 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloqueio de AS/IPS indevido!
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Não.. pois quem vai responder criminalmente pelo uso é o detentor do AS.
tem certeza que fizeram o bloqueio do seu ASN todo???
vi que o peer é apenas com a Sitecnet.
Você está realmente publicando o seu Bloco com eles???
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 13:35, Wildemberg Lopes
<abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Primeiramente gostaria de cumprimentar aos amigos desta lista, caros, essa
> manhã tive um problema com minha operadora de transito, pois o que
> aconteceu foi:
>
> Compro o link a eles, eles fazem o anuncio do meu ASN52919, tenho um
> pequeno data center no PE, como vendemos a todo mundo, clouds, servidores
> dedicados, enfim, pode nos acontecer de algum engraçado por virus, paginas
> falsas, enfim, essas coisas, só que essa manhã acontece isso, um arquivo
> PAC, me foi enviado do setor de incidentes da Santander Brasil, o fato,
> quando tomei conhecimentos, o mesmo provedor também deve ter recebido o
> e-mail, então os caras simplesmente bloquearam meu circuito "TENHO
> AS PRÓPRIO" então pergunto a vocês, se o IPS não são deles, AS também,
> então que politicas usaram para tal FATO? claro, na mesma hora que
> liberaram o LINK, eu removi o arquivo.
>
> Cordialmente,
> Wildemberg Lopes
> CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
> (83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
> http://as52919.peeringdb.com
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Att.
Rafael Galdino
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp77490obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:13:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.86.200 with SMTP id w48mr32830783yhe.5.1361315602953;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a3si21059248ani.162.2013.02.19.15.13.22;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF3E11F919;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:12:10 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com (mail-ee0-f51.google.com [74.125.83.51])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F71711F869
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:11 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id d17so3590592eek.38
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:16:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=F/LyFDt5Q0fY6Td8ivSRPUjsUA6cZq4y1Ifi27Qc2DM=;
b=A/a8B+NOEEdiwNCY+BN9scZdkObuX8iuM//vFLtIglCqu9q/0PXpGFqaM8Qo1TR56x
fSaH+1nUnQHeAAV2lIr/bs4HPBflL5LflwY8JwcsVv+0nhlRp18YKv8Et7tgFqEZZCJQ
UdxdxXejDHj1/uIdyX40qFPzO0fmw/ggBVHAm1r1yVjyqW0MrzZ4OZwwijx9YBHoGaA8
15rGGkfaipD7YqXWvHrzylRMe6Tai/qtXX5qLAj/XpGm7xxmttMw9pABs+cg+2Xf+Eqi
feANpKYbxMCrZrnEyNnSS29070O/LJER+AkGAQs8wRCuKDdcW10k2vDzpvV4rd7XJRg7
LCtg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.184.68 with SMTP id r44mr61116516eem.40.1361312168987;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.57.142 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:16:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFdmQspRS+1HV=nFczhRfN_uGiQ-rcF4Niy2-d-TJQY_wwkMmw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFdmQspRS+1HV=nFczhRfN_uGiQ-rcF4Niy2-d-TJQY_wwkMmw at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:08 -0300
Message-ID: <CAGFn2k2wijvkSHTCu3rc++jUjsB420vwM-PpCC=tJUFhQDhEog at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:12:09 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Substituir - Cisco 7206 VXR Borda
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
> Estamos analisando a troca do nosso router de borda devido
> demanda ter aumentado muito no ultimo ano, com isso o processamento fica
> maior parte do tempo acima de 85%, preciso da opinião dos experientes para
> qual modelo poderia estar migrando.
Acabou o mundo do software-forwarding para você. Bem-vindo ao mundo do
hardware-forwarding: Juniper MX5 ou Cisco ASR1001.
Mas vou pinçar alguns pontos abaixo como paliativos por enquanto:
> - iBGP/OSPF - > 25 Neighbor ( Rota Default GW / Rotas Internas AS )
Essa função de Route Reflector poderia ser migrada para outro
roteador... porque você não põe um PC para ser route-reflector,
deixando essas sessões em shutdown ?
E quando chegar o novo roteador de borda, você até pode então voltar
esse 7200 para ser route-reflector também.
> - EBGP_DOWNSTREAM -> 4 Neighbor (Full Routing)
Eles precisam mesmo de full-routing ?
> - GRE -> 1 Tunnel
Só de gerência ou tráfego constante ? GRE pode ser o vilão aqui.
Rubens
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp77512obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:14:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.172.39 with SMTP id s27mr32980558yhl.10.1361315642645;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:14:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m23si28091336yhl.25.2013.02.19.15.14.02;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:14:02 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AF811F922;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:12:34 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com
[209.85.212.44])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79AF911F809
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:19:37 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fr13so4584988vbb.17
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:19:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=4mgMhQkx9g347et480m8DuoJPikIDsbNTOfPddtPPso=;
b=UWcnY6/8wxRDSdI/nzMBA8DbkFpplmwSYCWFADuEp8wlFYXhKv1uH6nrTZtq8tLDys
s+O/qe3WDMcRrQ+A/Mmai4iX9k7PrwXHryOnYyZw0fvsEAAuaU3HxpT8DgwqP4APhz7S
MtGn9hECS6uNm/RqmPqo2dKkEhbl+kstSAToDfuFAU/yts5NUSR5KbqFkmxswaTEY3e1
zPFwmmcGb8VWFOSqhzI8UGJ2/QOI/ZjJRShAFioYWfWh5rbWm9w5DjaMuLUdt1N/ps1T
NlSiZ/6M0pYNrKSjCOQrS+msN6qAeZwRcJq8hQFzO1kTL5d67jrJ3cE0PxH4cne7cPY6
GegA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.229.197 with SMTP id ss5mr23795989vec.14.1361312375851;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:19:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.228.4 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:19:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPefbKrdZwDpt=QaTMUAdu8XPpOgyWd0TnrByCo=U8ZG0WN8+Q at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OByeAhonYNU+6YfLC--3Hu28-W7tNBjBcSh4PWwW9whhg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKrdZwDpt=QaTMUAdu8XPpOgyWd0TnrByCo=U8ZG0WN8+Q at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:19:35 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPefbKpKcNJfc1bA9gv4Pk+2Jx2o1N3QQ7o6aOY-EBjwTd+f1w at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rafael Galdino <sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:12:32 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloqueio de AS/IPS indevido!
