[GTER] Embratel: Latência altissima."

jaitony gmail jaitonys at gmail.com
Thu Dec 18 10:41:02 -02 2008


Aqui esta assim tambem
64 bytes from jc-in-f104.google.com (64.233.187.104): icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 
time=203 ms
64 bytes from jc-in-f104.google.com (64.233.187.104): icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 
time=190 ms
64 bytes from jc-in-f104.google.com (64.233.187.104): icmp_seq=3 ttl=239 
time=194 ms
64 bytes from jc-in-f104.google.com (64.233.187.104): icmp_seq=4 ttl=239 
time=191 ms
64 bytes from jc-in-f104.google.com (64.233.187.104): icmp_seq=5 ttl=239 
time=204 ms
64 bytes from jc-in-f104.google.com (64.233.187.104): icmp_seq=6 ttl=239 
time=203 ms
64 bytes from jc-in-f104.google.com (64.233.187.104): icmp_seq=7 ttl=239 
time=203 ms

64 bytes from reverso.ew3.com.br (66.7.193.104): icmp_seq=1 ttl=44 
time=194 ms
64 bytes from reverso.ew3.com.br (66.7.193.104): icmp_seq=2 ttl=44 
time=193 ms
64 bytes from reverso.ew3.com.br (66.7.193.104): icmp_seq=3 ttl=44 
time=192 ms
64 bytes from reverso.ew3.com.br (66.7.193.104): icmp_seq=4 ttl=44 
time=194 ms
64 bytes from reverso.ew3.com.br (66.7.193.104): icmp_seq=5 ttl=44 
time=194 ms

so que antes nao era embratel esta ficando um lixo

Rubens Kuhl Jr. escreveu:
> Para todo mundo com peering com o Google vai ser assim. Num caso
> desses de alta latência internacional, é bom comparar com algum
> conteúdo não disponível no Brasil.
>
>
> Rubens
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:07 AM,  <raul at novonet.com.br> wrote:
>   
>> Pela Unotel vai de boa...
>>
>> [admin at Router Borda] > /ping www.google.com.br
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=30 ms
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=33 ms
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=31 ms
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=40 ms
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=38 ms
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=34 ms
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=38 ms
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=41 ms
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=34 ms
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=34 ms
>> 209.85.193.99 64 byte ping: ttl=249 time=39 ms
>> 11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0% packet loss
>> round-trip min/avg/max = 30/35.6/41 ms
>>
>> --
>> Atenciosamente,
>>
>> Raul Olive Eler
>> MCP - Microsoft Certified Professional
>> Gerente de Tecnologia e Projetos
>> NOVONet/Facilinternet - Um novo jeito fácil de acessar a internet!
>> Coronel Fabriciano - MG
>> (31) 2109-5005
>> www.novonet.com.br
>> raul at novonet.com.br
>>
>> Socio e LINK
>> UNOTEL TELECOM S/A
>> www.unotel.com.br
>>
>>     
>>> Pela Embratel:
>>>
>>> ping -I eth0 www.google.com
>>> PING www.l.google.com (74.125.47.99) from 10.10.10.1 eth0: 56(84) bytes of data.
>>> 64 bytes from yw-in-f99.google.com (74.125.47.99): icmp_seq=1 ttl=243
>>> time=173 ms
>>> 64 bytes from yw-in-f99.google.com (74.125.47.99): icmp_seq=2 ttl=243
>>> time=189 ms
>>> 64 bytes from yw-in-f99.google.com (74.125.47.99): icmp_seq=3 ttl=243
>>> time=157 ms
>>> 64 bytes from yw-in-f99.google.com (74.125.47.99): icmp_seq=4 ttl=243
>>> time=165 ms
>>> 64 bytes from yw-in-f99.google.com (74.125.47.99): icmp_seq=5 ttl=243
>>> time=159 ms
>>>
>>>
>>> 2008/12/17 Wederson Rodrigues <wederson at vipvilhena.com.br>:
>>>       
>>>> Saudações,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AlguÃ(c)m tem notícias do que pode estar havendo com a Embratel nos últimos
>>>> dias? Tanto Eu, como meu "concorrente", estamos sentindo uma lentidão fora
>>>> do comum no link da Embratel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Saindo pela BrasilTelecom:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> srv-gate:~# ping -I eth0 www.google.com
>>>>
>>>> PING www.l.google.com (209.85.193.104) from 189.31.182.235 eth0: 56(84)
>>>> bytes of data.
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f104.google.com (209.85.193.104): icmp_seq=1 ttl=249
>>>> time=95.9 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f104.google.com (209.85.193.104): icmp_seq=2 ttl=249
>>>> time=88.7 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f104.google.com (209.85.193.104): icmp_seq=3 ttl=249
>>>> time=89.0 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f104.google.com (209.85.193.104): icmp_seq=4 ttl=249
>>>> time=132 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f104.google.com (209.85.193.104): icmp_seq=5 ttl=249
>>>> time=85.9 ms
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Saindo pela Embratel:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> srv-gate:~# ping -I eth1 www.google.com
>>>>
>>>> PING www.l.google.com (209.85.193.99) from 201.57.233.130 eth1: 56(84) bytes
>>>> of data.
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f99.google.com (209.85.193.99): icmp_seq=1 ttl=243
>>>> time=302 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f99.google.com (209.85.193.99): icmp_seq=2 ttl=243
>>>> time=349 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f99.google.com (209.85.193.99): icmp_seq=3 ttl=243
>>>> time=305 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f99.google.com (209.85.193.99): icmp_seq=4 ttl=243
>>>> time=303 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f99.google.com (209.85.193.99): icmp_seq=5 ttl=243
>>>> time=386 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f99.google.com (209.85.193.99): icmp_seq=6 ttl=243
>>>> time=300 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f99.google.com (209.85.193.99): icmp_seq=7 ttl=243
>>>> time=301 ms
>>>>
>>>> 64 bytes from br-in-f99.google.com (209.85.193.99): icmp_seq=8 ttl=243
>>>> time=315 ms
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agora está "baixo", um pouco mais cedo estava na casa de 900ms à 1500ms.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> []'s
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wederson Rodrigues .'.
>>>>
>>>> Gerente de T.I.
>>>>
>>>> VIP - Vilhena Internet Provider
>>>>
>>>> Vilhena - Rondônia
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> e-mail: wederson at vipvilhena.com.br
>>>>
>>>> MSN: cebolark at hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>
>>> --
>>> "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you,
>>> then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi
>>> Linux User #373408
>>> cabelohw.blogspot.com
>>> GPGkey ID  8AEEAAEB -->> http://pgp.mit.edu
>>> --
>>> gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>>       
>> --
>> gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>>
>>     
> --
> gter list    https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/gter
>
>   




More information about the gter mailing list