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
estranho o tracert que eu dei aqui saindo de um adsl velox sua rede passou
pela rede gvt e chegou até na rede da Vescnet em recife....
fiz o trazert para o seu ip 1.
você tem transito com a vescnet?
5 * so-13-1-0.0-bot-rj-rotn-j01.telemar.net.br (200.223.45.173) 94.479 ms
so-0-1-0.0-arc-rj-rotn-j01.telemar.net.br (200.164.197.209) 80.588 ms
6 200.216.30.81 (200.216.30.81) 226.151 ms
200.216.30.65 (200.216.30.65) 129.515 ms
200.216.30.81 (200.216.30.81) 88.061 ms
7 * * *
8 189.59.249.217.static.host.gvt.net.br (189.59.249.217) 231.169 ms
173.026 ms *
9 187.115.216.46.static.host.gvt.net.br (187.115.216.46) 169.104 ms
165.044 ms 121.698 ms
10 187.115.215.14.static.host.gvt.net.br (187.115.215.14) 162.428 ms
114.187 ms
187.115.216.46.static.host.gvt.net.br (187.115.216.46) 139.121 ms
11 vescnet.rce.gvt.net.br (187.115.159.62) 123.358 ms 291.271 ms
187.239 ms
12 177.10.132.1-static-core1.singlehost.com.br (177.10.132.1) 165.712 ms
255.814 ms 317.463 ms
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 19:12, Rafael Galdino <
sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Não.. pois quem vai responder criminalmente pelo uso é o detentor do AS.
> tem certeza que fizeram o bloqueio do seu ASN todo???
> vi que o peer é apenas com a Sitecnet.
> Você está realmente publicando o seu Bloco com eles???
>
>
> Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 13:35, Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
> Primeiramente gostaria de cumprimentar aos amigos desta lista, caros, essa
>> manhã tive um problema com minha operadora de transito, pois o que
>> aconteceu foi:
>>
>> Compro o link a eles, eles fazem o anuncio do meu ASN52919, tenho um
>> pequeno data center no PE, como vendemos a todo mundo, clouds, servidores
>> dedicados, enfim, pode nos acontecer de algum engraçado por virus, paginas
>> falsas, enfim, essas coisas, só que essa manhã acontece isso, um arquivo
>> PAC, me foi enviado do setor de incidentes da Santander Brasil, o fato,
>> quando tomei conhecimentos, o mesmo provedor também deve ter recebido o
>> e-mail, então os caras simplesmente bloquearam meu circuito "TENHO
>> AS PRÓPRIO" então pergunto a vocês, se o IPS não são deles, AS também,
>> então que politicas usaram para tal FATO? claro, na mesma hora que
>> liberaram o LINK, eu removi o arquivo.
>>
>> Cordialmente,
>> Wildemberg Lopes
>> CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
>> (83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
>> http://as52919.peeringdb.com
>> --
>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Att.
>
> Rafael Galdino
>
--
Att.
Rafael Galdino
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp77520obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:14:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.183.200 with SMTP id q48mr32702117yhm.21.1361315659994;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:14:19 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a27si28147668yhn.41.2013.02.19.15.14.19;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:14:19 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD67D11F925;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:12:44 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com
[209.85.212.54])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B4911F8F1
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:39:30 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so4624592vba.27
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:39:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bhžE8bWGPX2FM8jYyaMJKoY4ksXZCSVW6G6oWrrk4EWY=;
b=CwbRlbEtEDnU/Z5uiVVJzxAf3Jf0eCi18+5RVENtaLIJnVwnw4Zku9zdMFzAY+YxES
h5P2RlWbbuY1jPcZALpDJpQdK4VQVpamh2/CO+2gndVuOVDs0HdnjfGRdvDWbslyyfvn
ku/w+9ZP4HC3JkbLyleTcku5CHDAaJFYQUTg0OecWDnV2ukGBL4kv4k+X3w/JrqLqtSl
Q9G+5+yS+HGfgCs8sNGqUAKGG3hK6iCyx/zbFrjZFdfkdlcXFlKYGw02spMcnwOnbhkb
inxyltIw1kMNuPMGYjdvPP3HeKeMbYZh3a1CIk1d3jsP9VONgpEPzqK3TUp/u1Jjv4kF
5n9w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.229.197 with SMTP id ss5mr23874759vec.14.1361313568526;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:39:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.228.4 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:39:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPefbKpKcNJfc1bA9gv4Pk+2Jx2o1N3QQ7o6aOY-EBjwTd+f1w at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OByeAhonYNU+6YfLC--3Hu28-W7tNBjBcSh4PWwW9whhg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKrdZwDpt=QaTMUAdu8XPpOgyWd0TnrByCo=U8ZG0WN8+Q at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKpKcNJfc1bA9gv4Pk+2Jx2o1N3QQ7o6aOY-EBjwTd+f1w at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:39:28 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPefbKpo4NtASFq-vUjmJ-J2xHKwpy06vB+7k2r8DeuqsiSqsw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Rafael Galdino <sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:12:43 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloqueio de AS/IPS indevido!
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
olhando direitinho você não está anunciando um bloco também com a vescnet
não????
BGP routing table entry for *177.10.132.0/22 *
Paths: (4 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
26592 18881 262792 52919
187.33.27.2 from 187.33.27.2 (187.33.27.2)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external
Community: 26162:18881 26592:98 26592:198
Last update: Tue Feb 19 23:13:59 2013
18881 262792 52919
200.143.173.1 from 200.143.173.1 (200.143.173.1)
Origin IGP, localpref 120, valid, internal, best
Community: 16397:98 26162:18881
Last update: Tue Feb 19 21:44:26 2013
18881 262792 52919
200.143.173.2 from 200.143.173.2 (200.143.173.2)
Origin IGP, localpref 120, valid, internal
Community: 16397:98 26162:18881
Last update: Tue Feb 19 21:44:17 2013
26592 18881 262792 52919
187.33.27.1 from 187.33.27.1 (187.33.27.1)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external
Community: 26162:18881 26592:98 26592:198
Last update: Tue Feb 19 23:13:59 2013
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 19:19, Rafael Galdino <
sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com> escreveu:
> estranho o tracert que eu dei aqui saindo de um adsl velox sua rede passou
> pela rede gvt e chegou até na rede da Vescnet em recife....
> fiz o trazert para o seu ip 1.
> você tem transito com a vescnet?
>
>
> 5 * so-13-1-0.0-bot-rj-rotn-j01.telemar.net.br (200.223.45.173) 94.479
> ms
> so-0-1-0.0-arc-rj-rotn-j01.telemar.net.br (200.164.197.209) 80.588 ms
> 6 200.216.30.81 (200.216.30.81) 226.151 ms
> 200.216.30.65 (200.216.30.65) 129.515 ms
> 200.216.30.81 (200.216.30.81) 88.061 ms
> 7 * * *
> 8 189.59.249.217.static.host.gvt.net.br (189.59.249.217) 231.169 ms
> 173.026 ms *
> 9 187.115.216.46.static.host.gvt.net.br (187.115.216.46) 169.104 ms
> 165.044 ms 121.698 ms
> 10 187.115.215.14.static.host.gvt.net.br (187.115.215.14) 162.428 ms
> 114.187 ms
> 187.115.216.46.static.host.gvt.net.br (187.115.216.46) 139.121 ms
> 11 vescnet.rce.gvt.net.br (187.115.159.62) 123.358 ms 291.271 ms
> 187.239 ms
> 12 177.10.132.1-static-core1.singlehost.com.br (177.10.132.1) 165.712
> ms 255.814 ms 317.463 ms
>
>
>
> Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 19:12, Rafael Galdino <
> sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> Não.. pois quem vai responder criminalmente pelo uso é o detentor do AS.
>> tem certeza que fizeram o bloqueio do seu ASN todo???
>> vi que o peer é apenas com a Sitecnet.
>> Você está realmente publicando o seu Bloco com eles???
>>
>>
>> Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 13:35, Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com
>> > escreveu:
>>
>> Primeiramente gostaria de cumprimentar aos amigos desta lista, caros, essa
>>> manhã tive um problema com minha operadora de transito, pois o que
>>> aconteceu foi:
>>>
>>> Compro o link a eles, eles fazem o anuncio do meu ASN52919, tenho um
>>> pequeno data center no PE, como vendemos a todo mundo, clouds, servidores
>>> dedicados, enfim, pode nos acontecer de algum engraçado por virus,
>>> paginas
>>> falsas, enfim, essas coisas, só que essa manhã acontece isso, um arquivo
>>> PAC, me foi enviado do setor de incidentes da Santander Brasil, o fato,
>>> quando tomei conhecimentos, o mesmo provedor também deve ter recebido o
>>> e-mail, então os caras simplesmente bloquearam meu circuito "TENHO
>>> AS PRÓPRIO" então pergunto a vocês, se o IPS não são deles, AS também,
>>> então que politicas usaram para tal FATO? claro, na mesma hora que
>>> liberaram o LINK, eu removi o arquivo.
>>>
>>> Cordialmente,
>>> Wildemberg Lopes
>>> CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
>>> (83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
>>> http://as52919.peeringdb.com
>>> --
>>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Att.
>>
>> Rafael Galdino
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Att.
>
> Rafael Galdino
>
--
Att.
Rafael Galdino
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp77473obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:12:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.188.37 with SMTP id z25mr4511994yhm.127.1361315578729;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:12:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x9si28159289yhl.70.2013.02.19.15.12.58;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:12:58 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A6A11F913;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:12:05 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com
[209.85.219.53])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5383A11F8F1
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:48:10 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m1so7471789oag.26
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:48:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh=FtW4om7AoMH8k2x8YzaZy0qzO5NBIxS21o6Xvc+jlRw=;
b=zg7L48MqugV+MyEG44ZeicPWwTWCd8FDQfXzJVPmqciWW2ydXdeb2duL2q8FFsT5cj
qP5P+KOU/ZVoNHvl9xODTJLWBP8EFCYYp16iACnNKtg1uAFzRAgNiWKx0l/hYI3u2nPE
YOCmTCJKFTHrFITCf69TRgwolN7Ci4p5sGpPVp12NTBRoHuESF9N0WWNpam4d9P1JDgC
HNNIIeHTsGcGkzRfREWOCpBxLfELQhla8ZfeY0zllywPScUNx0zLwFeE+qgA6fGPecPE
ph+TMfg5JT7BO+FnxXShRsE7CojMYaX7EEStBs7Q0BpMW3HLq9/bzZOf2JDN0pYOFZ/d
quPQ=
X-Received: by 10.182.73.67 with SMTP id j3mr8140495obv.102.1361314088222;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:48:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.73.198 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:47:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFdmQspRS+1HV=nFczhRfN_uGiQ-rcF4Niy2-d-TJQY_wwkMmw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFdmQspRS+1HV=nFczhRfN_uGiQ-rcF4Niy2-d-TJQY_wwkMmw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Geeek Masters <rgeeek at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:47:47 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKncz40NUvC255rrdqvmCG65z5=CPbN08P3Y2pwXDmSmPsVqHw at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:12:03 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Substituir - Cisco 7206 VXR Borda
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
7600 Ou ISR1002
*Att,*
*Rodrigo Gregorio **
*[image: Ubiquiti airMAX Certified Admin]
*Mikrotik #MTCNA*
*Ubiquiti* *#UACA*
*Analista de Redes*
rodrigogregorio at gigacom.com.br
+55 21 (7907-2777)
*www.gigacom.com.br*
* ** <http://www.gigacom.com.br/>*
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 17:24, Kivio Braga <kiviobraga at gmail.com>escreveu:
> Prezados,
>
> Estamos analisando a troca do nosso router de borda devido
> demanda ter aumentado muito no ultimo ano, com isso o processamento fica
> maior parte do tempo acima de 85%, preciso da opinião dos experientes para
> qual modelo poderia estar migrando.
> Segue abaixo o que o nosso Cisco-7206 tem segurado na rede:
>
> Modelo: Cisco 7206 / NPE-G2
> Processamento: 85% Média (Horario de pico chega 92%)
>
> Serviços Rodando: BGP4 (IPv4,IPv6) / OSPF / MPLS / TUNNEL GRE
>
> FORWARD NPE-G2 ->
> Ethernet-0/1 -> 400Mbits ( Média utilização )
> Ethernet-0/2 -> 600Mbits ( Média utilização )
> Ethernet-0/3 -> 200Mbits ( Média utilização )
>
> - BGP_OPERADORA_A -> 500Mbits (Full Routing) 75% média consumo
> - BGP_OPERADORA_B -> 300Mbits (Full Routing) 70% média consumo
> - BGP_PTT/SP -> 200Mbits ( 9091 Prefixos ) 90% média consumo
> - BGP_PTT/MG -> 50Mbits ( 5037 Prefixos ) 9% média consumo
>
> - iBGP/OSPF - > 25 Neighbor ( Rota Default GW / Rotas Internas AS )
> - EBGP_DOWNSTREAM -> 4 Neighbor (Full Routing)
>
> - MPLS -> 6 Interface (Vlan)
>
> - GRE -> 1 Tunnel
>
>
>
> Alguma sugestão para qual modelo de caixa eu posso migrar e ter mais alguns
> anos de tranquilidade ?
>
>
> --
> Kívio Fernandes Braga
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp77457obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:12:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.130.98 with SMTP id j62mr32654594yhi.119.1361315555570;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m23si28085347yhl.64.2013.02.19.15.12.35;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953A811F90C;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:11:55 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-qe0-f51.google.com (mail-qe0-f51.google.com
[209.85.128.51])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C34011F782
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:51:38 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 6so3333341qea.24
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:51:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date
:to; bh=pRMBpqjd1HfEyXGtulbq61kin7Dzq8QP9TZjDXJjmO0=;
b=jqEduONhIn8kuCD0ZQTJXNPvRpenvg1/nglsARVt1/JuCocjErPLTeoXvLWey6UC8H
wq5bVrYNzj37WUK4Z2gnChn/UBlekM9tfi/mFwzLjJB8sfY7ZOodnq9d+XWXLV3be60M
0Jfgv4uE5qkf9U6PcvWhNEe4QJiNrMR7eviu4HYeQoSwbJDyyQFC7fBoznUY1zsup64p
dpzscxghQeJci8HNw4KqqeWknPCQ4eDrzZQKflC2IvFqE7zqjoG5YIROHV98rDQmV9mG
HY17tZfBvbiIGusn0gXnXUnOrx/JEwK6s+4d1uRNiwiSrJw5apqOviSW11Yq9KZl/+8x
ebbA=
X-Received: by 10.229.179.23 with SMTP id bo23mr1762265qcb.104.1361314296831;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:51:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.9.101] (intragw.nipcable.com. [200.220.136.13])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dt10sm29134110qab.0.2013.02.19.14.51.33
(version=TLSv1 cipherìDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits8/128);
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:51:34 -0800 (PST)
References: <CAFdmQspRS+1HV=nFczhRfN_uGiQ-rcF4Niy2-d-TJQY_wwkMmw at mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CAFdmQspRS+1HV=nFczhRfN_uGiQ-rcF4Niy2-d-TJQY_wwkMmw at mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <B0B963F5-7E77-43C8-97A3-2230F28CD7AC at gmail.com>
Cc: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B144)
From: "Marcelo M. Pinheiro GMail" <marcelo.nipcable at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:51:30 -0300
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:11:53 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Substituir - Cisco 7206 VXR Borda
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp81209obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:12:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.69.67 with SMTP id m43mr33525990yhd.40.1361322737305;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:12:17 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r30si30164068ann.139.2013.02.19.17.12.16;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:12:17 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4C611F915;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:11:58 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com
[209.85.214.182])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A509711F8E4
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:25:39 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id va7so7200368obc.13
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:25:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=OAfigSVS8SdiV7SONOepglOEkso4kvCGw+Uq/PBI+SI=;
b=hgcsqRad94Q9D3LiS2Uwqf5VUImzJLfkaML1KPfLCYnJ4tyK+Kgw5EqcV2EcmmdSfJ
L+ZXMToDhdDxPTGw/zQsccurx/vI4ijjG7ePFtTsrBlO8Tp+OTKesygyKVETiKoOxnTL
LDsVsMEW743gx3Yu6Z8hmva4fQSDSDvQHNbecLc7WlSyuI/bRmssNe+hpBlC5dTSnO6E
gakbyefqOqVyVbVFlbwleZO/70GVJYm8NXn6R1qbxEB1Z6/h4a+DmKtSYSJJq0/+NSWR
AAOVB6v5hh8KhfpdGh6ARMG9Upv4NVK+ZCbzxU9f7LrJ8nnho01kNIac9JomYCB7JQq5
pxaA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.74.5 with SMTP id p5mr8299968obv.74.1361316337722; Tue,
19 Feb 2013 15:25:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:25:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHSR2pQmjfpecZCt0cKcCfWPBq0b-+KB7Ezv-zGJ5s62iC9kfw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OCGZp0fS80pNT5RsRg_p71fHYo1ECiM54yq_fHAfqCXmw at mail.gmail.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1302181456400.25599 at zaphod.inexo.com.br>
<CAPn11ODuvsH=ysf6ShRDnYTWyWoT0ZRmobvvMRnxEOc7kacipA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC5qOdvbuN3=p+LbV5ÌPq+1EqDJgmqFM70NJp4twCyA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RSAsShbeTMK5db12X-XPkAU4LkgYgprN0LN2vjy4vPKVA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11OC_cozR+nEr+UHsdnMVYVNqmuy7UAc0+xA6F0EDVUK2zw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAKEr4RQ-zbufuN34Bd5VcRptfbzmxGadaDGkGUXdhD4CQw4UCg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPn11ODABiZub+kqWL9mR+CjePkfMsZqpQkvy1xiMQzyEeA8Gw at mail.gmail.com>
<CAOxoo32EmgivKxsKNL_vLqckR79GHCr4unjpEOoc854kYuJXRA at mail.gmail.com>
<SNT002-W90C5E3941720384A2EC58DF5F50 at phx.gbl>
<CAPn11OB7yqPS34qw9H47qaQWHT35mSBgW3WmB24gd193Cv-AjQ at mail.gmail.com>
<CAHSR2pQmjfpecZCt0cKcCfWPBq0b-+KB7Ezv-zGJ5s62iC9kfw at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:25:37 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11OCtjmGm5eDAP7efins_5U5Kp3ySYB0LsLcRm608Fxk5PQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:11:56 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloquei de porta 25
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Desculpe amigo Rafael, mas não não entendi sua resposta =)
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 18:00, V. Feitoza <vfeitoza at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Wildemberg ,
>
> Já possui link com a SitecNET, mas na época não tinhamos este problema.
> Como também tinhas ASN, tudo estava perfeitamente liberado, ate que
> tinhamos em nossa rede diversos servidores de e-amil's de clientes aqui em
> Campina Grande - PB.
>
> Virtual Word - O mundo ao seu alcance.
> Victor Feitoza
> Gerente de TI
>
>
> Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 16:28, Wildemberg Lopes
> <abusesingle at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
> > Bem de toda forma, apesar de achar um abuso, enviei a empresa a
> Declaração
> > para o debloqueio do mesmo!
> >
> >
> > Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 13:20, Bruno Cabral <bruno at openline.com.br
> > >escreveu:
> >
> > > $ whois -h www.registro.br 177.10.132/22(...)inetnum:
> > > 177.10.132/22aut-num: AS52919abuse-c: SRSHOowner: SINGLE
> > HOST
> > > DATACENTER LTDAownerid: 006.105.483/0001-75responsible: Gerencia de
> > > Redes Single Hostcountry: BRowner-c: WMM72tech-c: SRSHO
> > > se esse "provedor" que te vende link esta bloqueando, voce deve
> aciona-lo
> > > para nao bloquear. é simples desse jeito
> > > !3runo Cabral
> > > --
> > > Cursos e Consultoria BGP
> > > > > 2) o meu bloco Meu ASN 52919 e meu BLoco é 177.10.132.0/22 e eles
> > > estão
> > > > > bloqueados pelo ISP e não por mim,
> > > >
> > > > A dúvida do Douglas Fischer, e de muitos aqui para te ajudar, é se
> esse
> > > > bloco (177.10.132.0/22) é realmente seu, você pagou por ele direto
> > com o
> > > > NIC BR. Ou você alugou esse bloco do seu provedor? O seu provedor
> pagou
> > > por
> > > > um bloco maior com o Registro.BR, e está alugando esse /22 para você?
> > Com
> > > > isso o provedor se torna o proprietário legítimo do bloco, você é um
> > > > cliente dele.
> > > >
> > > > Mas se você contratou o bloco direto com o NIC BR, você que paga
> > > > diretamente por ele, aí você é o proprietário, e você que dita as
> > regras
> > > do
> > > > mesmo.
> > >
> > > --
> > > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialmente,
> > Wildemberg Lopes
> > CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
> > (83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
> > http://as52919.peeringdb.com
> > --
> > gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Cordialmente,
Wildemberg Lopes
CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
(83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
http://as52919.peeringdb.com
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp81196obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:11:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.157.8 with SMTP id n8mr30782675yhk.76.1361322707240;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:11:47 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k65si28573138yhj.114.2013.02.19.17.11.47;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:11:47 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8270611F85D;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:11:40 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com
[209.85.214.178])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93AA111F8E4
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:29:09 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id wd20so7231608obb.9
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:29:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=OeObz52TyNGBLVtDv5uHlVpeNijOb/1Tp75lE7g57yg=;
b=cPhyhv8mzdNRvHEVp35HiM8lt3CAaexakNMvksECnot+HyCZoI2W+Jm2u0dsOfoSev
9EVj5+vApvO3IqOWtxXI+3JXVejxsaSpNWxbFjjlaLzS8Z8A8wS729fMqxZKpTX990c7
SHRzpoE3yh84BJrOGx04XP6C/bsVcjbt13nUXar9uJcJ5uT4QjRJdrDz/LHN0evYj+Kd
QVKldXDIlmnaGFRfr4XE4cQ4peNEIwAr6TTioX8noqJYJMV07HHFpeQT5fpX8o3My04T
2bo8VQjDe1Gr83fqHM2Jr3vdaa49/Mjj0nmiLLeRGw7sV8JVkvLWf2E17BO8+Kfd6KqB
rh0A=
X-Received: by 10.60.31.225 with SMTP id d1mr7924736oei.120.1361316548206;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:29:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.116.40 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:28:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Gustavo Freitas <gst.freitas at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:28:48 -0300
Message-ID: <CA+m3O5LQcug7huJKTfkXj8kfKE5j=C_u1f+3SkRG6fJ9cfz1SA at mail.gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:11:38 -0300
Subject: [GTER] Link rede local redudante
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp81223obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:12:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.172.39 with SMTP id s27mr33667485yhl.10.1361322758565;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v21si28655476yhi.63.2013.02.19.17.12.37;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750D111F851;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:12:12 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com
[209.85.219.53])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC4C411F8E4
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:29:19 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id m1so7499502oag.26
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:29:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=2ZGxdjARGbAAD9h2wmKfrWxDWua2c1RLUBGAj6VcHrs=;
b=l8YFnwu0rmDFD0z31b0rCiBuZvJ6sSwriXPRajYD13eEOX13jkmADeuo9K/dtAnI0C
cPiJ2qfXMv7SZArXMZrWw10veQtK+fki9Z0NU0RopK0tQ1LlthtCNn6aJnyE9YkhG5yX
DD0kZ3+pP00fP7kmO9rzi+pg9e4080LzcQTwcIWOBrPfNgyxl8D9WIhkNFETU9TzsSbs
ahKp3jrN1l7Ey8Haze30fANI2gMFzq7DEVb9lpHUn3Tzf/qZ0coOSnhNYvJLnad92rv4
YWJ1BjTal0GVgxJxbe4YWs9oYD+6qreHyd7difn6ZMJfJGpwE9sEboiIR/st6OqGENcP
SAfA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.154.103 with SMTP id vn7mr8267466obb.60.1361316558219;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:29:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.144.226 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:29:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPefbKpo4NtASFq-vUjmJ-J2xHKwpy06vB+7k2r8DeuqsiSqsw at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPn11OByeAhonYNU+6YfLC--3Hu28-W7tNBjBcSh4PWwW9whhg at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKrdZwDpt=QaTMUAdu8XPpOgyWd0TnrByCo=U8ZG0WN8+Q at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKpKcNJfc1bA9gv4Pk+2Jx2o1N3QQ7o6aOY-EBjwTd+f1w at mail.gmail.com>
<CAPefbKpo4NtASFq-vUjmJ-J2xHKwpy06vB+7k2r8DeuqsiSqsw at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:29:18 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPn11ODi0VmrQVQ+5cPjq3KEtHX8Qo4px=aY8CQrDvEAYsu9XQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Wildemberg Lopes <abusesingle at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:12:11 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Bloqueio de AS/IPS indevido!
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
O BGP deles, foi informado errado, porem eu compro transito a eles!
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 19:39, Rafael Galdino <
sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com> escreveu:
> olhando direitinho você não está anunciando um bloco também com a vescnet
> não????
>
> BGP routing table entry for *177.10.132.0/22 *
> Paths: (4 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
> Not advertised to any peer
>
> 26592 18881 262792 52919
> 187.33.27.2 from 187.33.27.2 (187.33.27.2)
> Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external
> Community: 26162:18881 26592:98 26592:198
> Last update: Tue Feb 19 23:13:59 2013
>
> 18881 262792 52919
> 200.143.173.1 from 200.143.173.1 (200.143.173.1)
> Origin IGP, localpref 120, valid, internal, best
> Community: 16397:98 26162:18881
> Last update: Tue Feb 19 21:44:26 2013
>
> 18881 262792 52919
> 200.143.173.2 from 200.143.173.2 (200.143.173.2)
> Origin IGP, localpref 120, valid, internal
> Community: 16397:98 26162:18881
> Last update: Tue Feb 19 21:44:17 2013
>
> 26592 18881 262792 52919
> 187.33.27.1 from 187.33.27.1 (187.33.27.1)
> Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external
> Community: 26162:18881 26592:98 26592:198
> Last update: Tue Feb 19 23:13:59 2013
>
>
>
> Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 19:19, Rafael Galdino <
> sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> > estranho o tracert que eu dei aqui saindo de um adsl velox sua rede
> passou
> > pela rede gvt e chegou até na rede da Vescnet em recife....
> > fiz o trazert para o seu ip 1.
> > você tem transito com a vescnet?
> >
> >
> > 5 * so-13-1-0.0-bot-rj-rotn-j01.telemar.net.br (200.223.45.173)
> 94.479
> > ms
> > so-0-1-0.0-arc-rj-rotn-j01.telemar.net.br (200.164.197.209) 80.588
> ms
> > 6 200.216.30.81 (200.216.30.81) 226.151 ms
> > 200.216.30.65 (200.216.30.65) 129.515 ms
> > 200.216.30.81 (200.216.30.81) 88.061 ms
> > 7 * * *
> > 8 189.59.249.217.static.host.gvt.net.br (189.59.249.217) 231.169 ms
> > 173.026 ms *
> > 9 187.115.216.46.static.host.gvt.net.br (187.115.216.46) 169.104 ms
> > 165.044 ms 121.698 ms
> > 10 187.115.215.14.static.host.gvt.net.br (187.115.215.14) 162.428 ms
> > 114.187 ms
> > 187.115.216.46.static.host.gvt.net.br (187.115.216.46) 139.121 ms
> > 11 vescnet.rce.gvt.net.br (187.115.159.62) 123.358 ms 291.271 ms
> > 187.239 ms
> > 12 177.10.132.1-static-core1.singlehost.com.br (177.10.132.1) 165.712
> > ms 255.814 ms 317.463 ms
> >
> >
> >
> > Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 19:12, Rafael Galdino <
> > sup.rafaelgaldino at gmail.com> escreveu:
> >
> > Não.. pois quem vai responder criminalmente pelo uso é o detentor do AS.
> >> tem certeza que fizeram o bloqueio do seu ASN todo???
> >> vi que o peer é apenas com a Sitecnet.
> >> Você está realmente publicando o seu Bloco com eles???
> >>
> >>
> >> Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 13:35, Wildemberg Lopes <
> abusesingle at gmail.com
> >> > escreveu:
> >>
> >> Primeiramente gostaria de cumprimentar aos amigos desta lista, caros,
> essa
> >>> manhã tive um problema com minha operadora de transito, pois o que
> >>> aconteceu foi:
> >>>
> >>> Compro o link a eles, eles fazem o anuncio do meu ASN52919, tenho um
> >>> pequeno data center no PE, como vendemos a todo mundo, clouds,
> servidores
> >>> dedicados, enfim, pode nos acontecer de algum engraçado por virus,
> >>> paginas
> >>> falsas, enfim, essas coisas, só que essa manhã acontece isso, um
> arquivo
> >>> PAC, me foi enviado do setor de incidentes da Santander Brasil, o fato,
> >>> quando tomei conhecimentos, o mesmo provedor também deve ter recebido o
> >>> e-mail, então os caras simplesmente bloquearam meu circuito "TENHO
> >>> AS PRÓPRIO" então pergunto a vocês, se o IPS não são deles, AS também,
> >>> então que politicas usaram para tal FATO? claro, na mesma hora que
> >>> liberaram o LINK, eu removi o arquivo.
> >>>
> >>> Cordialmente,
> >>> Wildemberg Lopes
> >>> CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
> >>> (83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
> >>> http://as52919.peeringdb.com
> >>> --
> >>> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Att.
> >>
> >> Rafael Galdino
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Att.
> >
> > Rafael Galdino
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Att.
>
> Rafael Galdino
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
Cordialmente,
Wildemberg Lopes
CEO Single Host Soluções em Hospedagem
(83)3066-9870 - 9827-5710
http://as52919.peeringdb.com
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp85431obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.128.116 with SMTP id e80mr33752343yhi.111.1361330164903;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si29140171yhk.150.2013.02.19.19.16.04;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:04 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289D011F959;
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:15:58 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-qc0-f181.google.com (mail-qc0-f181.google.com
[209.85.216.181])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F3A11F88B
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:17:44 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id a22so2826316qcs.26
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:17:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s 120113;
h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date
:to:x-gm-message-state;
bh=duIMKpMV5vQ2LYd8q1B+kahmunOq+h9chbrq9NxcxGs=;
b=lspxJu2etfXOUHXBN3Dioy5pM1Thfo+xU5MTpSn/j+iOjfvRHL+Qj/6C0yWL2dQ3nt
tBUrqOmeapKuDn+PzfWpgkSj9MszFpKZaVXqFQYoERvWKvqWnkMG5ibgB3h585zbJVGw
APxfylBm2OBsE+lkXL5efeRkl5YuJEqZQZ2i8I3XGpYKgYxjrPlZn9U2d7b0Chhb9/ZF
Yayd9a4O2Ogq3SfKBUX4/XfxOJtXqckgOEpM++S9NVKr6TF2e6gmbFhZ7kuUUy1xFLp0
NuiDDxTGltHiOgNZtETyBXjnGBNe8wwytZkLb0kMqQEa1Z++ndS2J1yygLYdIjRxGxVa
tKgQ=
X-Received: by 10.49.105.73 with SMTP id gk9mr8843526qeb.40.1361323062688;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.89.253] ([177.38.98.46])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hr3sm29468242qab.4.2013.02.19.17.17.40
(version=TLSv1 cipherìDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits8/128);
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:17:42 -0800 (PST)
References: <CA+m3O5LQcug7huJKTfkXj8kfKE5j=C_u1f+3SkRG6fJ9cfz1SA at mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CA+m3O5LQcug7huJKTfkXj8kfKE5j=C_u1f+3SkRG6fJ9cfz1SA at mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <2EF0950C-C82C-4983-91AF-A15CF419147A at netway.psi.br>
Cc: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B144)
From: Fabio Luiz <fabio at netway.psi.br>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:17:37 -0300
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+MzHyEXoo1a17ch7ygnB5490mGGE3nGD/FZtqjrOQPjHop0KOd78MtbQ+9ZtA1K3KETLk
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:15:56 -0300
Subject: Re: [GTER] Link rede local redudante
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br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Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp85445obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.127.99 with SMTP id c63mr33879520yhi.91.1361330200048;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:40 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c15si33776999anh.87.2013.02.19.19.16.39;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:40 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF3411F956;
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:16:35 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com (mail-vb0-f41.google.com
[209.85.212.41])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8969311F92D
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:35:03 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l22so4745471vbn.28
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:35:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=7K8glinWG+ILmLvPpYrWoIfPTvaqpyhq8AvtJgHPYtk=;
b=dqHaVoYcuCVr5H0rj9rLV1AYQToj4kY7hjiKOg7qk4tZfQ7wQ1U5DO/pW9yb890bMO
qbgL7GJstqI8Xl41HJZqlqBwBIjLZdeDl6i7oxh2vBjjKcwY2dZ4Ar6apEzXD/sgqp4J
9cY85ES9yao4RCl4IYTdnWhpZ3gsE18GAk1He4GACOIOKHjJqDSNLsib8EwffQ7OXow1
RHl8wEnwAuo7uXeTMapswGSL6+9pCJT9nZfxQg906ADDsk+h8WArm9PKBxiSgedun6RN
zxah0/HNVJ3Yv0xcYI5JycO34aasasmTH2XCQGjz064pvnDWda0VORbClrhj/MsPqaRj
/QTQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.214.6 with SMTP id gy6mr23139033vcb.8.1361324101549;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.219.5 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:35:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.57.1361323281.26349.gter at eng.registro.br>
References: <mailman.57.1361323281.26349.gter at eng.registro.br>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:35:01 -0300
Message-ID: <CAFdmQsofXwNdWHfCjBgrcUqQycNtBwJH_MysGGiB0-QVUUyvWQ at mail.gmail.com>
From: Kivio Braga <kiviobraga at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:16:32 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: [GTER] Substituir - Cisco 7206 VXR Borda
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Rubens,
>- Essa função de Route Reflector poderia ser migrada para outro
roteador... porque você não põe um PC para ser route-reflector, deixando
essas sessões em shutdown ?
Apesar de não ser solução que gostaria implementar na rede
devido ser ponto falha, mais tenho que concorda que adicionar um PC para
subir sessões internas poderia ajudar economizar processamento da caixa ate
consegui comprar um nova caixa.
Talvez solução paliativa no meu caso será uma
Routerboard-1100AHx2, devido ter MPLS implementado em alguns Neighbor
interno.
> - Eles precisam mesmo de full-routing ?
Não sei se tem necessidade de Full Routing para todos clientes de
transito nosso, talvez um parcial + default_gw já atenda. Vou verificar!
>- Só de gerência ou tráfego constante ? GRE pode ser o vilão aqui.
Tunnel GRE usamos para gerenciar uma rede invalida fora do nosso
backbone, nada mais!
Obrigado pelas considerações, estarei analisando !
--
Kívio Fernandes Braga
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 19:16, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com> escreveu:
> > Estamos analisando a troca do nosso router de borda
> devido
> > demanda ter aumentado muito no ultimo ano, com isso o processamento fica
> > maior parte do tempo acima de 85%, preciso da opinião dos experientes
> para
> > qual modelo poderia estar migrando.
>
> Acabou o mundo do software-forwarding para você. Bem-vindo ao mundo do
> hardware-forwarding: Juniper MX5 ou Cisco ASR1001.
>
> Mas vou pinçar alguns pontos abaixo como paliativos por enquanto:
>
> > - iBGP/OSPF - > 25 Neighbor ( Rota Default GW / Rotas Internas AS )
>
> Essa função de Route Reflector poderia ser migrada para outro
> roteador... porque você não põe um PC para ser route-reflector,
> deixando essas sessões em shutdown ?
> E quando chegar o novo roteador de borda, você até pode então voltar
> esse 7200 para ser route-reflector também.
>
> > - EBGP_DOWNSTREAM -> 4 Neighbor (Full Routing)
>
> Eles precisam mesmo de full-routing ?
>
> > - GRE -> 1 Tunnel
>
> Só de gerência ou tráfego constante ? GRE pode ser o vilão aqui.
>
>
>
> Rubens
> --
> gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp85461obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:17:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.183.8 with SMTP id p8mr33867265yhm.32.1361330224512;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [2001:12ff:0:7::130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d1si33783629anp.149.2013.02.19.19.17.04;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) client-ip 01:12ff:0:7::130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 2001:12ff:0:7::130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C7011F961;
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:16:59 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1534311F910
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:44:11 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c11so9552857ieb.29
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:44:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=qkijmfVix40vhZafVgA3Cgx+p4Wy52zNA1SOx1QVzZQ=;
b=jy1Sebw1OLspxatuxoVqnAQZZW1pVynlylLA5tq1FR8rglu0X+91OevdsPoGS38/xg
b6Uyvjj2AE0fBcYqXABMeYhi5lNMhdoEahrNNDzpEFUGib8Z5kOtu/pFo75hyq1HeMLP
oqRluBs6cNmtydMBdvGXKYCRsVIOsqmiPNpxZNsM4/hzSHXMIa3NvVjsA9VIY2r/mgdk
qNUn16N8O9ldffIjO7YdcwMjrdoFePLFQY+zlEefqRN+q7A11lkBbminlwhqq83xamge
VbXQOlJ2FQJ7FxNtLNw6QBlSt7ju3n++SZc13wcY6WAwWqTJsQCpDuymIeB852Ydj4fL
NQuA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.7.211 with SMTP id l19mr9789887iga.53.1361328249711; Tue,
19 Feb 2013 18:44:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.97.99 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:44:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+m3O5LQcug7huJKTfkXj8kfKE5j=C_u1f+3SkRG6fJ9cfz1SA at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+m3O5LQcug7huJKTfkXj8kfKE5j=C_u1f+3SkRG6fJ9cfz1SA at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:44:09 -0300
Message-ID: <CAMkf-EQOM6Myy_AV3ReGCxo75bajUkc+z2vazcVP3hf4+gaFfw at mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rôney_Eduardo?= <roneyeduardosantos at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:16:57 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: Re: [GTER] Link rede local redudante
X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Em 19 de fevereiro de 2013 20:28, Gustavo Freitas
<gst.freitas at gmail.com>escreveu:
>
> A dúvida é como usar esse link de rádio ? caso a empresa ficar sem a
> fibra optica.
> a rede toda empresa está na faixa 192.168.0.X. e os tem switches HP JE006A
>
>
Você pode configurar os enlaces de rádio em bridge e habilitar nos switches
o spanning-tree (STP). Pelas especificações, seu switch suporta.
Na configuração de spanning-tree dos switches, você define as portas da
fibra com maior prioridade e as portas dos rádios com menor prioridade.
Quanto cair seu enlace de fibra, o tráfego passará automaticamente através
dos enlaces de rádio.
Uma dica, no caso de rádios 802.11x, é fechar os enlaces em WDS (assim você
evita alguns problemas na camada 2, como frames bpdus sendo dropados,
mac-addresses não passando de um lado pro outro, etc...)
--
Rôney Eduardo
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: by 10.182.21.230 with SMTP id y6csp85419obe;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:15:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.138.162 with SMTP id a22mr34069550yhj.80.1361330146052;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:15:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gter-bounces at eng.registro.br>
Received: from eng.registro.br (eng.registro.br. [200.160.7.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t5si11562712ann.117.2013.02.19.19.15.45;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:15:46 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) client-ip 0.160.7.130;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of gter-bounces at eng.registro.br designates 200.160.7.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gter-bounces at eng.registro.br;
dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: from eng.registro.br (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B1611F950;
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:15:42 -0300 (BRT)
X-Original-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Delivered-To: gter at eng.registro.br
Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com (mail-lb0-f176.google.com
[209.85.217.176])
by eng.registro.br (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B8DB11F945
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:53:20 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id s4so5541471lbc.21
for <gter at eng.registro.br>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:53:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=OpVWT6fOjry2Wm9eJK5QmeYmLhIipMMzg/XBKfiKZTM=;
b=zQE+fsDA+rvd5a+zqX9TxY+UYnFcyW/S4nO21Imr6GGHUnBvog1unDvG34t9A+9b6a
uc+15QfVmVz/+l/Tw4tqVCZvXItP5Ap7D22Pr55uXecgU3lhvyNTmpIO6Zgd6QdUJSof
Jvvh77tbG86yB86m8ccBfrL2EkANio7193fuuJojTQ24agHlj2Tk24zxWmDf+n0D4TKf
Okcl3zzHxlS02VWO2IBDDumvmW04GoP5dI8i2WU/PQXNvZqCiiP7Ds5uiv4y/TarkjCo
RIJnfL5BmNmkFJeeL1k+TexRP0n9zv53UqEJ2J6ByhsIKJ7Y0+uRie6Nxr85zQVbXc8K
84Xw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.132.36 with SMTP id or4mr14662815lab.8.1361328798762;
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:53:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.126.67 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:53:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.126.67 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:53:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk8ZAqYt59GuGm_Ex6NCv68=Jejuq0RGasBhwDwfZmeOjSWAg at mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHk8ZAqhwVOiMoFvU6GSJ+eA_-FgvcBtx3_MSdom_mpujv5Qng at mail.gmail.com>
<CAHk8ZAo3Mdcb5iQu58jZAeVReJDOmxTODwjsKrp3Kpwh0i-cQA at mail.gmail.com>
<CAHk8ZApwnmzdgCCuD9Uwuq+TephNVJrDGsB6BiT0=RKbJM-S4w at mail.gmail.com>
<CAHk8ZAqYt59GuGm_Ex6NCv68=Jejuq0RGasBhwDwfZmeOjSWAg at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:53:18 -0300
Message-ID: <CAHk8ZArbBGkC0HERB+UUwpABX3Ge-UFxoVXOYVwUtgDzYx1ERw at mail.gmail.com>
From: Danilo Marques de Gouveia <dm.gouveia at gmail.com>
To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes <gter at eng.registro.br>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:15:41 -0300
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Subject: [GTER] =?iso-8859-1?q?Internet_Satélite?X-BeenThere: gter at eng.registro.br
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Id: Grupo de Trabalho de Engenharia e Operacao de Redes
<gter.eng.registro.br>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/options/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://eng.registro.br/pipermail/gter>
List-Post: <mailto:gter at eng.registro.br>
List-Help: <mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter>,
<mailto:gter-request at eng.registro.br?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Sender: gter-bounces at eng.registro.br
Senhores,
Me foi apresentado um projeto onde seria necessário enviar aproximados
300MB em 15 minutos, isso não seria problema se o projeto não fosse
intinerante e fosse passar por regiões do interior do rio, sao paulo e
bahia, alguém já trabalhou com internet satélite ou se tem alguma idéia de
como posso ter esse upload sem ser via cabeada? Pensei em links provisórios
nas cidades porém acho que nem todas as cidades podem ter essa infra.
Devido ao tempo curto para upload, não da para enviar a uma cidade grande
para fazer esse processo.
Obrigado,
--
gter list https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
More information about the gter
mailing list